Select Committee on Intergovernmental Organisations Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 500 - 504)

MONDAY 31 MARCH 2008

Dr Sylvia Meek, Mr Alastair Burtt, Mr Paul Sommerfeld and Ms Tina Harrison

  Q500  Chairman: It is the WHO and Interpol that you would see working together better on this?

  Dr Meek: I think they should be working together more on it. They are both very keen to do so but, again on the WHO side, it is probably relatively limited resources. They are open to any opportunities to do more and Interpol seems to be enthusiastic about it as well.

  Mr Sommerfeld: The picture for tuberculosis is very similar to that for malaria as far as prequalification is concerned. The real block is the WHO's ability to handle the requirements of a number of cases coming forward. That is becoming increasingly important for us in TB because we have new diagnostics coming on board. We are beginning to see new drugs or new formulations, and new vaccines are coming closer to a trial, so there are new developments where the whole issue of prequalification will be more important. The only way we have so far got round it is exactly the same as in the malaria world. We have managed to try and find some money from somewhere to give a bit of extra money to the central WHO operation to do the prequalification. That is not a very satisfactory way. It is a bit of horse trading and it is likely to lead to unfairness between diseases. A general remark would be to strengthen the funding available to the WHO to have a large enough prequalification team.

  Dr Meek: From what I hear, that is working now.

  Mr Sommerfeld: And there have been improvements in the past two years. On the false drugs, again it can be an issue in tuberculosis but crucially for us has been the strength of the Global Drug Facility, which is the purchasing agent of the Stop TB Partnership, either given free or at a very low price to major, high burden countries. The fact that a very high proportion of TB drugs come through the Global Drug Facility means that they are properly controlled and checked. False drugs are an issue. You can go into any chemist in many countries of the world which are high burden TB countries and you can buy all sorts of things that claim to be Rifampin and Isoniazid and so on, but largely in the public sector that itself is not an issue. It is notable that the Global Drug Facility is one of the success stories of the Stop TB Partnership, and DFID just over 18 months ago agreed to fund through the Global Drug Facility and is paying for all of the TB drugs of the Indian National Programme, which means potentially a third of the world's TB sufferers.

  Q501  Lord Avebury: I was wondering, on the funding, why there has been no corresponding mechanism to pneumo-aid as you have with pneumoococcal disease and funding of new vaccines, so that payment can be made in advance to manufacturers to produce larger quantities and therefore bring the price down. That seems to be a mechanism that is working very well in pneumococcal disease. As far as I know, it has not been applied to any other disease group. Can you explain that?

  Dr Meek: At present there is not a malaria vaccine yet.

  Q502  Lord Avebury: Or medications generally?

  Dr Meek: They are just about to introduce a mechanism like that but a slightly different one, which is promoting access in the private sector. This is the Affordable Medicines Facility. We have a report on it and I can leave you a copy. It gives quite a lot of detail about how it would work but it is the same kind of idea and it does seem that some of those barriers are overcome.

  Q503  Lord Avebury: What about TB?

  Mr Sommerfeld: It is a question of how close is something potentially to market. At the moment there are debates going on. It is a strange body. I have never yet managed to pin down quite the international committee that is the legal agency. It has gone through one particular drug and we are beginning to talk about what will be its next one. We had a debate in the Coordinating Board of the Stop TB Partnership as to whether or not we should be pushing for a TB drug to be the feature of an advance market commitment. We suspect in a way that we are not quite at the point or that it would be an appropriate mechanism, but we should be rather soon. I believe there are issues which are worth exploring about what is the nature of the advance market commitment international agreements because they seem to be controlled by a slightly amorphous body. When this came up at the Coordinating Board of the Stop TB Partnership, I said, "Can somebody tell me exactly what is this committee? What is it an agency of?" Nobody seemed to be able to answer me.

  Chairman: Can I thank you very much your evidence, both written and verbal? If you feel that anything has been missed out, please write to the Clerk. You have already been in contact with him. Please send those comments in. You will get your transcript to look at before it goes out in public form.

  Baroness Eccles of Moulton: Could we possibly ask Mr Sommerfeld if he could let us know a bit more about integrating the HIV and TB programmes?

  Lord Desai: I thought we had talked about that.

  Q504  Chairman: If you feel there was anything that was not covered on that, perhaps you could send it in.

  Mr Sommerfeld: I think it was dealt with in the evidence of the people before us.

  Chairman: I agree it was covered to some extent but, if there is anything you want to add to that, please send it in.





 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008