Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum by the Rt Hon Caroline Flint MP, Minister for Europe, Foreign and Commonwealth Office

EUROPEAN SECURITY STRATEGY

  When I gave evidence to Sub-Committee C on 16 October I promised to write to the Committee on our policy towards the Nabucco pipeline and on trends in Russian domestic consumption of gas.

NABUCCO PIPELINE (Q422)

  It has long been our view that diversity of energy mix, as well as a diversity of routes of supply and sources of supply, is necessary to provide long term energy security for the UK and EU as a whole. There are differences in approach to the issue across the EU, but successive European Council conclusions have noted that the EU needs to agree how to speak with one voice on external energy policy. The Georgia crisis, and the coincidental temporary closure of the Baku—Tblisi—Ceyhan oil pipeline in August 2008, brought the need for European diversification of source and route of supply sharply into focus. In response, we have called for support for the development of the Southern Corridor and in particular the proposed Nabucco gas pipeline. This pipeline would bring gas from the Caspian region to EU markets via Turkey and would provide a market balancing mechanism to ensure that the EU was not dependent on a single supplier, who would hold a monopoly and be able to set the price. It is our belief that pipeline projects should be delivered by the market and, given the price balancing role of this pipeline, which would provide a new route and gas from new sources in terms of EU supply, we are fully supportive of it.

  A commercial consortium made up of six companies is already established and is developing this project. We would expect this consortium to lead the funding of the pipeline. Given the lack of confidence in both the political stability of the producing and transit regions and the ability to raise sufficient funding on the market in the current economic conditions, we are encouraging the European Commission to step up its political engagement in the region on this subject. We are also exploring options for some public involvement through possible support from European institutions, for example the European Investment Bank, which already supports large scale infrastructure projects both inside the EU and beyond.

RUSSIAN GAS CONSUMPTION (Q426)

  Lord Hamilton asked whether the Government thought that the proportion of Russian gas consumed domestically would rise. There is a great deal of uncertainty about the development of the Russian gas market over the coming years. Gazprom's bullish forecasts regarding long-term increases in overall output and exports need to be set against widespread scepticism among independent analysts, some of whom in fact predict a potential "gas supply crunch" for Russia within the next few years, primarily due to Gazprom's under-investment in new production projects. Under this scenario, Russian gas output would fail to keep pace with the twin requirements of meeting growing domestic demand whilst simultaneously fulfilling Gazprom's supply obligations to its external customers in Europe. This would require the Russian authorities to make tough choices over which markets—domestic or external—to supply as its first priority. But at present, it remains unclear whether such a "crunch" will in fact materialise, and, if so, in what time-frame and on what scale. I attach a background paper on this issue, which you may find useful. (Not printed here).

30 October 2008





 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008