Correspondence with Ministers October 2006 to April 2007 - European Union Committee Contents


FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AGENCY (10774/05)

Letter from the Chairman to Rt Hon Baroness Ashton of Upholland, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs

  Thank you for your letter of 8 September 2006[93]which has been made available to Sub-Committee E. I should be grateful if you would keep the Committee informed of developments.

12 October 2006

Letter from the Chairman to Rt Hon Baroness Ashton of Upholland

  Sub-Committee E examined the proposal at its meeting on 22 November 2006.

  We are pleased to see that a number of the Committee's recommendations contained in its Report Human Rights Protection in Europe: the Fundamental Rights Agency, 29th Report of Session 2005-06, HL Paper 155 are reflected in the current position of the draft proposal. Your Explanatory Memorandum explains that revised Article 4(2) allows a limited legislative scrutiny role for the Agency, which is something which we would particularly welcome. However, it is by no means obvious from that Article that legislative scrutiny is what is being envisaged here. This could be made clearer in the text.

  The area of the proposal which we find most disappointing relates to the independence of the Agency and its management structure. As we made clear in our Report, there is a danger that the combination of the one-Member State-one-seat management board and the significant role of the Council in determining the Agency's work programme will lead to excessive interference in and constraints on the Agency's work. We are pleased to learn from Meg Munn MP that the Government are considering agreeing to a smaller management board for the European Institute of Gender Equality.

  We note that this draft still includes the Decision empowering the Agency to act in Third Pillar matters and we express once again our strong support for the inclusion of this remit. As Recital 8 seeks to preclude the Agency from having a role outside the scope of application of Community law, some revisions will clearly have to be made to the proposal if a Third Pillar remit is agreed.

  We have decided to clear the document from scrutiny.

23 November 2006



93   Corresondence with Ministers, 40th Report of Session 2006-07, HL Paper 187, pp 356-357. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009