Select Committee on Communications Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 360 - 379)

WEDNESDAY 25 JULY 2007

Ms Helen Boaden, Mr Nigel Chapman and Ms Sian Kevill

  Q360  Chairman: Okay; I am going to cut it off there before you get into too deep a theological debate—

  Ms Boaden: Bring it on!

  Chairman:— and move on to the more general questions that we are interested in.

  Q361  Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall: This is very straightforward by comparison. Can I just ask you, going back to an earlier point you made about your researcher, for instance, in Blue Peter, amongst the people who are involved in news output what is the average length of contract that most of them have?

  Ms Boaden: Long. BBC News has a very low turnover, so an awful lot of people are, as we call them, lifers. They are on ongoing staff contracts. Journalism is probably the most stable part of the BBC. People come and they stay a long time.

  Q362  Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall: And within the wider—

  Ms Boaden: BBC?

  Q363  Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall: No, the area which is not news but is current affairs, people like researchers.

  Ms Boaden: They will be much shorter.

  Q364  Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall: So if you are a researcher on, let us not say Blue Peter; let us say Panorama, what is your average age likely to be?

  Ms Boaden: I do not know the average age but, from looking around, you are probably likely to be in your early thirties.

  Q365  Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall: And what is the average length of contract that you are likely to be on?

  Ms Boaden: I can find that out for you but it will depend on what kind of programme you are working on and what kind of track record you have. Some researchers will be staff researchers, ie, they are absolutely permanent, and some will come in and do specialist work. I can certainly find out the average length of contract.

  Q366  Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall: I think it would be quite helpful to know, particularly in relation to training issues and other things.

  Ms Boaden: Absolutely. I think you are getting to a very interesting issue, which is where journalism meets, as it were, the fluidity of the rest of the television industry.

  Q367  Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall: Yes, which you have referred to.

  Ms Boaden: It is something we are acutely aware of because for those difficult programmes that we often do—Panorama, This World—it is incredibly important that anyone who works in them understands what is and is not acceptable. We are acutely aware of that.

  Q368  Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall: I will now ask you the less controversial question. Can you tell us as briefly as you can what the structure of BBC News output is, what it provides and on how many different platforms does it do it?

  Ms Boaden: It is quite a long answer, actually.

  Q369  Chairman: If you want to we can have some of this in writing.

  Ms Boaden: I will do a quick précis and I do have a document that we give to people who do our impartiality reviews in the Trust which you might find interesting.

  Q370  Chairman: That would be much better.

  Ms Boaden: The key thing is that you have the Trust at the top and then the executive and then you have the journalism board which involves nations and regions, global, which my colleagues here are part of, news which I run, and sport, and they all work to Mark Byford who is the head of journalism. I have a team—a head of radio, a head of television, a head of interactive, a head of Millbank, a head of news-gathering and then HR and those people. They are responsible for great chunks of output but the thing you have to remember about the BBC is that the scale is enormous. For every hour of the day there are four and a half hours of news and current affairs. The only way you can possibly run something like that is by what the army calls mission command. You set the strategy, you set the values, you set and regulate quality control and you appoint the right people who you think understand those values inside out, and then you have to let them get on with it with their objectives, which obviously connect to our statement of programme policies and those kinds of things. You have a series of meetings, which is the document we can give you, which are about quality control, so I have an 8.50 meeting with my team every morning where we go through the key programmes—what worked, what did not, is that a bit biased, do we need to make sure we cover that angle, and then those people continue those kinds of meetings with their teams and then the editors continue with their teams. In the programme teams they will have two meetings a day which are both looking forward and reviewing. That does not mean to say that things do not go wrong, it does not mean to say things do not slip through the net, but when you are looking at that kind of scale—and again I can send you the information specifically but we have output on BBC One, BBC Two, BBC Three, BBC Four, Radio 1, Radio 1 Extra, Radio 2, Radio 3, Radio 4, Radio 5 Live, we have the online site, we have BBC Parliament, we have News 24, we have the World Service and we have BBC World—we have an extraordinary mix and range. In a sense it is a bit like the army in the sense that you have to be able to rely on the editors to hold the values for you in that kind of structure.

  Q371  Bishop of Manchester: In the section on the media in The Guardian on 5 July there was an interesting article which was exploring some of the issues that the Ofcom report had raised about "firm evidence of disengagement from mainstream news sources, in particular by 16-24 year olds, who say they follow news only when something important is happening", and that that has risen from 33% to 50% in five years, which is really quite a serious change. You were referring earlier to some of the data that you keep about news stories and I wondered whether you were able to give any indication about what you perceive to be important, particularly by that age group but not only by that age group, and whether you could see a shift from interest in international and traditional news stories towards something of the more celebrity, softer type.

  Ms Boaden: One of our big challenges is how we keep that audience engaged. We have to be slightly realistic about this. Young people have never been deeply engaged in news but the Ofcom finding was interesting because they are using television news in particular much less. We have got quite a scary graph which I can again give you which says that in terms of television news even big stories like the Suffolk murders, which you remember, that awful story last year which did grip the country for a period, that age group did not go to television news, not us or anybody, for information about that. They often get their information in different ways. They get it online and they get it from radio. Newsbeat on Radio 1 is critical for us in engaging that audience. Newsbeat, I think, is a very good model for understanding how as a public service broadcaster you can try and have the best of both world because undoubtedly they do far more stories on celebrities and brands than anywhere else in BBC News but they also do the European Union. They do the elections in Turkey, they certainly do the big stories. They are a classic Reithian concept. They do a lot on Iraq and Afghanistan, because, of course, a lot of their listeners are the young men who go and fight there or their friends and family, so that is a very important part of the BBC's portfolio and we learn from them how to engage audiences in that kind of age group. It is genuinely very interesting. The pattern has always been that young people were not terribly engaged with news and then if they got a mortgage and families they suddenly became much more interested because that is the moment when you grow up and you have to engage with how the outer world has an impact on the little protected world which teenagers tend to live in. It will be fascinating as we go forward to see, in an age of YouTube and Facebook and all those very introverted (one could argue) connections that young people have if they are going to connect with the wider world. In terms of international stories they do not talk about being gripped by them but then they go off and do gap years and come back and find it much more interesting. Very often you have to get into those stories in a slightly different way. As I said, the Newsbeat audience is quite interested in Afghanistan and Iraq for the very specific reason of their constituency. We have a generation of young people who are more interested in celebrity, they are more interested in branding, they are more interested in business very often and personal finance, and they are fascinated by relationships. We are clearly not going to move our news to absorb all of those things because all of us would be driven completely mad by it, would we not, and we are called consumers, but we have to acknowledge that in some of the things we are doing, and, of course, we are moving to a broadband world where eventually you will be able to personalise your news so you can get the news that you want. That has in many ways great strengths. If you are passionate about Africa you will be able to find out a lot more about Africa than you can at the moment just by watching or listening because it will all be there on the web, but if you are not at all interested in Africa you will be able to avoid those stories altogether and for the public body that is a real challenge for all of us.

  Q372  Bishop of Manchester: Do you see any discernible shift in the kinds of things which define BBC News in the various areas that we have talked about, and indeed the way in which news is covered by other companies? Would you accede, for example, to the BBC at any stage going nearer to the way in which Fox News will produce a much more opinionated kind of news coverage?

  Ms Boaden: Nigel might want to talk about impartiality but no, I do not see that at all. First of all, in a regulatory framework we are not allowed to be anything other than impartial, and that for me and for the BBC is absolutely core. Free, fair, independent information for a liberal democracy is one of the reasons we are here.

  Mr Chapman: The evidence I have got on the international news is that they are really quite hungry to understand the connectivity, if you like, between various forces in the world. There is a great opportunity now for international news broadcasting in the World Service and BBC World too to connect up around issues like terrorism, climate change and so on. There is a big appetite for that. I think it is one of the reasons why the World Service has been successful over the last few years, because it has focused an awful lot of attention and energy in its news agenda on doing it now. In terms of that, for instance, when Paris Hilton is released from jail in California it has got to be legitimate that that is part of the mix but it is not the lead story by any stretch of the imagination. I think that gives you an example of the range of what you need to cover because if you slam the door on curiosity and only go for significance it becomes a very lopsided world. You definitely need significance. Journalism is meant to be the first draft of history. You do need significance, but you also occasionally need to satisfy the curiosity of the wide range of interests of the listener and the user, and those are judgments that good and experienced people make in the overall mix of what are many hours of output.

  Ms Boaden: I always say to my people, "You cannot sack the audience". You might like to on occasion but they have a huge number of choices and if we are going to keep them with the BBC for all the good things that we think are very important we have to respect their curiosity for the things that some audiences do not find very palatable at all.

  Q373  Chairman: Except that I do notice from the report From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel Jeff Randall, who was a very successful business editor of the BBC, doing something that the BBC do not do very much of, saying of the BBC, "It is a bit like walking into a Sunday meeting of the Flat Earth Society", and on impartiality he said, "That's what it's like for someone with my right-of-centre views working inside the BBC".

  Ms Boaden: Bless him! That is just a view. I could argue point for point with Jeff on that. He feels very strongly about it and he also enjoyed working with us enormously and went away to a great job that he wanted to do but he keeps in touch and he still has a programme on Radio 5 Live every Sunday.

  Ms Kevill: I wanted to pick up on that because BBC World has a slightly different audience in that it is quite cosmopolitan and aimed in cities but what is quite interesting about the research we have done on the audience is that it is quite young; it is between 30 and 40. What is emerging is that globally there is quite a young generation which is much more connected through the internet, through the work that they do, through the ability to travel in a way that previous generations have not done, and we are finding that they are our core viewers. Domestic viewers tend to be a lot older than that so for us it is a comparatively young audience which is, as Nigel has said, interested in the connectivity of the world and how events in the world relate to and affect them. We have done some research recently which puts them at about a quarter of a billion, this particular group around the world, and in a sense that is what BBC World is aiming to do. The other interesting thing is that that group is very interested in business and on BBC World we do far more business, including company business, which is something which often is not covered as much on domestic television, so I think that again when you get a different audience, as Helen was saying, with Newsbeat, you understand what that audience wants and our audience does want more business coverage so we do a lot more and we have teams based in New York, India, Singapore. We have a global news-gathering team connected with business.

  Q374  Bishop of Manchester: Can I ask one final question following that up because you have a massive amount going on in the background? I go into Oxford Road occasionally to pick up Ariel, and earlier in the year I see Helen Boaden was quoted as saying that she is aware that some of the news staff feel "knackered and frustrated because of their workload", and then a journalist from The Guardian was quoted as saying "News 24 has always been a high pressure place but it has now become relentless", and Bob Sheenan on Radio 5 Live saying it was "hard making rolling news with fewer staff".

  Ms Boaden: It is; it is very tough. We went through a value-for-money process pre-charter, and we will be doing more value for money over the next five years because, as you will be aware, our licence fee is not just not pegged to inflation; it is going down, so we are currently working on plans to rationalise further, to streamline things so that ideally what we want to do is be able to deliver the same quality with fewer people but without quite as much relentlessness, which means that some of the duplication that I still think we have too much of in BBC News will be eliminated, without, I hope, losing the originality and bespoke qualities that all of us like in the output. This is stuff that most of these organisations have to go through once in a while. CNN, for example, have had to do it. We talk to ITN and they have had an incredibly tough time. Even though it is a big challenge I do not think it is right for the BBC to moan about their financial situation when we do get guaranteed income. I have worked in the commercial sector and, believe me, it is different.

  Q375  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: Presumably it is the core values that you absolutely have to hang on to through thick and thin because otherwise you will have to let some values go perhaps.

  Ms Boaden: I so totally agree with you. Impartiality, fairness, accuracy, honesty, transparency, trust—frankly, if we let those go, which is why we are taking so seriously what has happened recently, there is no point to us.

  Q376  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: So the economies will have to come in other areas?

  Ms Boaden: The economies do not necessarily undermine your values. Your values are something different from the economies but clearly you have to make sure that you do not get yourself into a situation where you are so tight that you are undermining the ability to act on those values. We do not know in the six cases that we were talking about quite what the dynamics were of what was going on, and culture is not just about finance; it is also about group expectations. The interesting thing about Nigel's case is the desperation to appear to be interactive. This is a new world for us. We are learning about interactivity and one of the things we might discover is that the audience out there likes it and quite understands that it does not always work. How many of us have had broadband go down or the phone line go whizzy or on the mobile it suddenly cuts out?

  Q377  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: It could be that the question I am meant to be asking you is not at all unconnected with this, which is about media ownership's influence on news values, and it is whether or not you think that the BBC has more or less editorial freedom as a result of being funded by the licence fee and not having to answer to shareholders.

  Ms Boaden: It is not so much editorial freedom because I think it would be extremely unfair, particularly on our colleagues at ITN and Sky, to give the impression that they are less editorially vigorous than we are, but I do think we can make different decisions about where we invest our money which do help with editorial processes. For example, we are the only British broadcaster to have a permanent base in Iraq and Kabul and Gaza. Even though Alan is not there we still have Palestinians there. Those are extremely costly in terms of just security, enormously expensive, but we think those stories are so important that that is an investment we can afford to make, and that gives us an editorial freedom. It is not about bias or pressure. It is about what we can do in terms of reporting the world. We have 40 bureaux. Seven of those are hub bureaux, which are big bureaux, but we have bureaux around the world which provide, particularly for the World Service, regular information from often quite obscure places about stories that are important to be reported both online and on radio because we have the licence fee and that allows us that freedom.

  Mr Chapman: Can I make one observation about the quote from Ariel? In the end it comes down to management making a judgment about the extent of the activities they want to do and what they can afford, and I do not think it is a bad thing sometimes to say, "We are doing too much. We want to stop something". I know we often get criticised for that. I as the Director of the World Service closed ten language services, not an easy thing to do, but that was the right thing to do and is the right thing to do. What we cannot let happen is that the values get stretched and break because the staff get to the point where they just cannot have enough time to do things properly and they feel under pressure to start cutting corners to get things to happen. That is an awful vicious circle that we can never allow to undermine the core values of the BBC. I suppose I ask for some understanding sometimes from people that we sometimes have to make difficult choices and say, "We are not going to do that any more because we want to focus our energy more intensely in this area at the expense of this and please will you come with us on that journey?". We say it to staff, we say it to the public, we say it to our stakeholders and that is the kind of intelligent conversation to have and the right conversation to have rather than just pressing blindly on thinking that with 10 or 20% less resources, however efficient and clever you are, you can always carry on doing 100% of what you did before.

  Q378  Chairman: You have been very helpful in offering to set out the number of overseas bureaux you have at some stage.

  Ms Boaden: Yes, we have got all of that.

  Chairman: That would be very interesting to us.

  Q379  Lord King of Bridgwater: And how much common working there is between all of you in sharing resources?

  Ms Boaden: Yes, we can do that.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008