Select Committee on European Union Written Evidence


Memorandum by Mr Giles Chichester, MEP

ENERGY

1.  Has there been sufficient unbundling of gas and electricity markets in all Member States?

  No. Even if the Second Directives were fully transposed and implemented it will be necessary to go beyond legal unbundling to remove obvious conflict of interests from common ownership.

2.  Is there agreement on the fundamental importance of a genuine single market to support a Common European strategy for energy?

  There is broad support for a liberalised single market, but room for different opinions on what this actually means based on recognition that national markets remain the normal reality with some regional markets such as Nordic Pool or UK. There are also a range of views on what a Common European Strategy for energy actually means.

3.  What are the implications for the single market of the Commission's commitments on climate change?

  The answer depends on how transparent policy instruments are. In particular the ETS needs to be revised and a realistic price for CO2 established as well as clearly understood criteria for RES support mechanisms be they financial or regulatory. Market mechanisms are the best way to pursue EU policy objectives on climate change.

4.  Should there be a single EU energy regulator?

  No or certainly not yet. The existing ERG structure has room for improvement in terms of maintaining common standards and sharing best practice but it should be allowed to develop by trial and error before turning to the drastic step of having a single regulator. There are signs of an interesting compromise proposal on this issue to come from the Commission this autumn.

27 June 2007



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008