Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 11420 - 11439)

  11420. The Eastbourne Terrace traffic will be a matter for the City Council, will it not?

   (Mr Berryman) Yes, my Lord, it will.

  11421. So will parking?

   (Mr Berryman) Yes, all of those things, parking, dropoff points, motorcycle parking, disabled parking.

  11422. Bus stops?

   (Mr Berryman) Bus stops, bus stands, of course they also have to be agreed with Transport for London.

  11423. Naturally, yes.

   (Mr Berryman) As I am sure you will appreciate, there are all kinds of people who need to accede to what we do.

  11424. BARONESS FOOKES: We are talking about the permanent arrangements after the work has been completed?

   (Mr Berryman) That is correct, my Lady.

  11425. CHAIRMAN: Are we, because surely we are also dealing with the highway movements during construction?

   (Mr Berryman) Yes, my Lord. As far as the traffic movements and the highway arrangements are concerned, we are talking about during and after construction. The final layout is the time when the buses move back and all that sort of thing happens, that is the time when we have to get not just Westminster City Council but Transport for London involved in that part and, indeed, Network Rail.

  11426. BARONESS FOOKES: I have a personal interest in this working well because I use the station a lot!

   (Mr Berryman) So I understand, my Lady, yes.

  11427. MS LIEVEN: The final topic I want to cover with you, Mr Berryman, is trees in Hyde Park. Can we put up 001, please.[21] I did not cover this in opening at all, my Lords and my Lady, because I did not understand PRACT were going to raise it, although we have discussed it with them in the past. Mr Berryman, can you explain what we are doing in Hyde Park and how it has changed since the Bill was introduced into Parliament?

  (Mr Berryman) Yes, when the Bill was originally introduced into Parliament this shaft in Hyde Park would be for the purposes of intervention by emergency services and also for ventilation. This shaft is unique in the set-up in that it is closer to other shafts than is normal. Normally, we have one kilometre between shafts. If we had done one kilometre between shafts in this area, we would have finished up with a shaft in the middle of a grassed area of Hyde Park and we were quite unable to come to an agreement with the Royal Parks and other interested parties about how that could be treated to make it look unobtrusive; indeed it could not be treated to make it look unobtrusive. We settled on a site for a shaft just here underneath the North Carriage Drive and at that time it was going to be a ventilation shaft and there was going to be an underground passageway that went around to the back of the pet cemetery. I do not know if members are familiar with that on the Bayswater Road. Subsequently, because these shafts are close together, we established that we do not need any ventilation capacity here at all under any scenario that we can envisage. The shaft becomes purely for intervention and the intervention will be from a sort of hatch in the floor next to Bayswater Road through an underground passageway and then down the shaft just here (Indicating). The reason for that is this is the point to which the fire brigade can get with a fire appliance all the time. Other times this road is closed and they cannot get down it so that is why the entrance is arranged there. Because we no longer have this adit which runs underneath the North Carriage Drive, we have been able to reduce the number of trees we would need to knock down. We think by refining the design further, we can reduce the number of trees further. The trees which we do knock down—there are bound to be some, we cannot get to none—we will be reducing the numbers as sensibly as we can. When we do have to fell a tree, we will replace it with a semi-mature tree which I understand is better than replacing it with a mature tree because they grow more quickly.

  11428. BARONESS FOOKES: That is right.

   (Mr Berryman) That is the position at Hyde Park.

  11429. MS LIEVEN: I am going to ask call Mr Thornely-Taylor after Mr Berryman to deal briefly with the groundbourne noise issue.

  11430. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: Could I put a question to Mr Berryman, please. Mr Berryman, did you look at the possibility that within Hyde Park there are still some of the subterranean workings from World War II that could have been reactivated and extended so you would not need to sink an access tunnel at all?

   (Mr Berryman) Indeed, we did look at that, my Lord, but not in the context of using them for ventilation. We looked at them in the context of making sure we did not collide with anything.

  11431. You said that you are not using it for ventilation access, and I am saying would it not have provided a ready-made access route if you had sunk it deeper? The trees could have lived in peace.

   (Mr Berryman) We come back to the same problem, my Lord, that any ventilation or, indeed, fire brigade access at some point has to come to the surface and it is finding a location at the surface which is the fundamental problem. Once we get underground we are out of sight, out of mind, so to speak.

  11432. There are some very deep access points in and around that park.

   (Mr Berryman) I understand there are, my Lord, but I believe they are further south in the Hyde Park area.

  11433. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: I cannot comment on that. I know there are some very deep ones.

  11434. BARONESS FOOKES: You also have this problem of the fire appliances getting through at all times, have you not? That is a constraining factor, I presume?

   (Mr Berryman) That is another constraining factor, my Lady, yes, and it is finding the best balance between appearance, accessibility and so on, and obviously by any stretch Hyde Park is going to be a difficult site.

  11435. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: Given the big appliances have to go through, could you not have taken a tunnel extension through from the Park Lane underground car park and gone straight through into the park from there? After all, you would have plenty of room for the vehicles there.

   (Mr Berryman) That is very well to the south, my Lord. That is quite a long way from the site.

  11436. LORD BROOKE OF ALVERTHORPE: Are you saying that the fire authorities do not have access to the park?

   (Mr Berryman) Apparently they cannot always get into North Carriage Drive. There are gates across it which are shut at night. There are no buildings in Hyde Park, but in the normal run of things the fire brigade would not ever need to go in there.

  11437. It would a save an awful lot of money if they had a set of keys and they could open the gate rather than having to go along the tunnel there.

  11438. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: You could leave the keys with Her Majesty and call to her to get the keys out!
  (Mr Berryman) We have a case, my Lord.

  11439. LORD YOUNG OF NORWOOD GREEN: We have a ton of these helpful suggestions!
  (Mr Berryman) I am sorry, my Lord, I did not catch that.



21   Committee Ref: A61, Hyde Park shaft-worksite layout (WESTCC-6_04-001) Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008