Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 9200 - 9219)

  9200. MR ELVIN: My Lord, I foreshadowed it yesterday and we have just received materials from Network Rail which I have not been able to look at overnight.

  9201. CHAIRMAN: So have we.

  9202. MR ELVIN: It says what I more or less expected it to say. The position is this, as I explained yesterday: that there is currently an issue as to how the central section of Crossrail, that is to say, the tunnel section, is to be regulated.

  9203. CHAIRMAN: This is the infrastructure manager point?

  9204. MR ELVIN: Yes, this is the infrastructure manager point. Just taking a step back, this involves at least a three-way negotiation between the Promoter, Network Rail, represented by my learned friends, and Transport for London. It is a negotiation as to what precise regulatory mechanism should apply in terms of the infrastructure manager for access and general purposes under the central section. It is agreed that Network Rail should be infrastructure manager for the purposes of the ROGs; that is not in dispute. The difficulty is that this is an issue which arises under current legislation. What Network Rail are seeking to do is to seek undertakings from the Secretary of State which would fetter his discretion under existing legislation, and to give an undertaking would be unlawful because there is a negotiation both on regulatory and commercial terms where, frankly, the Secretary of State sees the logic in Network Rail having a considerable involvement in the regulation of the central tunnel, as I said to you yesterday, and TfL are arguing, or were arguing, for almost complete exemption such as is the case with London Underground and the Docklands Light Railway. That is not acceptable to the Department for it to be completely exempt, but the precise nature of the regulatory system which is to operate in the central tunnel is a difficult matter and, as I said yesterday, it involves negotiations outside the powers of this Bill.

  9205. Therefore, in our respectful submission, whilst we note Network Rail's concerns and we do see Network Rail as having a major role to play, not least because of course we have to access the central section from Network Rail's national network and infrastructure, this is unfortunately a matter which has to continue under existing legislation outside the bill process and, therefore, in my respectful submission, although we are sympathetic to what Network Rail have to say, it is a matter for further negotiation and not a matter where Network Rail can properly ask your Lordships to do anything about it.

  9206. CHAIRMAN: It is the European Directive point, is it?

  9207. MR ELVIN: In part, it is the transposition of the European Directives into national law.

  9208. CHAIRMAN: Yes, it is the statutory instrument which transposes it.

  9209. MR ELVIN: And indeed under the Railways Act.

  9210. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: You have an extraordinary situation. It sounds like one of these problems that is so stupid it should not possibly be allowed to exist for five minutes, but how long is that situation going to be allowed to continue and still be able to proceed to the next stages of Crossrail because you cannot possibly go on without agreement?

  9211. MR ELVIN: My Lord, I understand that agreement should not be too far off. Perhaps I can take precise instructions as to where the negotiations have reached. (After a pause). I am told, my Lord, that the regulatory side has to be integrated in the financing arrangements and it is likely to take a number of months, but certainly within the scope of this year. It is not going to run on beyond that. It is certainly before work commences.

  9212. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: I cannot see how you can start without it.

  9213. MR ELVIN: Well, your Lordship is right, which is why it has got to be concluded within the year.

  9214. CHAIRMAN: It does not sound as though we are going to have time to deal with it.

  9215. MR ELVIN: Well, my Lord, as I have suggested and as I say, although we are sympathetic to Mr Purchas's clients' concerns, and indeed we are singing from the same hymn sheet up to a large point, I do not think it really is a matter for your Lordships.

  9216. CHAIRMAN: Up to the last verse.

  9217. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: It is only a matter for us in the sense of where the whole thing's momentum stands.

  9218. MR ELVIN: Well, it is, my Lord, but it is a matter lying within the scope of other legislation.

  9219. CHAIRMAN: Now, Mr Purchas?



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008