Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 120 - 121)

WEDNESDAY 21 NOVEMBER 2007

Mr Tony Bunyan and Professor Steve Peers

  Q120  Chairman: I do not in any way seek to diminish the importance of what you are saying and I am sure that there is a sub-committee that will want to look at it.

  Mr Bunyan: But you are quite right that it is not in the Treaty.

  Q121  Lord Lester of Herne Hill: I am not quite sure what you are seeking here, Mr Bunyan. Judges are not best placed to deal with matters of security, unless there is some clear breach of a human right or some abuse of power. Judges, as you know, adopt a hands-off policy when it comes to questions of national security, with those kinds of exceptions. Are you saying that what you regret about this is not just the recognition of greater co-operation by the intelligence services, but you regret the fact that the European Court of Justice is not going to have a hands-on approach in reviewing the exercise of these powers? Or are you accepting in my question that it is undesirable to think of judicial remedies, except where there are breaches of human rights or abuses of power? What actually is your position when you deal with the jurisdiction, as it were?

  Mr Bunyan: Yes, I think that they should have the jurisdiction. I have left out the point, which perhaps should be obvious, that one must see accountability here. Before these bodies meet, there must be a national and European Parliament coming together on what is to be their role. What are the limits of their role? Are they going to report back? Are we going to get annual reports? There are always two sides. There is the judicial side and then there is the democratic side, if you like, about what role we are allowing these agencies to carry out in our name.

  Chairman: These are all questions for us to ask when they take decisions, if they do take them, under the provisions of the Treaty, not on the Treaty. May I thank you very much indeed, Professor Peers and Mr Bunyan, for your evidence and the very detailed replies that you have given to all our questions.





 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008