Correspondence with Ministers October 2006 to April 2007 - European Union Committee Contents


GLOBAL EUROPE: COMPETING IN THE WORLD (13715/06)

Letter from the Chairman to Jim Fitzpatrick MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Employment Relations and Postal Services, Department of Trade and Industry

  Thank you very much for your Explanatory Memorandum 13715/06. This was considered by Sub-Committee A at their meeting on 7 November.

  The Sub-Committee cleared the document from scrutiny, as it does not propose any new policy initiatives. The Sub-Committee were disappointed, however, that a Communication which faced likely adoption on 13 November only had its Explanatory Memorandum tabled on 27 October. This seemed particularly disappointing in this case as the document was produced following considerable consultation by the Commission and so was anticipated. This short timescale makes effective scrutiny difficult, and I hope that you will be able to consider the need for more thorough consultation once the individual policy suggestions made in this Communication begin to be brought forward by the Commission in their own right.

  The Sub-Committee would have also welcomed sight of the draft Council Conclusions which you refer to in paragraph 14 of the Explanatory Memorandum. I would be grateful if you could send details of the conclusions that are adopted by the Council following the GAERC meeting.

16 November 2006

Letter from Jim Fitzpatrick MP to the Chairman

  Thank you for your letter of 16 November. I am very grateful to Sub-Committee A for clearing Explanatory Memorandum 13715/06 from scrutiny.

  I regret that the timing of our Explanatory Memorandum left you with a short timescale for scrutiny. Even though the European Commission had consulted Member States on their plans for the Communication, they chose not to give us an opportunity to review the text before its publication on 5 October. We will, though, strive to ensure that subsequent policy suggestions brought forward by the Commission as a result of this Communication reach you with greater time for consideration.

  As requested, I enclose a copy of the Council Conclusions on the Communication. For clarity, I should perhaps note that it was these Conclusions., not the Communication itself, which were adopted at the GAERC on 13 November.

5 December 2006

Annex A

COUNCIL ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSIONS

"The Council

  Welcomes the Commission's Communication Global Europe: Competing in the World, discussing the external aspects of Europe's competitiveness and linking external policies to the EU's broader competitiveness agenda, as presented in the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs.

  Shares the Commission's analysis on the changing context of the EU's trade and competitiveness policy, and on the challenges posed by globalisation. The ongoing transformations in the global economic order create significant opportunities for growth and development, but also necessitate rapid and deep-going adjustments. For the ELT to maintain its competitive position, it must constantly strive to improve upon its policy and regulatory framework.

  Acknowledges that an effective policy to foster competitiveness must cover both internal and external measures. Trade policy can make a significant contribution to growth and jobs, and must therefore be considered an essential element of a European policy of competitiveness. Internal and external policies should work in tandem, in a coherent and mutually supporting way.

  Shares the Commission's view on the basic parameters concerning the future development of the external aspects of the EU's competitiveness and its recognition of the need for an integrated, coherent approach to domestic and global challenges.

  Therefore considers that:

  1.  Trade policy must build upon the premise that Europe's economic prosperity is inextricably linked to that of other regions of the world. Hence, the answer to growing global competition is not to protect the EU from fair competition, but to adopt an increasingly active policy of openness at home and abroad.

  2.  Addressing barriers to trade, investment and business activity in third countries plays a key role in improving the competitive position of European industries. Our work on trade barriers must be increasingly broadly based so that it looks at the whole operating environment of European firms in third markets and places more emphasis on non-transparent and discriminatory regulatory obstacles, and restrictions to competition. This is particularly important for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs).

  3.  It is equally important to guarantee an effective, secure and non-discriminatory access of European companies to raw materials, including energy, and to other inputs to the production process. This underlines the need to promote open trading regimes in the EU and in third countries, and to tackle any foreign restrictions to exports that are likely to harm EU competitiveness.

  4.  The completion of the internal market and effective innovation policies at the European level are cornerstones of European competitiveness and a critical platform for the EU's success. A well functioning internal market based on clear and consistent rules is a precondition for the development of successful global firms. It also serves as a solid demonstration of how barriers to trade and investment can be eliminated for increasing productivity and growth. External aspects of competitiveness will have to be factored in the forthcoming Single Market review, and should be an integral part of the annual report on the implementation of the Lisbon strategy.

  5.  It is important to ensure that external considerations, including the global position of the EU and the policies of other countries, are taken into account when setting key internal policies. The goal must generally be to avoid provisions in the EU that impose undue burdens on European companies. The EU must play a leading role in sharing best practice and developing high quality global rules and standards. To do so effectively it must actively look for means to improve the compatibility between its regulations and those of its main trading partners. Progress in regulatory cooperation can bring about considerable benefits to all parties and lessen the risks of unnecessary compliance costs for businesses.

  6.  In current conditions where innovation is a key factor in the success of new business, IPR violations and counterfeiting deprive innovators of rewards for their investment and risk-taking. An effective protection of intellectual property is therefore an important priority in global competitive markets.

  7.  The EU will ensure that the WTO remains centre stage in the international trading system and the cornerstone of a strong and rules-based multilateral trading system. Achieving an ambitious outcome in the Doha Development agenda remains our first priority and the EU will work intensively to restart the negotiations as soon as possible.

  8.  Building on the platform of the WTO and in parallel to our efforts to resume the DDA negotiations, there is a need for complementary mechanisms that allow us to continue to achieve additional improvements in market access and business environment, particularly with our future major trading partners. IPR enforcement, public procurement, regulatory cooperation, competition (including state aid) and investment are all key issues in this respect.

  9.  As one of the policy initiatives, the EU should aim at a new generation of WTO-compatible FTAs that extend beyond present agreements and build towards future multilateral negotiations. The agreements should strive for the highest possible degree of trade liberalisation, taking into account their positive contribution to the EU's competitiveness and their impact on internal European policies. The agreements, which should be part of a coherent framework of the EU's relations with each partner, should include far-reaching liberalisation of services and investment and should place special emphasis on the elimination of non-tariff barriers and on regulatory issues. In setting geographical priorities for these agreements, economic considerations should play a primary role, notwithstanding other, political considerations.

  10.  Based on these criteria, the Council supports the early launch of negotiations with ASEAN countries, India and South Korea. For economic reasons but also given their role in the EU's neighbourhood, negotiations with Russia and Ukraine would be justified as soon as their WTO accession processes have been completed. Special attention should be paid to finalising the EU's ongoing negotiating processes, fulfilling the EU's existing commitments and to the development of the Transatlantic trading relationship.

  11.  In the context ofglobalisation and increasing openness, special attention must be paid to policy measures that help European citizens and businesses adapt to these changes. It is also important to ensure that the positive effects of trade opening benefit all citizens and are not captured by specific interests. A broad distribution of benefits through competitive markets is essential for winning the political argument for change.

  12.  All future initiatives will have to take into account the needs of developing countries and the potential impact of any new policies on them, in particular as concerns poor countries' access to EU markets, sustainable and economic development of these countries, and the goal of poverty reduction. We must work together with our trading partners to improve social and environmental standards.

  Invites the Commission, as appropriate and without undue delay, to submit proposals on the different new initiatives to the Council for further discussion. These include the strategy on China, published on 24 October 2006, a new generation of carefully selected and prioritised FTAs, proposals on IPR enforcement and public procurement, a renewed market access strategy and a Green Paper on trade defence instruments.

  Stresses the need for transparency throughout the whole process and in particular for all initiatives proposals for negotiating directives to be thoroughly discussed with Members States. Each FTA negotiation will need a separate proposal for negotiating directives.

  Underlines the importance, for internal and external competitiveness, of prompt and comprehensive implementation of the renewed Lisbon strategy.

  Invites future presidencies to work across individual policy domains and beyond the agenda set out in the Commission's communication, in order to deal comprehensively with globalisation and its effects.

  In the light of the significance of issues concerning the external aspects of Europe's competitiveness, agrees to revert to the matter at its forthcoming meetings."



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009