Select Committee on Intergovernmental Organisations Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 137 - 139)

MONDAY 25 FEBRUARY 2008

Professor Peter Borriello, Professor Mike Catchpole, Professor Francis Drobniewski and Professor Peter Chiodini


  Q137  Chairman: Welcome to the Intergovernmental Organisations Select Committee. Thank you for your time. You ought to know that this session will be webcast. Also, you will see a transcript of the evidence, so if there is anything you want to correct of a factual nature you will have an opportunity to do so. Although questions might come directly to individuals, all of you should feel able to add something if you think you have something important to say. If after this hearing you think there is something important that has been left out, perhaps you could tell us about that and write to the Clerk. That would be useful. When exactly were you set up?

  Professor Borriello: We were formed in 2003 and I think the Act was 2005.

  Q138  Chairman: You were born before your conception!

  Professor Borriello: Some people have a different interpretation of that.

  Q139  Chairman: From your evidence, you seem to take the view that the middle two quarters of the last century were very good on international health but that now some of those gains are being offset. I think you pick out globalisation, urbanisation and drug resistance. Am I understanding you correctly in saying that? And, secondly, what about the resistance issue, the resistance particularly of animal to human microbes? We want to have a clearer understanding of that.

  Professor Borriello: It is easy to forget that primarily we are in a golden age of health protection. It is very easy to look back and think things must have been better because we now have new, emerging infections. SARS obviously caused a lot of public and governmental concern but we responded very well to that. AIDS is still a major problem. It dominates people's view of risk. When most of the population's concern about infections risk is more about the possible side effects of the vaccine than the disease itself, I think that tells us something. When parents no longer worry about polio or diphtheria and many other diseases that used to just lay waste to our population—smallpox is now eradicated—then I think it is a little easy to think all the problems are now and not in the past. I think we have overcome many problems but there are increasing pressures that increase the risk of the emerging new infections spreading quickly as well as some existing infections, which of course are not fully eradicated, re-emerging. One is, of course, complacency on those that we no longer consider dangerous and therefore people are more willing not to have a vaccine or take other protective mechanisms. The other issue is increased globalisation, so it genuinely is the case that what you ate for breakfast today might have been in another country yesterday. There is also increased travel. That mobility, that flexibility, increases the risk of transmission of an infectious disease happening much more quickly than it used to in the past.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008