Select Committee on Economic Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum by UCATT

1.  UCATT RESPONSE

  UCATT is the largest specialist union representing construction workers in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. UCATT represents 125,000 workers in the construction industry both in the public and private sector. Although many of UCATT's members are direct employees, others work in a variety of employment relationships including short-term, temporary and agency arrangements. In addition, a large number of workers are bogus self-employed working under the CIS4 scheme. A large number of workers on construction sites are migrant workers. As regards the A8 nationals, by far the highest proportion of workers comes from Poland. A considerable number of workers also come from Lithuania and Slovakia.

  UCATT is the lead union among the signatories to the National Working Rule Agreement of the Construction Industry Joint Council and the Joint Negotiating Committee for Local Authority Craft and Associated Employees. UCATT is represented on a number of construction industry related bodies by the General Secretary including the Strategic Forum for Construction, Construction Skills Board and the Construction Skills Certification Scheme.

  UCATT agrees that "Immigration had a substantial economic impact on the UK", as stated in the consultation document. It is also true that it is difficult to measure the exact impact, as data on immigration is "hard to come by". As the UK's only specialist construction workers' union our response focuses on the industrial sectors which we represent.

2.  In what sectors and occupations are immigrants employed?

  There were 1.5 million foreign migrants working in the UK in 2005, which equals 5.4% of all employees. However, it is very difficult to give a figure of the percentage of migrant workers working in the construction sector. This is the case because a very high number of migrant workers work under the CIS4 scheme, the vast majority of them being falsely self-employed. A8 nationals do not need to register for a work permit and National Insurance number and hence are not included in work statistics. Statistical data therefore does not give an inclusive picture as it does not include the vast number of self-employed workers, which is the form of employment large parts of the construction industry relies on.

3.  Which sectors and occupations in the UK economy are particularly dependent on migrant labour and why? Does immigration fill skills gaps?

  The construction sector is highly dependent on a migrant workforce. It is estimated that UK construction output will be 3% annually between 2006-10 following a period of continued growth over the last decade. Increases in output are forecast for all sectors of construction, with the biggest rise expected in public housing, infrastructure and commercial activity. Prominent examples of massive building projects that have been started or will be started in the near future are Heathrow Terminal 5, Thames Gateway, the government programme for schools and hospitals renewals and the Olympics.

  By the end of 2006, over 2.5 million people were working in the construction industry. It is estimated that 245,000 additional workers are needed to keep up with industry growth in the next years. This translates into a need of 87,000 new workers each year all over the UK. It is without question that in order to be able to meet this demand the construction sector will continue relying on migrant labour. Clearly, immigration has helped to and will be needed to help fill the skills gap that has arisen in the construction industry.

4.  Why do employers want to hire immigrants?

  Employers hire migrant workers due to a variety of reasons. Firstly, migrant workers are valued by employers as hard workers. They are often highly skilled, though regularly employed for low skilled and hence lesser-paid jobs. Secondly, due to economic pressures migrant workers often have to accept more unfavourable work conditions than indigenous workers, including lower pay. This situation is made more acute as migrant workers are in an even more vulnerable work condition than British workers, mainly because they often lack sufficient language abilities and do not have a social support network.

5.  How do migrants' labour market outcomes—including their employment rates and earnings—compare to those of local workers?

  Evidence collected by UCATT officials on various construction sites shows that migrant workers are often paid less than their indigenous colleagues for the same type of work. This is an illegal practice and a number of Employment Tribunals are taking place dealing with this issue. On various sites migrant workers received less pay than agreed under the CIJC Working Rule Agreement both for regular and overtime pay. There were incidents of illegal deductions from pay. In several cases breaches against the National Minimum Wage were found with workers being paid as little as £3 per hour.

In addition, migrant workers working for employment agencies are often used on a long-term basis without being made permanent. They have fewer holidays than permanent workers, often receive no sick pay and work more hours than permitted under the Working Rule Agreement.

6.  What impact has immigration had on the labour market, including wages, unemployment and other employment conditions . . . ?

  UCATT so far has not come across hard evidence that employing migrant workers leads to a decrease of pay of British workers. Similarly, stories that employing migrant workers drives indigenous workers out of work is only anecdotal and has not been proved for the construction sector.

7.  What is the economic impact of illegal immigration, including on employment, wages and the fiscal balance?

  Large amounts of tax revenues do not reach the appropriate authority every year due to employers making use of workers who have no legal right to work in the UK. Workers who are employed illegally do so because of a lack of alternatives. It is therefore vital that tougher legal requirements and penalties are introduced for employers so that they refrain from employing illegal workers.

8.  What are the alternatives to immigration to reduce labour shortages?

  We believe that immigration has a positive impact on the UK economy as a whole. In the near future many Central and Eastern European migrant workers that have come to the UK in the last years are likely to be going back to their home countries where the construction sectors are growing at an increasing pace. We need to make sure that migrant workers continue to fill the labour shortage in the construction sector, and inducements must be created for this necessity by policy-makers and employers.

  While stating the continued necessity of migrant workers for the construction sector, UCATT also argues that more apprenticeship places must be offered to young people in the construction industry. Last year there were 50,000 applications for construction apprenticeships but only 9,000 places available. In Scotland there are seven apprentices for every 100 construction workers. In London and the South East there is less than one apprentice for every 100 construction workers. We believe that getting to the level of apprentices that exists in Scotland, throughout the whole of the UK should be the minimum target for the industry.

9.  How can data on immigration be improved?

  In terms of data on migrant workers in the construction sector, we have been arguing consistently that the Health and Safety Executive must establish the nationality where a worker is injured or killed on a construction site. Currently the Health and Safety Executive does not record this, so it is not known which nationality an injured or killed worker had. Reporting the nationality is a very easy-to-do and straightforward measure, but very effective for identifying vulnerable workers in the UK economy.

22 August 2007



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008