Select Committee on Economic Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum by Migrationwatch UK on the cost of pensions

  1.  The Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR) recently provided evidence to the Committee suggesting that the dependency ratio would increase sharply under a balanced migration scenario and would "put the equivalent of 9p on income tax by 2036".

  2.  This is massively distorted for two reasons:

    —  It used the 2004 rather than the 2006-based population projections.

    —  It confused zero migration (no migration at all) with zero net migration (or "balanced migration" where immigration is equal to emigration).

  3.  The use of 2004-based population projections means that the assumptions about fertility and mortality are now out of date, as are the resulting dependency ratios. Second, the 2004-based projections were produced before legislation was passed to raise the state pension age (in stages) to 68. This effectively moves about 2.5 million people from the "dependants" category into the "working age" category.

  4.  Immigrants tend to be young adults whilst emigrants are predominantly older. Thus, under a balanced migration scenario, dependency ratios are improved by replacing older people with younger.

  5.  The impact of these two factors is very large. The IPPR's erroneous calculation give a dependency ratio of 86.2% in 2074 under what they thought was balanced migration. On a correct calculation, the dependency ratio will rise to only 71.3% in 2081 from its current level of 60.7%. Under the principal population projection it will rise to 67.7% but the population would be 21 million higher at 85.3 million. Thus 5.7 million extra people would be required for each 1% reduction in the dependency ratio.[82]

  6.  The IPPR are also wrong to claim that zero net migration is likely to lead to a falling population. In fact it will increase to about 65 million in 2056 and then decline very slowly to 64.3 million in 2081.[83]

  7.  We conclude that the IPPR's calculations grossly overstate the benefit of high levels of migration on dependency ratios and on tax rates. By contrast their impact on population density and hence on our quality of life will be immense.

11 January 2008






82   Section 6 of Prof. Rowthorn's submission to the Committee entitled "Commentary on the Cross-Departmental Submission to the House of Lords Select Committee on Economic Affairs". Back

83   Ibid-Table 1 Back


 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008