Select Committee on Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform First Report


APPENDIX 3: LOCAL TRANSPORT BILL [HL]


Memorandum by the Department for Transport

Introduction

1.  This memorandum identifies provisions for delegated legislation in the Local Transport Bill (introduced in the House of Lords on 7th November 2007 and published on 8th November 2007). It summarises the main provisions of the Bill; identifies the delegated powers in the Bill and describes the purpose and proposed use of those powers; explains why matters have been left to delegated legislation; and explains the degree of Parliamentary control provided for and the reason for the procedure selected in each case.

Background to the Bill

2.  In July 2006 DfT Ministers announced that they and officials at the Department would undertake an extensive review of the bus sector with a view to taking action to increase bus patronage. This led to the publication in December 2006 of a paper entitled Putting Passengers First, which set out the Government's proposals for a modernised national framework for bus services.

3.  Following on from this, the draft Local Transport Bill and consultation paper (Strengthening local delivery) was published for consultation and pre-legislative scrutiny on 22 May 2007. The Bill has since been revised in light of the views expressed during consultation and scrutiny, but the core purpose of the Bill remains to tackle congestion and improve public transport. The main elements of the Bill contain measures relating to improving the quality of local bus services, reforming local transport governance, and taking forward local road pricing schemes. It also contains measures relating to the traffic commissioners, following a separate consultation paper issued on July 26 entitled Modernising the Traffic Commissioner System.

4.  Many of the measures contained in the Bill on local bus services and road pricing schemes consist of amendments to earlier legislation, in particular the Transport Act 2000 ("the TA 2000"). Many of the proposed amendments to bus legislation have been developed in consultation with working groups representing both local authorities and the bus industry, based on their experience of the existing legislative provisions.

Summary of the Bill

5.  The Local Transport Bill, which mostly extends to England and Wales only (the provisions which extend to Scotland and Northern Ireland are listed in clause 116), contains 118 clauses and 7 Schedules. The main provisions are summarised in the table set out below. More detailed descriptions of the relevant clauses are contained in the commentary on delegated powers following the table. A full description of all the clauses can be found in the explanatory notes which accompany the Bill.
  Clauses Summary
1 - 6Provisions relating to traffic commissioners, including the creation of a statutory post of senior traffic commissioner
7 - 11Amendments to sections 108 - 113 of the TA 2000 on local transport plans
12 - 17Amendments to sections 114 - 123 of the TA 2000 on quality partnership schemes
18 - 39Amendments to sections 124 - 134 of the TA 2000 on quality contracts schemes. The provisions include the creation of a new approvals board to consider applications for quality contracts schemes in England
40 Amendments to section 153 of and Schedule 10 to the TA 2000 to apply a new competition test to voluntary partnership agreements and certain other agreements between local authorities and bus operators
41 - 62 General provisions relating to passenger transport. Includes amendments to the Transport Act 1985 ("the TA 1985") in relation to community transport and the enforcement powers of the traffic commissioners
63Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee
64 - 65Public Transport Users' Committee and Rail Passengers' Council
66 - 85Arrangements relating to Integrated Transport Authorities, including powers for the Secretary of State to make orders about the constitutional arrangements and functions of existing Integrated Transport Authorities (ITAs) and to create new ITAs
86 - 89ITA powers to take steps which they consider likely to promote or improve the economic, social or environmental well-being of their local community
90 - 108Amendments to Part 3 of the TA 2000 and Schedule 23 to the GLA Act 1999 on local and London charging schemes
109 - 110Trunk road charging schemes in Wales
111Consequential amendment of provision relating to detention of certain goods vehicles
112 - 113Information about foreign registered vehicles
114 - 118Supplementary provisions

Delegated Powers

6.  A table at the back of this document lists all of the provisions containing delegated powers in the Local Transport Bill and the relevant Parliamentary procedure governing each power.

Provisions for Delegated Powers

Clauses 1 to 6: The traffic commissioners

7.  These clauses amend sections 3 and 4 of and Schedule 2 to the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981 ("the PPVA 1981"). Some new provisions are also inserted. These provisions put the current administrative appointment of a senior traffic commissioner on a statutory footing. They also remove the requirement for a traffic commissioner to be appointed to a specific traffic area in England and Wales (so that he only has jurisdiction in that traffic area) to create greater flexibility for traffic commissioner deployment. The following clauses contain delegated powers.

Clause 1: traffic areas

8.  Section 3 of the PPVA 1981 provides, for the purposes of that Act, for Great Britain to be divided into eight traffic areas. Subsection (2) empowers the Secretary of State, by order, to vary the traffic areas, either by altering the limits of existing traffic areas, or by increasing or decreasing the number of traffic areas. Subsection (3) provides that an order for varying the traffic areas may contain such consequential and incidental provisions, including in particular respects, as appear to be necessary. Such orders are affirmative instruments: the instrument must be laid after making and cannot come into force unless and until it is approved by both Houses of Parliament. This power has been exercised (see the Traffic Areas (Reorganisation) Order 1990 (S.I. 1991/288 amended by S.I. 1991/634 and 1999/1204) and the Traffic Areas (Reorganisation) (Wales) Order 1999 (S.I. 1999/1204)).

9.  The purpose of clause 1, which inserts new subsections (2A) to (2C) into section 3 of the PPVA 1981, is to extend the existing power in subsection (2) so as to make such incidental, consequential, supplemental or transitional provisions, and such savings, as may be necessary or expedient in order to give full effect to any variation in the number or geographical limits of traffic areas. This includes a power to amend or modify any enactment, whenever passed or made, but only for the purposes of making such provisions or savings as prescribed in the new subsection (2A).

10.  There are currently no firm plans to amend the existing traffic areas. However, following on from some of the other changes that would be made by these clauses to increase flexibility within the traffic commissioner network, it is possible that the Secretary of State may wish to do so in the future. The reason for taking the additional power described in paragraph 9 is to ensure that if, as a result of amending the number or limits of the traffic areas, consequential changes were needed to other legislation to ensure that its application remained appropriate the Secretary of State would have the necessary powers.

11.  An example is section 5 of the PPVA 1981 under which, when a traffic commissioner publishes information which relates to a particular area, he is required to send copies to every chief officer of police whose area falls at least in part in that traffic area. Any enlargement of the traffic areas in England might, under strict application of this provision, lead to information being sent needlessly to certain chief officers of police. The provision might, therefore, need to be amended in consequence. The Department believes it is appropriate that such orders, in tandem with any exercise of the power to amend the traffic areas, should be affirmative instruments.

12.  The justification for taking such a wide power is that it needs to be capable of being exercised at any time in the future, and therefore to amend or modify any enactments which are in force at that time, including enactments passed or made after this one. This is necessary so as to enable an order made at any time in the future to make such amendments as may be necessary to ensure an efficient and effective move to a different number of traffic areas.

13.  As this provision amends the existing order making power, and is limited so that it could only be used in conjunction with an order under section 3(2) of the PPVA 1981 to amend the existing traffic areas, such amendments would be subject to the parliamentary procedure described in paragraph 8 above.

Clause 2: Traffic commissioners

14.  Clause 2 amends section 4 of the PPVA 1981. That section currently provides for the Secretary of State to appoint a traffic commissioner for each traffic area (designated by virtue of section 3 of the PPVA 1981), and describes the functions of a traffic commissioner. It also requires traffic commissioners to act under the general directions of the Secretary of State.

15.  The amendments to section 4 of the PPVA 1981 made by clause 2 would replace the requirement for there to be a traffic commissioner for each area. The Secretary of State would instead have the power to appoint such number of traffic commissioners for England and Wales as the Secretary of State may consider appropriate, and one single commissioner for the Scottish Traffic Area. These provisions also describe the jurisdiction of traffic commissioners. In particular, the current restriction which prevents traffic commissioners from exercising their functions outside the traffic area to which they are appointed is removed. Deployment of traffic commissioners is made a function of the senior traffic commissioner (see commentary on clause 3 below).

16.  The reason for delegating the power to determine the number of traffic commissioners to the Secretary of State is to increase flexibility within the traffic commissioner network, and to reflect the new functions which would be granted to traffic commissioners through this Bill. The effect of other provisions in this Bill would be to give traffic commissioners a more prominent role in monitoring bus performance and in taking action to tackle poor punctuality. Traffic commissioners would also have new functions including the determination of applications for quality contracts schemes, and applications to register services in areas where quality partnership and quality contracts schemes were in place. Limiting the jurisdiction of traffic commissioners to one traffic area can hinder the effective performance both of these, and the existing functions of the traffic commissioners in respect of buses and goods vehicles. It is also possible that the Secretary of State might want to appoint a traffic commissioner to focus predominantly on bus punctuality across a wider area. This would not be an option under the current jurisdictional arrangements.

Clause 3: The senior traffic commissioner

17.  Traffic commissioners are appointed by the Secretary of State under section 4 of the PPVA 1981 (as would be amended by clause 2), with further provisions relating to terms of service set out in Schedule 2 to that Act (as would be amended by clause 4). Traffic commissioners have a range of functions, including granting licenses to the operators of public service vehicles and goods vehicles, and the registration of local bus services. Traffic commissioners also have powers, in prescribed circumstances, to attach conditions to operators' licences, or to impose sanctions.

18.  The Secretary of State currently appoints one of the traffic commissioners to be the senior traffic commissioner. This is an administrative appointment. Clause 4 inserts new sections 4A to 4C into the PPVA 1981 to put the role of the senior traffic commissioner on a statutory footing and to prescribe his powers.

19.  New section 4B would confer power on the senior traffic commissioner to require traffic commissioners to act in such matters and in such places as the senior traffic commissioner may require. (Currently it is for the Secretary of State to deploy traffic commissioners to a particular traffic area, and to give them general directions.) In respect of the traffic commissioner for the Scottish Traffic Area (and deputy traffic commissioners for that area) this new power only applies to reserved matters within the meaning of the Scotland Act 1998. This power, coupled with the wider jurisdiction for traffic commissioners (see paragraphs 14 to 16 above) would provide greater flexibility in relation to the exercise of the traffic commissioners' functions. In particular, it would allow the senior traffic commissioner to determine the most efficient and effective distribution of work between the individual traffic commissioners, taking account of the prevailing circumstances. The Department's view is that it is appropriate to grant such powers to the senior traffic commissioner, who has first hand knowledge of the work to be done and is in a stronger position to identify particular areas of need. The most effective way to distribute casework may vary from time to time and this more flexible approach is expected to deliver greater efficiency in responding to changing circumstances and pressures.

20.  New section 4C would confer power on the senior traffic commissioner to give guidance or general directions to the traffic commissioners as to the carrying out of their functions under any enactment. Whilst this clause applies in Scotland, the senior traffic commissioner can only give guidance or directions to the traffic commissioner for the Scottish Traffic Area in respect of the exercise of functions that relate to reserved matters.

21.  Subsections (2) and (3) of new section 4C of the PPVA 1981 set out the matters which may be included in general directions and guidance given by the senior traffic commissioner. Matters on which guidance may be given include the meaning and operation of any enactment or instrument relevant to the functions of the traffic commissioners, circumstances relating to the imposition of sanctions or penalties, and matters which should or should not be taken into account when exercising particular functions. The matters on which directions may be given include the delegation of functions to administrative staff, requests for information in connection with the exercising of functions, the publication of decisions, the procedure to be adopted when conducting inquiries, or circumstances in which a traffic commissioner should consult other traffic commissioners before exercising particular functions.

22.  Subsection (4) places an obligation on the senior traffic commissioner to consult certain persons before giving directions and guidance.

23.  Section 4(4)(a) of the PPVA 1981 and section 1(2) of the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995 currently provide for traffic commissioners to act under general directions of the Secretary of State. These provisions are amended to require traffic commissioners to act under the general directions of, and to have regard to any guidance given by, the senior traffic commissioner. The existing power for the Secretary of State to give general directions to the traffic commissioners is replaced by a power to give guidance to the senior traffic commissioner as to the exercise of his functions. The senior traffic commissioner must have regard to such guidance.

24.  The effect of these provisions is to delegate a number of functions to the senior traffic commissioner. The traffic commissioners, although appointed by the Secretary of State, are independent of government. These provisions enhance that independence by replacing the current power for the Secretary of State to give general directions to traffic commissioners with a power to give guidance to the senior traffic commissioner. It is then for the senior traffic commissioner (who must be a traffic commissioner) to direct and guide traffic commissioners as to the exercise of their functions. The new power for the senior traffic commissioner to deploy the traffic commissioners to such places and to carry out such functions as may be required by the senior traffic commissioner also increases effectiveness and administrative flexibility.

Clause 4: amendments of Schedule 2 to the PPVA 1981

25.  Clause 4 amends Schedule 2 to the PPVA 1981. In particular it amends the power to appoint deputy traffic commissioners in England and Wales to reflect the changes to the appointment of traffic commissioners. Currently, the Secretary of State can appoint deputy traffic commissioners where a traffic commissioner is unable to carry out their duties, or where more capacity is needed. The amended provisions would empower the Secretary of State to appoint such number of deputy traffic commissioners for England and Wales as may be determined. Such deputies would have jurisdiction throughout England and Wales and in respect of reserved matters within the Scottish Traffic Area. The appointment and terms of office of deputy traffic commissioners in the Scottish Traffic Area are not affected by these amendments.

26.  The reasons for these amendments are in line with those set out in paragraph 16 above.

Clause 6: Consequential amendments

27.  The functions of traffic commissioners are set out in various Acts of Parliament. In most cases the granting of the power to exercise those functions is linked to the traffic area to which a traffic commissioner is appointed. Following on from the amendments described in paragraphs 14 to 16 above, it will be necessary to amend all these references to reflect the new jurisdiction of the traffic commissioners.

28.  Clause 6 empowers the Secretary of State, by order, to make such provision as may be considered necessary or expedient to give full effect to the amendments to the PPVA 1981 contained in clauses 1 to 5. This includes a power to amend or modify any enactment, whenever passed or made, but this power is limited only to giving effect to the new provisions. The justification for taking such a wide power is as set out in paragraph 12 above.

29.  The Government considers that the amendments needed to give full effect to these provisions are too numerous and detailed to include on the face of the Bill. It is therefore proposed to make the necessary amendments in secondary legislation at the appropriate time.

30.  Orders made under this provision would be subject to the affirmative resolution procedure.

Clauses 12 to 17: Quality partnership schemes

31.  A quality partnership scheme is a scheme made by a local transport authority under which that authority provides particular facilities at specific locations along the routes used by local bus services, and operators of local services who wish to use those facilities agree to provide services of a particular standard. The current statutory provisions are contained in sections 114 - 123 of the TA 2000. Before making such a scheme, the local authority must be satisfied that it will improve the quality of local services, or reduce or limit traffic congestion, noise or air pollution.

32.  Clauses 12 to 17 amend these provisions in three main areas. First, clause 12(4) would insert new subsections (3A) to (3D) into section 114 of the TA 2000. The effect of these amendments would be to enable local authorities to impose restrictions on the registration of local services in the area of a quality partnership scheme. (Before starting to provide a local service, the operator must register details of that service with the traffic commissioner). Such restrictions would have to be specified in the scheme, and there would be an obligation on local authorities to consult on the proposed restrictions - see the amendment to section 115 of the TA 2000 contained in clause 13. It would also be a requirement for the scheme to specify the criteria against which traffic commissioners would exercise discretion as to whether or not to accept an application to register a service in that area. Such restrictions could only be imposed where the local authority considered that the provision of additional local services in the area of a scheme may be detrimental to the provision of services under that scheme.

33.  Secondly, the effect of the amendments contained in clause 12(5) to (7) would be to extend the potential scope of schemes to include requirements relating to the frequency and timings of services, and the maximum fares which may be charged. The inclusion of such provisions would only be permitted where no "admissible objections" had been received from relevant bus operators about the inclusion of such requirements (for more details see paragraphs 35 to 38 below).

34.  Finally, the amendments provide for the phased implementation of quality partnership schemes and the ability to postpone any part of a scheme rather than, as now, just the whole of it.

Clause 17: regulations about schemes which specify frequencies, timings or fares

35.  Clause 17 would amend and insert new provisions into section 122 of the TA 2000 (regulations about schemes). The effect would be to provide a new power for the appropriate national authority (the Secretary of State in England, or the Welsh Ministers in Wales) to make regulations to prescribe the content or operation of schemes which include requirements relating to the frequency and timing of services, and the maximum fares which may be charged (see paragraph 32 above for details).

36.  New section 114(3) to (5), as would be inserted by clause 17(3), sets out the matters which may be included in regulations in respect of the inclusion of requirements as to frequencies, timings and maximum fares in a scheme. In particular, such regulations could define "admissible objections" and "relevant operator" for these purposes and prescribe the procedure for making a determination as to whether a particular objection by a particular person is admissible. Regulations could also prescribe the procedure for setting requirements as to frequencies, timings and maximum fares, and provide for such requirements to be reviewed and revised at regular intervals.

37.  There are two main reasons for using regulations to prescribe such matters, rather than doing so on the face of the primary legislation. First, these are detailed procedural matters which are better suited to secondary legislation. Secondly, there is at present virtually no practical experience of the operation of quality partnership schemes and, given that frequencies, timings and maximum fares cannot currently be included in schemes, no experience of the inclusion of such requirements. Taking powers to prescribe such matters in secondary legislation will provide greater flexibility in the future to adapt the procedures in the light of experience, without the need to amend primary legislation. These regulations, in common with other regulations made under section 122, would be subject to the negative resolution procedure.

38.  The existing powers for the appropriate national authority to make regulations about quality partnership schemes (section 122 of the TA 2000), and section 123 of the TA 2000, which empowers the appropriate national authority to issue guidance to authorities about the carrying out of their functions in respect of quality partnership schemes, are not amended by this Bill.

Clauses 18 to 39: Quality contracts schemes

39.  A quality contracts scheme is a scheme under which the local authority determines the local bus network for the area to which the scheme relates, and local bus services in that area can only be provided under quality contracts entered into by the local authority and bus operators. The local authority can exclude certain local services, or classes of services, from the scheme. The existing provisions are to be found in sections 124 - 134 of the TA 2000.

40.  Under the existing provisions a local authority, in proposing a scheme, must be satisfied that a quality contracts scheme is the "only practicable way" to implement the policies of the local transport authority as set out in its bus strategy (which must at present be produced by virtue of section 110 of the TA 2000). The scheme must then be submitted to the appropriate national authority for approval. The effect of clause 10 would be to remove the requirement for local transport areas to produce bus strategies. The new provisions on quality contracts schemes therefore require authorities to be satisfied that the scheme would contribute to the implementation of local transport policies, as defined in section 108 of the TA 2000 (as would be amended by clause 7).

41.  Clauses 18 to 39 make a number of amendments to, and insert a number of new provisions into, the existing legislation. In particular, the "only practicable way" test referred to in paragraph 40 above is replaced with a set of public interest criteria which the proposed scheme must satisfy.

42.  The approval role of the Secretary of State in relation to schemes in England is also removed, and proposed schemes must instead be submitted to an approvals board consisting of a traffic commissioner and two other members. Appeals against decisions of the approvals board would fall to be determined by the Transport Tribunal. Schemes in Wales would continue, as now, to be approved by the Welsh Ministers.

43.  The amendments also provide for the phased implementation of quality contracts schemes, so that different provisions would be able to come into operation on different dates.

Clause 20: Approval of proposed schemes

44.  Clause 20 would amend section 126 of the TA 2000 (approval of proposed schemes). The effect would be to replace the current requirement for schemes to be approved by the Secretary of State with a requirement for them to be approved by the appropriate approval authority. The appropriate approval authority in England would be the approvals board for England, and in Wales the Welsh Ministers. This is being done to strengthen the independence of decision making in relation to schemes. In particular, the Secretary of State considers it to be more appropriate for such judgments to be taken at arm's length from central government by an independent approvals body, with a specified right of appeal against the decisions of that body.

Clause 21: Approvals Boards for England

45.  Clause 21 inserts a new section 126A into the TA 2000 to provide for the approvals board for England. As described in paragraph 44 above, the current function of the Secretary of State to determine applications for approval of a quality contracts scheme is to be delegated to this board in respect of applications in England only. Applications for schemes in Wales will continue, as now, to be determined by the Welsh Ministers.

46.  It is important to ensure that the process for determining applications to make quality contracts schemes is fair, open and impartial. In ensuring that this is achieved, Ministers and officials at the Department for Transport can be inhibited from working with local authorities in the development of suitable schemes. The Government therefore wishes to delegate the function to an independent, transparent and impartial Board so as to free up Ministers and departmental officials to assist and advise on proposals for new schemes.

47.  New section 126A provides that each board will consist of three members - a traffic commissioner (who would chair the board) and two people drawn from a panel appointed by the Secretary of State for these purposes (and who would have relevant expertise, for example in matters such as transport planning and economics). The effect of subsections (4) and (5) is to provide for the senior traffic commissioner to designate as chair the traffic commissioner considered to be most appropriate in the circumstances of each case on the basis of local knowledge unless, in that traffic commissioner's opinion, his ability to act impartially is impaired. The structure of the board is designed to ensure that impartial and fair decisions are taken by a mix of people with the appropriate expertise and local knowledge.

48.  The Bill provides for appeals against decisions of an approvals board to be made to the Transport Tribunal (see new sections 126D and 126E inserted by clause 24). A further right of appeal on points of law lies to the Court of Appeal.

49.  The Welsh Ministers have decided that they wish to retain responsibility for making determinations about applications for the approval of quality contracts schemes rather than to delegate it to a separate board.

Clause 22: Practice and procedure of approvals boards for England

50.  This clause inserts a new section 126B into the TA 2000. It empowers the Secretary of State to prescribe in rules the practice and procedure to be followed by approvals boards for England, and for carrying into effect the powers and duties of any such boards.

51.  The provisions which may be made in such rules include the procedure for making applications to the board and for the acknowledgement of such applications, the procedure for notifying relevant parties that an application has been lodged, and the timescales within which such parties may make representations to the board.

52.  A power to made regulations to prescribe the timescale within which the Secretary of State would normally expect a board to reach a decision on any application to it is also provided. New section 126B(4) would place a duty on the approvals board to take all reasonable steps to reach its decision within the time prescribed. If it failed to do so, the Chair of the board would be required to prepare a statement for the Secretary of State and the local authority which has made the application for approval.

53.  The purpose of rules and regulations made under this provision is to ensure an approvals boards reaches its determination in a proper and timely fashion. This is important both for authorities seeking to make a scheme and for those operators who would be affected by it. As the matters to be covered are essentially procedural, they are best suited to secondary legislation. In addition, as the concept of an approvals board is a new one, flexibility to make further changes to the practice and procedure of boards in the light of experience will be valuable. These rules and regulations would be subject to the negative resolution procedure by virtue of amendments made to section 160 of the TA 2000 by clause 22(2) and (3). This is consistent with the procedure applied to the making of other procedural rules (for example rules made under Schedule 4 to the TA 1985 which prescribe the procedure and practice for the Transport Tribunal).

54.  New section 126B empowers the Secretary of State to issue guidance about the carrying out by a board of its functions under these provisions. The board would be required to have regard to any such guidance. This guidance is not subject to any parliamentary procedure.

Clause 23: Inquiries by approvals boards for England

55.  This clause inserts a new section 126C into the TA 2000. The clause applies where a local authority has made an application to the approvals board for England under section 126 of the TA 2000 for the approval of a proposed quality contracts scheme. Clause 21, which inserts a new section 126A into the TA 2000, sets out the structure and functions of the approvals board for England (see paragraphs 45 to 49 above).

56.  New section 126C empowers an approvals board for England to hold an inquiry where members of a board consider it to be necessary in order to make a determination on an application for approval of a quality contracts scheme. Such inquiries must be held in public, subject to any provision made by regulations (see below).

57.  The provisions in new section 126C are similar to the powers of the traffic commissioners, as set out in section 54 of the PPVA 1981, to hold inquiries in connection with the exercise of their functions. Section 54 of the PPVA 1981 empowers the Secretary of State to make regulations in connection with the holding of such inquiries (see the Public Service Vehicles (Traffic Commissioners: Publication and Inquiries) Regulations 1986, S.I. 1986/1629, amended by S.I. 1993/2754 and S.I. 2004/2682).

58.  New section 126C includes a power for the Secretary of State to make regulations in respect of the holding of inquiries by approvals boards for England. The provisions in the Bill about the approvals board will not apply in Wales, so there is no corresponding power for the Welsh Ministers to make such regulations.

59.  The powers in new section 126C enable the Secretary of State to make provisions as to:

  • the holding of inquiries in public (subsection (4));
  • the manner in which notice of an inquiry should be published (subsection (5));
  • the circumstances in which the board may make an order for costs to be paid to the Secretary of State by any such party to the inquiry as the board thinks fit (subsection (6));
  • the method of calculating costs to be paid under such an order and the maximum amount which may be ordered to be paid under such an order (subsection (7)); and
  • restricting admission to such an inquiry (subsection (8)).

60.  Regulations made under this provision would be subject to the negative resolution procedure (see section 160(2) of the TA 2000), consistent with the existing powers in section 54 of the PPVA 1981. Empowering the Secretary of State to make regulations about what are, essentially, procedural matters, increases the flexibility available to prescribe that procedure, and to vary it in the light of experience in the future. This would be particularly important in respect of the setting of a maximum costs award which may be determined by the approvals board.

Clause 25: Making of scheme

61.  Clause 25 contains mainly consequential amendments to section 127 of the TA 2000. Section 127 sets out procedural requirements in respect of the making of a quality contracts scheme, in particular the maximum period between the approval of a scheme (currently by the Secretary of State for schemes in England and the Welsh Ministers for schemes in Wales) and the making of it by the local authority, and the minimum period between the scheme being made and it coming into force. The section also prescribes that notice must be given by the local transport authority as to the making of a scheme within 14 days of it being made, the form of that notice, and what it must contain.

62.  Amendments to this section contained in clause 25 would provide that the date on which a scheme can be made in England must be deferred until any appeal under the sections inserted by clauses 21 to 24 has been disposed of. The clause makes the necessary amendments to enable different parts of a scheme to come into operation on different dates, consistent with other amendments made to provisions on quality contracts schemes.

63.  Section 127(10) of the TA 2000 currently empowers the appropriate national authority, by order, to vary the period prescribed in subsection 2(b) between the making of a scheme and it coming into operation. This period was amended in England by virtue of the TA 2000 (Commencement of Quality Contracts Schemes)(England) Order 2005, S.I. 2005/75.

64.  Subsection (10) of clause 24 substitutes the existing section 127(10) with a new provision. This enables the appropriate national authority to vary not only the period between the making and coming into operation of a scheme, but also the period between the final outcome of an appeal against a decision of an approvals board in England and the coming into operation of a scheme (see new subsection (1A) as inserted by clause 24(4)) and the maximum period specified in section 127(1) between the approval of a scheme and it being made.

65.  Orders made under section 127(10) of the TA 2000 will continue as now to be subject to the negative resolution procedure.

Clause 27: effect of scheme: different provisions taking effect on different dates

66.   Clause 27 makes consequential amendments to section 129 of the TA 2000 to reflect amendments to section 127 of that Act which would enable different parts of a scheme to come into effect on different dates (see clause 25).

67.  Section 129(4) of the TA 2000 prescribes the maximum period between the making of a quality contracts scheme and issuing invitations to tender for quality contracts. The prescribed period is three months or such other period as the appropriate national authority may by order specify.

68.  The Department for Transport and the Welsh Assembly Government have agreed that it is not necessary to set such a maximum period, and section 129(4) is therefore repealed by clause 27(4).

Clauses 29 to 32: continuation of a scheme

69.  The provisions relating to quality contracts schemes in the TA 2000 do not provide a mechanism to enable a scheme to be continued at the end of the maximum ten year period. Should a local authority wish to do so, it would have to make the scheme again, as if from new. Clauses 29 to 32 of this Bill insert new sections 131A to 131D into the TA 2000 setting out the circumstances in which a scheme may be continued, and the procedure to be followed. Before making a final determination as to whether to continue a scheme the local authority must publish a consultation document containing the information described in new section 131A(3) (see clause 29). Once a determination has been made it must, unless it is an exempt proposal (see clause 30 and new section 131B of the TA 2000) be submitted to the appropriate approval authority.

Clause 30: approval of continuation scheme

70.  Clause 30 inserts new section 131B into the TA 2000. Subsection (1) provides that section 126 of the TA 2000 (approval of scheme by appropriate approval authority) does not apply to a proposal to continue a scheme where that scheme is exempt but, in any other case, applies with the modifications set out in subsection (2).

71.  An exempt proposal is defined in subsection (5) as a proposal which either satisfies certain conditions (described in subsections (6) to (10)), or is made in circumstances prescribed in regulations made by the appropriate national authority. The conditions set out in the primary legislation are quite detailed, and are based around the premise that a proposal should only be exempt where it, in effect, continues the scheme much as originally made. A proposal which extended the area of the scheme, or which would affect the operation of previously 'unregulated' services (as defined in subsection (4)), would not be exempt, and would therefore need to be submitted for approval.

72.  The proposal to take a power to prescribe other circumstances in regulations is done so as to retain some flexibility for the appropriate national authority to prescribe additional circumstances if, in the light of experience, it is considered that other types of scheme may not require approval. Regulations made under this section would be subject to the negative resolution procedure.

73.  Clause 31 inserts a new section 131C into the TA 2000. This new section provides a right of appeal against a decision of the local authority either that a proposal is an exempt proposal, or that a scheme which is the subject of an exempt proposal should continue in force. The right of appeal lies to the Transport Tribunal with a further right of appeal on points of law to the Court of Appeal.

Clause 35: regulations about schemes

74.  Clause 35 amends section 133 of the TA 2000 (regulations about schemes). Under this section regulations may be made to prescribe a range of matters in connection with quality contracts schemes.

75.  The amendments in subsections (2) and (3)(a) and (c) of clause 35 are consequential to the provisions in clauses 29 to 32 of the Bill which set out the procedure to be followed when a local transport authority wants a quality contracts scheme to continue beyond the maximum ten year period. The provision in clause 35(3)(b) inserts a power to make regulations about the procedure for determining applications for approval of a quality contracts scheme.

76.  Regulations made under this section would continue, as now, to be subject to the negative resolution procedure.

Clause 36: Transitional provisions about schemes

77.  Clause 36 amends section 134 of the TA 2000 (transitional provision about schemes). The amendment contained in subsection (2) is consequential to changes proposed in the Bill which would enable the coming into effect of a quality contracts scheme to be phased in over a period of time, with different provisions taking effect at different times.

78.  Subsection (3) inserts a new provision into section 134(2), the effect of which is to enable regulations about transitional provisions to prescribe circumstances in which any provision of sections 89 to 92 of the TA 1985 (obligation to invite tenders) should not have effect, or should have effect with prescribed modifications. Regulations can already make similar provision in respect of sections 6 to 9 of the TA 1985 (registration of local services).

79.  The effect of a quality contracts scheme is that the local authority takes control of the local bus network and, with certain exceptions, suspends the operation of the free market for bus services in that area. The transition from an unregulated market to one operated under local authority control may, potentially, be complex. The purpose of the power in section 134 is to enable the appropriate national authority to prescribe circumstances in which the normal free market provisions would not operate, or would operate to a modified extent, in the period leading up to the coming into operation of the scheme.

80.  The reason for this is to try to maintain some form of stability in the provision of bus services during the transitional period. Many members of the public rely on bus services to carry out their daily tasks and it is in the public interest to ensure that the transition to a quality contracts scheme, which is intended to be of benefit to members of the public living or working in the area, does not inconvenience them. Taking the additional power described in clause 36(3) would enable, for example, modifications to be made to the normal procedure for inviting tenders to operate subsidised services where an operator needed to be found to run such services at short notice, or to carry on operating a subsidised service for longer than normal to cover a transitional period.

81.  Regulations made under this section would continue, as now, to be subject to the negative resolution procedure.

Clause 37: guidance about quality contracts schemes

82.  Clause 37 inserts a new section 134A into the TA 2000 to empower the appropriate national authority to issue guidance concerning performance by local transport authorities of their functions in relation to quality contracts schemes. Local transport authorities are required to have regard to any such guidance.

83.  No parliamentary procedure has been prescribed for this guidance, which will be made in consultation with local authorities and the industry. This is consistent with the approach taken in the existing section 123 of the TA 2000, which provides for the issuing of guidance about quality partnership schemes.

Clause 39: power to make traffic regulation orders

84.  Clause 39 amends section 1 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 ("the 1984 Act") (traffic regulation orders outside Greater London). This section empowers the traffic authority for a road outside Greater London (as defined in section 121A of the 1984 Act) to make traffic regulation orders where such an order may be expedient for one of a number of reasons. In particular, such orders may be made to prevent danger to members of the public, to prevent damage to the road or any building on or near the road, to restrict certain types of vehicle from using a particular road, or for preserving or improving the amenities of a particular area.

85.  Subsection (3A) of section 1 of the 1984 Act was inserted by the TA 2000. The purpose was to enable a local traffic authority (either a county council or a metropolitan district council) to make a traffic regulation order in respect of a road for which either the Secretary of State is, or the Welsh Ministers are, the traffic authority, provided the consent of the appropriate authority had been sought, where such an order was required for the provision of facilities pursuant to a quality partnership scheme under Part 2 of the TA 2000. The types of facilities in mind were designated bus lanes or other bus priority measures.

86.  The power was not made available to local traffic authorities where such an order might be required pursuant to a quality contracts scheme. The effect of the amendments in clause 39 is to extend the power delegated to local traffic authorities to make traffic regulation orders in respect of roads for which either the Secretary of State is, or the Welsh Ministers are, the traffic authority where such an order may be necessary in order to provide facilities pursuant to a quality contract or a quality contracts scheme.

Clause 41: Detention of certain PSVs used without PSV operators' licences

87.  The effect of clause 41, and Schedule 3 which it would give effect to, would be to enable a regime to be established whereby certain illegally operated public service vehicles could be detained, removed and disposed of. These are enabling powers, which would have no effect until the appropriate regulations were in place.

88.  Schedule 3 to this Bill inserts a new Schedule 2A into the PPVA 1981 setting out the details of the provisions which may be made in regulations. These are very similar to the provisions in Schedule 1A to the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995, which empowered the Secretary of State to make regulations to provide for goods vehicles and their contents to be detained when operated in contravention of the licensing requirements. Regulations were made under this provision in 2001 (see the Goods Vehicles (Enforcement Powers) Regulations 2001 - S.I. 2001/3981).

89.  The powers in new Schedule 2A to the PPVA 1981 (as would be inserted by these provisions) would enable regulations to be made about the detention of property, and the mechanism for such property to be returned to its rightful owner. Regulations must also make provision requiring arrangements to be made to ensure that passengers travelling on a detained vehicle are transported in safety either to their destination or to a suitable place from which to continue their journey. Any regulations made by virtue of this Schedule would have to include provisions under which the owner of a detained vehicle could apply to the traffic commissioner for the return of that vehicle, and provide a right of appeal to the Transport Tribunal against such decisions of the traffic commissioner.

90.  The reason for taking a power to establish this regime in secondary legislation is because these are, essentially, detailed procedural matters. The framework of the regulations is set out in the primary legislation in some detail, and identifies certain provisions which must be included if the regulation making power is exercised. In addition, where criminal offences could be created, the primary legislation is specific about the maximum penalty which could be imposed.

91.  By virtue of section 61(1) of the PPVA 1981, regulations made under this Schedule would be subject to the negative resolution procedure. This is consistent with the power to make regulations to establish a similar scheme for goods vehicles in the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995 (see section 57(11) of that Act).

Clause 42: applications for registration where restrictions in force

92.  Clause 42 inserts new sections 6(2A) and 6A into the TA 1985. The new section 6A applies where restrictions have been imposed on the registration of local services as part of a quality partnership scheme. An operator of public service vehicles who wants to provide local bus services must register details of the proposed service with the traffic commissioner. Under normal circumstances, the traffic commissioner has no discretion to modify or refuse the application, although powers of enforcement are available if the operator fails to provide the service in accordance with the registered particulars.

93.  Clause 12 inserts new provisions into section 114 of the TA 2000 under which a local authority could impose restrictions on the registration of local services in an area in which a quality partnership scheme is in place where it is considered that such registrations could be detrimental to the scheme (see paragraph 32 above). In such cases, the traffic commissioner is to be granted discretion to refuse or modify such an application, in accordance with criteria specified by the local authority in the scheme.

94.  The reason for including this provision is to enable the traffic commissioner to exert some control over the registration of services which, if operated in the way proposed, could be detrimental to services provided under the scheme. A quality partnership scheme can only be made where it is in the public interest. If additional services are operated within the area of a scheme which might undermine it, the result may be that the scheme fails and the public would lose the benefits of the improved bus service. The traffic commissioner, working on the basis of the registration criteria specified by the local authority, is best placed to determine whether or not the operation of additional services might be detrimental to the scheme. The provisions provide a right of appeal to the Transport Tribunal against decisions of the traffic commissioners on this matter.

95.  New section 6A of the TA 1985 describes the procedure to be followed by the traffic commissioner in such circumstances. The primary legislation sets out, among other things, the circumstances in which the traffic commissioner may accept the application, the steps which must be taken by the traffic commissioner if representations are received from those notified about the application, and the options available to the traffic commissioner if his determination is that an application would be detrimental to the provision of services under a quality contracts scheme.

96.  New section 6A(11) empowers the Secretary of State, and the Welsh Ministers, to make regulations to set out some of the procedural detail e.g. the procedure which the traffic commissioner must adopt in giving notice to relevant local authorities and operators, the details which must be included in an application to register a service in these circumstances, and the procedure to be followed in determining the application.

97.  The matters which may be prescribed in regulations are detailed procedural matters best suited to secondary legislation. The effect of sections 134 and 135 of the TA 1985 is to apply sections 60 (general power to make regulations for purposes of Act) and 61 (exercise of regulation making powers and parliamentary control thereof) of the PPVA 1981 to regulations made under Parts 1 and 2 of the TA 1985 (this provision would be inserted into Part 1 of the TA 1985). This power is therefore exercisable by statutory instrument subject to the negative resolution procedure.

Clause 43: applications for registration where quality contracts scheme in force

98.  Clause 43 inserts new sections 6(2B) and 6B into the TA 1985. The effect is to provide for new section 6B to apply where an operator seeks to register a local service with the traffic commissioner in an area within which a quality contracts scheme is in force (see paragraphs 39 to 43 above for more information about quality contracts schemes). Section 129(1) of the TA 2000 provides that, where a quality contracts scheme is in place, no local services can be registered with the traffic commissioner (unless excepted by the scheme) and local services can only be operated under a quality contract.

99.  The effect of this new provision is to ensure that an application to register a local service can be accepted by the traffic commissioner but only where the local authority has certified that the proposed service would not have an adverse effect on services provided under quality contracts. The effect of subsection (5) is to enable the Secretary of State to prescribe the time within which the service must be registered, if the traffic commissioner receives the appropriate certification from the local authority,.

100.  The setting of an appropriate timescale is best left to secondary legislation following consultation with traffic commissioners and other interested parties. For the reasons described in paragraph 97 above, regulations made under this provision would be subject to the negative resolution procedure.

Clause 44: Traffic regulation conditions for anticipated traffic problems

101.  Section 7 of the TA 1985 empowers a traffic commissioner, on receipt of a request from a traffic authority, to make traffic regulation conditions which must be met in the provision of local bus services. Such a request can only be submitted "in relation to a particular traffic problem", and the traffic commissioner can only impose a condition where satisfied that it is required in order to prevent danger to road users, reduce severe traffic congestion, or reduce or limit noise or air pollution.

102.  Clause 44 amends section 7 of the TA 1985 to enable a request to be made to the traffic commissioner in cases where the traffic authority can reasonably foresee that a particular traffic problem is likely to arise. The purpose of this amendment is to enable appropriate action to be taken in anticipation of a problem, rather than having to wait until it has actually arisen. An example might be where there is particularly aggressive competition between bus operators on an already busy bus route leading to a large increase in the number of registered services, and increased congestion. The traffic authority might become aware of a potential problem when applications are made to register new services. This amendment would enable the authority to take appropriate action in such circumstances.

Clause 45: Transport Tribunal to decide appeals against traffic regulation conditions

103.  Clause 45 amends section 9 of the TA 1985. This section currently provides a right of appeal to the Secretary of State against traffic regulation conditions imposed by a traffic commissioner under section 7 of that Act. The effect of the amendments in clause 45 is to transfer that responsibility to the Transport Tribunal. This is consistent with the appeal process in respect of other decisions of traffic commissioners.

104.  Under section 9(3) of the TA 1985 the Secretary of State was empowered to make regulations prescribing the time and manner in which appeals under that section must be made, and the procedure to be followed. However Schedule 4 to the TA 1985, which sets out the constitution, powers and proceedings of the Transport Tribunal, empowers the Lord Chancellor to make general rules governing the procedure and practice of the Transport Tribunal (see the Transport Tribunal Rules 2000, S.I. 2000/3226, as amended by S.I. 2001/4041 and S.I. 2002/643).

105.  The effect of the amendments made by clause 45 is to render the power in section 9(3) otiose. It is therefore repealed.

Clauses 46 and 47: use of private hire vehicles to provide local services

106.  These clauses amend sections 12 and 13 of the TA 1985, and insert a new section 13A. Sections 12 and 13 currently enable holders of a taxi licence to apply to the traffic commissioner for a restricted Public Services Vehicles ("PSV") operator's licence (granted under section 12 of the PPVA 1981). Such a licence entitles the operator to use taxis to run local bus services.

107.  The purpose of the amendments in these clauses is to extend this ability to the holders of private hire vehicle ("PHV") licences, thus enabling the holders of such licences to use PHVs to provide local bus services. For these purposes, a "private hire vehicle licence" is defined as a licence granted under section 48 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976. This excludes licences granted in the Greater London area (which are defined under separate legislation).

108.  Section 12(9) of the TA 1985 contains a power for the Secretary of State to prescribe certain matters in regulations, for example the documents, plates and marks which must be carried by a taxi when it is being used to provide local bus services. Under subsection (10), the Secretary of State is empowered to prescribe those provisions in the taxi code (defined in section 13(3) of the TA 1985) which apply to a taxi when it is being used to provide local bus services.

109.  Clause 46(6) extends the application of section 12(9) of the TA 1985 to licensed hire cars which are being used to provide local bus services. Clause 46(7) extends the power in section 12(10) of the 1985 Act to enable regulations to prescribe provisions in the hire car code (defined in section 13(3)) of the TA 1985) which should apply when a PHV is being used to provide local bus services.

110.  By virtue of the definition of "private hire vehicle licence" (see paragraph 107 above) these provisions will not apply in Greater London until such time as Transport for London provides for them to do so. Clause 47 inserts a new section 13A into the TA 1985 to provide that Transport for London may, by order, provide that section 12 of the TA is also to apply to vehicles licensed under section 7 of the Private Hire Vehicles (London) Act 1998 (London PHV licences).

111.  Clause 47 also amends section 13 of the TA 1985 to devolve to Transport for London the power to modify, by order, the taxi code and hire car code as it applies to taxis and private hire cars in London. Transport for London already has powers to make regulations in relation to taxis and private hire cars in London. Delegating the power to modify the codes which apply to the use of such vehicles in London is therefore consistent with this.

112.  Orders made by the Secretary of State under this section will continue, as now, to be subject to the negative resolution procedure. The regulations will be relatively technical in nature and subject to full consultation with the industry.

113.  Orders made by Transport for London will not be subject to any parliamentary procedure. This is consistent with the existing powers of Transport for London to make regulations relating to taxis and private hire vehicles in London (see section 9 of the Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869 and section 32 of the Private Hire Vehicles (London) Act 1998 as amended by the Greater London Authority Act 1999).

114.  However, new section 13A(2) of the TA 1985 would require Transport for London to consult such representative organisations as it thinks fit before either extending the provisions in section 12 to private hire vehicles in London, or modifying the taxi or hire car code. Transport for London would also be required to print and publish any orders made under these provisions (see new section 13A(6) inserted by clause 47(8)).

Clauses 48 to 52: vehicles used under permits

115.  The effect of sections 19 to 23 of the TA 1985 is to enable certain voluntary bodies to operate PSVs without the requisite operator's licence. These clauses amend these provisions, and also insert a new section 23A into the TA 1985. The purpose is to remove some of the current restrictions as to the types of vehicles which may be used under these permits, and the circumstances in which they may be used. The amendments would also enable a system to be established under which permits would be time-limited (they currently have no expiry date) and to impose requirements as to the keeping of records in relation to such permits.

116.  Section 19(7) already contains a power for the Secretary of State to designate, by order, certain bodies eligible to grant permits under section 19 of the TA 1985. Clause 48(6) would amend paragraph (c) of that subsection so as to empower the Secretary of State, in such an order, to require designated bodies to keep records with regard to the permits granted, varied or revoked by that body. The current provision only requires the designated bodies to "make returns" in respect of permits granted by it. The purpose of this amendment is to improve the information available about bodies holding such permits. By virtue of section 135 of the TA 1985, orders made under this section are subject to the negative resolution procedure.

117.  Clause 51 would insert a new section 23A into the TA 1985 which would empower the Secretary of State to require permits issues after a specified date to be time limited (up to a maximum of five years). Regulations under subsection (2) of this clause could set a date in the future after which all non-time limited permits not surrendered to the body which issued them would be automatically revoked. Permits surrendered to the issuing bodies would, provided applicants continued to be eligible for the grant of such a permit, be re-issued for a period not exceeding five years. Such permits would be renewable at the end of that period.

118.  The effect of a grant of a permit under the existing provisions is to enable certain bodies who provide community services to operate particular type of public service vehicle without an operator's licence. This is important in enabling community groups to provide much needed services to those who might not otherwise have access to transport. It is also, however, important to ensure that proper records are maintained about those who hold permits, and for such permits to be renewed on a regular basis so as to ensure that those who hold them remain entitled to do so, and that they are providing services within the prescribed statutory restrictions.

119.  Regulations made under new section 23A, or clause 51(2), would be subject to the negative resolution procedure. This is consistent with the power to make orders under section 19(7), as described in paragraph 116 above.

Clause 54: powers of traffic commissioners where services not operated as registered

120.  Clause 54 inserts new sections 27A and 27B into the TA 1985. The purpose of these sections is to confer new powers on the traffic commissioners, enabling them to take appropriate steps where they consider that action taken, or not taken, by a local authority might have affected bus punctuality.

121.  New clause 27A(2) confers on the traffic commissioners a power to direct a local authority to provide information connected with the performance of its network management duty under section 16 or 17 of the Traffic Management Act 2004. The traffic commissioner may also require the local authority to attend any inquiry held in connection with deciding whether enforcement action should be taken against an operator. Where the traffic commissioner identifies any remedial measures which could be taken by either the operator or the local traffic authority, he may prepare a report recommending appropriate measures.

122.  New clause 27B supplements the provisions in new clause 27A(2) in respect of the power of the traffic commissioner to direct.

123.  One of the purposes of measures contained in the Local Transport Bill is to facilitate improvements in the provision of local bus services and to improve patronage. Punctuality is extremely important both for existing passengers, and in encouraging more people to travel by bus, and the traffic commissioners have an important part to play in taking appropriate enforcement action against operators who repeatedly fail to operate services in accordance with registered particulars.

124.  However, poor punctuality may not only be down to the bus operator. Actions either taken, or not taken, by a local authority may also play a part. The purpose of these provisions is to enable traffic commissioners, as part of their investigation of poor performance by an operator, to ask for and obtain relevant information about the role of the local authority in any operational problem. This will better equip the traffic commissioner either to make recommendations as to how performance might be improved, or to take appropriate enforcement action.

125.  As the traffic commissioners are already responsible for taking enforcement action against operators, it is appropriate that they should also have the power to require local authorities to provide the information needed to determine the appropriate way forward.

Clause 55: Additional sanctions for failures by bus operators

126.  Section 155 of the TA 2000 already empowers traffic commissioners to impose financial penalties on bus operators in certain circumstances (e.g. failing to operate a service as registered, or operating a service in contravention of a quality partnership or quality contracts scheme). The maximum penalty which may be imposed is £550 per licensed vehicle operated by the operator, or such other amount as the Secretary of State or the Welsh Ministers may by order specify.

127.  Clause 55 amends section 155 to provide traffic commissioners with a range of options as to the sanctions that may be imposed. As well as a financial penalty, the traffic commissioner could require the operator to invest in improvements to the service, or to compensate passengers for poor performance. Where an order to invest money or pay compensation is made, and the operator fails to comply, a higher financial penalty may be imposed.

128.  The purpose of this amendment is to enable sanctions to be imposed in such a way as to bring direct benefits to passengers, through investment in the services or provision of compensation, rather than just imposing a financial penalty. Traffic commissioners already have powers of enforcement over bus operators, and are therefore the appropriate officers to have these new powers.

Clause 56: operational data

129.  Clause 56(3) would insert a new subsection (9)(ka) into section 6 of the TA 1985 to enable regulations made under that section to impose restrictions on the use of information made available to traffic commissioners or other persons. This is to ensure that any confidential information provided by bus operators can be given appropriate protection.

130.  The power to make regulations under section 6(9)(i) to (k) of the TA 1985, which could be used to require operators to keep certain records and pass them to traffic commissioners and other persons as required, have not yet been exercised (although other regulations have been made under this section). The Department is working with bus operators and local authorities to improve punctuality and, as a result, it is likely that regulations will be made under these particular provisions. Where confidential information is supplied, it is important to ensure that it is subject to appropriate protection.

131.  Clause 56(4) inserts a new subsection (10) into section 6 of the TA 1985 to enable regulations made under the new power in paragraph (ka) to create criminal offences for a breach of any restrictions on the use of information. The maximum penalties are prescribed in that provision.

132.  Regulations made under these new provisions will be subject to the negative resolution procedure, consistent with other regulations made under section 6 of the TA 1985.

Clause 57: revival of certain powers

133.  Orders made under section 60(5) of the TA 1985 disapplied, amongst other things, the power in section 10(1)(viii) of the Transport Act 1968 ("the TA 1968") for Passenger Transport Executives ("PTEs") to let passenger vehicles to bus operators on hire.

134.  There are circumstances in which the Department considers that it would be appropriate for PTEs to have such a power (it was never disapplied in respect of other local authorities) in particular where, by leasing a vehicle to an operator, they can ensure that the service is provided to a higher standard. The effect of clause 57 is to replace the power in section 10(1)(viii) of the TA 1968 with a power which would only apply where a service is being provided under a contract (either a subsidised service contract or a quality contract). Subsection (4) provides that orders made under section 60(5) of the TA 1985 are to cease to have effect to the extent that they prevent PTEs from using the power under section 10(1)(viii) of the TA 1985.

Clause 64: Public Transport Users' Committee for England

135.  Clause 64 would insert new sections 125A and 125B into the TA 1985. The approach set out in these provisions is modelled closely on the powers conferred on the Welsh Ministers in the Transport (Wales) Act 2006 (see sections 8 and 9 of that Act).

136.  New section 125A would empower the Secretary of State, by order, to establish a body corporate to be known as the Public Transport Users' Committee for England. An order made under this power could include provision about the status and membership of the Committee, the proceedings of the Committee, and other matters such as staffing and financial arrangements.

137.  New section 125B provides that the Committee may consider and make recommendations to the Secretary of State about matters relating to public passenger transport services or facilities in England. The provision would enable the Secretary of State to limit the remit of the Committee to such services or facilities of a prescribed description (e.g. local bus services). The Committee would be under an obligation to consider and make recommendations to the Secretary of State about any matter where requested to do so.

138.  The Secretary of State would have power to change or remove any functions of the Committee or to confer new functions on it, or to transfer functions of the Committee to another person.

139.  Orders under these new sections would be subject to the affirmative resolution procedure.

Clause 65: Power to confer non-rail functions on the Rail Passengers' Council

140.  Clause 65 would insert a new section 19A into the Railways Act 2005. This new section would empower the Secretary of State to confer additional functions on the Rail Passengers' Council (established under section 19 of that Act) so as to extend its remit to local services of a prescribed description and prescribed domestic coach services to the extent that they operate in England.

141.  Orders made under this section would be subject to the affirmative resolution procedure.

142.  This power is being taken as alternative to the powers in clause 64 to establish a Public Transport Users' Committee. Many commentators have argued for a statutory body to be established to represent the interests of bus passengers, but there is much less consensus about how that might best be achieved. The Secretary of State will consult on the establishment of a body to represent the users of public transport. Rail passengers have such a body in the form of the Rail Passengers' Council, and one option might be to broaden the remit of that Council. An alternative would be to establish a new Public Transport Users' Committee, and perhaps to limit that body's remit to local buses and domestic coach services.

143.  The powers which would be taken in clauses 64 and 65 are necessary in order to preserve options for the Secretary of State in developing proposals in the light of consultation, which would then be subject to Parliamentary scrutiny under the affirmative resolution procedure.

Clause 67: Power to establish a new ITA

Clauses 72, 77 and 78: Powers to amend constitutional arrangements of existing ITAs, to change the boundaries of ITAs and to dissolve ITAs

Clause 80: Power to make incidental etc. provision

144.   Clause 67 gives the Secretary of State power by order to establish a new Integrated Transport Authority ("ITA"). Exercise of the power is subject to the requirements set out in subsections (2) to (12), including the following:

  • a scheme has been prepared and published by any two or more authorities under clause 68 or 69 (or a direction has been given for them to do so under clause 69 but a scheme has not been published),
  • the Secretary of State, having had regard to that scheme, considers that the establishment of the ITA is likely to improve both the exercise of statutory transport functions in the area of the proposed ITA and the effectiveness and efficiency of transport within that area (subsection (2)),
  • the area to be included within the ITA complies with the requirements of subsections (4) to (6),
  • the Secretary of State has consulted as described in subsections (10) and (11),
  • the Secretary of State has had regard to the need to reflect the identities and interests of local communities and to secure effective and convenient local government.

145.  Clauses 72, 77 and 78 give power to the Secretary of State:

  • to change the constitutional arrangements of an existing ITA,
  • to change the boundaries of an ITA, and
  • to dissolve an ITA.

146.  Exercise of the powers in clauses 72, 77 and 78 is subject to the requirements set out in clause [79], including the following:

  • a scheme for statutory changes in an area has been prepared and published by one or more local authorities or ITAs, or a direction has been given for them to do so but a scheme has not been published,
  • the Secretary of State has had regard to any such scheme,
  • the Secretary of State considers that the making of the Order is likely to improve the exercise of statutory transport functions in the area to which the Order relates or is likely to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of transport within that area,
  • the Secretary of State has consulted the persons described in subsection (4), and
  • the Secretary of State has had regard to the need to reflect the identities and interests of local communities and to secure effective and convenient local government.

147.  In addition:

  • the Secretary of State may make an order providing for the dissolution of an ITA only where a majority of the county councils, unitary councils and district councils in the area of the ITA have given their consent (clause 79(6) and (7)),
  • the Secretary of State may make an order changing the boundary of an ITA only where each of the councils described in clause 79(8) to (10) have given their consent.

148.  The purpose of the powers in clauses 67, 72, 77 and 78 is to enable the arrangements made in each area for the exercise of statutory transport functions to reflect the needs of that area. The Government is committed to ensuring that the structures in place in each area reflect what works best for them, rather than a "one size fits all" approach imposed from the centre. There also needs to be the necessary flexibility to allow change to be introduced as and when it is needed for each area. This may mean new arrangements being introduced in different areas at different times, as the needs of different areas evolve and develop.

149.  Clause 80 gives the Secretary of State power to make incidental etc provision for the purposes of orders under clauses 67, 72, 77 and 78, including a power to amend, repeal or revoke any enactment. The substance of clause 80 is based on provisions in sections 19, 20, 22 and 26 of the Local Government Act 1992 regarding structural and boundary changes to local government areas. Clause 80(3)(a), which enables the creation or imposition of new rights or liabilities in respect of anything transferred by or under an order, is precedented in section 100(2) of the Local Government Act 1985 and Schedule 3, paragraph 4 of the Regional Development Agencies Act 1998.

150.  Clause 81 provides that orders under any of these clauses are statutory instruments and subject to affirmative resolution in each House of Parliament. This is the same procedure as is provided for in section 26(2) of the Local Government Act 1992 in relation to structural changes to local authorities.

Clause 73 Delegation of functions of the Secretary of State to an ITA

Clause 74 Delegation of local authority functions to an ITA

Clause 75 Conferral of a power to direct on an ITA

151.  Clause 73 enables the Secretary of State by order to delegate to an ITA or its successor local authority any function of a Secretary of State, other than a legislative or fee-raising function, which is considered can be appropriately exercised by that ITA or local authority. The intention is that this power will be exercised on a case by case basis, according to what is appropriate in any particular circumstance. For instance, it might be the case that the Secretary of State will delegate to an ITA his functions as highway authority or traffic authority for a particular length of trunk road, where this provides a better fit with the management of the local road network. It is expected that the exercise of this power will depend on local circumstances, and may need to alter as circumstances change.

152.  Clause 74 enables the Secretary of State by order to delegate to an ITA or its successor local authority any function of a local authority which is exercisable in relation to the ITA's area and which the Secretary of State considers can appropriately be exercised by the ITA or eligible local transport authority. Exercise of this power will enable an ITA to exercise specified functions of a local authority, where the Secretary of State considers that those functions can appropriately be exercised by the ITA. The power is intended to be exercised on a case by case basis according to what is appropriate in any particular circumstances, and according to circumstances which may alter over time.

153.  Clause 75 enables the Secretary of State by order to confer on an ITA, or the successor local authority to an ITA, a power to give a direction to a local highway authority or local traffic authority as to the exercise of their powers. The Secretary of State's power will enable him to give to an ITA or its successor local authority a power similar to that given to Transport for London by section 301A of the Highways Act 1980 (inserted by section 266 of the GLA Act 1999). It is however wider than that power in that clause 75(8)(e) could enable an ITA to require a local highway authority or traffic authority to exercise a power, provided that the ITA meets the authority's costs of complying with the direction.

154.  The power for an ITA or its successor local authority to give a direction to a local highways authority might be used to ensure that proposed road works are modified to minimise disruption to public transport at peak congestion times, or to ensure that a local traffic authority continues a bus lane or cycle lane installed along a road by a neighbouring authority.

155.  As set out in paragraph 149 above, clause 80 gives the Secretary of State power to make incidental etc provision for the purposes of an order under clauses 73 74 and 75, including a power to amend, repeal or revoke any enactment.

156.  As set out in paragraph 150 above, clause 81 provides that orders under these clauses are statutory instruments and subject to affirmative resolution in each House of Parliament.

Clause 69: Power to direct a review: new ITA

Clause 71: Power to direct a review of arrangements

Clause 82: Further provision about directions

157.  Clause 69 gives the Secretary of State power to direct two or more of the authorities mentioned in subsection (2) to undertake a review of transport functions in their area and to prepare and publish a scheme for the establishment of an ITA by order under clause 67. Clause 71 gives the Secretary of State power to direct one or more authorities mentioned in subsection (2) to undertake a review of transport functions in their area and to prepare and publish a scheme for the revision of any of the matters for which an order under any of clauses 72 to 78 may be made. Clause 82 provides that the directions must be in writing, and may make different provision for different cases.

158.  The power of the Secretary of State to give directions is exercisable only where he considers that the review and any scheme are likely to improve the exercise of statutory functions relating to transport and/or the effectiveness and efficiency of transport. Any orders made by the Secretary of State under Chapter 2 of Part 5 of the Bill will only be made after he has taken into account facts established, and opinions formed, by local authorities in the area concerned, either in a voluntary review conducted under clause 68 or 70 or in a directed review conducted under clause 69 or 71.

159.  No Parliamentary procedure is provided for the power of direction.

Clause 85 Repeal of power to reorganise functions of an ITA

160.  Section 42 of the Local Government Act 1985 enables the Secretary of State, by order subject to affirmative resolution in both Houses of Parliament, to exclude a metropolitan district from a passenger transport area, to abolish a passenger transport area or to exclude a metropolitan district council from an ITA's constituent councils as respects functions of the ITAs other than those transferred to it from a metropolitan county council. This power is rendered otiose by the powers conferred on the Secretary of State by Chapter 2 of Part 5 of the Bill. It is therefore repealed.

Clauses 86 to 89: Power of ITAs to promote well-being

161.  Clause 86 gives to Integrated Transport Authorities a power to do anything which they consider is likely to achieve any one or more of the objects of promoting or improving the economic well-being of their area, promoting or improving the social well-being of there area, and promoting or improving the environmental well-being of their area. A power in the same terms was given to local authorities in England and Wales by section 2 of the Local Government Act 2000.

162.  Clause 87(3) enables the Secretary of State, by order subject to affirmative resolution in each House of Parliament, to prevent ITAs from doing under clause 86 anything which is specified, or is of a description specified, in the order. Clause 87(5) imposes a requirement on the Secretary of State to consult certain persons as he considers appropriate before making the order. These provisions reproduce for ITAs the provision in section 3 of the Local Government Act 2000.

163.  Clause 88 contains a power which enables the Secretary of State, by order subject to affirmative resolution in each House of Parliament, to amend, repeal, revoke or disapply an enactment which he thinks prevents or obstructs ITAs from exercising their power under clause 68. Clause 88 reproduces in relation to ITAs the provision made in relation to local authorities by section 5 of the Local Government Act 2000.

164.  Clause 89(1) and (2) requires the Secretary of State to consult certain persons as he considers appropriate before making an order under clause 88 and to lay before each House of Parliament a document which explains the proposals, sets them out in the form of a draft order, and gives details of the consultation he has undertaken. Clause 88(3) requires this document to be laid before Parliament at least 60 days before a draft Order under clause 88 is laid before Parliament. Clause 89 reproduces for ITAs the provision made by sections 4 and 5 of the Local Government Act 2000.

Clauses 90, 93, 95 and 96: Power of ITAs to make local charging schemes

165.  Clauses 90, 93 and 95 enable Integrated Transport Authorities (ITAs) to make local road charging schemes jointly with one or more local charging authorities or London charging authorities. There is no proposal for ITAs to make a charging scheme independently of the local traffic authority for the roads which are to be subject to the scheme. Under section 108 of the TA 2000 as proposed to be amended by clause 7 of and Schedule 1 to the Bill, an ITA will be a local transport authority with the statutory function of developing policies for the promotion and encouragement of safe, integrated, efficient and economic transport in its area. It will therefore be appropriate for it to have the option, where it considers it appropriate, of joining with local authorities in its area to implement those policies through road charging schemes. Clause 96 introduces Schedule 5, which makes consequential changes to the TA 2000 to take account of these new powers of ITAs to make a charging scheme.

Clauses 91, 92 and 94: Powers of local authorities to make charging schemes

166.  Clauses 91, 92 and 94 alter the purpose for which local charging authorities can exercise their existing powers to make charging schemes or joint charging schemes. They provide that such schemes may only be made if they appear desirable for the purpose of directly or indirectly facilitating the achievement of the local transport policies developed in accordance with sections 108 and 113 of the TA 2000 as proposed to be amended by Part 2 of the Bill. The provisions are therefore consequential to the changes proposed by clauses 7 to 11. (The powers in clauses 90, 93, 95 and 96 for ITAs to make charging schemes contain equivalent provision as to the purposes for which schemes may be made.)

Clause 97: abolition of requirement for confirmation of English schemes

167.  Clause 97 removes in England the requirement for a road charging scheme made by a local charging authority under the TA 2000 to be confirmed by the Secretary of State.

168.  Responsibility for deciding on a local charging scheme in England as a whole (rather than just in London, as at present) will therefore lie with local authorities rather than with the Secretary of State. This ensures that local authorities who wish to develop local charging schemes are free to do so in a way that is best suited to local needs, within a framework of local accountability. The Secretary of State is retaining powers under section 193 of the TA 2000 to issue guidance to local charging authorities with respect to their functions in relation to charging schemes. The Secretary of State (in Wales, the Welsh Ministers) is taking new powers in clause 104 to require local charging authorities to supply him with information about schemes.

Clause 98: abolition of power to require consultation or inquiries for English schemes

169.   Clause 98 removes in England the power in section 170 of the TA 2000 for the Secretary of State to require a local charging authority to consult other persons about a proposed charging scheme. The purpose of this power as originally formulated was to enable the Secretary of State to ensure that appropriate consultation had been carried out by a charging authority on a particular scheme before he decided whether or not to confirm that scheme under section 169 of the TA 2000. The removal by clause 97 of the Secretary of State's confirmation role therefore makes this power otiose. Charging authorities, when deciding whether or not to make a charging scheme, will be subject to the usual procedural requirements for decision-making in the Local Government Acts.

Clause 99: Charges

170.   Clause 99 provides that, when making a charging scheme, a charging authority can include in that scheme provision which imposes a different level of charge according to the method or means of recording, administering, collecting or paying the charge. This will enable charging authorities to alter charges according to the costs of administering the means used for payment: for instance it is expected that a scheme could provide for electronically generated payments to be made at a discount.

Clause 100: Supplementary provision as to contents of a charging scheme

171.  Clause 100(1) and (2) inserts a new section 172(2A) into the TA 2000. This will enable the Secretary of State (in Wales, the Welsh Ministers) to make regulations requiring charging authorities to accept payment from specific types of road user in a specific manner. For example, a road user might wish to be able to register with one scheme, install a particular form of technology, and make an administrative arrangement with a single body for payment to be made to other local charging schemes. The Secretary of State's power to make regulations could be used to ensure that a local charging authority makes the necessary arrangements ("interoperability") for this to be possible.

172.  Section 197 of the TA 2000 provides that the exercise of this power is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament (negative resolution procedure).

173.  Clause 100(3) provides that a road outside Greater London shall not be subject to charges imposed by more than one scheme at the same time. Clause 100(3), (5) and (6) provide that a road within Greater London may be subject to charges imposed by more than one scheme if the Greater London Authority consents: (in London, Transport for London and the London boroughs each have power to make separate schemes for the same roads, whereas outside Greater London powers of two authorities in the same area can only be exercised jointly, rather than singly).

174.  Clause 100(7) makes provision in relation to the manner of payment of charges under a charging scheme under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 which is equivalent to that made for schemes under the TA 2000 by clause 100(1) and (2). Section 420(6) of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 makes the exercise of this power subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.

Clause 101: Suspension of charging schemes

175.  Clause 101 inserts a new section 172A into the TA 2000. The new section enables a charging authority to temporarily suspend a scheme either in the event of an emergency or to enable or facilitate a temporary event to take place. This enables a charging authority to make appropriate provision where there is an event of a temporary nature which could be affected by the provisions of a scheme, or where there is an emergency and the response to that emergency could be affected by the provisions of a scheme. Subsection (4) requires the charging authority to publish notice of any suspension, and subsection (5) requires it to keep the suspension under review. Where alterations to a scheme are needed over a period longer than that provided for in this clause, it is expected that the charging authority will use its powers under section 168(2) of the TA 2000 to vary or revoke a scheme.

Clause 102: interference with equipment used for charging schemes

176.  Clause 102(1) amends section 173 of the TA 2000 so as to make it a criminal offence not only to interfere with equipment used in connection with a charging scheme but to interfere with the functioning of such equipment. The new provision is intended to ensure that interference with an electronic signal from charging equipment is as much as an offence as interfering with the equipment itself.

177.  Clause 102(2) amends section 174 of the TA 2000, so as to enable the Secretary of State (in Wales, the Welsh Ministers) to make regulations enabling or requiring charging schemes under the TA 2000 to contain provision enabling a motor vehicle to be examined for the purpose of ascertaining whether the functioning of any equipment has been interfered with with intent to avoid payment of a charge.

178.  This regulation-making power is made subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament by section 197 of the TA 2000.

179.  Clause 102(3) to (5) makes equivalent provision as respects the Greater London Authority Act 1999 to that made in clause 102(1) and (2) for the TA 2000, with the power to make regulations being subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament by section 420(6) of that Act.

Clause 103: Use of equipment for charging schemes

180.   Clause 103(2) amends section 176 of the TA 2000 so as to give the Secretary of State (in Wales the Welsh Ministers) power to to regulate the manner in which equipment is used in connection with a charging scheme. Regulations made using this power would be able to ensure that different schemes use standard data formats so that equipment is interoperable with that of other schemes, and that equipment identification numbers are not duplicated between different schemes.

181.  Section 197 of the TA 2000 makes this regulation-making power subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.

182.  Clause 103(4) to (8) amends paragraph 29 of Schedule 23 to the Greater London Authority Act 1999, which provides for approval by the Greater London Authority of equipment used in relation to a London charging scheme. The amendments to paragraph 29 enable the Secretary of State to give notice to the Authority that the use of equipment in connection with a London charging scheme is incompatible with regulations made under section 176 as amended. The effect of such a notice is that equipment subject to such a notice may only be used in connection with a charging scheme with the consent of the Secretary of State.

Clause 107: London charging schemes: 10 year plan for share

183.  Clause 107 amends paragraphs 19 to 24 of Schedule 23 to the Greater London Authority Act 1999, which make provision requiring a charging authority to include in a scheme a general 10 plan for applying the net proceeds from a scheme, and to prepare 4 year programmes for applying those proceeds. Clause 107 removes the requirements for the 10 year plan and 4 year programmes to be approved by the Secretary of State.

Clause 108: Financial proceeds of schemes

184.  Clause 108 introduces Schedule 6. Part 1 of Schedule 6 makes amendments to the financial provisions relating to road user charging and workplace parking levy schemes in Schedule 12 to the TA 2000. The amendments provide that all the net proceeds of any local charging scheme must be applied by the charging authority for the purpose of directly or indirectly facilitating the achievement of the authority's local transport policies. The Secretary of State's and Welsh Ministers' existing powers to make regulations as the use to be made of the net proceeds of certain schemes in certain circumstances are repealed. Paragraphs 9 to 11 in Part 2 of Schedule 6 make equivalent amendments to Schedule 23 to the GLA Act 1999.

185.  Paragraph 12 of Schedule 6 provides that, where a charging scheme in London applies to a trunk road (which it may do so subject to the consent of the Secretary of State given under paragraph 9(7) of Schedule 23), a proportion of the net proceeds of the scheme may be paid to the Secretary of State to be available to him for the purposes of directly or indirectly facilitating the achievement of any policies or proposals relating to transport.

Clause 109: Trunk road charging in Wales

186.  Clause 109 amends Schedule 5 to the Government of Wales Act 2006 so as to insert a new matter in respect of the imposing of charges for using or keeping motor vehicles on trunk roads in Wales. The purpose of this clause is to enable the National Assembly for Wales to make provision for charging on trunk roads in Wales without being subject to the restrictions set out in section 167(2) of the TA 2000. Section 167(2) provides that a trunk road charging scheme may only be made in respect of bridges or tunnels over a certain length, or in connection with a charging scheme made by a local traffic authority.

Clause 111: Vehicles used without operator's licence: power to return detained vehicles

187.  Clause 111 amends the regulation making power in paragraph 8 of Schedule 1A to the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995. The effect is to clarify that regulations may prescribe circumstances in which a detained vehicle may be returned to the owner without an application being made to the traffic commissioner. The change is made to reflect the wording in new Schedule 2A to the PPVA 1981 (see note on clause 41 above).

Department for Transport

November 2007

Summary of the Delegated Powers in the Local Transport Bill [HL]
ClauseDelegated power Conferred onExercisable by Parl'y procedurePara ref
1An existing delegated power (to vary the number and geographical limits of traffic areas) is extended to include power to make incidental, consequential etc. amendments in order to give full effect to any such variation. This includes a power to amend or modify any enactment, whenever passed or made. Secretary of State OrderAffirmative 8-13
2Existing power for the Secretary of State to appoint one traffic commissioner per traffic area amended to allow appointment of such number of commissioners for England and Wales as he considers appropriate (and one commissioner for Scotland) Secretary of State Appointment of traffic commissioners None14-16
3Power to appoint a senior traffic commissioner (STC), and if necessary a deputy or interim STC. Secretary of State Appointment of senior traffic commissioner None17-18
3Powers for the STC to require traffic commissioners to act in such matters, and in such places, as he may require Senior traffic commissioner Deployment of traffic commissioners None19
3Power for the STC to give general directions and guidance to traffic commissioners. Senior traffic commissioner Directions and guidance to traffic commissioners None20-22
3An existing power for the Secretary of State to issue directions to the traffic commissioners is replaced with a power for him to issue guidance to the senior traffic commissioner Secretary of State Guidance to the senior traffic commissioner None23-24
4Amendment of power for the Secretary of State to appoint deputy traffic commissioners in England and Wales Secretary of State Appointment of deputy traffic commissioners in England and Wales None25-26
6New power to make provisions to give full effect to the amendments contained in clauses 1 to 5 including a power to amend or modify any enactment. Secretary of State OrderAffirmative 27-30
17Existing power to make regulations about quality partnership schemes extended to make provision about requirements relating to frequencies, timings or maximum fares Secretary of State (England), Welsh Ministers (Wales) RegulationsNegative 35-37
20Existing role of Secretary of State in approving quality contracts schemes in England is transferred to an independent Approvals Board chaired by a traffic commissioner Approvals BoardDecision of the Board None44
21New power to make provisions about the procedure and deadline for the approvals process for quality contracts schemes in England Secretary of State RegulationsNegative 45-49
22New power to make provisions about the practice of the approvals boards for England Secretary of State RulesNegative 50-54
22New power to make provisions as to the time within which any approvals board should normally reach decisions Secretary of State RegulationsNegative 50-54
23New power to make provisions in respect of the holding of inquiries by Approvals Boards in England Secretary of State RegulationsNegative 55-60
25Existing power to vary the period between making and coming into operation of a quality contracts scheme extended to allow certain other periods to be varied Secretary of State (England), Welsh Ministers (Wales) OrderNegative 61-65
27Repeal of existing power to prescribe a maximum period between making of a quality contracts scheme and the issuing of invitations to tender N/AN/A N/A66-68
30New power to make prescribe circumstances in which the continuation of a quality contracts scheme is to be exempt from the approvals process Secretary of State (England), Welsh Ministers (Wales) RegulationsNegative 70-73
35Addition of one additional item to the list of matters which regulations about quality contracts schemes may, in particular, cover Secretary of State (England), Welsh Ministers (Wales) RegulationsNegative 74-76
36Extension of existing power to make transitional provision about quality contracts schemes Secretary of State (England), Welsh Ministers (Wales) [?] RegulationsNegative 77-81
37New power to issue guidance concerning performance by local authorities of their functions in relation to quality contracts schemes Secretary of State (England), Welsh Ministers (Wales) GuidanceNone 82-83
39Extension of existing power to make traffic regulation orders in respect of certain roads where necessary in order to provide facilities pursuant to a quality contract or quality contracts scheme Traffic authority (as defined in section 121A of the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984) Making of traffic regulation orders None84-
41 and Schedule 3New power to make regulations to implement a regime for the detention of certain PSVs used without PSV operators' licences Secretary of State RegulationsNegative 87 - 91
42Determination of applications for registration where restrictions imposed by a quality partnership scheme are in force Traffic Commissioners Determination of applications for registration None92-95
42New power to make regulations about procedural details relating to traffic commissioner determinations Secretary of State (England), Welsh Ministers (Wales) RegulationsNegative 96-97
43Determination of applications for registration in area where a quality contracts scheme is in force Traffic Commissioners Determination of applications for registration None98-100
44Existing power for traffic commissioners to apply traffic regulation conditions extended to cover anticipated problems Traffic commissioner Making of traffic regulation conditions None101 - 102
45Appellate role for appeals against traffic regulation conditions transferred from Secretary of State to Transport Tribunal N/AN/A N/A103-105
46Extension of existing power to prescribe provisions in the hire car code which should apply when a private hire vehicle is being used to provide local bus services Secretary of State RegulationsNegative 108 and 112
47New power to provide that section 12 of the Transport Act 1985 is to apply to vehicles licensed under section 7 of the Private Hire Vehicles (London) Act 1998 Transport for London OrderNone 110- and 113-114
47New power to modify the taxi code and hire car code as they apply in London Transport for London OrderNone 111 and 113-114
48New power to require "designated bodies" to keep records with regard to community transport permits granted, varied or revoked by that body Secretary of State OrderNegative 116
51New power to limit the validity of new permits issued under sections 19 and 22 of the Transport Act 1985, and to specify a date after which all non-time-limited permits would be revoked Secretary of State RegulationsNegative 117-1189
54New power to direct a local authority to provide information connected with the performance of its network management duty under sections 16 or 17 of the Traffic Management Act 2004, and to require the local authority to attend certain inquiries Traffic commissioners Directions to local authorities None121-125
55Provides for a broader range of sanctions that may be imposed in respect of certain failures by bus operators Traffic commissioners Making orders in respect of sanctions None126-128
56Existing power extended to allow imposition of restrictions on the use that may be made of certain records and information, and to create related criminal offences Secretary of State RegulationsNegative 129-132
57Revival of powers for PTEs in certain circumstances to hire PSVs to operators Passenger Transport Executives N/ANone 133-134
64New power to establish a Public Transport Users' Committee for England, and to change, remove or confer new functions on the Committee or transfer functions of the Committee to another person Secretary of State OrderAffirmative 135-136, 138-139
64New power to consider and make recommendations to the Secretary of State about matters relating to public passenger transport services in England Public Transport Users' Committee (if established by Order) Recommendations to Secretary of State None137
65New power to confer additional functions on the Rail Passenger Council so as to extend its remit to prescribed local services and domestic coach services in England Secretary of State OrderAffirmative 140-143
67New power to establish a new Integrated Transport Authority (ITA) Secretary of State OrderAffirmative 144
72, 77 and 78New power to change the constitutional arrangements and boundaries of an existing ITA, or to dissolve an ITA Secretary of State OrderAffirmative 145-148
80New power to make incidental etc. provision for the purposes of orders under clause 67, 72, 77 and 78, including a power to amend etc. any enactment Secretary of State OrderAffirmative 149
73, 74 and 75New power to delegate functions of the Secretary of State, or local authority functions, to an ITA; and to confer on an ITA a power to give a direction to a local highway authority or local traffic authority as to the exercise of their powers. This includes a power to make incidental etc. provision, including a power to amend etc. any enactment Secretary of State OrderAffirmative 151-156
69, 71 and 82New powers for Secretary of State to direct authorities to undertake reviews Secretary of State DirectionsNone 157-158
85Repeal of existing power to reorganise functions of an ITA N/AN/A N/A160
87New power for the Secretary of State to prevent ITAs from doing under clause 86 anything specified, or of anything of a specified description under their power under clause 86 (power to promote well-being) Secretary of State OrderAffirmative 162
88, 89New power for the Secretary of State to amend etc an enactment which he things prevents or obstructs ITAs from exercising their power under clause 86 (power to promote well-being) Secretary of State OrderAffirmative 163-164
90, 93, 95 and 96New power for ITAs to make local road charging schemes jointly with one or more local charging authorities or London charging authorities Integrated Transport Authorities N/AN/A 165
91, 92 and 94Revision to the purposes for which local charging authorities can exercise existing powers to make charging schemes or joint charging schemes Local transport authorities N/AN/A 166
97Repeal of existing requirement, in England, for a road charging scheme made by a local charging authority under the TA 2000 to be confirmed by the Secretary of State N/AN/A N/A167-168
98Repeal of existing power to require a local charging authority to consult other persons about a proposed charging scheme N/AN/A N/A169
99Amendment to existing power to clarify that a charging scheme may impose a different level of charge according to the method or means of recording, administering, collecting or paying the charge Charging authorities under Part 3 of the TA 2000 N/AN/A 170
100New power to require charging authorities to accept payment from specific types of road user in a specific manner Secretary of State (England), Welsh Ministers (Wales) RegulationsNegative 171-174
101Power to temporarily suspend charging schemes Charging authorities under Part 3 of the TA 2000 N/AN/A 176
102Amendment to existing power so as to enable a motor vehicle to be examined for the purpose of ascertaining whether the functioning of any equipment has been interfered with, with intend to avoid payment of a charge Secretary of State (England), Welsh Ministers (Wales) RegulationsNegative 177-179
103Amendment to existing power so as to enable the regulation of the manner in which equipment used in connection with a charging scheme is used Secretary of State (England), Welsh Ministers (Wales) RegulationsNegative 180-182
188.  107189.  Repeal of power to approve plans and programmes for use of proceeds of scheme in London 190.  N/A191.  N/A 192.  N/A193.  183
108Repeal of existing power to make provisions as to the use of net proceeds from certain charging schemes in certain circumstances, and provision of new power for proceeds of charging a trunk road in London to be paid to the Secretary of State N/AN/A N/A184 and 185
109Power for National Assembly for Wales to make trunk road charging schemes without being subject to the restrictions in section 167(2) of the TA 2000 The National Assembly for Wales MeasureN/A 186
111Minor amendments of existing regulation making power to enable circumstances to be clarified when detained vehicles may be returned The Secretary of State RegulationsNegative 187



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007