Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Further supplementary memorandum by METREX

  Lord Woolmer asked me yesterday whether METREX was advocating an additional level of government for European metropolitan regions and areas. I may not have made the METREX position explicit.

GOVERNANCE AND GOVERNMENT

  We do advocate a level of governance at the metropolitan level but not necessarily a level of government. The distinction is between governance as the capability for decision-making and government, which can add competencies (powers) and resources.

  I can perhaps illustrate this through the situation in Scotland. Here the government consists of the Scottish Parliament and 32 local Councils. However, there are also five city regions or metropolitan areas across which strategic decision-making is required. Across the Glasgow metropolitan area the eight Councils concerned have set up a level of governance, through a joint committee, without adding to the levels of government.

  Across Europe metropolitan areas are making appropriate administrative arrangements to manage change and these range from such informal governance to elected government, as in Germany. The choice often depends on the perception of the scale and intensity of change that has to be managed and the effectiveness of decision-making and implementation that is required.

  In addition, many European metropolitan regions and areas are cooperating for collective strength and competitiveness and this is particularly important outside the prosperous core if the Lisbon agenda is to be realised. The European jargon is coopetition.

  This is the approach advocated in the METREX Framework.

  However, such coopetition is not possible without metropolitan governance of some kind through which it can be progressed. In this sense the Benchmark approach facilitates the realisation of the Framework.

ERDF IMPLICATIONS

  METREX advocates the production of a European perspective or framework to clarify how the related objectives of social, economic and territorial cohesion can be achieved and the allocation of financial resources accordingly. European metropolitan regions and areas would then be key partners in the realisation of such an overview.

  In reality cooperation at the metropolitan level and between metropolitan areas is happening across Europe, driven by the practical need for competitiveness. The allocation of ERDF resources should reflect this reality (for example, the Northern Way initiative in England) and support it as one way of progressing the realisation of the Lisbon Agenda.

9 January 2008





 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008