Select Committee on Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Fourteenth Report


Fourteenth Report


Education and Skills Bill — Government Amendments

1.  We reported on this Bill in our 10th Report (HL Paper 120). The Government have now invited us to consider amendments to be moved at Report, printed on sheet HL Bill 80-I. The Department for Children, Schools and Families have provided a supplementary memorandum on the amendments, printed at Appendix 1 to this Report. There is nothing in the delegations in the amendments to which we wish to draw the attention of the House.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL] — Government Amendments

2.  We reported on this Bill in our First Report (HL Paper 11). We were invited to consider amendments made to the Bill during its passage through the House of Commons, printed on sheet HL Bill 83. The amendments were explained in a memorandum by the Department of Health, printed at Appendix 2 to this Report. These amendments were scheduled for consideration in the House later on the day of our meeting. There was nothing in the amendments to which we wished to draw the attention of the House by means of an urgent report.

Local Transport Bill [HL] — Government Amendments

3.  We reported on this Bill in our First Report (HL Paper 11). We have now been invited to consider amendments made to the Bill during its passage through the House of Commons, printed on sheet HL Bill 85. The amendments are explained in a memorandum by the Department for Transport, printed at Appendix 3 to this Report.

4.  Clause 87 provides that orders made under clauses 73 and 78 to 86 of the Bill (powers to establish Integrated Transport Authorities, and make provision about their constitution and powers) will be statutory instruments subject to affirmative resolution in each House. The Government considers that orders made using some of these powers, in particular those transferring functions between local authorities, might fall within this House's hybrid statutory instruments procedure (which gives those whose private interests are adversely affected the opportunity to petition against the order). The memorandum explains that this could cause "uncertainty and delay" which "would be detrimental to the timely and effective use of the powers provided by the Bill". The Government has therefore tabled amendment 167 to disapply the hybrid statutory instrument procedure. This is not in itself unusual but we draw the disapplication to the attention of the House, so that the House may satisfy itself that the alternative consultation procedures set out in the memorandum are an adequate alternative. There is nothing else in the delegations in the amendments to which we wish to draw the attention of the House.

Pensions Bill — Government Amendments

5.  We reported on this bill in our 9th Report (HL Paper 111) and published the Government's response in our 10th Report (HL Paper 120). The Government have now invited us to consider Report stage amendments, printed on sheet HL Bill 79-I(c). The Department for Work and Pensions have provided a supplementary memorandum on the amendments, printed at Appendix 4 to this Report. The majority of these amendments were considered by the House on Monday 27 October; the remainder were due to be considered later on the day of our meeting. There is nothing in the delegations in the amendments to which we wish to draw the attention of the House.

Draft Legislative Reform (Verification of Weighing and Measuring Equipment) Order 2008

Background

6.  This draft Order was laid on 20 October, under the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006 ("the 2006 Act"). The Order is to be made under the burden-reducing power in section 1 of the 2006 Act. An Explanatory Document (ED)[1] has been laid with the draft Order, prepared by the National Weights and Measures Laboratory ("NWML").

7.  Weighing and measuring equipment which is used for trade is subject to statutory checking requirements - verification - at certain points in its life cycle. Verification typically takes place before prescribed equipment is first marketed or used, and again after it has undergone installation, repair or adjustment. Under the Weights and Measures Act 1985 ("the 1985 Act") manufacturers, installers or repairers of prescribed equipment who have become "approved verifiers" are able to verify equipment which they have themselves manufactured, installed or repaired. However, they are not currently permitted to verify equipment which they have adjusted (this is work that falls short of repair, for example to make equipment measure more accurately when it is already within the prescribed limits of accuracy). Post-adjustment verification may only be carried out by an official inspector. NWML comment that this "appears to have been an unintended consequence" of the drafting of previous legislation (para. 15), and state that by amending the 1985 Act the Order would remove this unintended consequence by allowing approved verifiers to verify equipment which they themselves have adjusted.

8.  The ED states that the only sector likely to be significantly affected by the Order is the petrol retailing industry, as fuel dispensers tend to be adjusted for accuracy more often than many other kinds of measuring instruments because their accuracy drifts due to normal wear of the meter (para. 23). The ED also explains that the proposals were subject to a consultation exercise between July and October 2005, details of which are given in Annex B to the ED. The consultation revealed an overall level of 60% support. This is far from overwhelming, but there was a relatively low number of responses (30), and the level of support can be explained in part by the fact that several responses from the trading standards community reflected that community's broader concerns about the existing approved verifiers regime (to which NWML respond fully in the ED and accompanying documentation), and not solely the specific proposal to extend the regime to adjustment.

Opinion of the Committee

9.  Having considered the draft Order carefully the Committee considers that it meets the tests in the 2006 Act; that it is not otherwise inappropriate to be made by delegated legislation; and that it meets the tests applied to other instruments by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments.

10.  The 2006 Act allows the Government to propose the negative, affirmative or super-affirmative procedure for each LRO, with either House able to upgrade the procedure if it so wishes within 30 days from the date on which the Order was laid. The Government have proposed the affirmative procedure for this draft Order: we do not consider that procedure inappropriate.


1  http://www.nwml.gov.uk/Admin/Docs/Regulatory_Reform_Order/Explan%20Doc%20IA%20Sig%20Oct08.DOC Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008