Select Committee on Communications Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1120 - 1128)

WEDNESDAY 28 NOVEMBER 2007

Mr Malcolm Wall, Mr Paul Richmond, Mr Jon James and Mr Scott Dresser

  Q1120  Chairman: You are becoming veterans of the competition legislation/regulation. Is there any way that you would like to see it improved, any suggestions or proposals?

  Mr Wall: I would echo what Michael Grade said, that one area is speed. This is a very fast-moving business and there is a danger that we take a snapshot of the business that develops so quickly thereafter. We have got this also in terms of what Ofcom are doing. Largely we welcome the Ofcom process of a market investigation that is taking place that does not look at a particular case but steps back and has a look at the market overall, which we very much welcome, but again with the proviso that they are sufficiently resourced in order to move at speed and in order to make a judgment that actually has an impact rather than makes a ruling once the market has moved on.

  Q1121  Chairman: Your counsel feels that legislation, both in the Enterprise Act and in the Communications Act, is clearly set out and everyone can understand exactly what is required?

  Mr Dresser: It has certainly been tested now.

  Q1122  Chairman: That was not quite my question.

  Mr Dresser: We have taken issue with a number of provisions but it seems to be working and we will see how this plays out.

  Q1123  Chairman: Are you still interested in taking over ITV?

  Mr Wall: If I may I will jump that question. There is a time and a place, there is a 17.9% blocking stake there so it is all somewhat academic.

  Q1124  Bishop of Manchester: You will be aware that in The Times this morning there is an article in the wake of the departure of Virgin Media's head of strategy and some references to the role of Mr Birkett. Among the things that are commented on is, "The turbulent history of the pay television and broadband group ... the myriad troubles that the group has been facing ... Mr Birkett has conceded that the group's status with its listing and key investors in the United States but its operations in Britain was a bit odd." I wondered if you would like to comment on the article.

  Mr Wall: I do not believe that particular article is necessarily influenced by the owner of the publication; however, part of that is factually correct even if the language is somewhat exaggerated. We have had turbulent times in cable. In response to one of the early questions about how cable was structured, what has happened to cable, why is cable not as great a competitor or is not in the same status as it is in the US is because the way it was structured has led to a number of financial restructurings: it has been turbulent. It has been hard to put the businesses together and subsequently we have had some management changes. It is not altogether unexpected; you bang two businesses together and you do have those. The shareholding structure is again down to history. As part of the restructuring back in 2005 the junk bond-holders or the debt-holders were converted to equity and they were largely US organisations which led to a Nasdaq quote.

  Q1125  Chairman: Are you profitable now?

  Mr Wall: We are profitable to the EBITDA line and we are there or thereabouts once you remove the capex and interest payments.

  Q1126  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: Could I just ask a very quick one? This is just out of ignorance and it is just a material question. When you bought NTL:Telewest were the cables that they had installed entirely fibre optic?

  Mr Wall: As of today we are largely fibre optic and, at this late stage, I can bring my right winger in. How much is analogue?

  Mr James: A few hundred thousand homes.

  Mr Wall: A few hundred thousand. We have a small leftover of analogue homes which have a lesser experience.

  Q1127  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: Now you have introduced another factor which I am not going to pursue.

  Mr Wall: If I may, we have a big fat pipe network but at the end of some parts of the network it is a slimmer pipe.

  Q1128  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: Lord Maxton drew a distinction between poor old-fashioned BT with copper wire and you who were up to speed with a much wider spectrum, band width.

  Mr Wall: We are, except for small leftover areas.

  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: Which we will keep very quiet about.

  Chairman: Thank you very much, Lady Eccles, for bringing these important issues in at this point, but we will actually draw it to an end if we might. Going back to Lord Inglewood's point, if you have got any more evidence, which I think at one point you did say in your evidence, we would be very grateful to receive that. If, on reflection, either looking at the minutes or reflecting on this meeting you have other things that you would like to put in front of us, we would be obviously very happy to receive them. In the meantime may I thank you and your colleagues very much indeed for the trouble you have taken and the very clear way you have given your evidence.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008