Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 9640 - 9659)

  9640. LORD SNAPE: I have the same problem and I am not an engineer!
  (Mr Berryman) Terminal 5 is at the top of this drawing and the idea is to build a new track down here. As it happens, this uses the track bed of the old branch which we have been talking about which goes up to the north. That branch was truncated by the M25—I am sorry to report to your Lordship in view of your remarks about the M25—but the southern part of that branch would be used or close to it in any event and it will join with the existing railway. This is the line that goes up to Windsor, and a new station will be built at Staines High Street (Indicating). Staines Station is a little way from the main activity of the town and a new cord built here to link onto the lines going down to Reading. Trains going down to Waterloo will go down that existing Windsor line, through the existing station site and off to Waterloo; trains going down to Reading will go through the new station site around the cord in the centre of Staines and off down towards Reading.

  9641. LORD SNAPE: Thank you.

  9642. MR ELVIN: I do not know whether your Lordships have any further questions?

  9643. LORD BROOKE OF ALVERTHORPE: We have heard enough!

  9644. CHAIRMAN: That is very helpful. Thank you very much.

The Petition of English Welsh & Scottish Railway Ltd

The witness withdrew

  9645. MR ELVIN: My Lords, the next matter for your Lordships is the remainder of EWS's petition. I do not propose to say anything else other than to say this: Mr George is going to show you in a moment the agreement over Old Oak Common which has been reached. As I said yesterday, the arrangement is a sale of EWS's holdings at Old Oak Common to CLRL and there is a version which, although it has "draft" on, it is no longer draft but I will confirm that Mr George is going to show you the agreed terms but Old Oak Common is now resolved, fortunately.

The following Petition against the Bill was read:

The Petition of English, Welsh and Scottish Railway Ltd.

MR CHARLES GEORGE QC appeared on behalf of the Petitioner.

MESSRS BIRCHAM DYSON BELL appeared as Agent

  9646. CHAIRMAN: Mr George?

The Petition of English Welsh & Scottish Railway Ltd

  9647. MR GEORGE: My Lords, before I start I wonder whether Mr Berryman could be recalled to deal with this matter of Old Oak Common?

  9648. MR ELVIN: He has instructed me to confirm.

  9649. MR GEORGE: He has instructed you to confirm.

  9650. MR ELVIN: The reason for the peculiarity is the Secretary of State is not agreeing to buy it, CLRL is but Mr Berryman has authorised me to indicate to your Lordships it is agreed.

  9651. CHAIRMAN: Is that satisfactory? (Mr George took instructions)

  9652. MR ELVIN: Apparently my word is not good enough! I am quite happy to recall Mr Berryman. I am not sure what difference it will make, but there it is.

MR KEITH BERRYMAN, Recalled Examined by MR GEORGE

  9653. MR GEORGE: My Lords, this will merely take a couple minutes. Could we please put up on the screen the Cross London Rail Link Limited statement to the House of Lords Select Committee. Mr Berryman, you are one of the managing directors of Cross London Rail Link Limited, is that right?

  (Mr Berryman) That is correct, yes.

  9654. This document sets out in paragraph 1 that there have been discussions regarding CLRL purchasing EWS's leasehold interest in the Old Oak Common depot site and in paragraph 2 that heads of terms have been negotiated and agreed between the parties with the intention that they will work towards a formal exchange of the contract for the purchase by 19 May 2008.[48] The document is marked "draft", but I think you are able to confirm that it is not a draft document?

  (Mr Berryman) I am able to confirm that word "draft" can be safely removed from the document, yes.

  9655. If one then goes on down to paragraph 7, if we put paragraph 7 on the screen, it reads: "the parties, acting reasonably, have agreed to work together in utmost good faith to conclude a legally binding agreement in accordance with these terms by 19 May 2008 or as soon as possible thereafter".[49] Are you able to confirm that is the position, including that manuscript addition?

  (Mr Berryman) Indeed I am.

  9656. The situation is I think that there is still a board meeting to be held by CLRL, but that would be a few days before 19 May and the hope of everyone is that will lead to the contract being exchanged?
  (Mr Berryman) That is right. For the avoidance of doubt, the matter has already been put to our board and I think the purchase price and so on have been agreed.

  9657. MR GEORGE: I am very grateful, Mr Berryman.

  9658. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr Berryman.

The witness withdrew

  9659. MR GEORGE: My Lords, as your Lordships will recall from last Tuesday, Day 21, on behalf of English, Welsh and Scottish Railway, they are the largest UK operator of rail freight and also of certain chartered passenger trains. EWS are particularly hard hit by the proposals in this Bill because there is a severe impact on its various goods yards on the Great Western approach to Paddington and it will lose a site which it recently acquired at Plumstead and lose its major remaining London maintenance and repair depot, Old Oak Common, which is to become the Crossrail main depot and about which that sale agreement has just been reached. This will all happen at a time when EWS has just lost its other London depot. Temple Mills in the Lea Valley, which has been acquired for CTRL trains. The taking of those two freight maintenance depots for two major new passenger ventures, Crossrail and CTRL, illustrates very starkly how freight, for all the Department's fine words about its importance, is required over and over again to play second fiddle to more glamorous passenger services. Nevertheless, we do not come here today to argue the case for retaining Old Oak Common. We have seen the light, as it were, and the way things are going, and faced with the threat of compulsory purchase, terms have been provisionally agreed and that will pass to Crossrail, nor are we here in any way to impede Crossrail.



48   Committee Ref: A57, CLRL Statement-English Welsh and Scotiish Rail Ltd.-Old Oak Common Depot, London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (LINEWD-103_04A-001) Back

49   Committee Ref: A57, CLRL Statement-English Welsh and Scotiish Rail Ltd.-Old Oak Common Depot, London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (SCN-20080430-049) Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008