Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Question Numbers 340-342)

Mr Miles Austin, Ms Coralie Laurencin, Mr Nick Haslam and Mr Sam Fankhauser

8 OCTOBER 2008

  Q340  Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe: It is not beyond the bounds of possibility?

  Mr Austin: Not 100%.

  Q341  Chairman: If you look at where carbon emission is going to increase exponentially over the next 20 or 30 years, it is the BRIC countries. They are also amongst some of the greatest beneficiaries of a reduction in carbon emissions as states; yet they are states which set themselves fairly strongly against being involved in any such arrangements. How would you encourage them? Is there any way of encouraging them to bring them on board?

  Mr Austin: Certainly. In China, I cannot remember the name of the official or what his role was but he was somehow involved in the Kyoto negotiations. If you look at the per capita emissions of the United States, you are looking at about 20 tonnes per person per year. The EU average is about 11. In China, it is something like 4.8 and in India it is round about 1.9. The Chinese official made a statement to the effect of, "Bring down your per capita emissions too close to our level and then we will talk." I do not think that is an unreasonable approach. If we start to approach Chinese emission levels, I think we would certainly have the right to discuss China taking on targets. Until that point I do not see any legitimacy in asking them to take on targets.

  Q342  Lord Cameron of Dillington: China's total emissions have now gone over the United States' total emissions.

  Mr Austin: Simply because it is a large country. It would be like treating Europe as a block.

  Ms Laurencin: The EU is sensitive to this issue and in the proposal that has been amended by the committee yesterday from the Commission's text, there is language saying, "We will allow imports from countries which are participating in an international climate change agreement." There is that form of encouragement in saying, "We are happy to provide for technology transfer and funds to provide emission reductions in the countries that themselves take on a more dynamic role towards an international agreement on climate change."

  Mr Fankhauser: I am not an expert in this area but what I hear is that the developing countries are interested in three things. One is technology; the second is finance and the third is adaptation or recognition that certainly China and India are extremely vulnerable. The Russians have not figured out whether they are vulnerable or not but certainly in China and India there is the recognition that they are vulnerable, so it is in their own self-interest to address the problem. On top of that, there is finance and technology.

Chairman: Thank you very much indeed. It has been very helpful.





 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008