Select Committee on Merits of Statutory Instruments Sixteenth Report


APPENDIX 1: TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (MAYOR OF LONDON) ORDER 2008 (SI 2008/580)


Further information from the Department for Communities and Local Government

Introduction

1.  The Greater London Authority (GLA) Act 2007 implements many of the outcomes of the Government's review of the GLA that required primary legislation. The review fulfilled a 2005 manifesto commitment by identifying additional powers and responsibilities that would be best exercised by the GLA in order to devolve power from Whitehall to London and improve the delivery of strategic public services in the capital. It is necessary to update the Mayor of London Order 2000, the Town and Country Planning (Local Development)(England) Regulations 2004 and GOL Circular 1/2000 to implement the new powers in the Act. The Mayor of London Order and Circular will come into force on 6 April, but the Local Development (Amendment) Regulations are not expected to come into force until June at the earliest.

2.  The Government is clear that planning decisions should be made at the most appropriate level of government. In London this means that the Mayor should be able to determine some strategically important applications. The Order sets out the mechanisms by which the Mayor sees, and can take over, potentially strategic important applications; in particular the thresholds identifying which applications are referred to him, the policy test he must apply to decide whether his intervention is justified and the procedures he must follow in making decisions.

3.  The Local Development (Amendment) Regulations will set out the process by which the Mayor can intervene in borough Local Development Schemes. The GOL Circular sets out further guidance on all these matters, as well as the processes by which the Mayor must prepare the Spatial Development Strategy (which are unchanged by the new powers).

4.  This consultation on the draft Order builds on an earlier consultation, carried out in autumn 2006, which sought views on the broad content of the new Order. We also published two drafts of the Order, in January and July 2007, to help inform Parliamentary scrutiny of the GLA Bill.

5.  The issues of most concern to stakeholders - the thresholds for referring applications to the Mayor, the policy tests and the process - were fully debated in the Lords Committee and Report. A wide range of stakeholders from business organisations to local authorities and their representative bodies were also directly engaged with by Ministers and officials on these issues.

Consultation on Mayor of London Order (November 2007 - February 2008)

6.  The second consultation on the Mayor of London Order was undertaken between 22 November and 14 February 2008. Many of the issues raised in responses to this consultation are the same as raised in the first consultation and subsequently debated extensively in Parliament, sometimes at the behest of the consultee themselves. For example, London Councils are recorded as answering 'No' to the question 'Do you agree with the Government proposals on thresholds for referral of planning applications to the Mayor? If not, what changes do you propose?' because they wanted Category 1A to remain at 500 housing units rather than be reduced to 150 units. However this key point was subject to extensive debate in Parliament and an amendment at Lords report plus a vote to keep the threshold at 500 units. The threshold increase was defeated by 193 - 127 votes. (Hansard: Vol 693 No.108 Column 547 [see also Columns 531 et seq] Tuesday 26 June: House of Lords Official report - Greater London Authority Bill).http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldhansrd/text/70626-0007.htm

7.  37 responses were made to the second consultation. This compares with over 200 that were made to the first consultation which ran between August and October 2006. We recognise that the response to the consultation was negative but we consider that the extensive earlier consultation on these proposals and the full parliamentary scrutiny given to the key issues mean that we do have a solid basis on which to go forward with the Order and Circular.

March 2008


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008