Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 380-381)

Professor Danuta Hübner

6 MARCH 2008

  Q380  Lord Kerr of Kinlochard: Supposing there were not any Structural Funds and you arrived and there was a decision that there should be Structural Funds, there should be Regional, Cohesion and Social Funds, and you had the job of doing it from scratch, like George Thomson 35 years ago, would you construct exactly what there is now or how would you do it differently?

  Professor Hübner: I would probably keep some things and I would change some things because the world is changing. As you know, Lord Kerr, the history of Europe is that this is a policy that has been evolving over time. We did not discuss the issue of policy as allowing for internal market development but it is helping the poorer to participate in the benefits of integration that otherwise would be beyond their capacity and there is this additional function of the policy. I must tell you that very often on the ground we are the first group of people coming to check the transposition of European law, especially for procurement. There is a very tough conditionality with this policy which some people say is the only effective conditionality across the world. We are also exporting that to China and Russia. We have signed Memorandums of Understanding with Brazil, China, the West African Union and also Mercosur because they want to follow the European example. We have had a lot of exchanges and working together. I would certainly change the system in relation to bureaucracy. This is something where we have to be really innovative and think how we can protect the budget, which is one function, and the other one is to contribute to growth and how to reduce the cost of this policy. Do not ask me how I would do it and it would not be accepted by anybody if I had my way. I would probably change this. Incidentally, I would keep this policy for all the regions. I travel a lot and have visited 60-something per cent of the regions so far and I see the value of this policy on the ground. Today people do not want to be informed, they want to be involved in things and this policy gives them the chance to be involved. It triggers innovative approaches to many, many things. I probably should not say it here because one should not praise the UK too much in this room, but the inspiration we get from the UK on financial engineering and the approach to many, many projects which you would never expect to find on the Continent because of differences in economic culture is really very inspiring. Learning from others, which I do taking examples from one region to another, is something that this policy is bringing in terms of change to the European economy.

  Q381  Chairman: Thank you very much, Commissioner, that was enormously helpful. I am very grateful to you for receiving us. I would ask one favour. Could I have a copy of your survey on the approval ratings of the policy because it is particularly important to know that in the United Kingdom?

  Professor Hübner: Yes.

  Chairman: Thank you very much.





 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008