Select Committee on Intergovernmental Organisations First Report


DISEASES KNOW NO FRONTIERS: HOW EFFECTIVE ARE INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS IN CONTROLLING THEIR SPREAD?

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.  We were appointed by the House for the 2007-08 session of Parliament "to consider how contemporary issues of international policy are addressed through United Kingdom membership of intergovernmental organisations (excluding the European Union), including their impact and effectiveness and value for money".

Defining Our Role

2.  The European Union (EU) was excluded from our terms of reference because the House already has a European Union Committee. What this exclusion precludes is an in-depth examination by us of EU activity in a given field. It does not, however, preclude exploration of the boundary line between EU and other intergovernmental activity: indeed, it is essential to our task of examining action by non-EU intergovernmental organisations that we should look at how such action fits together with what is being done under the auspices of the EU.

3.  We also recognised at the outset that our focus was to be on intergovernmental organisations (IGOs) rather than on international ones. The distinction is important. There is a wide range of organisations (for example, OXFAM, Médecins Sans Frontières or the International HIV/AIDS Alliance) whose activities are international in character. IGOs, on the other hand, are organisations (such as the United Nations, OECD or NATO) whose members are national governments. Even here, however, there are distinctions to be drawn, in particular between intergovernmental action, when a number of governments agree to collaborate for a common purpose, and action by intergovernmental organisations, where a recognised IGO acts in the name of and on behalf of all its Member States. Our focus is on the latter.

4.  We interpret our role as being to examine how the British Government is making use of its membership of such organisations in order to achieve objectives which meet both UK interests and those of the international community generally. In order to be able to address this question we have found it necessary to examine the effectiveness of the IGOs themselves and the way they function. But it is important to recognise that in doing so our primary objective has not been to attempt to audit the performance of the organisations but to reach a view of how effectively UK influence is being brought to bear within them and whether appropriate value for money is being obtained.

5.  We acknowledge that in the post-Cold War world there is much discussion about the need to reform IGOs. Structural reform of IGOs is, of course, the responsibility of the governments who are their members, but in much of the writing about this problem there is a wide recognition that creating new ways of working within and between existing IGOs can be an important part of the reform process. Indeed it has been pointed out to us that creating and developing networks between existing IGOs and NGOs is a useful way of getting international support for them. The British Government is a major participant in these organisations and the Government's policy can have an effect greater than the financial input alone, although that is also very significant.

Choosing Our Inquiry

6.  We considered a number of areas of IGO activity which would be suitable for inquiry, including Peacekeeping, Human Trafficking, Disarmament and Controlling the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction. One subject, however, commanded clear support as deserving a clear-cutting and urgent inquiry—namely, controlling the global spread of infectious diseases.

7.  It was once thought that, with rapid advances in medical science, the twentieth century had seen the main killer diseases—such as smallpox, polio-myelitis, tuberculosis and malaria—brought under control. That is not, however, what health or national security experts now think. Medical science has indeed advanced, but lifestyles have changed substantially and sometimes in a way that threatens to undermine its achievements. During the last 50 years trade and travel between nations have increased at a considerable rate—the number of international tourist journeys alone rose from 25 million in 1950 to over 800 million in 2005, while world trade has grown more than 20-fold over the same period. As a result infections which were once limited to specific parts of the globe are now able to spread more easily and rapidly to others, often before we are aware of their potential. Within many poorer countries there has been substantial urbanisation, which obliges millions of people to live together in close proximity and often poor conditions of hygiene and which creates a fertile ground for the spread of infectious diseases. There have also been significant changes in agricultural practices and ecology generally, not to mention changes in climatic conditions.

8.  There is also increasing evidence that a number of killer diseases, including tuberculosis and malaria, are becoming resistant to once-effective antibiotics. And, of course, there are new and deadly infections emerging. Though most publicity has been given to the Human Immuno-deficiency Virus (HIV), which if uncontrolled often results in the lethal disease of AIDS, there are many others, including SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), ebola and avian influenza, which, unlike HIV/AIDS, have the potential to cause rapid and devastating sickness and death across much of the world if they are not detected and checked in time.

9.  For these reasons we decided as a committee that our first priority should be to examine the action which is being taken through IGOs to control the global spread of communicable diseases. We were agreed, however, that we should not look at intergovernmental management in a vacuum but that it would be helpful if we could relate what was being done to certain specific diseases. This, we hoped, might provide us with working illustrations of the problems which the relevant IGOs are facing and of good and bad practice in dealing with them. The diseases we selected are all highly infectious and all pose serious problems for global health if not controlled. They do however differ from each other in some important aspects and thereby furnish examples of different issues.

10.  HIV is an infection which was recognised in the 1980s and has spread globally since then. In 2007 some 33 million people were estimated to be living with HIV. During the same year 2.5 million people became newly infected and 2.1 million people died of AIDS. HIV is an infection which, though concentrated mainly in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia, has spread worldwide. But, unlike the other three infections on which we have focused, its spread is largely attributable to lifestyle factors, in particular sexual behaviour. There is as yet no cure or vaccine, though antiretroviral (ARV) drugs have proved to be effective in retarding the onset of AIDS and thereby prolonging the lives of those infected.

11.  Pandemic influenza might be said to be at the opposite end of the spectrum. At the time of going to press, there has been no recent outbreak of pandemic influenza reported. Historically, however, such outbreaks have occurred on average three times every century, and the last outbreak was in 1968. The last two pandemics (1958 and 1968) were caused by relatively mild strains of the virus, but the next one could have more serious consequences, especially if it should come in the form of a virus, such as the H5N1 variety, which is common in birds and poultry, which has already jumped the species barrier to infect humans and which might at some point in the near future become capable of human-to-human transmission. The Government's evidence to us on this was sobering:

In other words, we have in pandemic flu an infection which is not yet with us but which, when it arrives, is likely to have a devastating, if relatively short-lived, impact.

12.  Tuberculosis (TB) and malaria might be said to fall within these two extremes. Here we have infectious diseases which have been around for centuries, and steady progress was being made until about 30 years ago towards eradicating them. In both cases effective antibiotics had been found and, in the case of malaria, house-spraying with DDT was proving effective in controlling the mosquitoes which spread the disease. In both cases, however, the disease has begun to develop resistance to conventional antibiotics and there has been some fall-away in DDT spraying as a result of fears of side-effects for human health and the environment. In addition, the rise of HIV has had a considerable impact on the incidence of TB, which is present harmlessly in a large proportion of the world's population but is able to develop into pathogenic form where natural immunity to infection has been compromised. According to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, TB is the most common cause of death in people infected with HIV.

13.  In selecting these four diseases, therefore, as illustrations of intergovernmental health management we have attempted to cover a spectrum of disease types. There are, we recognise, many other serious infections, including ebola, SARS, pneumococcal disease and leprosy, and our choice does not imply that there is not a need for concerted intergovernmental action to deal with them. The ones we have selected are intended simply as working examples of how IGOs are going about their task.

Acknowledgements

14.  Our Call for Evidence, which was issued on 10 December 2007, is shown at Appendix 2. In response we received 56 submissions of written evidence, and we subsequently took oral evidence, in London, Geneva and Paris, from 34 persons or organisations. Volume II of this report shows all the evidence received, both written and oral. We would like to thank all those who assisted us in this way: without their help our inquiry could not have been carried out.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008