Correspondence with Ministers October 2006 to April 2007 - European Union Committee Contents


COMPANY LAW AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (10041/03, 7677/04)

Letter from Rt Hon Ian McCartney MP, Minister of State for Trade, Investment and Foreign Affairs, Department of Trade and Industry/Foreign and Commonwealth Office to the Chairman

  I am writing to update your Committee on the European Commission's review of its Company Law and Corporate Governance Action Plan.

  In May 2003, the European Commission launched its Action Plan in its Communication "Modernising Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union", On 26 June 2003, the DTI submitted an Explanatory Memorandum (EM 10041/03). Your Committee cleared this EM, by a letter dated 3 July 2003. In December 2005, the Commission completed the short-term phase of the Action Plan, and announced a review of its priorities for the remaining 13 measures due for action in the medium or long term. On 28 March 2006[84], Gerry Sutcliffe wrote to your Committee giving details of the Government's comments to the Commission on that review.

  In particular, he noted that the Government was questioning whether the case had been made for EU action in relation to the majority of the 13 measures that had yet to be brought forward. In the light of this, the House of Commons Scrutiny Committee asked for information on any cases where measures were dropped from the Action Plan as a result of the Government's representations. The DTI promised to give this information once the review of the Action Plan had been completed by the Commission.

  The outcome of the review was announced by Commissioner McCreevy during a speech at the European Parliament on 21 November. I attach the extract from the speech that deals with the Action Plan. You will see that, of the 13 measures outstanding, the Commissioner has committed himself to legislation on only one—a Directive to make it easier for companies to transfer their registered office from one Member State to another. In addition, he is carrying out studies on two other possible measures, and is reflecting on a third. His statement also mentions two measures not included in the original Action Plan. The first is a simplification scheme to reduce administrative burdens imposed by existing EU companies legislation. The second is the report on auditor liability that the revised 8th company law directive requires the Commission to issue by 1 January 2007. We understand that the Commission will not formally be amending its Communication on the Action Plan. This leaves open the possibility, in theory at least, that other measures will resurface. However, our understanding is that the Commissioner's statement represents his wish not impose further regulatory burdens on EU companies.

  The DTI, in partnership with UK business and investor representatives, worked hard before and during the UK Presidency both to promote a review of the Action Plan, and to persuade the Commission and other Member States that EU measures should be pursued only where necessary to further competitiveness or better regulation principles. I believe that the Commissioner's statement represents a successful outcome to that work.

12 December 2006

EXTRACT FROM COMMISSIONER MCCREEVY'S SPEECH TO THE LEGAL COMMITTEE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 21 NOVEMBER 2006

COMPANY LAW AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

  Company law exemplifies how this policy mix can work. I am determined to give European firms a flexible regulatory framework that serves their needs, rather than imposing unnecessary regulatory burdens on them.

  And I am committed to making company law a test case of how we apply Better Regulation principles. All initiatives on company law and corporate governance will build on public consultations and be subject to in-depth regulatory impact assessments.

    —  Firstly, we need to make sure that companies can fully reap the benefits of the Internal Market. Companies should enjoy full mobility within the EU—which is not the case today. For that reason, I have asked my services to start assessing the impact of a Directive enabling companies to move their registered office from one Member State to another. On that basis, I envisage submitting a proposal for a 14th Company Law Directive next spring.

    —  Secondly, many stakeholders expressed strong support for a Statute for the European Private Company. Your Committee has just voted on a report which also supports this idea. I have asked my services to start work on a study of the feasibility of a European Private Company Statute. We will examine all options for a simple, user-friendly statute which will also meet the needs of small firms.

    —  However, I am very cautious about introducing a multiplicity of European corporate forms. And I am not yet convinced about the ability of a European Foundation Statute to respond to the specific needs of foundations. Nonetheless, we will pursue our reflection.

    —  Beyond these individual initiatives, we will launch a simplification scheme to make life easier for companies. We need to simplify the environment in which they operate. We know there still exist unnecessary administrative burdens. We will measure the costs imposed by such burdens and then make proposals on how to remove them. I intend to present a communication on this crucial issue before next summer.

    —  As you are already aware, I also intend to continue to provoke a lively debate on the issue of proportionality between capital and control of companies.

    —  Last but not least, there is the separate but linked question of auditor liability. This subject came up last year when we agreed a new 8th Company Law Directive, thanks in large part to the excellent work of Bert Doorn. The Commission agreed to analyse insurability of audit firms and the risk of loosing of one of the so-called Big Four audit firms. I hope I can rely on your support in work on this issue.

Letter from Rt Hon Ian McCartney MP to the Chairman

  I am writing to inform you that I am publishing today consultation documents on implementation of the Directives listed above, following agreement with the Economic Affairs, Productivity and Competitiveness (EAPC) Committee.

  I will also be informing Parliament today of the publication of these documents. Copies of them will be placed in the House libraries and will be available on the DTI website.

  With particular reference to your letter of 19 January 2006[85], (Doc 14119/04), in which you asked for a copy of the consultation document on the implementation of the proposed Directive amending Directives 78/660/EC and 83/349/EC concerning the annual accounts of certain types of companies and consolidated accounts (Amendments to the EC Accounting Directives), I am enclosing copies of all these documents for your committee (not printed).

5 March 2007




84   Correspondence with Ministers, 40th Report of Session 2006-07, HL Paper 187, pp 316-317 Back

85   Correspondence with Ministers, 45th Report of Session 2005-06, HL Paper 243, p 385 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009