Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 8420 - 8439)

  8420. Now, your turn, for the moment, Mr Francis, to sum up.

  8421. MR FRANCIS: I would just say thank you very much for the consideration that you have given, and I look forward to seeing your recommendations and hope you will endorse some of the suggestions we have made in our Petition. Thank you.

  8422. CHAIRMAN: You may want to look at the material which is now promised.

  8423. MR FRANCIS: Indeed.

  8424. CHAIRMAN: And if you have any comments to make on it we certainly would not object to receiving them.

  8425. MR FRANCIS: Thank you very much. I will take you up on that offer.

  8426. LORD SNAPE: My Lord Chairman, before Mr Francis leaves, then, will he have the opportunity, if he so desires, to cross-examine, for example, BAA about western access when BAA appears before us next week?

  8427. CHAIRMAN: I am not so sure about that. I do not think we can have Petitioners cross-examining each other.

  8428. MR ELVIN: It is sometimes called "friendly fire"—although I am not sure it would be that friendly in the present circumstances! Of course, I am assuming BAA is going to turn up and it is entirely possible they may not. It is not within our control. Certainly they had a representative here this morning but he has gone. However, we will make sure that their attention is drawn to the transcript of this afternoon and the discussion, and we will also copy them in on any information we provide to Mr Francis and to the Committee so that they are on notice, should they want to add something, or to ensure they turn up and contribute to the issue.

  8429. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr Francis.

  8430. MR ELVIN: My Lord, I think the only remaining Petitioner for this afternoon is ATOC and, subject to anything that is said, as I indicated in opening we have reached substantial agreement with ATOC and there is a proposed undertaking which has been the subject of considerable discussion.

  8431. We are agreeable to it in principle; the problem is that the various franchising interests within the Department who need to sign off are still looking at it. It is the latest draft that has been provided.

  8432. What I am told I can say to the Committee is that the substance of the proposed undertaking which you will be shown in a moment is not in issue; all that remains is a sign-off on the detailed drafting.

  8433. What is agreed between us and ATOC is that compensation should be based on the no net gain/no net loss principle, and the difficulties and the differential in time between ATOC's evidence and franchising agreements should not lead to any reduction in compensation, which is the simple way of explaining what is, I understand, a very complicated issue and one which I am hoping your Lordships will not press me on because I am not sure I can provide your Lordships with an entirely convincing explanation of the complexities, but since I understand that the substance is not in dispute and that we should be able to sign off on the final version of this agreement within the next few days, I do not think there should be much difficulty.

  8434. CHAIRMAN: Mr Elvin, this was the Petition in which clause 41.3 arose?

  8435. MR ELVIN: I do not think ATOC is presenting any points on that today. I do not think we are pursuing that.

  8436. MR EVANS: My Lords, no, we are not.

The Petition of The Association of Train Operating Companies.

MR NICHOLAS EVANS appeared on behalf of the Petitioner.

MESSRS BIRCHAM DYSON BELL appeared as Agents.

  8437. MR EVANS: This is the proposed undertaking at, I think, its last iteration. There is only a very minor change in the drafting that has occurred since which is the manuscript change that has been made on the last but one line, "considered to be" instead of "treated as", so you can see we are on to very weighty matters now.[53]

The Petition of Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC)

  8438. MR ELVIN: I am not sure that matters.

  8439. MR EVANS: Well, I understand it is your wording! As Mr Elvin said, the principle and, it would appear, almost all of the words are agreed and we wait to have final sign-off from the Department for Transport.



53   Committee Ref: A46, Proposed undertaking in respect of railway compensation (SCN-20080422-012) Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008