Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 7700 - 7719)

  7700. Stakeholders then made further representations and the ORR is currently considering these before it publishes its final decision.

  7701. The Office of Rail Regulation expects to make a final decision on the Crossrail access option in mid April.

  7702. CHAIRMAN: Mid April?

  7703. MR TAYLOR: Mid April, yes, which should be in time to inform the hearing of any railway industry Petitioners by the Committee. This is later than had been anticipated. The ORR cannot specify a particular date at this stage but that should firm up in about a week's time.

  7704. The ORR is aware of the importance of the timing of this decision for the hearing by the Select Committee of the railway Petitioners; equally, it is conscious of the importance of making its decision following a legally and procedurally robust process.

  7705. As the Promoter has previously stated, if a suitable Access Option is approved then the Promoter will seek to cut back the railway-related clauses in the Crossrail Bill. The policy on this has already been explained in the supporting Information Paper to the application for the Access Option in July of 2007 (which is available from the ORR's website).

  7706. At the meeting of the Crossrail Railway Stakeholders Forum on 26 March of this year, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport, Tom Harris MP, made it clear to the assembled representatives of the railway industry that he was alive to the needs to provide updated information on the cutting back of Bill powers as soon as possible.

  7707. This information will not be the Bill amendments themselves. The railway clauses are public provisions and proposed amendments to them would be brought forward at the subsequent public stages of the Bill. Line by line scrutiny of the drafting is appropriate at the public stages but is not necessary at this stage of the Bill process.

  7708. But recognising the interests of Petitioners, a further statement of policy on amendments to the railway clauses will be made shortly to provide clarity on what is intended for each clause.

  7709. CHAIRMAN: What do you mean by "shortly"?

  7710. MR TAYLOR: I am coming to that, my Lord. I will get there; just let me finish this paragraph, if I may? It is expected that this will largely involve the deletion of clauses and I can say now that the amendments will remove any overriding duties on the ORR.

  7711. This statement will not be held back until the ORR's final decision is reached but will of course be subject to that final decision being satisfactory to the Promoter.

  7712. The intention is to send out this policy statement to Petitioners no later than 11 April—that is a week tomorrow. This will give two clear weeks before Petitioners are heard on matters relating to Bill powers—and the Committee will recall that we have two weeks of railway Petitioners and the way the programme has been developed the idea is to put those with concerns relating to Bill powers in the second week.

  7713. The Promoter believes that this gives adequate time for Petitioners to prepare before appearing in Committee.

  7714. My Lord, I hope that assists the Committee.

  7715. CHAIRMAN: Do you suppose that the railway Petitioners have enough information, or will have enough information after 11 April to be able to proceed?

  7716. MR TAYLOR: Indeed; that is exactly what we intend to ensure is the case.

  7717. CHAIRMAN: I can tell you that if this thing goes much after 8 May there may be great difficulty about a quorum in this Committee.

  7718. MR TAYLOR: My Lord, you made that clear on Tuesday.

  7719. CHAIRMAN: And the Secretary of State ought to know that.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008