Select Committee on Science and Technology Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Dr. Genoveva Esteban

1.  What is the state of systematics research and taxonomy in the UK? What are the current research priorities? What are the barriers, if any, to delivering these priorities?

  State of systematic research and taxonomy in the UK: still declining. Molecular approaches to systematics do get funding, but whole-organism-biology studies get nothing or almost nothing in comparison.

  Current research priorities: molecular tools do not answer ecological and/or conservation questions. Research on species and their ecological function in nature gets little attention, unless molecular tools are incorporated in the research. This is a mistake.

  Barriers: lack of funding for non-molecular taxonomic/systematic research, especially studies related to the ecological role of whole organisms. There is a lack of investment on whole-organism initiatives.

2.  What is the role of systematics and taxonomy and, in particular, in what way do they contribute to research areas such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services and climate change? How important is this contribution and how is it recognised in the funding process? How is systematics integrated in other areas of research?

  The only way to detect the effect of climate or environmental change is by the direct observation of, eg a community of organisms (be it plants, animals or microbes), and how that community has changed either in composition or in relative species abundances. This is still cheap and fast to do, but it is little recognised in the funding process (see response to point 1 above). Systematics and taxonomy can be incorporated in other areas of research by changing their name so that potential reviewers do not look at it with "bad" eyes. For example, "traditional taxonomy" becomes "biodiversity".

3.  Does the way in which systematics research is organised and co-ordinated best meet the needs of the user community? What progress has been made in setting up a body to lead on this? What contribution do the leading systematics research institutions make both nationally and internationally?

4.  What level of funding would be needed to meet the need for taxonomic information now and in the future? Who should be providing this funding?

  Research Councils like NERC could provide funding for taxonomic information, both for new and for keeping and updating national archives. The UK used to be a leading nation in taxonomic research ever since the 19th Century. Some senior managers of certain public organisations refer to taxonomy as "stamp collection", which highlights the level of unawareness that exists at such levels. Funding provided could be the equivalent to, eg one of NERC's Thematic Programmes (some of which, incidentally, have proved to be very productive, taxonomically speaking in the past).

5.  How does funding in other countries compare? Could there be more international collaboration? If so, what form should this collaboration take and how might it be achieved?

  Yes, there could be more international collaboration, especially for knowledge-transfer initiatives, eg training, workshops and seminars.

6.  What impact have developments in DNA sequencing, genomics and other new technologies had on systematics research? In what way has systematics embraced new technologies and how can these research areas interact successfully and efficiently?

  DNA sequencing has taken over completely. A taxonomic study without a molecular section is a lost study unless it has a large conservation-only component. Some work on taxonomy and systematic has incorporated new technologies only to demonstrate the usefulness of the phenotype alone for explaining how nature works, how ecosystems function, and the patterns of biodiversity at local and global levels.

DATA COLLECTION, MANAGEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND DISSEMINATION

7.  Does the way in which taxonomic data is collected, managed and maintained best meet the needs of the user community? What is the state of local and national recording schemes?

  Some schemes have been withdrawn funding completely—so, they depend on charitable donations. To meet the needs of the user community taxonomic data should improve web-based information and the way they transfer the knowledge accumulated in their databases. Such databases are now important historical records for studies on global change biology and local/national climate changes.

8.  What is the role of the major regional museums and collections? How are taxonomic collections curated and funded?

  I can talk by my own experience. I consider myself lucky as I was offered (and I accepted) a job at one of London's leading universities to bring taxonomy back to the curriculum. I am currently using national culture collections and similar facilities to improve teaching of taxonomy at the University, and to get students to realise the wealth of knowledge that exists in UK museums and collections. NERC subsidises some culture collections, which also get a limited extra funding from the business of selling cultures.

9.  What progress has been made in developing a web-based taxonomy? How do such initiatives fit in with meeting demand for systematics and taxonomy information? How do UK-led initiatives fit in with international initiatives and is there sufficient collaboration?

  Some progress has been made with web-based taxonomy. The valuable datasets that exist at local and national level should be available on-line—this would be a great step forward. However, the main component of taxonomy, ie taxonomists themselves, is in very short supply and still declining—this should not be underestimated.

10.  What needs to be done to ensure that web-based taxonomy information is of high quality, reliable and user-friendly?

  Promoting taxonomy in schools and universities, and to get students to be involved in preparing user-friendly web-based taxonomic information.

11.  How does the taxonomic community engage with the non-taxonomic community? What role do field studies play?

  Field studies seem to be declining too (I was told this when I joined the University). Promoting this kind of work in primary and secondary schools would indeed help to form the researchers of future generations that will safeguard natural Britain. There are many enthusiastic teachers and students out there that do not have the chance to collaborate with scientists or do not even know there are scientists in the area where they live. The Royal Society and other organisations are helping to overcome this problem, eg Partnership grants.

SKILLS BASE

12.  What are the numbers and ages of trained taxonomists working in UK universities and other organisations?

  I would not know the answer, other than that the age has significantly increased in the last 15 years and that the number of taxonomists has decreased as older taxonomists have gone into retirement.

13.  What is the state of training and education in systematics and taxonomy? Are there any gaps in capacity? Is the number of taxonomists in post, and those that are being trained, sufficient to meet current and future needs across all taxonomic subject areas?

  Current numbers are not enough to meet current or, especially, future needs unless, of course, taxonomists are not needed anymore (as some people seem to claim).


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008