Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 296-299)

Mr John Cooke and Mr Roger Brown

1 JULY 2008

  Q296  Chairman: Welcome, Mr Cooke and Mr Brown. I ought to issue the conventional warning. You are on the air; you are being broadcast throughout but you will get a transcript of whatever you say so that any infelicities can be revisited. We always ask witnesses whether they would like to make an opening statement or whether they would like us just to launch into questions—it is your choice.

  Mr Cooke: We felt that we had given you written evidence, so we are quite happy to be launched into questions.

  Q297  Chairman: Thank you very much. In which case, I will start. Nobody has told us a great deal about services so far, really because progress on services has not been enormously strong, so we are particularly interested in how you see the prospects right up to date for liberalisation of trade in services? In short, where do you think we are in the negotiations; do you remain hopeful or do you think it is very difficult? And why do you think that the progress has been so appallingly slow?

  Mr Brown: I think there are two main elements to this. First of all, there is the state of the Round generally and, as we all know, it has been slow, it has been difficult and the outcome is uncertain, and that is true for services as for the rest of it; and we will need to see what happens at the Ministerial, which has been called for 21 July. I understand that they are going to devote at least one day, possibly more, to a services signalling exercise. But services has been dragged down by the general problems with the Round. The other element is that services has been very much overshadowed by NAMA and agriculture, despite the fact that services accounts for over 70 per cent of European GDP and offers the greatest prospects for welfare gains. It was decided that agricultural tariffs, subsidies and industrial tariffs were the gateway issues and that services would be slotted in later. So the fact is that in the Doha process there has been very little serious negotiation on services; so you have the general problem and that specific difficulty.

  Mr Cooke: I would add two things to that. One is that in general I see the prospects for liberalisation of trade in services as quite good. Leaving aside the Doha Round a lot of countries have been and are gradually liberalising trade in services and see good reason to do so. Certain services like financial services are part of the bedrock infrastructure for economic growth and they see the need to gradually liberalise those. As for the difficulties in the Doha Round, I think—particularly if you have not yet been introduced much to the question of negotiations on trade and services—it needs to be recognised that negotiating liberalisation of services is simply much more difficult than negotiating liberalisation of trade in goods. With trade in goods the negotiations in the many past GATT round negotiations have been about tariff reductions. There are two things about that. One is that there can be a calculus if you reduce the tariff by X per cent do you expect to increase trade by Y per cent? So it is possible for countries to take a view of what they are offering and what they expect to get in return in terms of trade. Negotiating on services is not subject to any kind of formulae or calculus of that kind; one is really negotiating about regulatory barriers to free trade in services and these regulatory barriers are parts of countries' domestic regulation; they can be politically sensitive legislative issues so they are completely different prospects to negotiate. With that, I think, goes the fact that the domestic regulators who have to be involved in each country in liberalising trade in services may be marching to a completely different drum—different timing from the trade negotiators in Geneva—so that any country that is participating in such a negotiation has quite a difficulty in rallying its own forces to produce results that involve trade ministers, other ministers, regulators and so on in a timescale that leads to making an offer in a negotiation.

  Q298  Chairman: Are you saying to us that the prospects for liberalisation in the Doha Round may not be that great, but the prospects generally for the liberalisation at least of financial services are better?

  Mr Cooke: I think in the long run that they are positive, yes. I am also hopeful about the Doha Round.

  Q299  Lord Moser: If I may, is there also a problem about the data, the statistics on services being less hard? Are you implying that it is a slightly more wishy-washy area for negotiation data on services, or are you not implying that?

  Mr Cooke: I think the data has always been more difficult to assemble.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008