Correspondence with Ministers October 2006 to April 2007 - European Union Committee Contents


EU-THIRD COUNTRY AGREEMENTS: TAKING ACCOUNT OF BULGARIA AND ROMANIA

Letter from Lord Triesman, Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, to the Chairman

  Following the accession of Bulgaria and Romania, it has become necessary to update a number of EU-Third Country Agreements. A full list of these agreements is attached (Annex A).

  I am submitting for Scrutiny an example of one such agreement, the amendment of the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Moldova, alongside this letter. This is the second EU-Third Country Agreement to be prepared by the Commission. The first such proposed amendment, the EU-Mexico Association Agreement, cleared Scrutiny in January 2007, (but has yet to be adopted by Council).

  The amending of these agreements is purely a technical matter, simply incorporating the new Member States as parties to the Agreement. No further changes are envisaged. In light of this, I hope you will agree that it will not be necessary to submits EMs for the future amendments to the EU-Third Country Agreements listed in Annex A.

  The exception to the above is the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Russia. Geoff Roon wrote to you about this issue on 2 February 2007.

13 February 2007

Annex A

LIST OF AGREEMENTS TO BE UPDATED

    —  Association Agreement with Turkey and relevant Association Council Decisions

    —  Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Croatia

    —  Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Macedonia

    —  Interim Agreement on Trade and Trade-related matters with Albania

    —  Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Albania

    —  EU Partnership Agreement with India

    —  EU Partnership Agreement with China

    —  Canada: Bilateral Agreement on Trade in Wines and Spirit Drinks

    —  EU-Chile Association Agreement

    —  EU-Andean Countries Agreement

    —  EU-Central America Political Dialogue and Co-operation Agreement

    —  EU Association Agreements with all the Mediterranean Countries

    —  Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Armenia

    —  Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Azerbaijan

    —  Partnership, Co-operation and Development Agreement with Georgia

    —  Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Kazakhstan

    —  Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Kyrgyzstan

    —  Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Ukraine

    —  Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Uzbekistan

    —  Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Turkmenistan

    —  Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Belarus

    —  Trade and Co-operation Agreement with Mongolia

    —  European Community-South Africa Trade, Development and Co-operation Agreement

    —  EU-Norway Bilateral Trade Agreement

    —  EU-Iceland Bilateral Trade Agreement

    —  European Economic Area Agreement

    —  EU-Faroe Island Bilateral Trade Agreement

Letter from Rt Hon Geoff Hoon MP, Minister for Europe, Foreign and Commonwealth Office to the Chairman

  Lord Triesman wrote to you on 13 February 2007 proposing that it should not be necessary to submit Explanatory Memoranda in respect of Protocols that amend EU-Third Country Agreements by incorporating Romania and Bulgaria. Your Committee has, however, requested that a short Explanatory Memorandum be submitted for all such Protocols.

  Since this exchange of letters, the Council Secretariat informed us on 20 March that Council and Commission Decisions on the signing, provisional application and conclusion of a Protocol to incorporate Romania and Bulgaria into the EU-Ukraine Partnership and Co-operation Agreement are due to be approved at the Economic and Financial Affairs Council on 26 March. Approval by the Council on this date would enable the Protocol to be signed by the EU and Ukraine during the proposed visit of the Ukranian Prime Minister to Brussels on 27 March.

  I do not wish to hold up Council approval of these documents and am therefore writing to inform you that I will, in all likelihood, have to approve the documents prior to completion of scrutiny. Given the straightforward nature of these documents, as explained by Lord Triesman in his letter of 13 February, I hope your Committee will understand my decision.

22 March 2007



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009