Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum by Dr Magi Sque and Dr Tracy Long, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton

DR SQUE'S AND DR LONG'S WORK RELATING TO THE FAMILIES OF POTENTIAL ORGAN DONORS

Q.  What further research do you feel is needed to investigate these issues and to develop ideas for encouraging more relatives to agree to organ donation? In what ways do you feel that involvement of the European Commission could help with this work?

  We need to increase the evidence to enhance donation rates as there is very little work done with families, health professionals or the public in UK and Europe. Therefore we need studies at UK and European levels. The purpose of these studies would be to inform best practice. I feel strongly however that we need to get our house in order in UK and make organ donation a research priority and get a number of large scale studies commissioned urgently; particularly in areas that will illuminate the recommendations of the Organ Donation Taskforce and underpin its implementation. We have provided a list of studies that we believe to be priorities (Please see Appendix 1).

  The European Commission must make organ donation a health priority and must commission and fund research in individual Member States and EU projects. The Commission needs to establish an EU co-ordinating centre eg Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Organ Transplantation [ELPAT] based at Erasmus University, Rotterdam. A similar organisation, the Gift of Life Institute in Philadelphia mission states: "The Gift of Life Institute aims to increase organ and tissue donation rates by providing the most innovative, evidence-based training, and consulting services required to enhance the skills, expertise, and practices of donation professionals worldwide." An EU Co-ordinating centre would oversee and work with Member States on:

    —  Research and development.

    —  Dissemination of best practice.

    —  Education and training.

    —  Exchange of best practice.

    —  Conferences and publications.

    —  Data storage and analysis.

    —  Source of information.

  ELPAT, funded by a grant from the European Union, is based at Erasmus MC University in Rotterdam. It is attempting to provide a structure through which the complex issues that concern organ transplantation can be discussed by drawing on European expertise in the legal, ethical and psychosocial aspects of organ transplantation. ELPAT aims to map and resolve complex differences between Member States by formulating European guidelines reflecting the ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects of organ transplantation. ELPAT's goal is to be a link between the European Union, the Council of Europe and European Society of Organ Transplantation thereby benefiting all the individuals within Member States in need of a transplant operation. It is the first real attempt to get EU experts in the field and with similar interests working together.

CHALLENGES FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONALS IN HELPING FAMILY MEMBERS OF POTENTIAL ORGAN DONORS

Q.  What arrangements do you think could be most effective for helping the families of potential organ donors to overcome their concerns and to agree to the donation of organs from a deceased relative? What evidence can you describe to us from across the EU or elsewhere in the world about the effectiveness of the arrangements you suggest?

  At a National level the present lack of a cohesive system for making organ and tissue donation a priority within the NHS is the main barrier to increasing donation rates.

  The lack of a cohesive system is hindering the efforts of health professionals who are striving to change this situation. Changes within the present day NHS, poorly informed and trained staff, and a poorly informed public, are undermining their aim of providing the best possible service to potential donor families and thereby increasing the donation of both solid organs and tissues.

  Most of the barriers within the NHS have been clearly identified in the Organ Donation Taskforce report as well as being placed in front of this committee by earlier speakers. By implementing the recommendations of the Taskforce the foundations will be laid for a service that helps health professional's support bereaved family members to reach decisions about organ donation that they have confidence in and feel satisfied with.

Preparation and training of health professionals

  Those who are in the front line of organ and tissue donation should have mandatory training, which is centralised and standardised. Training that is based on the best evidence and not personal preference. It is essential that tissue and blood donation are also fully integrated into this training as both of these activities are reducing within the UK, and yet are greatly influenced by the intervention of knowledgeable, positive and skilled health professionals.

  On a wider scale all training for health professionals, must address organ and tissue donation. This is in place in countries such as Norway, Belgium, France, Portugal, USA and Australia. In these countries organ and tissue donation is part of the curriculum at undergraduate and post graduate, or post registration levels. Issues underpinning organ and tissue donation are embedded in ethical working practices and end of life care modules.

RAISING PUBLIC AWARENESS OF ORGAN DONATION ISSUES

Q.  How important do you think that raising public awareness about organ donation and transplantation issues will be in seeking to raise the level of organ donation rates across the UK as a whole; and among particular sub-groups of the population? Please would you describe how you think such awareness raising could most effectively be carried out

  Increasing public awareness about organ and tissue donation is crucial in seeking to increase donation rates in the UK and Europe as organ and tissue donation can only exist with the participation of society and the support of the public. This support is fragile because organ donation whether deceased or living is an emotive issue and depends to a large extent on public trust in the professionals who are making decisions about the life or death. Due to the low numbers of people who die in circumstances that facilitate donation potential donor families are very unlikely to have any role models for their behaviour.

  Unlike a number of European countries the public in the UK [and USA] were not given the opportunity to be involved in the discussions concerned with setting up laws and defining under what conditions organ donation could take place. A questioning British public now needs to understand that organ donation is something they may be asked about as part of being involved in a health system; or at the death bed. Therefore they need non-crisis information to develop trusting relationships with health professionals and to be able to make informed choices at the bedside.

  Information regarding the possibility of organ donation should be therefore be fundamental to all areas of UK and EU health care systems and not left until individuals are at the death bed. The function of public education should be to enhance awareness of organ donation to the extent that when the question of organ donation is raised the idea is neither foreign nor intimidating to the grieving family but simply reminds them that other lives hang in the balance of their response.

  The circumstances of loss and bereavement associated with organ donation are culturally challenging, especially the post mortem procedures on the body. There is a need for public information and education about the procedures surrounding donation and transplantation, ie the concept of death certified by brainstem testing; brainstem testing; the nature of the donation operation (ie it is a careful surgical operation) and, the appearance of the donor following the operation, and the possibility and process of donation after cardiac death; the propriety of the donation operation; the disparity in need for organs and organ availability.

  Donor relatives have an important contribution to make in sustaining donation rates both in the educational role they play within their own communities and the formal roles they sometimes adopt, to help educate health care professionals, and bereavement support groups. Sque was advised that, in the USA, for every donor, approximately 1,000 people will receive informal donation education. Meeting the needs of families involved with donation may therefore be an effective way of improving donating rates across the EU.

  Support for the donor families should start at the bedside of the donor and be continued for as long as the need exists. One of these special needs is that it is important for the family to be cognisant of the difference a transplant made to a particular recipient's life, so they can "picture" their donor's achievement.

  Donor families wish this achievement of their donor to be recognised, valued and not forgotten. A number of strategies have been used to promote this on a personal level such as: thank you letters from transplant coordinators and recipients, updates on recipients' progress, remembrance cards sent to the family on the anniversary of the death and donation. On a public level in some areas there are commemorative thanks giving church services and the British Organ Donor Society has access to an avenue of lime trees in Wimpole Park in Cambridge, which can be adopted in the memory of a donor or recipient, while Donor Family North is developing a commemorative quilt.

  In the USA there are memorial gardens. An example of a memorial to organ and tissue donors is the granite memorial which stands on the main walkway into the entrance of the Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami. This is not only memorial to donors but acts as a tool of public education. Miami had one of the highest rates of donation in the USA.

  Are there other ways [such as a books of remembrance in hospitals] that could help families realise that the gift from their loved one is appreciated, valued and not forgotten? We probably need something of national significance. The bottom line is, and as suggested by the Organ Donation Taskforce, that we need research with families to help us understand the best way to acknowledge their donor and their families' generous decisions.

  All promotion advertising should stress the importance of discussing donation with family members or the person expected to make decisions following death.

  It might be helpful for charitable organisations and UK Transplant to work together to promote awareness about organ donation.

20 February 2008



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008