EU-US AVIATION AGREEMENT (8656/06)
Letter from Rt Hon Douglas Alexander,
Secretary of State for Transport, Department for Transport to
the Chairman
My Department submitted an Explanatory Memorandum
on this proposal on 31 May 2006, following which there was an
exchange of correspondence which rests with your letter of 25
July 2006[28]
to Gillian Merron, in which you asked to be kept informed of further
developments.
At that stage negotiations between the EU and
the United States had ended, and further consideration of the
draft agreement by the Transport Council suspended, pending the
conclusion of the US Department of Transportation's consultations
on its proposed Rule on foreign control of US airlines. However,
following opposition from the US Congress, the proposed Rule was
in the event subsequently delayed and then, in December 2006,
withdrawn.
At its subsequent meeting the EU Transport Council
expressed its disappointment at this outcome and asked the European
Commission to enter into further negotiations with the United
States as soon as possible with a view to seeking further elements
to ensure a proper balance of interests. As a result further negotiations
were held between January and March, concluding in a revised draft
first stage agreement that will now be presented to the Transport
Council on 22 March.
The main elements of the draft first stage agreement
remain as before (as set out in EM 8656/06), but new aspects added
as a result of the latest discussion include:
clarification of the rights for EU
investors to own US airlines (within the limits of existing US
legislation);
measures to facilitate EU ownership
of third country airlines;
the EU reserving the right to introduce
new limits on US investment in EU airlines on a reciprocal basis;
provisions on franchishing and branding
that will help EU airlines or other companies to develop a presence
in the US market;
a commitment from the US that this
agreement will qualify EU airlines to apply for antitrust immunity;
some limited additional rights for
EU carriers only to operate passenger services from the US to
other destinations (so-called "seventh freedom services");
some limited access for Community
carriers to certain types of US Government-financed traffic under
the "Fly America" programme, with a commitment to consider
further access in the next stage; and
a list of agreed priority items for
second stage negotiations, and a right for parties to withdraw
rights under the agreement if no second stage agreement has been
signed within a defined timetable.
We expect the Commission and Presidency to commend
the revised agreement to the Council for its approval. The Council
will not be asked to make a formal decision on signature or ratification
of the agreement at this stage, and will not therefore be considering
the proposed Council instruments that are currently subject to
scrutiny. However, the Presidency has indicated that it will be
seeking "political decision" from the Council to proceed
on the basis of the current text, with a view to possible signature
at the EU-US Summit on 30 April.
As you will be aware, there are strong views
both for and against the draft agreement amongst UK interests.
We have been in close discussion with interested parties since
these negotiations began in 2003, and particularly so in recent
weeks, and have listened carefully to their views.
As I am sure you will understand, I am afraid
that I cannot pre-empt the discussion in the Council by setting
out our intentions or our negotiating position in detail, but
I thought it would be useful at this stage to up-date the committee
on recent developments. It remains the UK's position that our
final goal must be a fully liberalised open aviation area, covering
European and US markets, within which airlines are able to operate
freely as regards routes, schedules, fares, ownership and control,
based on commercial decisions and fair competition in an open
market. The deal currently on the table would go some considerable
way to delivering these objectives, but falls short in certain
areas, particularly as regards the liberalisation of ownership
and control restrictions. At the same time, we are aware of the
current political realities within the United States, and of the
benefits for consumers and other interests that the current deal
would deliver. So what I and my fellow European transport ministers
will need to consider at the Council is whether a phased approach
is possibleone which unlocks some passenger and other benefits
now, but also ensure that there is a clear mechanism in place,
with real incentives on both sides, to make early progress to
achieving the fully open market that remains my ultimate objective.
I will, of course, keep you informed of the
outcome of the Council discussions.
Finally, on a point of detail, you asked in
your letter of 25 July about "potential new entrants"
already holding slots at London Heathrow. Clearly it is difficult
for me to speculate about the likely strategies of individual
airlines. However, it is a matter of record that bmi, with the
second largest slot portfolio at Heathrow, has long sought access
to the Heathrow-US market. It is also the case that the draft
agreement would make it possible for airlines from other EU countries
to operate transatlantic services out of Heathrow, and that some
of these do have significant slot holdings at the airport. And
it could certainly be envisaged that potential new entrants might
seek to secure slots through secondary trading, particularly within
alliances.
16 March 2007
Letter from the Chairman to Rt Hon Douglas
Alexander MP
Thank you for your letter of 16 March 2007,
which Sub-Committee B considered at its meeting on 19 March.
We were grateful to you for your report on the
latest developments on the EU-USA agreement ahead of the Transport
Council meeting on 22 March. As you will be aware, at our meeting
on 19 March, we took evidence from two of your officials, David
McMillan and Tim Figures. We were very grateful to them for clarifying
some of the issues surrounding the agreement.
We believe that the "first phase"
agreement which appears to be on the table for agreement in Council
would represent some progress, although it falls far short of
your goal of "a fully liberalised open aviation area".
This is a goal which we continue to share. The deal as it stands
does seem to offer benefits for consumers and the UK economy as
a whole, and these must be carefully weighed against the strong
opposition it faces from some of the larger UK airlines.
Of particular concern to us is the likely continuance
of the "Fly America" programme in the USA. We are aware
that significant amendments to this policy would almost certainly
require US primary legislation, but if the agreement is to be
fairly balanced between European and American interests we would
ask you to argue forcibly for strong "tie-ins" in the
phase one deal which would address this programme.
As we have not been able to ascertain the details
of the agreement, we will maintain scrutiny on the proposal, and
would be grateful to you for a full report following the Transport
Council.
21 March 2007
Letter from Rt Hon Douglas Alexander MP
to the Chairman
Further to my letter of 16 March, I am writing
as promised to inform you of the outcome of the Transport Council's
discussions on 22 March.
As expected, the Commission and Presidency commended
the revised draft stage one agreement to the Council for its approval.
After some discussion, the Council agreed unanimously to approve
this agreement, with a view to its signature at the EU-US summit
meeting in Washington on 30 April.
In its conclusions the Council also:
re-iterated its ultimate objective
of a fully liberalised open aviation area covering the EU and
the US in accordance with the mandate agreed by the Council in
June 2003;
asked the Commission to secure agreement
of the United States to put back the date of provisional application
of the agreement to 30 March 2008 in order to give airlines and
airports more time to prepare;
underlined the importance of reaching
a second stage agreement in order to pursue the benefits of liberalisation
on both sides of the Atlantic and called upon the Commission to
engage robustly with the United States government so as to secure
this goal as quickly as possible; and
agreed on a mechanism whereby, if
no Stage 2 agreement has been reached within 12 months of the
start of the review mentioned in Article 21(3) of the agreement,
the Community will automatically give notice of the suspension
of new traffic rights to the US under that articlesuch
rights to be determined by each Member State in relation to its
own territoryunless the Council decides by unanimity not
to do so.
This agreement will bring an end to the restrictions
on routes, frequencies and fares governing aviation between the
UK and the US that stretch back over 60 years. It will also end
the legal uncertainty surrounding UK-US aviation relations.
I am very much aware of the need for further
progress towards our ultimate goal of a fully liberalised open
aviation area. I am pleased that we secured at the Council a clear
political commitment that this remains our goal, together with
a detailed timetable for second stage negotiations and the unconstrained
ability to take sanctions against the US if meaningful progress
has not been made within that timetable.
I said to the Transport Select Committee that
I would not sign up to a deal which was not in Britain's best
interests. Taking into account the further commitments and safeguards
reflected in the Council conclusions, and bearing in mind the
benefits this agreement would bring for UK interests, I took the
view that this stage one deal satisfied that test. This agreement
will sweep away outdated and illegal restrictions which stand
at odds with our policy of air services liberalisation. It should
deliver real benefits for UK consumers through increased competition
and better services. It provides an open, deregulated transatlantic
market place in which UK carriersboth existing and newwill
be well placed to compete. It sets out a clear process for delivering
our ultimate goal of a fully liberalised EU-US open aviation area.
And I believe it will provide a real impetus to further deregulation
and modernisation of the international aviation industry around
the globe.
I was grateful for the Committee's very prompt
response to my previous letter, following the meeting on 19 March
at which you took evidence from my officials.
I note that you maintained scrutiny on the proposal
pending full details of the agreement. Accordingly, I attach a
copy of the text of the final agreement as we expect it to be
presented for signature. I note also your comments about the "Fly
America" programme in the USA. The Government also remains
concerned about the continuation of this programme. Although some
concessions were obtained from the US side in the final stages
of these negotiations, the bulk of the restrictionswhich,
as you say, are enshrined in US lawremain in place for
the time being. That is why we have ensured that "further
access to Government-financed air transportation" is specifically
listed in Article 21 of the agreement as a priority item for the
second stage negotiations.
With these explanations and assurances I hope
you will feel able to lift scrutiny ahead of the proposed signature
of the agreement.
11 April 2007
Annex A
AIR TRANSPORT
AGREEMENT
The United States of Ameria (hereinafter the
"United States"), of the one part; and
The Republic of Austria,
The Kingdom of Belgium
The Republic of Bulgaria,
The Republic of Cyprus,
The Czech Republic,
The Kingdom of Denmark,
The Republic of Estonia,
The Republic of Finland,
The French Republic,
The Federal Republic of Germany,
The Hellenic Republic,
The Republic of Hungary,
Ireland,
The Italian Republic,
The Republic of Latvia,
The Republic of Lithuania,
The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg,
The Republic of Malta,
The Kingdom of the Netherlands,
The Republic of Poland,
The Portuguese Republic,
Romania,
The Slovak Republic,
The Republic of Slovenia,
The Kingdom of Spain,
The Kingdom of Sweden,
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland,
being parties to the Treaty establishing the European
Community and being Member States of the European Union (hereinafter
the "Member States"),
and the European Community, of the other part;
Desiring to promote an international aviation
system based on competition among airlines in the marketplace
with minimum government interference and regulation;
Desiring to facilitate the expansion of international
air transport opportunities, including through the development
of air transportation networks to meet the needs of passengers
and shippers for convenient air transportation services;
Desiring to make it possible for airlines to
offer the travelling and shipping public competitive prices and
services in open markets;
Desiring to have all sectors of the air transport
industry, including airline workers, benefit in a liberalized
agreement;
Desiring to ensure the highest degree of safety
and security in international air transport and reaffirming their
grave concern about acts or threats against the security of aircraft,
which jeopardize the safety of persons or property, adversely
affect the operation of air transportation, and undermine public
confidence in the safety of civil aviation;
Noting the Convention on International Civil
Aviation, opened for signature at Chicago on December 7, 1944;
Recognizing that government subsidies may adversely
affect airline competition and may jeopardize the basic objectives
of this Agreement;
Affirming the importance of protecting the environment
in developing and implementing international aviation policy;
Noting the importance of protecting consumers,
including the protections afforded by the Convention for the Unification
of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, done at Montreal
May 28, 1999;
Intending to build upon the framework of existing
agreements with the goal of opening access to markets and maximizing
benefits for consumers, airlines, labor, and communities on both
sides of the Atlantic;
Recognizing the importance of enhancing the
access of their airlines to global capital markets in order to
strengthen competition and promote the objectives of this Agreement;
Intending to establish a precedent of global
significance to promote the benefits of liberalization in this
crucial economic sector;
Have agreed as follows:
ARTICLE 1
Definitions
For the purposes of this Agreement, unless otherwise
stated, the term:
1. "Agreement" means this Agreement,
its Annexes and Appendix, and any amendments thereto;
2. "Air transportation" means
the carriage by aircraft of passengers, baggage, cargo, and mail,
separately or in combination, held out to the public for remuneration
or hire;
3. "Convention" means the Convention
on International Civil Aviation, opened for signature at Chicago
on December 7, 1944, and includes:
(a) any amendment that has entered into force
under Article 94(a) of the Convenion and has been ratified by
both the United States and the Member State or Member States as
is relevant to the issue in question, and
(b) any Annex or any amendment thereto adopted
under Article 90 of the Convention, insofar as such Annex or amendment
is at any given time effective for both the United States and
the Member State or Member States as is relevant to the issue
in question;
4. "Full cost" means the cost
of providing service plus a reasonable charge for administrative
overhead;
5. "International air transportation"
means air transportation that passes through the airspace over
the territory of more than one State;
6. "Party" means either the United
States or the European Community and its Member States;
7. "Price" means any fare, rate
or charge for the carriage of passengers, baggage and/or cargo
(excluding mail) in air transportation, including surface transportation
in connection with international air transportation, if applicable,
charged by airlines, including their agents, and the conditions
governing the availability of such fare, rate or charge;
8. "Stop for non-traffic purposes"
means a landing for any purpose other than taking or or discharging
passengers, baggage, cargo and/or mail in air transportation;
9. "Territory" means, for the
United States, the land areas (mainland and islands), internal
waters and territorial sea under its sovereignty or jurisdiction,
and, for the European Community and its Member States, the land
areas (mainland and islands), internal waters and territorial
sea in which the Treaty establishing the European Community is
applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and
any successor instrument; application of this Agreement to Gibraltar
airport is understood to be without prejudice to the respective
legal positions of the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom
with regard to the dispute over sovereignty over the territory
in which the airport is situated, and to the continuing suspension
of Gibraltar Airport from European Community aviation measures
existing as at 18 September 2006 as between Member States, in
accordance with the Ministerial statement on Gibraltar Airport
agreed in Co«rdoba in September 2006; and
10. "User charge" means a charge
imposed on airlines for the provision of airport, airport environmental,
air navigation, or aviation security facilities or services including
related services and facilities.
ARTICLE 2
Fair and Equal Opportunity
Each Party shall allow a fair and equal opportunity
for the airlines of both Parties to compete in providing the international
air transportation governed by this Agreement.
ARTICLE 3
Grant of Rights
1. Each Party grants to the other Party
the following rights for the conduct of international air transportation
by the airlines of the other Party:
(a) the right to fly across its territory without
landing;
(b) the right to make stops in its territory
for non-traffic purposes;
(c) the right to perform international air transportation
between points on the following routes:
(i) for airlines of the United States (hereinafter
"US airlines"), from points behind the United States
via the United States and intermediate points to any point or
points in any Member State or States and beyond; and for all-cargo
service, between any Member State and any point or points (including
in any other Member States);
(ii) for airlines of the European Community
and its Member States (hereinafter Community airlines), from points
behind the Member States via the Member States and intermediate
points to any point or points in the United States and beyond;
for all-cargo service, between the United States and any point
or points; and, for combination services, between any point or
points in the United States and any point or points in any member
of the European Common Aviation Area (hereinafter the "ECAA")
as of the date of signature of this Agreement; and
(d) the rights otherwise specified in this Agreement.
2. Each airline may on any or all flights
and at its option:
(a) operate flights in either or both directions;
(b) combine different flight numbers within one
aircraft operation;
(c) serve behind, intermediate, and beyond points
and points in the territories of the Parties in any combination
and in any order;
(d) omit stops at any point or points;
(e) transfer traffic from any of its aircraft
to any of its other aircraft at any point;
(f) serve points behind any point in its territory
with or without change of aircraft or flight number and hold out
and advertise such services to the public as through services;
(g) make stopovers at any points whether within
or outside the territory of either Party;
(h) carry transit traffic through the other Party's
territory; and
(i) combine traffic on the same aircraft regardless
of where such traffic originates;
without directional or geographic limitation
and without loss of any right to carry traffic otherwise permissible
under this Agreement.
3. The provisions of paragraph 1 of this
Article shall apply subject to the requirements that:
(a) for US airlines, with the exception of all-cargo
services, the transportation is part of a service that serves
the United States, and
(b) for Community airlines, with the exception
of (i) all-cargo services and (ii) combination services between
the United States and any member of the ECAA as of the date of
signature of this Agreement, the transportation is part of a service
that serves a Member State.
4. Each Party shall allow each airline to
determine the frequency and capacity of the international air
transportation it offers based upon commercial considerations
in the marketplace. Consistent with this right, neither Party
shall unilaterally limit the volume of traffic, frequency or regularity
of service, or the aircraft type or types operated by the airlines
of the other Party, nor shall it require the filing of schedules,
programs for charter flights, or operational plans by airlines
of the other Party, except as may be required for customs, technical,
operational, or environmental (consistent with Article 15) reasons
under uniform conditions consistent with Article 15 of the Convention.
5. Any airline may perform international
air transportation without any limitation as to change, at any
point, in type or number of aircraft operated; provided that,
(a) for US airlines, with the exception of all-cargo services,
the transportation is part of a service that serves the United
States, and (b) for Community airlines, with the exception of
(i) all-cargo services and (ii) combination services between the
United States and a member of the ECAA as of the date of signature
of this Agreement, the transportation is part of a service that
serves a Member State.
6. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed
to confer on:
(a) US airlines the right to take on board, in
the territory of any Member State, passengers, baggage, cargo,
or mail carried for compensation and destined for another point
in the territory of that Member State;
(b) Community airlines the right to take on board,
in the territory of the United States, passengers, baggage, cargo,
or mail carried for compensation and destined for another point
in the territory of the United States.
7. Community airlines' access to US Government
procured transportation shall be governed by Annex 3.
ARTICLE 4
Authorization
On receipt of applications from an airline of
one Party, in the form and manner prescribed for operating authorizations
and technical permissions, the other Party shall grant appropriate
authorizations and permissions with minimum procedural delay,
provided:
(a) for a US airline, substantial ownership and
effective control of that airline are vested in the United States,
US nationals, or both, and the airline is licensed as a US airline
and has its principal place of business in US territory;
(b) for a Community airline, substantial ownership
and effective control of that airline are vested in a Member State
or States, nationals of such a State or States, or both, and the
airline is licensed as a Community airline and has its principal
place of business in the territory of the European Community;
(c) the airline is qualified to meet the conditions
prescribed under the laws and regulations normally applied to
the operation of international air transportation by the Party
considering the application or applications; and
(d) the provisions set forth in Article 8 (Safety)
and Article 9 (Security) are being maintained and administered.
ARTICLE 5
Revocation of Authorization
1. Either Party may revoke, suspend or limit
the operating authorizations or technical permissions or otherwise
suspend or limit the operations of an airline of the other Party
where:
(a) for a US airline, substantial ownership and
effective control of that airline are not vested in the United
States, US nationals, or both, or the airline is not licensed
as a US airline or does not have its principal place of business
in US territory;
(b) for a Community airline, substantial ownership
and effective control of that airline are not vested in a Member
State or States, nationals of such a State or States, or both,
or the airline is not licensed as a Community airline or does
not have its principal place of business in the territory of the
European Community; or
(c) that airline has failed to comply with the
laws and regulations referred to in Article 7 (Application of
Laws) of this Agreement.
2. Unless immediate action is essential
to prevent further noncompliance with subparagraph 1(c) of this
Article, the rights established by this Article shall be exercised
only after consultation with the other Party.
3. This Article does not limit the rights
of either Party to withhold, revoke, limit or impose conditions
on the operating authorization or technical permission of an airline
or airlines of the other Party in accordance with the provisions
of Article 8 (Safety) or Article 9 (Security).
ARTICLE 6
Additional Matters related to Ownership, Investment,
and Control
Notwithstanding any other provision in this
Agreement, the Parties shall implement the provisions of Annex
4 in their decisions under their respective laws and regulations
concerning ownership, investment and control.
ARTICLE 7
Application of Laws
1. The laws and regulations of a Party relating
to the admission to or departure from its territory of aircraft
engaged in international air navigation, or to the operation and
navigation of such aircraft while within its territory, shall
be applied to the aircraft utilized by the airlines of the other
Party, and shall be complied with by such aircraft upon entering
or departing from or while within the territory of the first Party.
2. While entering, within, or leaving the
territory of one Party, the laws and regulations applicable within
that territory relating to the admission to or departure from
its territory of passengers, crew or cargo on aircraft (including
regulations relating to entry, clearance, immigration, passports,
customs and quarantine or, in the case of mail, postal regulations)
shall be complied with by, or on behalf of, such passengers, crew
or cargo of the other Party's airlines.
ARTICLE 8
Safety
1. The responsible authorities of the Parties
shall recognize as valid, for the purposes of operating the air
transportation provided for in this Agreement, certificates of
airworthiness, certificates of competency, and licences issued
or validated by each other and still in force, provided that the
requirements for such certificates or licences at least equal
the minimum standards that may be established pursuant to the
Convention. The responsible authorities may, however, refuse to
recognize as valid for purposes of flight above their own territory,
certificates of competency and licences granted to or validated
for their own nationals by such other authorities.
2. The responsible authorities of a Party
may request consultations with other responsible authorities concerning
the safety standards maintained by those authorities relating
to aeronautical facilities, aircrews, aircraft, and operation
of the airlines overseen by those authorities. Such consultations
shall take place within 45 days of the request unless otherwise
agreed. If following such consultations, the requesting responsible
authorities find that those authorities do not effectively maintain
and administer safety standards and requirements in these areas
that at least equal the minimum standards that may be established
pursuant to the Convention, the requesting responsible authorities
shall notify those authorities of such findings and the steps
considered necessary to conform with these minimum standards,
and those authorities shall take appropriate corrective action.
The requesting responsible authorities reserve the right to withhold,
revoke or limit the operating authorization or technical permission
of an airline or airlines for which those authorities provide
safety oversight in the event those authorities do not take such
appropriate corrective action within a reasonable time and to
take immediate action as to such airline or airlines if essential
to prevent further noncompliance with the duty to maintain and
administer the aforementioned standards and requirements resulting
in an immediate threat to flight safety.
3. The European Commission shall simultaneously
receive all requests and notifications under this Article.
4. Nothing in this Article shall prevent
the responsible authorities of the Parties from conducting safety
discussions, including those relating to the routine application
of safety standards and requirements or to emergency situations
that may arise from time to time.
ARTICLE 9
Security
1. In accordance with their rights and obligations
under international law, the Parties reaffirm that their obligation
to each other to protect the security of civil aviation against
acts of unlawful interference forms an integral part of this Agreement.
Without limiting the generality of their rights and obligations
under international law, the Parties shall in particular act in
conformity with the following agreements: the Convention on Offenses
and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft, done at Tokyo
September 14, 1963, the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful
Seizure of Aircraft, done at The Hague December 16, 1970, the
Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety
of Civil Aviation, done at Montreal September 23, 1971, and the
Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts of Violence at Airports
Serving International Civil Aviation, done at Montreal February
24, 1988.
2. The Parties shall provide upon request
all necessary assistance to each other to address any threat to
the security of civil aviation, including the prevention of acts
of unlawful seizure of civil aircraft and other unlawful acts
against the safety of such aircraft, of their passengers and crew,
and of airports and air navigation facilities.
3. The Parties shall, in their mutual relations,
act in conformity with the aviation security standards and appropriate
recommended practices established by the International Civil Aviation
Organization and designated as Annexes to the Convention; they
shall require that operators of aircraft of their registries,
operators of aircraft who have their principal place of business
or permanent residence in their territory, and the operators of
airports in their territory act in conformity with such aviation
security provisions.
4. Each Party shall ensure that effective
measures are taken within its territory to protect aircraft and
to inspect passengers, crew, and their baggage and carry-on items,
as well as cargo and aircraft stores, prior to and during boarding
or loading; and that those measures are adjusted to meet increased
threats to the security of civil aviation. Each Party agrees that
the security provisions required by the other Party for departure
from and while within the territory of that other Party must be
observed. Each Party shall give positive consideration to any
request from the other Party for special security measures to
meet a particular threat.
5. With full regard and mutual respect for
each other's sovereignty, a Party may adopt security measures
for entry into its territory. Where possible, that Party shall
take into account the security measures already applied by the
other Party and any views that the other Party may offer. Each
Party recognizes, however, that nothing in this Article limits
the ability of a Party to refuse entry into its territory of any
flight or flights that it deems to present a threat to its security.
6. A Party may take emergency measures including
amendments to meet a specific security threat. Such measures shall
be notified immediately to the responsible authorities of the
other Party.
7. The Parties underline the importance
of working towards compatible practices and standards as a means
of enhancing air transport security and minimizing regulatory
divergence. To this end, the Parties shall fully utilize and develop
existing channels for the discussion of current and proposed security
measures. The Parties expect that the discussions will address,
among other issues, new security measures proposed or under consideration
by the other Party, including the revision of security measures
occasioned by a change in circumstances; measures proposed by
one Party to meet the security requirements of the other Party;
possibilities for the more expeditious adjustment of standards
with respect to aviation security measures; and compatibility
of the requirements of one Party with the legislative obligations
of the other Party. Such discussions should serve to foster early
notice and prior discussion of new security initiatives and requirements.
8. Without prejudice to the need to take
immediate action in order to protect transportation security,
the Parties affirm that when considering security measures, a
Party shall evaluate possible adverse effects on international
air transportation and, unless constrained by law, shall take
such factors into account when it determines what measures are
necessary and appropriate to address those security concerns.
9. When an incident or threat of an incident
of unlawful seizure of aircraft or other unlawful acts against
the safety of passengers, crew, aircraft, airports or air navigation
facilities occurs, the Parties shall assist each other by facilitating
communications and other appropriate measures intended to terminate
rapidly and safely such incident or threat.
10. When a Party has reasonable grounds
to believe that the other Party has departed from the aviation
security provisions of this Article, the responsible authorities
of that Party may request immediate consultations with the responsible
authorities of the other Party. Failure to reach a satisfactory
agreement within 15 days from the date of such request shall constitute
grounds to withhold, revoke, limit, or impose conditions on the
operating authorization and technical permissions of an airline
or airlines of that Party. When required by an emergency, a Party
may take interim action prior to the expiry of 15 days.
11. Separate from airport assessments undertaken
to determine conformity with the aviation security standards and
practices referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article, a Party
may request the cooperation of the other Party in assessing whether
particular security measures of that other Party meet the requirements
of the requesting Party. The responsible authorities of the Parties
shall coordinate in advance the airports to be assessed and the
dates of assessment and establish a procedure to address the results
of such assessments. Taking into account the results of the assessments,
the requesting Party may decide that security measures of an equivalent
standard are applied in the territory of the other Party in order
that transfer passengers, transfer baggage, and/or transfer cargo
may be exempted from re-screening in the territory of the requesting
Party. Such a decision shall be communicated to the other Party.
ARTICLE 10
Commercial Opportunities
1. The airlines of each Party shall have
the right to establish offices in the territory of the other Party
for the promotion and sale of air transportation and related activities.
2. The airlines of each Party shall be entitled,
in accordance with the laws and regulations of the other Party
relating to entry, residence, and employment, to bring in and
maintain in the territory of the other Party managerial, sales,
technical, operational, and other specialist staff who are required
to support the provision of air transportation.
3. (a) Without prejudice to subparagraph
(b) below, each airline shall have in relation to groundhandling
in the territory of the other Party:
(i) the right to perform its own groundhandling
("self-handling") or, at its option
(ii) the right to select among competing
suppliers that provide groundhandling services in whole or in
part where such suppliers are allowed market access on the basis
of the laws and regulations of each Party, and where such suppliers
are present in the market.
(b) The rights under (i) and (ii) in subparagraph
(a) above shall be subject only to specific constraints of available
space or capacity arising from the need to maintain safe operation
of the airport. Where such constraints preclude self-handling
and where there is no effective competition between suppliers
that provide ground-handling services, all such services shall
be available on both an equal and an adequate basis to all airlines;
prices of such services shall not exceed their full cost including
a reasonable return on assets, after depreciation.
4. Any airline of each Party may engage
in the sale of air transportation in the territory of the other
Party directly and/or, at the airline's discretion, through its
sales agents or other intermediaries appointed by the airline.
Each airline shall have the right to sell such transportation,
and any person shall be free to purchase such transportation,
in the currency of that territory or in freely convertible currencies.
5. Each airline shall have the right to
convert and remit from the territory of the other Party to its
home territory and, except where inconsistent with generally applicable
law or regulation, the country or countries of its choice, on
demand, local revenues in excess of sums locally disbursed. Conversion
and remittance shall be permitted promptly without restrictions
or taxation in respect thereof at the rate of exchange applicable
to current transactions and remittance on the date the carrier
makes the initial application for remittance.
6. The airlines of each Party shall be permitted
to pay for local expenses, including purchases of fuel, in the
territory of the other Party in local currency. At their discretion,
the airlines of each Party may pay for such expenses in the territory
of the other Party in freely convertible currencies according
to local currency regulation.
7. In operating or holding out services
under the Agreement, any airline of a Party may enter into co-operative
marketing arrangements, such as blocked-space or code-sharing
arrangements, with:
(a) any airline or airlines of the Parties;
(b) any airline or airlines of a third country;
and
(c) a surface (land or maritime) transportation
provider of any country;
provided that (i) all participants in such arrangements
hold the appropriate authority and (ii) the arrangements meet
the conditions prescribed under the laws and regulations normally
applied by the Parties to the operation or holding out of international
air transportation.
8. The airlines of each Party shall be entitled
to enter into franchising or branding arrangements with companies,
including airlines, of either Party or third countries, provided
that the airlines hold the appropriate authority and meet the
conditions prescribed under the laws and regulations normally
applied by the Parties to such arrangements. Annex 5 shall apply
to such arrangements.
9. The airlines of each Party may enter
into arrangements for the provision of aircraft with crew for
international air transportation with:
(a) any airlines or airlines of the Parties;
and
(b) any airlines or airlines of a third country;
provided that all participants in such arrangements
hold the appropriate authority and meet the conditions prescribed
under the laws and regulations normally applied by the Parties
to such arrangements. Neither Party shall require an airline of
either Party providing the aircraft to hold traffic rights under
this Agreement for the routes on which the aircraft will be operated.
10. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Agreement, airlines and indirect providers of cargo transportation
of the Parties shall be permitted, without restriction, to employ
in connection with international air transportation any surface
transportation for cargo to or from any points in the territories
of the Parties, or in third countries, including transport to
and from all airports with customs facilities, and including,
where applicable, the right to transport cargo in bond under applicable
laws and regulations. Such cargo, whether moving by surface or
by air, shall have access to airport customs processing and facilities.
Airlines may elect to perform their own surface transportation
or to provide it through arrangements with other surface carriers,
including surface transportation operated by other airlines and
indirect providers of cargo air transportation. Such intermodal
cargo services may be offered at a single, through price for the
air and surface transportation combined, provided that shippers
are not misled as to the facts concerning such transportation.
ARTICLE 11
Customs Duties and Charges
1. On arriving in the territory of one Party,
aircraft operated in international air transportation by the airlines
of the other Party, their regular equipment, ground equipment,
fuel, lubricants, consumable technical supplies, spare parts (including
engines), aircraft stores (including but not limited to such items
of food, beverages and liquor, tobacco and other products destined
for sale to or use by passengers in limited quantities during
flight), and other items intended for or used solely in connection
with the operation or servicing of aircraft engaged in international
air transportation shall be exempt, on the basis of reciprocity,
from all import restrictions, property taxes and capital levies,
customs duties, excise taxes, and similar fees and charges that
are (a) imposed by the national authorities or the European Community,
and (b) not based on the cost of services provided, provided that
such equipment and supplies remain on board the aircraft.
2. There shall also be exempt, on the basis
of reciprocity, from the taxes, levies, duties, fees and charges
referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, with the exception
of charges based on the cost of the service provided:
(a) aircraft stores introduced into or supplied
in the territory of a Party and taken on board, within reasonable
limits, for use on outbound aircraft of an airline of the other
Party engaged in international air transportation, even when these
stores are to be used on a part of the journey performed over
the territory of the Party in which they are taken on board;
(b) ground equipment and spare parts (including
engines) introduced into the territory of a Party for the servicing,
maintenance, or repair of aircraft of an airline of the other
Party used in international air transportation;
(c) fuel, lubricants and consumable technical
supplies introduced into or supplied in the territory of a Party
for use in an aircraft of an airline of the other Party engaged
in international air transportation, even when these supplies
are to be used on a part of the journey performed over the territory
of the Party in which they are taken on board; and
(d) printed matter, as provided for by the customs
legislation of each Party, introduced into or supplied in the
territory of one Party and taken on board for use on outbound
aircraft of an airline of the other Party engaged in international
air transportation, even when these stores are to be used on a
part of the journey performed over the territory of the Party
in which they are taken on board.
3. Equipment and supplies referred to in
paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article may be required to be kept
under the supervision or control of the appropriate authorities.
4. The exemptions provided by this Article
shall also be available where the airlines of one Party have contracted
with another airline, which similarly enjoys such exemptions from
the other Party, for the loan or transfer in the territory of
the other Party of the items specified in paragraphs 1 and 2 of
this Article.
5. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent
either Party from imposing taxes, levies, duties, fees or charges
on goods sold other than for consumption on board to passengers
during a sector of an air service between two points within its
territory at which embarkation or disembarkation is permitted.
6. In the event that two or more Member
States envisage applying to the fuel supplied to aircraft of US
airlines in the territories of such Member States for flights
between such Member States any waiver of the exemption contained
in Article 14(b) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October
2003, the Joint Committee shall consider that issue, in accordance
with paragraph 4(e) of Article 18.
7. A Party may request the assistance of
the other Party, on behalf of its airline or airlines, in securing
an exemption from taxes, duties, charges and fees imposed by state
and local governments or authorities on the goods specified in
paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, as well as from fuel through-put
charges, in the circumstances described in this Article, except
to the extent that the charges are based on the cost of providing
the service. In response to such a request, the other Party shall
bring the views of the requesting Party to the attention of the
relevant governmental unit or authority and urge that those views
be given appropriate consideration.
ARTICLE 12
User Charges
1. User charges that may be imposed by the
competent charging authorities or bodies of each Party on the
airlines of the other Party shall be just, reasonable, not unjustly
discriminatory, and equitably apportioned among categories of
users. In any event, any such user charges shall be assessed on
the airlines of the other Party on terms not less favorable than
the most favorable terms available to any other airline at the
time the charges are assessed.
2. User charges imposed on the airlines
of the other Party may reflect, but shall not exceed, the full
cost to the competent charging authorities or bodies of providing
the appropriate airport, airport environmental, air navigation,
and aviation security facilities and services at the airport or
within the airport system. Such charges may include a reasonable
return on assets, after depreciation. Facilities and services
for which charges are made shall be provided on an efficient and
economic basis.
3. Each Party shall encourage consultations
between the competent charging authorities or bodies in its territory
and the airlines using the services and facilities, and shall
encourage the competent charging authorities or bodies and the
airlines to exchange such information as may be necessary to permit
an accurate review of the reasonableness of the charges in accordance
with the principles of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article. Each
Party shall encourage the competent charging authorities to provide
users with reasonable notice of any proposal for changes in user
charges to enable users to express their views before changes
are made.
4. Neither Party shall be held, in dispute
resolution procedures pursuant to Article 19, to be in breach
of a provision of this Article, unless (a) it fails to undertake
a review of the charge or practice that is the subject of complaint
by the other Party within a reasonable amount of time; or (b)
following such a review it fails to take all steps within its
power to remedy any charge or practice that is inconsistent with
this Article.
ARTICLE 13
Pricing
1. Prices for air transportation services
operated pursuant to this Agreement shall be established freely
and shall not be subject to approval, nor may they be required
to be filed.
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1:
(a) The introduction or continuation of a price
proposed to be charged or charged by a US airline for international
air transportation between a point in one Member State and a point
in another Member State shall be consistent with Article 1(3)
of Council Regulation (EEC) 2409/92 of 23 July 1992, or a not
more restrictive successor regulation.
(b) Under this paragraph, the airlines of the
Parties shall provide immediate access, on request, to information
on historical, existing, and proposed prices to the responsible
authorities of the Parties in a manner and format acceptable to
those authorities.
ARTICLE 14
Government Subsidies and Support
1. The Parties recognize that government
subsidies and support may adversely affect the fair and equal
opportunity of airlines to compete in providing the international
air transportation governed by this Agreement.
2. If one Party believes that a government
subsidy or support being considered or provided by the other Party
for or to the airlines of that other Party would adversely affect
or is adversely affecting that fair and equal opportunity of the
airlines of the first Party to compete, it may submit observations
to that Party. Furthermore, it may request a meeting of the Joint
Committee as provided in Article 18, to consider the issue and
develop appropriate responses to concerns found to be legitimate.
3. Each Party may approach responsible governmental
entities in the territory of the other Party, including entities
at the state, provincial or local level, if it believes that a
subsidy or support being considered or provided by such entities
will have the adverse competitive effects referred to in paragraph
2. If a Party decides to make such direct contact it shall inform
promptly the other Party through diplomatic channels. It may also
request a meeting of the Joint Committee.
4. Issues raised under this Article could
include, for example, capital injections, cross-subsidization,
grants, guarantees, ownership, relief or tax exemption, by any
governmental entities.
ARTICLE 15
Environment
1. The Parties recognize the importance
of protecting the environment when developing and implementing
international aviation policy. The Parties recognize that the
costs and benefits of measures to protect the environment must
be carefully weighed in developing international aviation policy.
2. When a Party is considering proposed
environmental measures, it should evaluate possible adverse effects
on the exercise of rights contained in this Agreement, and, if
such measures are adopted, it should take appropriate steps to
mitigate any such adverse effects.
3. When environmental measures are established,
the aviation environmental standards adopted by the International
Civil Aviation Organization in Annexes to the Convention shall
be followed except where differences have been filed. The Parties
shall apply any environmental measures affecting air services
under this Agreement in accordance with Article 2 and 3(4) of
this Agreement.
4. If one Party believes that a matter involving
aviation environmental protection raises concerns for the application
or implementation of this Agreement, it may request a meeting
of the Joint Committee, as provided in Article 18, to consider
the issue and develop appropriate responses to concerns found
to be legitimate.
ARTICLE 16
Consumer Protection
The Parties affirm the importance of protecting
consumers, and either Party may request a meeting of the Joint
Committee to discuss consumer protection issues that the requesting
Party identifies as significant.
ARTICLE 17
Computer Reservation Systems
1. Computer Reservation Systems (CRS) vendors
operating in the territory of one Party shall be entitled to bring
in, maintain, and make freely available their CRSs to travel agencies
or travel companies whose principal business is the distribution
of travel-related products in the territory of the other Party
provided the CRS complies with any relevant regulatory requirements
of the other Party.
2. Neither Party shall, in its territory,
impose or permit to be imposed on the CRS vendors of the other
Party more stringent requirements with respect to CRS displays
(including edit and display parameters), operations, practices,
sales, or ownership than those imposed on its own CRS vendors.
3. Owners/Operators of CRSs of one Party
that comply with the relevant regulatory requirements of the other
Party, if any, shall have the same opportunity to own CRSs within
the territory of the other Party as do owners/operators of that
Party.
ARTICLE 18
The Joint Committee
1. A Joint Committee consisting of representatives
of the Parties shall meet at least once a year to conduct consultations
relating to this Agreement and to review its implementation.
2. A Party may also request a meeting of
the Joint Committee to seek to resolve questions relating to the
interpretation or application of this Agreement. However, with
respect to Article 20 or Annex 2, the Joint Committee may consider
questions only relating to the refusal by either Participant to
implement the commitments undertaken, and the impact of competition
decisions on the application of this Agreement. Such a meeting
shall begin at the earliest possible date, but not later than
60 days from the date of receipt of the request, unless otherwise
agreed.
3. The Joint Committee shall review, no
later than at its first annual meeting and thereafter as appropriate,
the overall implementation of the Agreement, including any effects
of aviation infrastructure constraints on the exercise of rights
provided for in Article 3, the effects of security measures taken
under Article 9, the effects on the conditions of competition,
including in the field of Computer Reservation Systems, and any
social effects of the implementation of the Agreement.
4. The Joint Committee shall also develop
cooperation by:
(a) fostering expert-level exchanges on new legislative
or regulatory initiatives and developments, including in the fields
of security, safety, the environment, aviation infrastructure
(including slots), and consumer protection;
(b) considering the social effects of the Agreement
as it is implemented and developing appropriate responses to concerns
found to be legitimate;
(c) considering potential areas for the further
development of the Agreement, including the recommendation of
amendments to the Agreement;
(d) maintaining an inventory of issues regarding
government subsidies or support raised by either Party in the
Joint Committee;
(e) making decisions, on the basis of consensus,
concerning any matters with respect to application of paragraph
6 of Article 11;
(f) developing, within one year of provisional
application, approaches to regulatory determinations with regard
to airline fitness and citizenship, with the goal of achieving
reciprocal recognition of such determinations;
(g) developing a common understanding of the
criteria used by the Parties in making their respective decisions
in cases concerning airline control, to the extent consistent
with confidentiality requirements;
(h) fostering consultation, where appropriate,
on air transport issues dealt with in international organizations
and in relations with third countries, including consideration
of whether to adopt a joint approach;
(i) taking, on the basis of consensus, the decisions
to which paragraph 3 of Article 1 of Annex 4 and paragraph 3 of
Article 2 of Annex 4 refer.
5. The Parties share the goal of maximizing
the benefits for consumers, airlines, labor, and communities on
both sides of the Atlantic by extending this Agreement to include
third countries. To this end, the Joint Committee shall work to
develop a proposal regarding the conditions and procedures, including
any necessary amendments to this Agreement, that would be required
for third countries to accede to this Agreement.
6. The Joint Committee shall operate on
the basis of consensus.
ARTICLE 19
Arbitration
1. Any dispute relating to the application
or interpretation of this Agreement, other than issues arising
under Article 20 or under Annex 2, that is not resolved by a meeting
of the Joint Committee may be referred to a person or body for
decision by agreement of the Parties. If the Parties do not so
agree, the dispute shall, at the request of either Party, be submitted
to arbitration in accordance with the procedures set forth below.
2. Unless the Parties otherwise agree, arbitration
shall be by a tribunal of three arbitrators to be constituted
as follows:
(a) Within 20 days after the receipt of a request
for arbitration, each Party shall name one arbitrator. Within
45 days after these two arbitrators have been named, they shall
by agreement appoint a third arbitrator, who shall act as President
of the tribunal.
(b) If either Party fails to name an arbitrator,
or if the third arbitrator is not appointed in accordance with
subparagraph (a) of this paragraph, either Party may request the
President of the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization
to appoint the necessary arbitrator or arbitrators within 30 days
of receipt of that request. If the President of the Council of
the International Civil Aviation Organization is a national of
either the United States or a Member State, the most senior Vice
President of that Council who is not disqualified on that ground
shall make the appointment.
3. Except as otherwise agreed, the tribunal
shall determine the limits of its jurisdiction in accordance with
this Agreement and shall establish its own procedural rules. At
the request of a Party, the tribunal, once formed, may ask the
other Party to implement interim relief measures pending the tribunal's
final determination. At the direction of the tribunal or at the
request of either Party, a conference shall be held not later
than 15 days after the tribunal is fully constituted for the tribunal
to determine the precise issues to be arbitrated and the specific
procedures to be followed.
4. Except as otherwise agreed or as directed
by the tribunal:
(a) The statement of claim shall be submitted
within 30 days of the time the tribunal is fully constituted,
and the statement of defense shall be submitted 40 days thereafter.
Any reply by the claimant shall be submitted within 15 days of
the submission of the statement of defense. Any reply by the respondent
shall be submitted within 15 days thereafter.
(b) The tribunal shall hold a hearing at the
request of either Party, or may hold a hearing on its own initiative,
within 15 days after the last reply is filed.
5. The tribunal shall attempt to render
a written decision within 30 days after completion of the hearing
or, if no hearing is held, within 30 days after the last reply
is submitted. The decision of the majority of the tribunal shall
prevail.
6. The Parties may submit requests for clarification
of the decision within 10 days after it is rendered and any clarification
given shall be issued within 15 days of such request.
7. If the tribunal determines that there
has been a violation of this Agreement and the responsible Party
does not cure the violation, or does not reach agreement with
the other Party on a mutually satisfactory resolution within 40
days after notification of the tribunal's decision, the other
Party may suspend the application of comparable benefits arising
under this Agreement until such time as the Parties have reached
agreement on a resolution of the dispute. Nothing in this paragraph
shall be construed as limiting the right of either Party to take
proportional measures in accordance with international law.
8. The expenses of the tribunal, including
the fees and expenses of the arbitrators, shall be shared equally
by the Parties. Any expenses incurred by the President of the
Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization, or by
any Vice President of that Council, in connection with the procedures
of paragraph 2(b) of this Article shall be considered to be part
of the expenses of the tribunal.
ARTICLE 20
Competition
1. The Parties recognize that competition
among airlines in the transatlantic market is important to promote
the objectives of this Agreement, and confirm that they apply
their respective competition regimes to protect and enhance overall
competition and not individual competitors.
2. The Parties recognize that differences
may arise concerning the application of their respective competition
regimes to international aviation affecting the transatlantic
market, and that competition among airlines in that market might
be fostered by minimizing those differences.
3. The Parties recognize that cooperation
between their respective competition authorities serves to promote
competition in markets and has the potential to promote compatible
regulatory results and to minimize differences in approach with
respect to their respective competition reviews of inter-carrier
agreements. Consequently, the Parties shall further this cooperation
to the extent feasible, taking into account the different responsibilities,
competencies and procedures of the authorities, in accordance
with Annex 2.
4. The Joint Committee shall be briefed
annually on the results of the cooperation under Annex 2.
ARTICLE 21
Second Stage Negotiations
1. The Parties share the goal of continuing
to open access to markets and to maximize benefits for consumers,
airlines, labor, and communities on both sides of the Atlantic,
including the facilitation of investment so as to better reflect
the realities of a global aviation industry, the strengthening
of the transatlantic air transportation system, and the establishment
of a framework that will encourage other countries to open their
own air services markets. The Parties shall begin negotiations
not later than 60 days after the date of provisional application
of this Agreement, with the goal of developing the next stage
expeditiously.
2. To that end, the agenda for the second
stage negotiations shall include the following items of priority
interest to one or both Parties:
(a) Further liberalization of traffic rights;
(b) Additional foreign investment opportunities;
(c) Effect of environmental measures and infrastructure
constraints on the exercise of traffic rights;
(d) Further access to Government-financed air
transportation; and
(e) provision of aircraft with crew.
3. The Parties shall review their progress
towards a second stage agreement no later than 18 months after
the date when the negotiations are due to start in accordance
with paragraph 1. If no second stage agreement has been reached
by the Parties within twelve months of the start of the review,
each Party reserves the right thereafter to suspend rights specified
in this Agreement. Such suspension shall take effect no sooner
than the start of the International Air Transport Association
(IATA) traffic season that commences no less than twelve months
after the date on which notice of suspension is given.
ARTICLE 22
Relationship to Other Agreements
1. During the period of provisional application
pursuant to Article 25 of this Agreement, the bilateral agreements
listed in section 1 of Annex 1, shall be suspended, except to
the extent provided in section 2 of Annex 1.
2. Upon entry into force pursuant to Article
26 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall supersede the bilateral
agreements listed in section 1 of Annex 1, except to the extent
provided in section 2 of Annex 1.
3. If the Parties become parties to a multilateral
agreement, or endorse a decision adopted by the International
Civil Aviation Organization or another international organization,
that addresses matters covered by this Agreement, they shall consult
in the Joint Committee to determine whether this Agreement should
be revised to take into account such developments.
ARTICLE 23
Termination
Either Party may, at any time, give notice in
writing through diplomatic channels to the other Party of its
decision to terminate this Agreement. Such notice shall be sent
simultaneously to the International Civil Aviation Organization.
This Agreement shall terminate at midnight GMT at the end of the
International Air Transport Association (IATA) traffic season
in effect one year following the date of written notification
of termination, unless the notice is withdrawn by agreement of
the Parties before the end of this period.
ARTICLE 24
Registration with ICAO
This Agreement and all amendments thereto shall
be registered with the International Civil Aviation Organization.
ARTICLE 25
Provisional Application
Pending entry into force pursuant to Article
26:
1. The Parties agree to apply this Agreement
from 30 March 2008.
2. Either Party may at any time give notice
in writing through diplomatic channels to the other Party of a
decision to no longer apply this Agreement. In that event, application
shall cease at midnight GMT at the end of the International Air
Transport Association (IATA) traffic season in effect one year
following the date of written notification, unless the notice
is withdrawn by agreement of the Parties before the end of this
period.
ARTICLE 26
Entry into Force
This Agreement shall enter into force one month
after the date of the later note in an exchange of diplomatic
notes between the Parties confirming that all necessary procedures
for entry into force of this Agreement have been completed. For
purposes of this exchange, the United States shall deliver to
the European Community the diplomatic note to the European Community
and its Member States, and the European Community shall deliver
to the United States the diplomatic note or notes from the European
Community and its Member States. The diplomatic note or notes
from the European Community and its Member States shall contain
communications from each Member State confirming that its necessary
procedures for entry into force of this Agreement have been completed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, being
duly authorized, have signed this Agreement.
DONE at [ ]
on this [ ]
day of
200 in duplicate.
| For the United States of America
| For the Republic of Austria |
| For the Kingdom of Belgium
|
| For the Republic of Bulgaria
|
| For the Republic of Cyprus
|
| For the Czech Republic |
| For the Kingdom of Denmark
|
| For the Republic of Estonia
|
| For the Republic of Finland
|
| For the French Republic |
| For the Federal Republic of
Germany
|
| For the Hellenic Republic
|
| For the Republic of Hungary
|
| For Ireland |
| For the Italian Republic
|
| For the Republic of Latvia
|
| For the Republic of Lithuania
|
| For the Grand Duchy of
Luxembourg
|
| For the Republic of Malta
|
| For the Kingdom of The
Netherlands
|
| For the Republic of Poland
|
| For the Portuguese Republic
|
| For Romania |
| For the Slovak Republic |
| For the Republic of Slovenia
|
| For the Kingdom of Spain
|
| For the Kingdom of Sweden
|
| For the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern
Ireland
|
| For the European Community
|
| |
ANNEX
1
Section 1
As provided in Article 22 of this Agreement, the following
bilateral agreements between the United States and Member States
shall be suspended or superseded by this Agreement:
(a) The Republic of Austria: Air services agreement, signed
at Vienna March 16, 1989; amended June 14, 1995.
(b) The Kingdom of Belgium: Air transport agreement, effected
by exchange of notes at Washington October 23, 1980; amended September
22 and November 12, 1986; amended November 5, 1993 and January
12, 1994.
(amendment concluded on September 5, 1995 (provisionally applied).)
(c) The Republic of Bulgaria: Civil aviation security Agreement,
signed at Sofia April 24, 1991.
(d) The Czech Republic: Air transport agreement, signed at
Prague September 10, 1996; amended June 4, 2001 and February 14,
2002.
(e) The Kingdom of Denmark: Agreement relating to air transport
services, effected by exchange of notes at Washington December
16, 1944; amended August 6, 1954; amended June 16, 1995.
(f) The Republic of Finland: Air transport agreement, signed
at Helsinki March 29, 1949; related protocol signed May 12, 1980;
agreement amending 1949 agreement and 1980 protocol concluded
June 9, 1995.
(g) The French Republic: Air transport agreement, signed at
Washington June 18, 1998; amended October 10, 2000; amended January
22, 2002.
(h) The Federal Republic of Germany: Air transport agreement
and exchanges of notes, signed at Washington July 7, 1955; amended
April 25, 1989.
(related protocol concluded November 1, 1978; related agreement
concluded May 24, 1994; protocol amending the 1955 agreement concluded
on May 23, 1996; agreement amending the 1996 protocol concluded
on October 10, 2000 (all provisionally applied).)
(i) The Hellenic Republic: Air transport agreement, signed
at Athens July 31, 1991; extended until July 31, 2007 by exchange
of notes of June 22 and 28, 2006.
(j) The Republic of Hungary: Air transport agreement and memorandum
of understanding, signed at Budapest July 12,1989; extended until
July 12, 2007 by exchange of notes of July 11 and 20, 2006.
(k) Ireland: Agreement relating to air transport services,
effected by exchange of notes at Washington February 3, 1945;
amended January 25, 1988 and September 29, 1989; amended July
25 and September 6, 1990.
(Memorandum of consultations, signed at Washington October
28, 1993 (provisionally applied).)
(l) The Italian Republic: Air transport agreement, with memorandum
and exchange of notes, signed at Rome June 22, 1970; amended October
25, 1988; related memorandum of understanding signed September
27, 1990; amendment of 1970 agreement and 1990 MOU concluded November
22 and December 23, 1991; amendment of 1970 agreement and 1990
MOU concluded May 30 and October 21, 1997; agreement supplementing
the 1970 agreement concluded December 30, 1998 and February 2,
1999.
(Protocol amending the 1970 agreement concluded December 6,
1999 (provisionally applied).)
(m) The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg: Air transport agreement,
signed at Luxembourg August 19, 1986; amended June 6, 1995; amended
July 13 and 21 1998.
(n) The Republic of Malta: Air transport agreement, signed
at Washington October 12, 2000.
(o) The Kingdom of the Netherlands: Air transport agreement,
signed at Washington April 3, 1957; protocol amending the 1957
agreement concluded on March 31, 1978; amendment of 1978 protocol
concluded June 11, 1986; amendment of 1957 agreement concluded
October 13 and December 22, 1987; amendment of 1957 agreement
concluded January 29 and March 13, 1992; amendment of 1957 agreement
and 1978 protocol concluded October 14, 1992.
(p) The Republic of Poland: Air transport agreement, signed
at Warsaw June 16, 2001.
(q) The Portuguese Republic: Air transport agreement, signed
at Lisbon May 30, 2000.
(r) Romania: Air transport agreement, signed at Washington
July 15, 1998.
(s) The Slovak Republic: Air transport agreement, signed at
Bratislava January 22, 2001.
(t) The Kingdom of Spain: Air transport agreement signed at
Madrid February 20, 1973; related agreement of February 20, March
31 and April 7, 1987; amendment of 1973 agreement concluded May
31, 1989; amendment of 1973 agreement concluded November 27, 1991.
(u) The Kingdom of Sweden: Agreement relating to air transport
services, effected by exchange of notes at Washington, December
16, 1944; amended August 6, 1954; amended June 16, 1995.
(v) The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland:
Agreement concerning air services, and exchange of letters, signed
at Bermuda July 23, 1977; agreement relating to North Atlantic
air fares, concluded March 17, 1978; agreement amending the 1977
agreement, concluded April 25, 1978; agreement modifying and extending
the 1978 agreement relating to North Atlantic air fares, concluded
November 2 and 9, 1978; agreement amending the 1977 agreement,
concluded December 4, 1980; agreement amending the 1977 agreement,
concluded February 20, 1985; agreement amending Article 7, Annex
2, and Annex 5 of the 1977 agreement, concluded May 25, 1989;
agreement concerning amendments of the 1977 agreement, termination
of the US/UK Arbitration Concerning Heathrow Airport User Charges
and the request for arbitration made by the United Kingdom in
its embassy's note no. 87 of 13 October 1993 and settlement of
the matters which gave rise to those proceedings, concluded March
11, 1994; agreement amending the 1977 agreement, concluded March
27, 1997.
(Arrangements, being provisionally applied, contained in the
memorandum of consultations dated September 11,1986; arrangements
contained in the exchange of letters dated July 27, 1990; arrangements
contained in the memorandum of consultations of March 11, 1991;
arrangements contained in the exchange of letters dated October
6, 1994; arrangements contained in the memorandum of consultations
of June 5, 1995; arrangements contained in the exchange of letters
dated March 31 and April 3, 2000 (all provisionally applied)).
Section 2
Notwithstanding section 1 of this Annex, for areas that are
not encompassed within the definition of "territory"
in Article 1 of this Agreement, the agreements in paragraphs (e)
(Denmark-United States), (g) (France-United States), and (v) (United
Kingdom-United States) of that section shall continue to apply,
according to their terms.
Section 3
Notwithstanding Article 3 of this Agreement, US airlines
shall not have the right to provide all-cargo services, that are
not part of a service that serves the United States, to or from
points in the Member States, except to or from points in the Czech
Republic, the French Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany,
the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Malta, the Republic
of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, and the Slovak Republic.
Section 4
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, this
section shall apply to scheduled and charter combination air transportation
between Ireland and the United States with effect from the beginning
of IATA winter season 2006/2007 until the end of the IATA winter
season 2007/2008.
(a) (i) Each US and Community airline may operate
3 non-stop flights between the United States and Dublin for each
non-stop flight that the airline operates between the United States
and Shannon. This entitlement for non-stop Dublin flights shall
be based on an average of operations over the entire three-season
transitional period. A flight shall be deemed to be a non-stop
Dublin, or a non-stop Shannon, flight, according to the first
point of entry into, or the last point of departure from, Ireland.
(ii) The requirement to serve Shannon in subparagraph
(a)(i) of this Section shall terminate if any airline inaugurates
scheduled or charter combination service between Dublin and the
United States, in either direction, without operating at least
one non-stop flight to Shannon for every three non-stop flights
to Dublin, averaged over the transition period.
(b) For services between the United States and
Ireland, Community airlines may serve only Boston, New York, Chicago,
Los Angeles, and 3 additional points in the United States, to
be notified to the United States upon selection or change. These
services may operate via intermediate points in other Member States
or in third countries.
(c) Code sharing shall be authorized between
Ireland and the United States only via other points in the European
Community. Other code-share arrangements will be considered on
the basis of comity and reciprocity.
ANNEX 2
Concerning Cooperation With Respect to Competition Issues
in the Air Transportation Industry
Article 1
The cooperation as set forth in this Annex shall be implemented
by the Department of Transportation of the United States of America
and the Commission of the European Communities (hereinafter referred
to as "the Participants"), consistent with their respective
functions in addressing competition issues in the air transportation
industry involving the United States and the European Community.
Article 2
Purpose
The purpose of this cooperation is:
1. To enhance mutual understanding of the application
by the Participants of the laws, procedures and practices under
their respective competition regimes to encourage competition
in the air transportation industry;
2. To facilitate understanding between the Participants
of the impact of air transportation industry developments on competition
in the international aviation market;
3. To reduce the potential for conflicts in the Participants'
application of their respective competition regimes to agreements
and other cooperative arrangements which have an impact on the
transatlantic market; and
4. To promote compatible regulatory approaches to agreements
and other cooperative arrangements through a better understanding
of the methodologies, analytical techniques including the definition
of the relevant market(s) and analysis of competitive effects,
and remedies that the Participants use in their respective independent
competition reviews.
Article 3
Definitions
For the purpose of this Annex, the term "competition
regime" means the laws, procedures and practices that govern
the Participants' exercise of their respective functions in reviewing
agreements and other cooperative arrangements among airlines in
the international market. For the European Community, this includes,
but is not limited to, Articles 81, 82, and 85 of the Treaty Establishing
the European Community and their implementing Regulations pursuant
to the said Treaty, as well as any amendments thereto. For the
Department of Transportation, this includes, but is not limited
to, sections 41308, 41309, and 41720 of Title 49 of the United
States Code, and its implementing Regulations and legal precedents
pursuant thereto.
Article 4
Areas of Cooperation
Subject to the qualifications in subparagraphs 1(a) and 1(b)
of Article 5, the types of cooperation between the Participants
shall include the following:
1. Meetings between representatives of the Participants,
to include competition experts, in principle on a semi-annual
basis, for the purpose of discussing developments in the air transportation
industry, competition policy matters of mutual interest, and analytical
approaches to the application of competition law to international
aviation, particularly in the transatlantic market. The above
discussions may lead to the development of a better understanding
of the Participants' respective approaches to competition issues,
including existing commonalities, and to more compatibility in
those approaches, in particular with respect to inter-carrier
agreements.
2. Consultations at any time between the Participants,
by mutual agreement or at the request of either Participant, to
discuss any matter related to this Annex, including specific cases.
3. Each Participant may, at its discretion, invite representatives
of other governmental authorities to participate as appropriate
in any meetings or consultations held pursuant to paragraphs 1
or 2 above.
4. Timely notifications of the following proceedings
or matters, which in the judgment of the notifying Participant
may have significant implications for the competition interests
of the other Participant:
(a) With respect to the Department of Transportation, (i)
proceedings for review of applications for approval of agreements
and other cooperative arrangements among airlines involving international
air transportation, in particular for antitrust immunity involving
airlines organized under the laws of the United States and the
European Community, and (ii) receipt by the Department of Transportation
of a joint venture agreement pursuant to section 41720 of Title
49 of the United States Code; and
(b) With respect to the Commission of the European Communities,
(i) proceedings for review of agreements and other cooperative
arrangements among airlines involving international air transportation,
in particular for alliance and other cooperative agreements involving
airlines organized under the laws of the United States and the
European Community, and (ii) consideration of individual or block
exemptions from European Union competition law;
5. Notifications of the availability, and any conditions
governing that availability, of information and data filed with
a Participant, in electronic form or otherwise, that, in the judgment
of that Participant, may have significant implications for the
competition interests of the other Participant; and
6. Notifications of such other activities relating to
air transportation competition policy as may seem appropriate
to the notifying Participant.
Article 5
Use and Disclosure of Information
1. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Annex,
neither Participant is expected to provide information to the
other Participant if disclosure of the information to the requesting
Participant:
(a) is prohibited by the laws, regulations or practices of
the Participant possessing the information; or
(b) would be incompatible with important interests of the
Participant possessing the information.
2. Each Participant shall to the extent possible maintain
the confidentiality of any information provided to it in confidence
by the other Participant under this Annex and to oppose any application
for disclosure of such information to a third party that is not
authorized by the supplying Participant to receive the information.
Each Participant intends to notify the other Participant whenever
any information proposed to be exchanged in discussions or in
any other manner may be required to be disclosed in a public proceeding.
3. Where pursuant to this Annex a Participant provides
information on a confidential basis to the other Participant for
the purposes specified in Article 2, that information should be
used by the receiving Participant only for that purpose.
Article 6
Implementation
1. Each Participant is designating a representative to
be responsible for coordination of activities established under
this Annex.
2. This Annex, and all activities undertaken by a Participant
pursuant to it, are
(a) intended to be implemented only to the extent consistent
with all laws, regulations, and practices applicable to that Participant;
and
(b) intended to be implemented without prejudice to the Agreement
between the European Communities and the Government of the United
States of America Regarding the Application of their Competition
Laws.
ANNEX 3
Concerning US Government Procured Transportation
Community airlines shall have the right to transport passengers
and cargo on scheduled and charter flights for which a US Government
civilian department, agency, or instrumentality (1) obtains the
transportation for itself or in carrying out an arrangement under
which payment is made by the Government or payment is made from
amounts provided for the use of the Government, or (2) provides
the transportation to or for a foreign country or international
or other organization without reimbursement, and that transportation
is (a) between any point in the United States and any point in
a Member State, exceptwith respect to passengers onlybetween
points for which there is a city-pair contract fare in effect,
or (b) between any two points outside the United States. This
paragraph shall not apply to transportation obtained or funded
by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department.
ANNEX 4
Concerning Additional Matters Related to Ownership, Investment
and Control
Article 1
Ownership of Airlines of a Party
1. Ownership by nationals of a Member State or States
of the equity of a US airline shall be permitted, subject to two
limitations. First, ownership by all foreign nationals of more
than 25 percent of a corporation's voting equity is prohibited.
Second, actual control of a US airline by foreign nationals is
also prohibited. Subject to the overall 25 percent limitation
on foreign ownership of voting equity:
(a) ownership by nationals of a Member State or States of:
(1) as much as 25 percent of the voting equity; and/or
(ii) as much as 49.9 percent of the total equity
of a US airline shall not be deemed, of itself, to constitute
control of that airline;
(b) ownership by nationals of a Member State or States of
50 percent or more of the total equity of a US airline shall not
be presumed to constitute control of that airline. Such ownership
shall be considered on a case-by-case basis.
2. Ownership by US nationals of a Community airline shall
be permitted subject to two limitations. First, the airline must
be majority owned by Member States and/or by nationals of Member
States. Second, the airline must be effectively controlled by
such states and/or such nationals.
3. For the purposes of paragraph (b) of Article 4 and
subparagraph 1(b) of Article 5 of this Agreement, a member of
the ECAA as of the date of signature of this Agreement and citizens
of such a member shall be treated as a Member State and its nationals,
respectively. The Joint Committee may decide that this provision
shall apply to new members of the ECAA and their citizens.
4. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, the European Community
and its Member States reserves the right to limit investments
by US nationals in the voting equity of a Community airline made
after the signature of this Agreement to a level equivalent to
that allowed by the United States for foreign nationals in US
airlines, provided that the exercise of that right is consistent
with international law.
Article 2
Ownership and Control of Third-Country Airlines
1. Neither Party shall exercise any available rights
under air services arrangements with a third country to refuse,
revoke, suspend or limit authorizations or permissions for any
airlines of that third country on the grounds that substantial
ownership of that airline is vested in the other Party, its nationals,
or both.
2. The United States shall not exercise any available
rights under air services arrangements to refuse, revoke, suspend
or limit authorizations or permissions for any airline of the
Principality of Liechtenstein, the Swiss Confederation, a member
of the ECAA as of the date of signature of this Agreement, or
any country in Africa that is implementing an Open-Skies air services
agreement with the United States as of the date of signature of
this Agreement, on the grounds that effective control of that
airline is vested in a Member State or States, nationals of such
a State or States, or both.
3. The Joint Committee may decide that neither Party
shall exercise the rights referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article
with respect to airlines of a specific country or countries.
Article 3
Control of Airlines
1. The rules applicable in the European Community on
ownership and control of Community air carriers are currently
laid down in Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92
of 23 July 1992 on licensing of air carriers. Under this Regulation,
responsibility for granting an Operating Licence to a Community
air carrier lies with the Member States. Member States apply Regulation
2407/92 in accordance with their national regulations and procedures.
2. The rules applicable in the United States are currently
laid down in Sections 40102(a)(2), 41102 and 41103 of Title 49
of the United States Code (U.S.C.), which require that licenses
for a US "air carrier" issued by the Department of Transportation,
whether a certificate, an exemption, or commuter license, to engage
in "air transportation" as a common carrier, be held
only by citizens of the United States as defined in 49 U.S.C.
§40102(a)(15). That section requires that the president and
two-thirds of the board of directors and other managing officers
of a corporation be US citizens, that at least 75 percent of the
voting stock be owned by US citizens, and that the corporation
be under the actual control of US citizens. The requirement must
be met initially by an applicant, and continue to be met by a
US airline holding a license.
3. The practice followed by each Party in applying its
laws and regulations is set out in the Appendix to this Annex.
APPENDIX TO
ANNEX 4
1. In the United States, citizenship determinations are
necessary for all US air carrier applicants for a certificate,
exemption, or commuter license. An initial application for a license
is filed in a formal public docket, and processed "on the
record" with filings by the applicant and any other interested
parties. The Department of Transportation renders a final decision
by an Order based on the formal public record of the case, including
documents for which confidential treatment has been granted. A
"continuing fitness" case may be handled informally
by the Department, or may be set for docketed procedures similar
to those used for initial applications.
2. The Department's determinations evolve through a variety
of precedents, which reflect, among other things, the changing
nature of financial markets and investment structures and the
DOT's willingness to consider new approaches to foreign investment
that are consistent with US law. DOT works with applicants to
consider proposed forms of investment and to assist them in fashioning
transactions that fully comply with US citizenship law, and applicants
regularly consult with DOT staff before finalizing their applications.
At any time before a formal proceeding has begun, DOT staff may
discuss questions concerning citizenship issues or other aspects
of the proposed transaction and offer suggestions, where appropriate,
as to alternatives that would allow a proposed transaction to
meet US citizenship requirements.
3. In making both its initial and continuing citizenship
and fitness determinations, DOT considers the totality of circumstances
affecting the US airline, and Department precedents have permitted
consideration of the nature of the aviation relationship between
the United States and the homeland(s) of any foreign investors.
In the context of this Agreement, DOT would treat investments
from EU nationals at least as favorably as it would treat investments
from nationals of bilateral or multilateral Open-Skies partners.
4. In the European Union, paragraph 5 of Article 4 of
Regulation 2407/92 provides that the European Commission, acting
at the request of a Member State, shall examine compliance with
the requirements of Article 4 and take a decision if necessary.
In taking such decisions the Commission must ensure compliance
with the procedural rights recognized as general principles of
Community law by the European Court of Justice, including the
right of interested parties to be heard in a timely manner.
5. When applying its laws and regulations, each Party
shall ensure that any transaction involving investment in one
of its airlines by nationals of the other Party is afforded fair
and expeditious consideration.
ANNEX 5
Concerning Franchising and Branding
1. The airlines of each Party shall not be precluded
from entering into franchise or branding arrangements, including
conditions relating to brand protection and operational matters,
provided that: they comply, in particular, with the applicable
laws and regulations concerning control; the ability of the airline
to exist outside of the franchise is not jeopardized; the arrangement
does not result in a foreign airline engaging in cabotage operations;
and applicable regulations, such as consumer protection provisions,
including those regarding the disclosure of the identity of the
airline operating the service, are complied with. So long as those
requirements are met, close business relationships and cooperative
arrangements between the airlines of each Party and foreign businesses
are permissible, and each of the following individual aspects,
among others, of a franchise or branding arrangement would not,
other than in exceptional circumstances, of itself raise control
issues:
(a) using and displaying a specific brand or trademark of
a franchisor, including stipulations on the geographic area in
which the brand or trademark may be used;
(b) displaying on the franchisee's aircraft the colours and
logo of the franchisor's brand, including the display of such
a brand, trademark, logo or similar identification prominently
on its aircraft and the uniforms of its personnel;
(c) using and displaying the brand, trademark or logo on,
or in conjunction with, the franchisee's airport facilities and
equipment;
(d) maintaining customer service standards designed for marketing
purposes;
(e) maintaining customer service standards designed to protect
the integrity of the franchise brand;
(f) providing for license fees on standard commercial terms;
(g) providing for participation in frequent flyer programs,
including the accrual of benefits; and
(h) providing in the franchise or branding agreement for the
right of the franchisor or franchisee to terminate the arrangement
and withdraw the brand, provided that nationals of the United
States or the Member States remain in control of the US or Community
airline, respectively.
2. Franchising and branding arrangements are independent
of, but may coexist with, a code-sharing arrangement that requires
that both airlines have the appropriate authority from the Parties,
as provided for in paragraph 7 of Article 10 of this Agreement.
Letter from the Chairman to Rt Hon Douglas Alexander
MP
Thank you for your letter of 11 April, which included the
full text of the "Phase One" Agreement. Sub-Committee
B considered your letter, and the text, at its meeting on 23 April.
We were very grateful to you for your full report of the
discussions and conclusions of the Council meeting on 22 March.
We hope that your assessment that this phase one agreement is
"in Britain's best interests", and note the immediate
economic benefits that should result for the UK's economy as a
whole. Neveretheless, we do not see the "first phase"
deal as representing a satisfactory outcome on its own in the
long term. We would underline the importance of the "phase
two" agreement, as we have consistently called for the fullest
possible liberalisation of the aviation area between the EU and
US. Making headway on the "Fly America" programme will
be key to realising this.
In your letter you requested our clearance of the Agreement
ahead of its proposed signature at the EU-US summit on 30 April.
The scrutiny reserve applies to the decisions made in the Council
of Ministers, and thus your support for this Agreement is technically
an override of scrutiny. However as the Committee made it clear
that we agreed with your signature; and we received as much information
as the Government could have reasonably provided, we will not
treat this as a formal override, and will include an explanation
of the circumstances in any report we make of it.
We would welcome the opportunity to take evidence from you,
or your officials, at a convenient point before the Summer Recess
on your expectations for a phase two agreement to be concluded
successfully next year.
24 April 2007
28
Correspondence with Ministers, 40th Report of Session 2006-07,
HL Paper 187, p 99. Back
|