Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 8120 - 8139)

  8120. LORD BROOKE OF ALVERTHORPE: So you do not accept the South West Regional Assembly's argument that people coming up from the South West, from Plymouth and places like that, would want to go into Reading and go straight through to Heathrow using Crossrail?
  (Mr Berryman) They could not use it.

  8121. Their argument is that there would be a substantial increase.
  (Mr Berryman) You cannot go direct from Reading to Heathrow by Crossrail under any envisaged scenario. You would have to change at Hayes and Harlington and go back into Heathrow as there is no direct link from the west side into Heathrow.

  8122. I think they argued in their Petition that you should have a line running through, a Crossrail line, from Reading into Heathrow ----
  (Mr Berryman) They did argue that, my Lord—

  8123.—so that people coming up from the South West could then gain access to Heathrow without the necessity of going any further into London.
  (Mr Berryman) Such work would be very substantial. It would involve building a new junction facing west on the west side of Heathrow Airport and a new line up from Heathrow. The traffic on offer, I am sorry to say this, is not that great. People get confused between railways and airports because airports always seem to have more people around them than railway stations, but one reason for that is that people wait there for three hours before they catch their plane, so there is a difference in scale between railways and airports. The kind of railway which we are offering, which is a very high-capacity service, you really have to have a lot of passengers to justify putting it anywhere.

  8124. I am only going on what they were arguing.
  (Mr Berryman) Indeed, my Lord. One of the difficulties we have in planning railways is that there are a lot of people with maps and pencils who do not perhaps understand the economics of construction or the economics of the operation of a railway and they come up with all kinds of suggestions. We have had very, very many of those suggestions in the course of preparation of the scheme.

  8125. I presume you have put these convincing arguments to them and that is why we are not hearing from them this morning
  (Mr Berryman) I trust that that is the case, my Lord.

  8126. BARONESS FOOKES: I think there are coach services, are there not, between Reading and Heathrow?
  (Mr Berryman) That is correct, my Lady, there are. I think there will be a relatively attractive way of getting to Heathrow by train from the Reading direction, but it would mean changing at Hayes and Harlington. As I said earlier on, we are hoping to provide a semi-fast service from Reading to the principal Thames Valley stations and that may well be a train that is coming through from Oxford, so it passes through Reading, but serves these destinations, and access rights will be sought via Network Rail in the normal way through the Office of the Rail Regulator.

  8127. MR ELVIN: I think that concludes your brief run-through of some of the rail infrastructure issues. I do not know whether the Committee would find that a convenient point to break and, if Mr George has any questions, for him to ask them after the break.

  8128. LORD BROOKE OF ALVERTHORPE: I have one question, following up on my interest of where people come from when they are seeking to go into Heathrow. Presumably it is BAA that does the research of the original source from which people come or presumably somebody has got statistics on this?
  (Mr Berryman) They do, my Lord, and BAA does a regular survey and the Civil Aviation Authority also periodically do it and they have a sort of postcode of origin, postcode of destination type of thing.

  8129. You had access to all of that?
  (Mr Berryman) We have, my Lord.

  8130. LORD SNAPE: On that same point then, Mr Berryman, can you explain to the Committee why you are fairly dismissive of the need for a west-facing junction into Heathrow because of the lack of traffic from the South West and why Heathrow is to be treated differently from, for example, Manchester where initially access into Manchester Airport by rail was from the north, from the Greater Manchester direction, but it was very soon felt necessary to provide a south-facing connection.
  (Mr Berryman) That is correct, my Lord. The works at Manchester, according to my recollection, was a fairly simple cord which was put in from the Styal lines up into the airport branch. The works that would be required at Heathrow would be very, very substantial. It would require a grade-separated connection somewhere in the West Drayton area and it would require the construction of a new line. As you probably know, there was a branch down there called the `Colnbrook Line' which originally went down to Staines West, I think, but the junction from that faces east in towards London. That line could not be doubled because there is a very large M25 junction which is built right over the line and there is only space for a single track in there at the moment. It would require a full-grade separation facing west rather than a simple cord, as was provided at Manchester. I think that is the reason. I have to say, the traffic on offer at Heathrow is probably more than was on offer for that connection at Manchester from the Crewe direction.

  8131. Yes, indeed.
  (Mr Berryman) I recall the scheme at the time that it was built and it was a modest scheme.

  8132. As much as these things ever are of course!
  (Mr Berryman) Indeed.

  8133. Again, would a more accurate description then of your views on a west-facing junction be that it is too expensive for the traffic that is likely to be on offer rather than, as you seem to imply, that there was not the necessary amount of traffic on offer anywhere?
  (Mr Berryman) What you have just said is correct and we are looking at both sides of the equation. It is the cost versus the amount of traffic on offer and I think that that equation does not work for a west-facing connection and it misses working by a very long way.

  8134. BARONESS FOOKES: Mr Berryman, I think you said that people might prefer to change at Hayes and Harlington.
  (Mr Berryman) Yes.

  8135. But would they be doing that coming up from the Main Line from the West Country, from Plymouth?
  (Mr Berryman) No, my Lady, they would have to change at Reading as well if they were coming from the West Country.

  8136. This is what I was thinking, so two changes when you have luggage is not a good idea. You would be an encumbered passenger.
  (Mr Berryman) If you were trying to get there in the quickest way possible, my Lady, your best way would be to go into Paddington on your Intercity train and change on to the Heathrow Express. That would actually be quicker.

  8137. And more expensive of course.
  (Mr Berryman) I fear so.

  8138. CHAIRMAN: Mr George, I think you probably want to ask some questions, but this is the time of day when we tend to break for a cup of coffee.

After a short break

  8139. CHAIRMAN: Mr George, you have some questions?



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008