Select Committee on Merits of Statutory Instruments Twenty-First Report



Twenty-first Report

Instrument drawn to the special attention of the House

The Committee has considered the following instrument and has determined that the special attention of the House should be drawn to it on the ground specified.

Draft Rail Vehicle Accessibility (Interoperable Rail System) Regulations 2008

Summary: These Regulations introduce European accessibility standards for people with reduced mobility travelling on trains on the major lines of the United Kingdom rail network. The current domestic standard, the Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations 1998 (RVAR), will continue to apply to the Docklands Light Railway, the London Underground and similar metro systems. The scope of the new Regulations is broadly similar to RVAR but, in contrast to exemptions under the current domestic regime, derogations under the new regime will be dealt with administratively by the Department for Transport rather than by statutory instrument subject to a parliamentary procedure. The Government proposed making exemptions an administrative matter in the bill for the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 but the House amended the bill to require continued parliamentary control over exemptions. Since the 2005 Act was passed, we have been impressed with the thoroughness of the case presented in Explanatory Memoranda (EM) in support of each exemption order. The EM to this instrument says that the scope for derogations under the European regime is narrower than under the present regime but the House may wish to satisfy itself that it is appropriate for the Department for Transport to deal with derogations on an administrative basis. In line with the 2005 Act, the Regulations also set the date of 1 January 2020 by which time all passenger rail vehicles operating on these lines must comply with the new regime.

 

These Regulations are drawn to the special attention of the House on the ground that they give rise to issues of public policy likely to be of interest to the House.

1.  The Department for Transport (DfT) have laid these Regulations under section 46(1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 as amended, section 2(2) of the European Communities Act and section 247 of the Transport Act 2000 together with an Explanatory Memorandum (EM). Additional information from the Department is printed at the Appendix to this report.

2.  These Regulations introduce European accessibility standards for people with reduced mobility travelling on trains on major lines of the UK rail network as set out in a "technical specification for interoperability" for "persons with reduced mobility" (PRM TSI) annexed to Decision 2008/164/EC of the European Commission of 21 December 2007. The definition of "persons with reduced mobility" (PRM) is broader than the definition of "disabled person" used in the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, as the former also covers groups with mobility impairments including limb impairments, ambulant difficulties, those travelling with children, those travelling with heavy luggage, elderly people and pregnant women.

3.  The technical requirements in the PRM TSI are mainly equivalent or superior to the existing domestic regulations. There are however a small number of areas where the new standards are less onerous. Most of these areas are changes which standardise the UK with usage elsewhere in Europe, for example as to the size and iconography of signage. More significant differences are:

a minimum clearway and doorway width for wheelchair users of 800mm (currently 850mm in domestic standards). This nonetheless remains accessible to someone in a "reference wheelchair" (which is 700mm wide); and

that the minimum duration and type of tone for door warnings may not be ideal.

4.  The European standards will apply to all new heavy passenger vehicles commissioned after 1 July 2008. In addition, the Regulations set an end date of 1 January 2020, by which time all passenger vehicles operating on these lines must comply. Some parts of the industry have argued that this is gold-plating the EC legislation since that does not include an end date; however the end date chosen retains the general compliance date set by the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 ("the 2005 Act") in relation to the previous domestic standards.

5.  These Regulations will apply to heavy rail vehicles carrying passengers on major lines, which represents about 70% of the national rail network (a more detailed explanation is given in the Appendix). The domestic standard, the Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations 1998 (RVAR), will continue to apply to the Docklands Light Railway, the London Underground and similar metro systems.

Derogations / exemptions

6.  The tension in the RVAR between the Government's objectives of i) avoiding unreasonable delay in introducing new rolling stock, key to the success of the integrated transport policy and ii) meeting the transport needs of disabled people[1] was one of the first issues which this Committee drew to the attention of the House. We considered that the number and duration of exemptions to the RVAR suggested that avoiding delay to the travelling public was a higher priority for the Government than improving access for the disabled[2].

7.  This reflected a wider concern in the House, demonstrated in the proceedings on the bill for the 2005 Act[3]: in that bill, the Government proposed making exemptions an administrative matter but the House amended the bill to require continued parliamentary control over exemptions. Since the 2005 Act was passed, we have seen fewer exemption orders and we commend the thoroughness of the case presented for each, which has including the full text of the views of the Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee (DPTAC)[4].

8.  The European legislation here being implemented provides scope for exemptions (derogations) and paragraphs 18-23 of the further information from the Government (printed at the Appendix) sets out their scope and the proposed procedure. The Government propose to change the way in which exemptions are granted, moving the process from a statutory instrument subject to parliamentary control to an administrative process within the department. This is a question of choice rather than obligation. The Interoperability Directives state that exemptions may only be granted by a Competent Authority. The Railways (Interoperability) Regulations 2006 (which transpose the Interoperability Directives) set the Competent Authority as the Secretary of State for Great Britain, the Intergovernmental Commission of the Governments of the UK and France for the Channel Tunnel, and the Department of Regional Development for Northern Ireland. There is no reason that the grant of exemptions could not be subject to parliamentary control: statutory instruments are made by the Secretary of State, not by Parliament.

9.  In their further information, the department has assured us that the new power of derogation is more limited than that under the domestic regime because there is no facility for granting an exemption to enable new trains to enter traffic while non-compliances are rectified, in contrast to the domestic regime. There is however a mechanism to enable the Secretary of State to decide that individual parts of the PRM TSI need not apply to a renewal or upgrade of an existing rail vehicle. The consultation paper on the draft Regulations explained that the Department intend to use this mechanism on a case-by-case basis to allow minor non-compliances, which do not materially affect accessibility, to remain past the end date of 1 January 2020 (such as moving a control button by 50mm). The Department have stated that they intend to consult DPTAC as appropriate before making any decisions of this nature, although specific consultation is not a requirement of the PRM TSI (unlike the consultation requirement in the 2005 Act). In view of the policy tension to which we refer at paragraph 6, we hope that the Government will also consult bodies more broadly representative of passengers in general. The domestic RVAR exemption process will remain for light rail, metro and underground systems only and exemptions will continue to be granted by statutory instrument subject to a parliamentary procedure.

10.  Given the interest paid to the mechanism for exemptions during the passage of the bill for the Disability Discrimination Act 2005, the House may wish to consider whether it is appropriate for the Department for Transport to deal with derogations on an administrative basis.

 


1   For the Government's policy, see the Department for Transport's guidance on the RVAR. Back

2   13th and 18th Reports of session 2003-04 and 14th Report of session 2004-05. Back

3   See Report from the Joint Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill (Session 2003-04), HL Paper 82-I, paragraphs 158 to 167; 4th and 6th Reports from the Delegated Powers Committee (Session 2004-05). Back

4   See for example 25th Report from the Select Committee on the Merits of Statutory Instruments (Session 2005-06) HL Paper 135. Back

 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008