Select Committee on Communications Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 480 - 499)

WEDNESDAY 10 OCTOBER 2007

Mr Richard Wallace

  Q480  Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall: In terms of projecting your business model forward what assumptions are you making about that and about advertising revenue?

  Mr Wallace: Ultimately, the bulk of it will probably be on-line. As I said, we have got some very aggressive plans for the new year to use the Daily Mirror. We are not going to be just the Daily Mirror newspaper that happens to be on your computer, because other papers like the Guardian and Telegraph, who have spent a great deal of money getting out into that area and effectively JCB-ing their papers on-line, are suddenly sitting there saying, "The revenue streams are not really appearing yet," and that is a heck of a commitment.

  Q481  Lord Maxton: I am fascinated by on-line and what you are saying. Does that mean that for instance some of your advertising on-line, from the same advertising as in your newspaper, will be a television-type advert rather than a picture one? Are you going to have videos of stories which are in the newspaper and are you going to update so that if a news story breaks at midday it will be on your Daily Mirror website at quarter past 12 rather than waiting for tomorrow morning?

  Mr Wallace: This is one of the key questions that we are answering. My belief is that it is pointless us trying to compete with the BBC or with CNN, et cetera, on the breaking news front; we just do not have the resource. If you look at the figures on that, certainly the BBC are way ahead of anybody else in this field, so to my mind us with 300 employees trying to compete with the Leviathan of the BBC is, frankly, not the way forward. However, yes, we will provide a basic news update service a" la Press Association, or what have you, but my belief, again coming back to one of the functions of the paper, is that people want more analysis on stuff, so there are certain opinion makers and opinion formers within our newspaper that will certainly have a much bigger role on-line and perhaps in a televisual way. Certainly on the advertising issue we will cross-pollinate in the sense that we will do necessary deals with Toyota or whoever that we advertise with on-line and in the newspaper. We did a very successful football transfer window quite recently where we had one of our football writers on-line every morning from his breakfast table saying, "In the Daily Mirror today this is going to be happening. The Sun is saying this ..." Everybody said to me, "Why are you advertising The Sun?" I said "I am not, I am saying if you want a one-stop shop to get all the football transfer news this morning, then Mirror.co.uk is the place to be". I must stress we are feeling our way forward. The interesting thing and one of the exciting things about the digital age, as it were, is that it is a green field, nobody has the answers here, nobody knows where it is going because the consumer for once is completely king.

  Q482  Lord Maxton: The Guardian had an article this week in its media pages on what it called the "newspapers' iPodcast moment", in other words the iPod telephone which is also much more than a telephone, you will be able to read the Daily Mirror or The Mirror on the train on your mobile phone rather than buying it.

  Mr Wallace: Yes, and you would probably go cross-eyed in the process at the moment. It is about consuming things pleasantly and I am yet to be convinced that people will be frantically scrolling down through their Blackberries to read the papers. I have several news alert SMS things myself, so Sky, the BBC and CNN updates will get sent to my phone and that is a great bit of kit. I can often be at my own news desk and say, "What's all this about?" Those kind of things are great but as far as people reading it in that kind of form, I just do not see it.

  Q483  Baroness Thornton: How popular is your website and do you know whether the hits on your website are readers or whether they are new people or what?

  Mr Wallace: As I said, we have not gone aggressively into this market-place yet because there has been a lot of waiting and seeing rather than let us just pour all the money in and then find that we have got it wrong. Even now we are getting around two point one million unique users a month. An interesting fact on it is that over 70% of our audience is under 45. I have got a couple of figures here which are actually quite useful. Reading a paper, under 45s, 41%; over 65s, 27%. Then you go to co.uk and 72% are under 45 and only 4% are over 65. It is a huge growth market and again we need to understand it and the consumer needs to understand. For instance, we have quite a degree of older readers and they used to up until 18 months ago send me angry missives by letter. Now they email me: "I am 89-year-old Mrs Biggins from Rotherham and I think blah, blah, blah," and that is a remarkable sea change in just 18 months.

  Q484  Baroness Thornton: Are you going to try and convert that demographic into readers of the newspaper?

  Mr Wallace: Again it is a personal view, but I believe that trying to drive one to the other does not necessarily work. One of the reasons I believe that newspapers have perhaps not done so well on-line so far is that there is this mind-set "let's just do what we do here over there," and people do not use the Internet in the same way. You have got to think about how people use the Internet. Most people are not sitting at their desks like we are idly browsing and surfing away. They are holding down proper jobs, they are living their lives, and looking after the kids, et cetera. They go to the home computer to buy a holiday or do their supermarket shop or whatever. They go for specific things, they are not there idly passing the time of day, so therefore are they going to turn on their computer and idly flick through the Daily Mirror on-line? I do not believe they are. However, I do believe that we can provide other services perhaps with a more consumer element that can complement what we do in the newspaper.

  Q485  Baroness Thornton: Which is why the brand trust is so important?

  Mr Wallace: Absolutely.

  Q486  Lord King of Bridgwater: The thing we have not covered at all, part of this inquiry is about ownership and of course you are part of the Trinity Mirror Group and you said we are just a very small organisation, we have only got 300 chaps. You have got the Sunday Mirror, you have got the People, you have two Scottish national papers, you have 100 regional and local titles as well; to what extent does that have significance for you in terms of news and a synergy of being able to draw on the resources that all those organisations have? Do you know how many journalists there are in the Trinity Mirror Group?

  Mr Wallace: I think it is around 1,500 but I do not know for sure.

  Q487  Lord King of Bridgwater: Which makes it quite a big organisation?

  Mr Wallace: I think there are different demands at local level that local newspapers need to deliver compared to national newspapers.

  Q488  Lord King of Bridgwater: So you have no real input? You do not say, "Look at this story breaking in Birmingham"—although you do not have the Birmingham Mail, is that right, it has been sold?

  Mr Wallace: We still have it.

  Q489  Lord King of Bridgwater: A story breaks in Birmingham, surely they are the boys on the ground?

  Mr Wallace: On that basis, yes, we have Liverpool, which is one of our heartlands, and obviously we have the Echo and Post up there. Yes, we have good relationships.

  Q490  Lord King of Bridgwater: And do you use their journalists?

  Mr Wallace: Not their journalists but we use their material. We are not swilling around with staff, as it were, we are quite a lean, mean machine, so a lot of those particular organisations are needing their guys to do their work.

  Q491  Lord King of Bridgwater: You see yourself as very much a completely separate organisation and the fact that you happen to be owned by one group does not affect you?

  Mr Wallace: As I said, we use each other's resource in the sense that if the Liverpool Echo has got a great set of pictures of what have you then we can make that phone call and get those pictures, whereas if I was from the Daily Mail and made that phone call then I would probably have to pay a premium price for those pictures, and they might not even want to make them available to me. On that ad hoc basis, yes, but as far as formal channels or what have you, no.

  Q492  Baroness Howe of Idlicote: I am a little bit puzzled, if I may say so, about the reasons which I do not think you have fully gone into as to why your own circulation has dropped as much as it appears to have dropped and whether it worries you particularly or whether you are concentrating now on the future. Coming to my second point and stargazing into the future, say the next 10 years, you have given us some ideas and you are playing around with a lot of ideas and how you are going to meet the competition and meet the desires of your readers and so on, but how far ahead are you looking: 10 years? What are you predicting for your own paper and for newspapers generally? Are there really going to be no newspapers around at all other than on the Internet?

  Mr Wallace: I do not think that. Addressing your first couple of points, the reason that I believe we were declining faster than our competitors was because of these bulk sales I mentioned, either giving away papers free or cut price. I believe The Sun is 15 pence in Scotland at the moment, which is obviously considerably less than we are, and these DVD give-aways, they do drive sales. The Daily Mail recently did a serious on the World at War and I think it sold something like an extra three million papers, and that is a heck of a lot of papers for giving away a DVD. If I am a Daily Mirror reader and I am going into the shop and I am suddenly seeing a DVD being given away with it, I am kind of inclined to go there. These kinds of things over time, you are being slugged round the back of the head on a fairly regular basis then, yes, it is difficult. I am absolutely optimistic of the survival not only of the Daily Mirror but of newspapers. As I said, I believe we will get to a plateau. I think there are all sorts of social factors that come into play. Age is a key one. Somebody once said to me that anybody who buys a Daily Telegraph before they are 38 and a half is obviously a little bit odd. I am merely reporting what was said to me!

  Q493  Lord Maxton: Not if you are a young Tory, it is not!

  Mr Wallace: As far as the digital question, yes, this has been coming down the pipeline for the last five or 10 years, but it is here now and it is not going to go away so we have to confront it head on.

  Q494  Baroness Howe of Idlicote: And the newspaper industry generally will be all looking in this sort of way?

  Mr Wallace: Absolutely. As an industry we have a great habit of navel-gazing and shooting ourselves in the foot a lot and bashing each other up, but I am very bullish about the future. I think there is a great press tradition in this country which we can maintain not only off-line, as they call it in newspapers, but on-line. Yes, I would imagine what the Daily Mirror does in 10 years' time might be very different to what it does today, but I think the essence of it will remain.

  Q495  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: Mr Wallace, I was wanting to turn to the question of the journalists who work on the newspaper and over the last 10 years, as the circulation has declined, what effect this has had on your ability to continue to employ top-quality journalists and therefore your news-gathering being maintained at the same high standards?

  Mr Wallace: We actually employ about 25 more journalists now than we did 10 years ago because of obviously our digital expansion, et cetera, but we have seen from other newspapers that if you do not have the necessary journalistic resource you go downhill very, very quickly and the consumer is very, very quick to catch on to the fact "Do you know what, this is just rubbish", so therefore there is an understanding throughout our business that maintaining the levels of staffing and quality of journalism is absolutely essential, because that is one—to use a buzz word—aspect of our brand. There is a certain integrity associated with a newspaper and that comes out of its staff and the way we report the news and other things.

  Q496  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: And are you finding it any more difficult or easier to actually maintain the standards? Are the journalists coming on-stream and coming into the industry getting better?

  Mr Wallace: It is getting more difficult because again it is another competitive issue, it is a lot more attractive to go into the bright lights of television and the digital world, and therefore there is not the great pool that there previously was. However, there still is a pool and I think it will remain. Being a journalist, certainly a newspaper journalist, is a vocation rather than anything else because you do not go into this business to earn your fortune and people are born with the itch. Thankfully, there still is a pool and we have a very successful graduate trainee scheme which has brought through a lot of very successful young journalists not only who continue to work for us but elsewhere, and I remain optimistic about that.

  Q497  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: As far as foreign news gathering is concerned, which presumably is the more expensive end—?

  Mr Wallace: Indeed.

  Q498  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: Have you had to resort more to agency sources or are you able to maintain your foreign news corps?

  Mr Wallace: We cut back on our foreign bureaus 10 or 15 years ago purely because the technology enables one to. In New York 25 years ago, we had nine people stationed there, which is mind-boggling now, so the nature of the way technology has been brought on has meant that we can scale down. Nevertheless, we maintain American staff but our only staff link, as it were, is in America. There are good agencies throughout the world now and individuals who have formally been on Fleet Street have moved to Moscow and just set up shop.

  Q499  Baroness Scott of Needham Market: My questions are on the same sort of lines really which is based on evidence which we received from the Chartered Institute about how the practice of journalism is changing as a response to budgetary constraints, so journalists do not get out and about because there are fewer of them, they rely more on the telephone and the Internet and there is a sense that what you get is an iteration of what is already there, not properly checking facts, not really thinking afresh; how do you respond?

  Mr Wallace: To be honest, this is where we will be very careful about how much we get our journalists to actually contribute to the on-line thing, because I know of some of the problems in other organisations where journalists have said to me, "They want me to do a blog in the morning, then they want me to do a news story for on-line, then we want me to update my blog, then do a podcast, and then do my story for the paper. When am I actually going to do some reporting here?" There are demands on the journalists' time but again it is finding that balance. I am a great believer if I am seeing a load of people sitting around the office then we are having a bad day. People need to be out and they need to be meeting people because that is how it happens. The slovenliness for instance of using Wikipedia—and there was an incident quite recently involving Ronnie Hazlehurst the composer, and okay, that was an amusing mistake in the end but it is a great danger. We warn our journalists all the time, just banging in Google and then turning up whatever it is does not make it right. It is a concern but I think it is something that everybody has become conscious of now, that you cannot do it the lazy way just because you can access the worldwide web.

  Chairman: Mr Wallace, thank you very much. You have given some very important and interesting evidence. Perhaps if we have got any other questions to follow up we could drop you a note and ask you about that. Thank you very very much indeed. We will all look in to ITV tonight.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008