Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 7600 - 7619)

  7600. MS LIEVEN: That is right, my Lord, and I am very happy. We will provide a note that sets out the relevant dates and what has been considered and what has not. In that we will cover Ebbsfleet and the CTRL internationals and any information we have on the inter-relationship between them and Abbey Wood.

  7601. CHAIRMAN: I do not know whether that is going to satisfy Lord James, but until he has seen it I do not suppose we can tell.

  7602. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: I will do my best, my Lord, to be satisfied.

  7603. MS LIEVEN: My Lord, there is one other matter that I ought to touch on with Mr Anderson, because it is relevant to your Lordships' questions. Mr Anderson, the Environmental Statement and all the traffic modelling for Abbey Wood was drawn up on the basis that there would be no station at Woolwich. Is that right?

   (Mr Anderson) That is correct, yes, originally.

  7604. The position on Woolwich is a little complicated, but the position now is that assuming that an agreement is reached with Berkeley Homes (and the Committee will be aware that there are heads of terms of an agreement with Berkley Homes but it is not yet finalised) and assuming that the station is fitted out under agreements with Greenwich and other contributors—so if there is a station at Woolwich—then does that have an impact on the traffic forecast at Abbey Wood?

   (Mr Anderson) It has a very material impact on the forecast at Abbey Wood. There would be a significant reduction compared to the figures set out in the Environmental Statement—something of the order of a quarter of the passengers accessing the station would probably use the Woolwich station.

  7605. So there would be a significant reduction in traffic at Abbey Wood if there is a station at Woolwich. Is that right?

   (Mr Anderson) There would be a material reduction, yes. I should say there would still be an impact that we would have to address through the undertaking.

  7606. MS LIEVEN: I just think it is important that the Committee sees that as part of the context.

  7607. CHAIRMAN: Is the Woolwich station in Schedule 1? I think it is not.

  7608. MS LIEVEN: It is the subject of an additional provision, my Lord. Mr Walker will check. No, it is in the Bill, my Lord.

  7609. CHAIRMAN: It is in the Bill already, is it?

  7610. MS LIEVEN: It is in the Bill already.

  7611. CHAIRMAN: I am just trying to find it, that is all.

  7612. MS LIEVEN: Quite what powers it is being built under may not be straightforward, but it is not on quite the same footing as the other stations in the Bill because we have assessed it on the basis that it will only go forward if these agreements are entered into. So it is not one of the stations that the Secretary of State is funding and building under the powers in the Bill. I think, at that point, I can hand over to Mr Carrier.

  7613. CHAIRMAN: However, if it is in the Bill then provisionally you will have to add it into the traffic considerations, will you not?

  7614. MS LIEVEN: Yes, my Lord. It has been fully assessed in the Environmental Statement that went in AP4, but the critical point to emphasise at this stage, in the face of this Petition, is that if it is built the impact on Abbey Wood goes down because lots of people in south-east London go to Woolwich and not to Abbey Wood. So it makes the situation at Abbey Wood better, and that is part of the background to Greenwich's report, the Mouchel report that Mr Carrier was so concerned about.

  7615. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: Ms Lieven, Woolwich is not going to be a stop for the Eurostar, so it is irrelevant to the point of the traffic consequence of transfer from Ashford.

  7616. MS LIEVEN: Yes, my Lord, I quite accept that.

  7617. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: Just to be clear on that point. It does not alter the original question.

  7618. MS LIEVEN: I am sorry, my Lords, I did not put it as an answer to my Lord, Lord James's questions; it has got nothing to do with the CTRL internationals; it is to do with the fact that a significant proportion of the people who are assessed to use Abbey Wood or to drive to Abbey Wood will now use Woolwich if it is built.

  7619. LORD YOUNG OF NORWOOD GREEN: It will have a material effect on the Transport Impact Assessment around Abbey Wood.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008