Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60 - 79)

THURSDAY 6 DECEMBER 2007

Sir Liam Donaldson and Ms Triona Norman

  Q60  Lord Lea of Crondall: If a law came in, would that totally close the gap between supply and demand? On the face of it, there are thousands extra. Is there something erroneous in that?

  Sir Liam Donaldson: It would make a big difference. We do not know really, I suppose, how many people are below the surface who are just not being put forward at all for transplants. The demand is suppressed by the fact that there are not the opportunities for operations. For example, we do not know whether there are elderly people who could benefit from an improved quality of life from transplant who are not even being referred for surgery because the referring doctors know there is no chance of them being treated.

  Q61  Lord Lea of Crondall: This is what I am getting at. There is a presumed gap.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Yes.

  Q62  Lord Lea of Crondall: There is a statistical straightforward gap.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Yes.

  Q63  Lord Lea of Crondall: It is in one of your documents that there are 1,000 kidneys, or whatever it is.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Yes.

  Q64  Lord Lea of Crondall: The presumed gap, as somebody said, is in between what you do not know and what you do not know you do not know.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Yes.

  Q65  Chairman: That is an important issue. It goes back to this priorities issue too, does it not? Our priorities are set in relation to expectations.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Yes.

  Q66  Baroness Young of Hornsey: Good morning. You have already said something about the difficulties in trying to gauge public opinion regarding presumed consent, so I will not go over that again, but can you say something about your assessment of general knowledge in relation to organ transplantation and donation issues amongst the general public? Also, to what extent do you feel the raising of public awareness about those issues could be made much more effective? I am thinking particularly amongst black and minority ethnic populations, where the discrepancy between the number of people who need transplants and those who are willing to give consent to it seems to be much bigger than it is amongst the general population. I wonder if you could say something about some of those issues, please.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: I think a big factor is that the media are not particularly interested. If you look at other areas of health where people are dying for want of treatment, the media make a lot of comment on it and criticism. There is virtually nothing. When my report was published there was a flurry of interest then, but if you look at most transplant stories they are about babies who are waiting for heart operations and do not have a donor. Those are tragic cases—and in many cases they are resolved positively—but they are a very small minority of the need. I cannot remember the last media report I saw on the idea of a middle-aged person dying. Interestingly, having produced my report there was a flurry of interest, and I was very interested to listen to some of the phone-in programmes that followed interviews which I gave, with patients who were on dialysis for long periods of time talking about how restricted their life was and how miserable it was. Those sorts of stories just do not get out into the public at all. If the media did pay more attention to this, I think there would be much, much more public pressure for something to be done about the shortage of organs. I am told that in some of the other European countries there is a lot more education in schools about this. I do not have any hard and fast evidence but talking to certainly one of the researchers who has done some work on what happens in other European countries she made the point that the general public level of understanding is much higher, and I would guess that it is very, very low in this country. It is always easy to say, "There should be more education in schools" but then we have problems of a crowded curriculum and so on and so forth, but I do think the health component of the school curriculum could be looked at to see whether this could be incorporated. Turning to the situation of ethnic minority populations: you are right—and you will be familiar with the statistics—about 25% or so of people on the transplant waiting list are from black or ethnic minority groups and 2% of donors are from those same groups. I would guess there are some cultural barriers and distaste, possibly, for donating organs. I think a different form of awareness and education would be needed, tailored to the attitudes and beliefs of those communities, if we are going to increase the donation rate from them.

  Q67  Baroness Young of Hornsey: You say that as though you are not sure. Is that because you personally are not sure whether there is research? Has research been carried out in that area?

  Sir Liam Donaldson: I do not think there has been particularly good research carried out yet in that area. We can check on that and come back to you.

  Ms Norman: It is something the Taskforce agreed needed further work.

  Q68  Baroness Young of Hornsey: Is there any knowledge about whether that pattern is repeated internationally, that, where there are significant ethnic minority groups, there is this reluctance to come forward? Or is it something that is peculiar to Britain? Or do you not know?

  Ms Norman: I do not know. I am sorry. Across Europe I do not know.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: This is not directly related to your question because it is a wider context, but when I was producing the recommendations following Alder Hey we had several meetings with the faith groups, because we expected big resistance over trying to change the legislation, and there was really very little strong feeling about it—the Jewish community being the exception, I think, where there was a strongly held view. Certainly many of the other faith and cultural groups were quite keen on the idea of organs and tissues being used to help others, but that was in relation to people who had had post-mortems. We were not talking about transplants.

  Q69  Lord Trefgarne: It is a particular problem with some faith groups.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Yes.

  Q70  Lord Trefgarne: Who have not very readily responded to our requests for views on this matter. Is there a difficulty with some faith groups? I think you have referred to the Jewish faith.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Yes.

  Q71  Lord Trefgarne: Is the Muslim faith group content with all this?

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Certainly when we spoke to them in the earlier context they pointed to interpretations of the Koran which were supportive of the idea of donation. But then different Muslim scholars sometimes take different positions. Certainly the representatives we spoke to were very positive about it all.

  Q72  Lord Trefgarne: Although most of the faiths do not seem to have a difficulty, nonetheless in some of these faiths they do not come forward.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Yes, which is why I think we probably need more research into the attitudes and beliefs and to see whether it is purely a lack of awareness or whether there are some more fundamental objections.

  Q73  Lord Lea of Crondall: Is there not a paradox? You have a huge gap in supply and demand and I wonder why there is not slightly more direct public service advertising. When HIV/AIDS suddenly became a big thing, on a lamppost in Farnham there was a big poster saying, "Don't die of ignorance" and I remember one of my friends in the pub saying, "I didn't know you could die of that" ha-ha, but you did go in for direct advertising to fill the gap. Is the gap because people are too lazy to do it a donor card, or, like me, they have not got around to it? Is it because people are squeamish? It is strange. If the public opinion polls are saying that we ought to move in the direction of presumed consent, why is there such a big gap? Or is it just that people do not realise there is a gap?

  Sir Liam Donaldson: I think people probably realise there is a gap because there are different recruitment campaigns undertaken periodically. I think it is just that people do not get around to it mainly.

  Ms Norman: I would add: all of the above and a certain degree of apathy.

  Q74  Lord Lea of Crondall: It is not easy to do. I do not know how to do it. What do I do?

  Sir Liam Donaldson: You can just register on the website of UK Transplant.

  Q75  Lord Trefgarne: You can still carry a card, can you?

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Yes, you can.

  Ms Norman: You can register at doctors' surgeries.

  Q76  Chairman: The Committee has demonstrated its ignorance I wonder when the last time was that government had a really strong TV campaign, like the smoking campaign or the drink driving campaign.

  Ms Norman: We have tried to drip feed—which is a way we think we can get the best message across. Rather than a big, major campaign, we drip, drip, drip, to get the message across that way. I think there is evidence that if there is big media coverage, people will go to the website, they do register. As Sir Liam said, when the report was published a lot of people registered on the organ donation site.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: Within 48 hours of my report, about 30,000 people registered.

  Q77  Chairman: Maybe that is something we should be exploring.

  Ms Norman: When Holby City covered a transplant in their storyline about 18 months ago, if you remember, there was quite a lot of interest then.

  Chairman: We are demonstrating that it is probably ignorance and not squeamishness that stops people coming forward.

  Q78  Lord Wade of Chorlton: What views do you have about the need to make much more explicit for potential organ donors the basis of defining the point after death at which organs may be taken from them?

  Sir Liam Donaldson: I am not sure there is a problem of the public or the relatives of somebody who is dying fearing that the organ may be taken before they are pronounced brain dead. The greater problem really is an awareness amongst the staff in the hospitals, both in the intensive care units and in the accident and emergency departments, of the need to pursue consent wherever possible.

  Ms Norman: UK Transplant has done an audit of every death in intensive care since 2003 and they have tracked where we are losing potential donors. That audit is probably worth having a look at and I can certainly provide it to the Committee. Before they even get to being asked, we are losing. I think there is an issue around working with the clinical staff but also with the relatives.

  Q79  Lord Wade of Chorlton: There must be an understanding now in the medical profession as to when you say somebody is dead. What is the basis of that? Is it being brain dead or when your heart stops beating? I am not a medical man, so I do not have a clue how you do this.

  Sir Liam Donaldson: For somebody who is in a coma, basically, in intensive care, there is a whole range of criteria—and we can send you them—on how you define brain death. For somebody who is admitted to an accident department after a car crash and they are pronounced dead, it would be a conventional medical examination to determine whether there were any signs of life. That group is a more difficult group to get a viable organ from because you have to move very, very quickly to perfuse the organ and make sure it is viable. In the case of somebody who is in a coma, when you pronounce them brain dead the organ continues until the last minute to have its blood supply and it is well perfused and it is a healthier organ to transplant.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008