Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Lord Avebury asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether they will require the Health Protection Agency to modify its data-collection procedures to identify the number of cases of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases in each prison and young offender institutions. [HL4326]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health (Lord Darzi of Denham): The department is working with the Health Protection Agency (HPA) to improve disease surveillance in prisons and young offender institutions.
On the specific issue of identifying cases of sexually transmitted infections and HIV in prisons, the department and the HPA Centre for Infections are discussing a review of surveillance systems to determine if they can be amended to enhance prison reporting.
Lord Jopling asked the Leader of the House:
Further to her reply on 10 June (Official Report, House of Lords, col. 480) about Mr Liam Byrne MP being responsible for not answering Baroness Valentine's Question for Written Answer tabled on 24 January, whether she has drawn this matter to the attention of the Prime Minister; and what recommendations she made for the management of Mr Byrne's responsibilities. [HL4155]
The Lord President of the Council (Baroness Ashton of Upholland): An Answer was given to Baroness Valentine on 16 June 2008 (Official Report, col. WA 122). The Government take accountability to Parliament through Questions for Written Answer very seriously and I am working with ministerial colleagues to ensure that Answers are accurate and timely.
Lord Berkeley asked Her Majesty's Government:
What representations they have received about the desirability of including a Brighton to Milton Keynes passenger rail service in the new Southern franchise; and whether such a service would benefit passengers on that route. [HL4370]
Lord Bassam of Brighton: The Department for Transport is currently carrying out consultation on the specific elements of the new South Central franchise. This consultation closes on 14 August. We have already received some responses regarding stakeholder aspirations for services between Brighton and Milton Keynes. No final decisions have been made as yet.
Neither the Brighton Main Line nor the south London route utilisation strategies recommended that the West London line service should operate south of Croydon.
Lord Hanningfield asked Her Majesty's Government:
How many railway passengers start their journey at Reading and end it at Paddington per year, broken down between peak and off-peak times; and [HL4166]
What was the average number of railway passengers per weekday who started their journey at Chelmsford and ended it at Liverpool Street in each of the past 10 years. [HL4167]
Lord Bassam of Brighton: The Department for Transport does not hold the detailed information requested on the number of rail passenger journeys made.
This information may be available by contacting the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC) directly at the following address: ATOC Ltd, 3rd Floor, 40 Bernard Street, London, WC1N 1BY.
Lord Bradshaw asked Her Majesty's Government:
How many requests they have received in the past 18 months from train operating companies to be allowed to provide additional rolling stock to meet passenger demand. [HL4328]
Lord Bassam of Brighton: The Government's approach to providing extra rolling stock to meet passenger demand is through the high-level output specification (HLOS) process. In addition, the Department for Transport meets train operators regularly to discuss a range of issues including, on occasion, proposals for additional rolling stock. However, no specific proposal for the department to fund extra rolling stock other than that identified through HLOS has proceeded beyond the informal discussion stage within the past 18 months.
Lord Bradshaw asked Her Majesty's Government:
Why train operating companies may not negotiate freely with rolling stock companies about the supply of new rolling stock. [HL4330]
Lord Bassam of Brighton: With the exception of the InterCity Express programme, the Thameslink programme, and the additional Pendolinos, all of which are being led by the Department for Transport, train operators are free to negotiate with rolling stock companies about the supply of new rolling stock during the term of their franchise.
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether they are making representations to the Government of Sri Lanka concerning (a) Mr J S Tissainayagam, alleged to have been held in custody without charge for over 100 days; and (b) Mr V Jasiharan and two other men held by the Terrorism Investigation Department, one of whom alleges torture. [HL4234]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): In June, our high commissioner in Colombo raised the case of the detention of Mr J S Tissainayagam and his associates at high level with Sri Lankan Government representatives. The EU and US ambassadors in Colombo have taken similar action. We do have serious concerns about a growing number of attacks and incidents of intimidation against journalists in Sri Lanka, which ranks 156 out of 169 entries in the Reporters Sans Frontieres Worldwide Press Freedom Index. On 10 June, I told President Rajapakse that Sri Lanka needs to do more to meet her international human rights obligations. I recommended that an independent monitoring mechanism could play a role in this.
Lord Alton of Liverpool asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether they will contribute to the annual budget of the World Food Programme Humanitarian Service in Darfur; and what is their current assessment of the humanitarian situation in Darfur. [HL4057]
Lord Tunnicliffe: The Department for International Development provides humanitarian support to UN agencies in Sudan through the Common Humanitarian Fund (CHF). The fund allows the UN humanitarian co-ordinator to decide on priority funding needs. We have contributed £40 million to the CHF this year.
The humanitarian situation in Darfur remains precarious and incidents involving violence against humanitarian workers and assets continue. Access remains the primary concern of the humanitarian community. While some progress has been made, bureaucratic impediments and security limitations, particularly in West Darfur, continue to block the delivery of services in many areas.
Lord Alton of Liverpool asked Her Majesty's Government:
What assessment they have made of the humanitarian impact of cuts announced on 10 June to the World Food Programme Humanitarian Service in Sudan. [HL4058]
Lord Tunnicliffe: Our initial assessment is that the flight changes announced by the World Food Programme's Humanitarian Air Service will not adversely affect the frontline work of the humanitarian operation in Darfur. The reductions in the helicopter service still represent an increase from 2007. Other flight changes affect connections between the capital Khartoum and the south. Although these will not have a significant impact on humanitarian operations, they will affect the frequency with which aid workers can travel to regional hubs.
Lord Alton of Liverpool asked Her Majesty's Government:
What representations they have made to their international partners regarding the current shortfall in the budget of the World Food Programme Humanitarian Service in Sudan. [HL4059]
Lord Tunnicliffe: The Department for International Development has engaged intensively with international partners about the funding problems being experienced by the World Food Programme's Humanitarian Air Service (HAS) in Sudan. We are encouraging the European Commission Humanitarian Office (ECHO) to provide longer-term funding for HAS.
In addition, DfID has urged the UN to consider the case for increased funding for the HAS. As a first step, an additional US$4 million has already been made available and a further grant of US$2 million is under active consideration. These additional funds come from the Common Humanitarian Fund for Sudan, to which DfID has contributed £40 million this year.
Lord Laird asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether the Comptroller and Auditor General monitors the payment of income tax and national insurance contributions of board or commission members by bodies set up by statute. [HL4243]
Lord Davies of Oldham: As part of his financial audit of bodies, of which he is the statutory auditor, the Comptroller and Auditor General audits each of the figures in the remuneration report. This includes the salaries, wages or fees of individual board or commission members. Where the statutory body pays an individual's income tax or employees national insurance contributions as a benefit in kind, these amounts are also audited individually to ensure that they are fairly stated within the remuneration report. Compliance with income tax and national insurance regimes is the responsibility of the individual concerned. HM Revenue and Customs is responsible for the monitoring and enforcement of these regimes.
The Earl of Sandwich asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether they will continue financial assistance to the Government of Uganda for northern Uganda, or contribute to the Peace, Recovery and Development Plan and civil society organisations working in the north. [HL4012]
Lord Tunnicliffe: Support to northern Uganda is a priority for the UK Governments programme in Uganda. The UK Governments Department for International Development is allocating resources to support the implementation of the Peace Recovery and Development Plan (PRDP) which is the Uganda Government's overarching framework for the recovery effort. The objective is to support a smooth transition from humanitarian to development programming, delivering benefits to the people of the north and helping to sustain peace. DfID together with other development partners is currently in discussions with the Government about the most appropriate way to finance the PRDP.
In the mean time, DfID will continue to allocate its resources through a range of actors including the World Bank, the United Nations, the Red Cross Movement, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and civil society organisations.
Lord Avebury asked Her Majesty's Government:
Why the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights kept the report of the visit by that office to Western Sahara in September 2006 secret; on what dates United Kingdom embassy officials, Foreign Office officials and the United Nations Secretary-General's special representative have visited the territory since September 2006; what were the dates since then of meetings between Morocco and the Polisario chaired by the United
26 Jun 2008 : Column WA277
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) visited Morocco, Western Sahara, the Polisario-run refugee camps in Tindouf (Algeria) and Algiers in May and June 2006 to gather information on the human rights situation. The OHCHR shared its report privately with Morocco, Algeria and the Polisario on 8 September 2006, but did not publish it, in line with terms of reference agreed by all parties prior to the visit. The High Commissioner for Human Rights continues to maintain the position that the report should remain an internal document, not for official publication.
Staff from our embassy in Rabat visited Western Sahara in July 2006, and a further visit is planned. The UN Secretary-General's personal envoy to the Western Sahara, Peter van Walsum, visited the territory in September 2006, May 2007 and February 2008. Mr van Walsum hosted talks between the parties to the dispute in New York on 18 and 19 June 2007, 10 to 12 August 2007, 7 to 9 January 2008 and 18 and 19 March 2008.
The UK has not made any representations to the UN about resources for Mr van Walsum, for the UN Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara, or other resources dedicated to resolving the Western Sahara conflict.
Baroness Tonge asked Her Majesty's Government:
What assessment they have made of the decision of the United Nations Refugee Agency to begin the voluntary repatriation of Ugandan refugees in Zambia.[HL3854]
Lord Tunnicliffe: The repatriation of 200 Ugandan refugees by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) is being carried out at the request of the refugees themselves. The UNHCR, the Governments of Zambia and Uganda and the refugees have concluded that the current political, economic and social conditions in Uganda allow for the repatriation to take place. While we have no reasons to disagree with this assessment it will be important that the reintegration process in Uganda is monitored to ensure its success. As is the case with all returning refugees, the UNHCR will monitor for at least six months to ensure a successful reintegration in Uganda.
The repatriation process will be guided by the principles that refugee repatriation should be voluntary and be carried out under conditions of safety and dignity, as required under international refugee law.
Lord Hanningfield asked Her Majesty's Government:
What meetings Ministers have had with representatives of (a) the Movement for Democratic Change, and (b) Zimbabwean pro-democracy groups, in the past 12 months. [HL4314]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): Ministers take every opportunity to speak with those attempting to restore the democratic process in Zimbabwe, including opposition parties. In addition, our embassy in Harare has regular and frequent contact with Zimbabwean political and civil society activists working for democracy.
Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |