Correspondence with Ministers October 2006 to April 2007 - European Union Committee Contents


DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE 2005

Letter from Gareth Thomas MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for International Development to the Chairman

  Your Committee met on 11 October 2006 and discussed the Annual Report 2006 on the European Community's Development Policy and the Implementation of External Assistance in 2005. Your Committee did not clear the document from scrutiny and asked for further information.

  The Committee raised concerns about the management of financial risks, both for the Commission's budget support and for the whole of Community expenditure on development assistance. You asked me to comment on the Commission's ability to evaluate the quality of public finance management before and during a budget support operation. As you will know, the Commission's budget support has it own set of regulations designed to minimize risk of fraud and mismanagement. Safeguards are further strengthened by the European Court of Auditors, which audits the use of Community external aid (and audited the Commission's budget support to Africa, Caribbean and Pacific countries in 2005). The Commission itself also performs ex-ante "audits" to check the robustness of recipients of Community budget support.

  In addition, the Commission is now adopting the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) framework to assess the quality of public finance management systems in partner countries. The Commission is actively involved in the development and implementation of the PEFA framework in partner countries, taking a lead role with the World Bank. I very much support this initiative; the UK will also be integrating PEFA in our own approach to fiduciary risk management.

  You also asked for comments on the Commission's capacity to identify, minimise and manage the risk of poor or fraudulent management of the disbursements of aid. I am satisfied in this regard. Much progress has been made since the reform programme began in 2000 to increase the effectiveness and reduce the risks associated with aid.

  In 2001, EuropeAid was created in order to ensure sound and accountable financial, technical and contractual management of Community aid. At the same time, the Commission has "deconcentrated" (decentralised) much of its programme management to their country offices. This has helped to bring management much closer to the projects, with the commensurate increase in project quality and outcomes. The 2004 Court of Auditors' Report on deconcentration concluded that robust financial management procedures are generally ensured under devolved management.

  In order to improve the design of individual operations, quality support groups now review projects and programmes in preparatory stages and at completion of preparatory activities. These quality support groups use checklists based on evaluation criteria recommended by the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. These indicators include institutional capacity issues, monitoring and evaluation systems and risk management. The Commission's Annual Report describes further measures taken in 2005 to help delegations carry out quality checks at the design phase of projects and programmes.

  As much as any other development agency. the Commission is seeking to strike a balance between ensuring that risks are controlled, and working to provide aid at the right time and in the most useful ways. We will continue to work with the Commission to ensure that emerging lessons in this regard are fully understood and acted upon.

  For your information, I attach the Council Conclusions that were adopted at the October GAERC. While these Conclusions welcome the Report, they emphasise the need for continuing improvements in many of the areas which I have highlighted to you in the past (including in my Explanatory Memorandum on the Report).

  The Conclusions encourage the Commission to adopt a forward look when drafting the Report, rather than only commenting on issues in the calendar year under consideration. The Commission is encouraged to set out annual objectives explicitly, and to provide an assessment on achievement of these objectives. In particular they invite the Commission to make a clear link from the description of activities to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. The Council also invites the Commission to provide a more explicit description of the implementation and effects of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness.

25 November 2006



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009