Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 3960 - 3979)

  3960. MR HORTON: Well, I was not. I was dealing with my own position. I have not seen this, but, as soon as I go from here, I shall be speaking with Ms Jones.

  3961. CHAIRMAN: I think it is perfectly simple. We cannot make any further progress on this point at all. If I have identified the point correctly, and you at least agreed that I have, I do not think we can make any further progress on it until there has been a proper exchange of documents and time for them to be considered.

  3962. MR HORTON: I think that is right, I am afraid.

  3963. CHAIRMAN: Is that right?

  3964. MR ELVIN: My Lord, there is a series of simple, legal answers to this and I think I can assist you further with this without seeing any further documentation, other than the documentation that is already before the Committee.

  3965. CHAIRMAN: Yes, I dare say, but I think we have got a duty to the Petitioner to allow them to produce what material they wish, provided that they show it to you.

  3966. MR ELVIN: My Lord, this Petitioner does not wish to put in evidence. This is a pure point of law and I have a legal answer to it.

  3967. CHAIRMAN: Well, then what is the point of 200 pages?

  3968. MR ELVIN: Well, this is for the Petitioner tomorrow.

  3969. MR HORTON: The work has been divided up. The Spitalfields Society tomorrow adopt the legal submissions made today and then seek to provide you with the evidential material.

  3970. CHAIRMAN: I think the difficulty that we are going to be in is that, if it is to be treated as a main alternative, and we are being invited to make a recommendation to the House to consider this on re-committal, as such, in accordance with the Directive, I think we have to have some material upon the basis of which we can say that it is a main alternative.

  3971. MR HORTON: Exactly.

  3972. CHAIRMAN: I do not see how we can do that at the moment because we have not got any material at all.

  3973. MR HORTON: That must be right.

  3974. MR ELVIN: My Lord, I am quite happy to give my main submissions tomorrow in respect of both Petitions, having heard the Society's Petition tomorrow, but I think it would assist the Committee that the rest of the business today is for you to hear Professor Mair and Mr Thornely-Taylor which can be comfortably accommodated within a few hours, I should imagine. If your Lordships would allow me, I can at least give you some preliminary enlightenment as to what the position is.

  3975. CHAIRMAN: Well, I think that probably would help everybody, but it is without prejudice to what may emerge from the material that we have not yet seen.

  3976. MR ELVIN: Doubtless, I can produce something in writing overnight as well to assist the Committee. I will have to explain it to my wife again, but never mind!

  3977. CHAIRMAN: If you want to give us a preliminary submission on what Mr Horton has said now, we will listen to it. It does not mean to say that you cannot make a submission again when the totality of the case, including the evidence, has been placed before us.

  3978. MR ELVIN: I am very grateful.

  3979. CHAIRMAN: That must be all right, must it not, Mr Horton, if you are coming tomorrow?



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008