Select Committee on Communications Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 620 - 624)

WEDNESDAY 10 OCTOBER 2007

Mr Lionel Barber

  Q620  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: Can I ask, because what you say is very interesting, do you have any system within the newspaper—which sounds, from the way you describe it, as though it has very great pride in its own standards—of training or mentoring when you take journalists in, no matter where they come from?

  Mr Barber: Absolutely.

  Q621  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: There is a sort of critical friendly eye on what they do?

  Mr Barber: We have the normal editors who are looking at prose and copy and if it is not up to standard we deal with these problems, but we have a system where we are monitoring the performance of our journalists and we have regular training sessions, which are in very specific detail about how to read a company's balance sheet and how to report on business. These are conducted by specialists, but very experienced people from within the paper.

  Q622  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: What about how to write a sentence?

  Mr Barber: We hope the schools contribute a little bit.

  Q623  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: Quite. My point, Mr Barber, is you seem to be implying that it is at that level that there may be a compromise with quality because what you are getting actually is not quite of the high standard you would hope for. I am asking you, do you attempt to correct that?

  Mr Barber: Absolutely, all the time, every day. You should read my emails!

  Q624  Chairman: Mr Barber, thank you very, very much indeed. A very interesting portrait of the FT. Perhaps if we have got some other questions which arise from this we could write to you?

  Mr Barber: My Lord Chairman, thank you. It has been a pleasure. I hope I have been helpful

  Chairman: Very much. Thank you.






 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008