Select Committee on Science and Technology Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by University College London

TAXONOMY AND AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE

  Taxonomy is fundamental to environmental change science in two principal ways, (i) using organisms as biological indicators; and (ii) more directly in biodiversity studies

  At UCL we have been especially interested in the use of diatoms as indicators of water quality.

DIATOMS

  Diatoms are a very distinctive group of algae. They occur in all kinds of aquatic environment in great abundance and diversity and they are especially sensitive to changes in water chemistry. Because they have a resistant siliceous cell wall, they are preserved in lake sediments and can be used, not only to track contemporary water quality changes, but also to reconstruct past water quality over previous decades and centuries.

  In this context we have been and are concerned especially with problems of;

    1.

    eutrophication of surface waters through waste-water discharge and fertiliser runoff from agricultural land;

    2.

    surface water acidification as a result of acid rain;

    3.

    impacts of climate change on aquatic ecosystems

SURFACE WATER ACIDIFICATION: AN EXAMPLE

  Taking the example of surface water acidification we were able to show from diatom analysis of lake sediments that acidification in Britain began in the mid 19th century and was indeed caused by acid deposition from the combustion of fossil fuels. Our results helped to persuade the Thatcher government that Britain needed to sign up to the various UNECE and EU protocols and directives and agree to reduce emissions of sulphur and nitrogen gases.

  For the last 20 years on behalf of Defra we have been monitoring lakes and streams across the UK to assess the extent to which surface waters in the UK are recovering from acidification (but see below). We are now especially interested in whether climate change may influence the recovery process.

  This work has depended on (i) establishing a rigorous high resolution taxonomy for diatoms found in upland waters of the UK; and (ii) matching the distribution of diatoms across the UK (and adjacent parts of North-west Europe) with associated environmental data to define the indicator value of individual species.

THE ROLE OF TAXONOMY

  The taxonomic work involves:

    1.

    Field sampling from different streams and lakes

    2.

    High magnification inspection of the samples using light microscopy and digital photography

    3.

    Identification of unknown species using reference literature and type material in museums, especially the NHM

    4.

    Harmonisation of taxonomies between research groups using taxonomic quality control techniques ("blind" counting, microscope workshops).

    5.

    Cataloguing decisions (using the web) and archiving slides (ideally with copies at the NHM).

    6.

    Developing statistical models to describe the relationship between species distribution and environmental variables (eg pH, phosphorus).

DEVELOPMENT IN DIATOM TAXONOMY

  Considerable progress has been made over the last 30 years, in particular:

    1.

    Most diatom taxa in N.W.Europe are now well described and published;

    2.

    We have built large databases, some available on the internet, that describe the distribution (mainly with respect to water chemistry) of most taxa

    3.

    European scale research projects (eg EDDI, European Diatom Database Information System) have been successful in harmonising taxonomy (but not nomenclature) between national research communities

    4.

    Diatoms are now used routinely by environment agencies across Europe as environmental (mainly water quality) indicators, facilitated by electronically available identification keys

    5.

    The NHM has been able to maintain staffing in the diatom section, despite threats of closure in the 1980s. It sustains it's own research programme and curates the worlds largest collection of diatom slides

    6.

    We (UCL) have maintained an international diatom analysis training programme for over 20 years and conduct workshops in the UK for Environment Agency staff.

FUTURE CONCERNS

  Despite the progress there are also worrying trends. In particular there has been an overall decline in the training of freshwater biologists and a related decrease in the taxonomic competence of staff employed by environment agencies and related bodies. This applies not just to diatom analysis but also to other aspects of freshwater biology.

  Assessing the ecological status of surface waters using biological indicators (diatoms, phytoplankton, aquatic macro-invertebrates, aquatic plants) is central to the EU Water Framework Directive, and the need for taxonomic skills in these biological groups is growing at a time when supply is decreasing. High quality phytoplankton identification skills are in especially short supply.

  Moreover, there is increasing concern about global biodiversity loss (especially acute in freshwaters) and the future role of climate change in modifiying the structure and functioning of aquatic ecosystems. Taxonomic skills underpin both the research and surveillance needed to assess the impact of climate change in future, both in the use of organisms as indicators of climate change and conversely in assessments of biodiversity loss. Ironically, and as an aside, Defra have this year decided to make massive reductions to the national programme (noted above) for monitoring the ecology of upland waters in the UK. The programme has now been running for 20 years and the cuts have been made at a time when the network is arguably most needed.

  We coordinate a major 36 partner EU project on "The impact of climate change on European freshwater ecosystems". As part of the project a German team is leading a major initiative to develop a new system of freshwater biological indicators for monitoring the impacts of climate change. In due course this system and related results from the project will be built into the Water Framework Directive allowing Environment Agencies across Europe to improve their monitoring methods. Implementation, however, will depend on the ability of staff in the field and laboratory to identify organisms correctly.

17 March 2008


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008