Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 3760 - 3779)

  3760. LORD BROOKE OF ALVETHORPE: It seems that you have some legitimate points to pursue but you need the mechanism, the machinery to pursue them. There is the machinery on offer and the argument seems to be more about the process rather than the substance and you really have to break through on this otherwise you are really not representing anybody at the end of the day if you are not having discussions with the interested parties. So it really is very difficult to see how we take it forward unless you can make decisions yourself on who you are prepared to accept.

  3761. MS COVE: It is a panel decision and I will take it to the next meeting and see what sort of response there is.

  3762. CHAIRMAN: Of course it is a panel decision but it is a decision that the panel is going to have to take. It is no use going on saying, "PAL is being paid by Crossrail and therefore we cannot trust them," or something like that. I do not know whether that is being said, but the attitude at the moment is one that does not reflect the successful outcome of this process at King's Cross, and I would think that you ought perhaps to model yourselves on the later stages of the panel process in King's Cross because that seems to have been much more effective.

  3763. MS COVE: The King's Cross panel of course is probably ended now because that was to do with the Channel Tunnel, but we will make some contact with Paddington and see how they are getting on.

  3764. LORD BROOKE OF ALVETHORPE: Would you be willing to accept the borough as the Chair, Mr Elvin?

  3765. MR ELVIN: My Lord, I have said that in the note. We regard the tripartite arrangement as one which falls squarely in the undertaking we have given to the House of Commons. The difficulty is that Planning Aid for London thought that it would facilitate smoother panel meetings if the London Borough of Tower Hamlets did not participate. If the panel want Tower Hamlets to participate we are happy for any mechanism which works, whether it is with Planning Aid, Tower Hamlets or ourselves—as long as it works that is what we want.

  3766. CHAIRMAN: That is about as far as we are going to take it because it will have to go back to the panel for discussion. Is that everything you want to say?

  3767. MS COVE: I think so, you might be pleased to hear.

  3768. CHAIRMAN: I am sorry you got interrupted but perhaps we made a little progress this morning over and above what we would have been able to do last night.

  3769. MS COVE: It gave Mr Elvin the opportunity of producing answers.

  3770. MR ELVIN: Just before Ms Cove goes, I did say that there was a detailed note on air quality and health impact. Would the Committee like that because I need to give a copy to Ms Cove if that were the case?

  3771. CHAIRMAN: I am sure Ms Cove would like it.

  3772. MS COVE: It would be very useful.

  3773. LORD BROOKE OF ALVETHORPE: Lord Chairman, could I make a suggestion? Looking at it, it seems to me that Crossrail usefully could provide one of their officials to go to them and take them through the documents, to all the appropriate points in the relevant documents because it is all there.

  3774. MR ELVIN: If I circulate the note on air quality now and give Ms Cove a copy, if the panel are willing to meet with us we are more than happy to take them through the details. They are the same details as have been publicly available for the last three and a half years and we are more than happy to have another go at explaining them.

  3775. The other issue is, as Ms Cove mentioned yesterday, I think, we have written formally to the panel setting out a detailed response to the questions about remit, which reflects what I have said rather more briefly. Would you like a copy of the letter that we wrote to the panel, which is not in the exhibits because it went out late? We have set out our position formally.

  3776. CHAIRMAN: I think one more letter will do no harm.

  3777. MR ELVIN: In that case could I circulate it and give a copy to Ms Cove, and we will email it to her as well. (Same handed)

The Petition of Spitalfields Small Business Association

  3778. CHAIRMAN: Ms Cove, I think it would probably be the view of my colleagues and myself that there must be a workable liaison committee to deal with the sorts of things you have been talking about; they are very important and we recognise that. If the present panel does not work then something else will have to be found that does, and it is really as simple as that, otherwise we are going to miss the opportunity to draw upon your knowledge and experience and indeed to attempt to deal with your concerns because the apparatus and the machinery is not there. So perhaps the panel could consider that. If it does not want to do it itself it may be that some other organisation will have to be set up.

  3779. MS COVE: Some while ago I did actually say that the Community Association welcomed the instructions from the House of Commons to Crossrail and we were willing participants.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008