Select Committee on Science and Technology Sixth Report


CHAPTER 8: Summary of recommendations

Data collection

8.1.  We are not satisfied that the Government are giving a high enough priority to the collection of data on waste. Targets and policies to reduce waste are meaningless if they are not based upon a thorough understanding of the waste streams involved. The amalgamation of administrative data sources may cost less than comprehensive surveys, but saving money in this way is a short-sighted approach to tackling waste. We recommend that the Government arrange for comprehensive surveys to collect data on the various waste streams in the UK thus enabling the formation of an overall strategic direction and policies. (para 2.13)

Design, innovation and technology

8.2.  Some businesses have begun to embrace sustainability principles as part of their product design and development processes, but large gaps in knowledge still exist. There is still confusion amongst businesses regarding their environmental design obligations and designers are often unable to provide solutions as they themselves lack a clear source of guidance to provide clarification. The Design Council and the Higher Education Funding Council for England have begun to address the teaching of sustainability principles but we are concerned that higher education institutions still lack the appropriate knowledge and resources. We recommend that the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills and the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform should take the lead in working with the Design Council, the Higher Education Funding Council for England, design schools, industry and the relevant professional bodies to ensure that sustainability is embedded into the design curriculum, teachers are given the correct training and designers are educated about business requirements and the cost of waste. (para 3.36)

8.3.  At present there appears to be little to be gained from regulating the design profession but whilst regulation is not usually welcomed, this is something which the Government should keep under review in the future to ensure that designers exhibit consistent standards of competence. We recommend that the Design Council should take a stronger lead in providing the necessary guidance to designers on how to comply with the principles of eco-design legislation. Designers must also be encouraged to work beyond the minimal level of compliance and we support the use of awards issued by professional bodies to acknowledge those who push the boundaries of sustainable design. (para 3.37)

8.4.  The research councils, knowledge transfer networks, technology strategy board and market transformation programme have recognised that in order to encourage true innovation and waste reduction, multi-disciplinary research is required which embraces designers, materials scientists, engineers and social scientists. Good work is now being undertaken to promote innovation and share knowledge, but we are concerned that recent cuts in ring-fenced funding will undermine some of this vital research and the transfer of existing knowledge. It is crucial that the Government continue to provide adequate funding to support the work of these organisations and that it also provides clear direction, by the use of ring-fenced funding if necessary, that research into resource efficiency and novel processes must remain priorities. (para 3.46)

Manufacturing

8.5.  The ISO 14001 standard acts as a useful benchmark to recognise businesses which implement sustainable practices and we support the promotion of this standard to industry. We are concerned that once this standard has been achieved, businesses which do not recognise the costs of their waste may become complacent if they no longer have any incentives to drive further improvement. We recommend that the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform should ensure this standard is promoted alongside business education to enable industry to recognise the benefits that can result from continual innovation and waste reduction efforts. (para 4.18)

8.6.  Detailed information on the lifetime impacts of products is still lacking. The development of PAS 2050 is a step in the right direction and we commend the Government and industry for recognising the need for simple, yet standardised, assessment methodologies which businesses can apply. However, an assessment of embodied greenhouse gases is not synonymous with a life-cycle assessment. The Government, in conjunction with the industrial, design and materials communities, should encourage the development of simple methodologies to enable businesses to analyse the lifetime implications, including the amount of waste generated, of the materials, products or services they produce. Providing businesses of varying size and character with these key tools is vital as it will enable them to recognise the amount of waste they create and will be the first step towards implementing change. (para 4.19)

Local authorities

8.7.  Responsibility for the recycling and collection of waste has been given to local authorities, not all of whom meet the needs of businesses. Poor quality recycled material, a lack of disposal facilities and a fragmented approach between local authorities hinders the attempts of those businesses which are striving to reduce their waste. In turn, local authorities are hampered by weight-based targets and landfill allocations which discourage them from supporting industry. Targets for local authorities currently focus on decreasing the weight of domestic waste sent to landfill but a more holistic approach to waste reduction is required. We recommend that the Government should restructure the waste targets and costs imposed upon local authorities to allow them to address commercial and industrial waste by providing the necessary support, disposal facilities and high quality materials to businesses. (para 4.34)

8.8.  It is extremely important that local authorities co-ordinate the services they provide. Whilst joint waste authorities will largely be concerned with the collection, treatment and disposal of waste, we hope that their creation will lead to greater collaboration between local authorities on all aspects of the waste hierarchy, so that they can provide the consistent facilities and support which businesses require in order to invest in long-term waste reduction strategies and experience the economies of scale. (para 4.35)

Legislation

8.9.  Until recently, the legal framework has militated against the re-use of particular waste streams and we are glad that the need for clarification has been recognised. We welcome the revision of the Waste Framework Directive and support the inclusion of articles which specify conditions for by-products and allow the development of quality criteria to clarify when waste ceases to be waste. We hope that these will result in greater exploitation of a wide range of resources. (para 4.44)

8.10.  With the development of quality protocols by the Environment Agency and the Waste and Resources Action Programme, the UK is in a good position to contribute effectively to the development of end-of-waste criteria at the EU level and we urge the Government to continue to work closely with the Commission and other Member States to develop quality criteria as quickly as possible. We recommend that the Government should urgently provide clear information to UK businesses about the priority sectors and waste streams that will be considered first and the timeframe in which quality criteria will be developed for each material. (para 4.45)

8.11.  Collective producer responsibility directives have had limited success at encouraging sustainable design and often result in small technical innovations which increase recycling and comply with minimum standards, rather than fully embracing the principles of sustainability. However, we acknowledge that they do at least bring the subjects of sustainability and waste reduction to the attention of business and so their basic principles should be encouraged. We recognise that these directives must be developed on an international basis and recommend that the Government should work with the European Commission and EU Member States to review the ways in which these directives are applied so that they foster real innovation and encourage all businesses to continually reduce their waste. (para 4.62)

8.12.  We welcome a review of the implementation of the Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment and support the establishment of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Advisory Board. Implementing individual producer responsibility will be a long and complex process, but will be crucial in establishing the direct responsibility necessary to encourage manufacturers to reduce their waste. We recognise that individual producer responsibility will be more appropriate for some products than others and it is important that the Government continue to consult stakeholders on the practicalities of such a system. Nevertheless, we believe that the time has come for action and recommend that the UK Government should take the lead in implementing true individual producer responsibility and, at the very least, should introduce it for those products for which industry requests it. (para 4.63)

8.13.  The variety of waste regulations can conflict and be difficult for businesses, hampering those attempting to implement sustainable business solutions. We recommend that the Government should continue to work with the European Commission to promote an holistic approach during the development of new legislation, to ensure that full consideration is given to the impacts of any new legislation on the variety of sectors involved. It is vital that the Government also provide adequate guidance to UK businesses about how to comply with new regulations in conjunction with existing ones. (para 4.70)

8.14.  Whilst we acknowledge that the cost of landfill must be kept under constant review, we support the use of the landfill tax escalator as a blunt instrument to divert waste from landfill and hope that over time it will encourage businesses to embrace true waste reduction strategies. (para 4.71)

Consumption

8.15.  There is widespread support for waste reduction and the development of a more sustainable society. A strong campaign to increase recycling has meant that the waste reduction message has been overlooked and consumers are often ill-informed about the environmental impacts of their products and the way they use them. We recommend that the Government should continue to work with the European Commission to examine the types of information that should be included on eco-labels and promote the development of eco-labels which are clear and easy for consumers to understand, but we are not convinced that the use of eco-labels alone will be enough to change consumer behaviour. (para 5.21)

8.16.  Following the successful drive to improve the energy efficiency of products, we believe that a similar strategy should be employed to encourage the purchase of more sustainable products which produce less waste. We recommend that the Government should encourage change by continuing to work with retailers to promote choice editing on the grounds of waste reduction. The use of voluntary sectoral agreements will be a useful strategy to encourage retailers to adopt this concept initially but, once established, we believe that consumer demand for the most sustainable products should drive businesses to stock products which achieve ever greater sustainability. (para 5.22)

8.17.  We recognise that addressing the multitude of practical and psychological issues which influence consumer behaviour is a complex and difficult task, but businesses are well placed to implement measures which encourage consumers to adopt more sustainable behaviours. Waste could be reduced if consumers were encouraged to retain products for longer and repair them when necessary, but this is usually an uncompetitive strategy and businesses cannot be expected to promote something which leads to a reduction in profits. Business models must therefore be developed which are both sustainable and profitable. Such strategies might include the production of modular products which can be continually added to and upgraded, or schemes that reward customers for recycling but which also foster brand loyalty. If repair work is to be encouraged, changes to the Value Added Tax regime may be required. We therefore recommend that the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform should work with retailers and academia to promote the use of sustainable business models and must review the range of policies and incentives required to accelerate their implementation. (para 5.30)

8.18.  We endorse the message of the Sustainable Consumption Roundtable's report, I will if you will, that in order to reduce consumption, a joint effort from government, businesses and consumers is required. Whilst the Government's Framework for Pro-Environmental Behaviours outlines a good approach to address consumer behaviour we urge the Government to follow this up by using its approach to reduce the wastage of a wider range of products, rather than just food. (para 5.35)

Business support

8.19.  Businesses which implement new and innovative solutions to reduce waste tend to experience significant cost savings and awareness of such strategies is beginning to increase. However, many businesses still fail to recognise the financial costs of their waste and even where waste reduction strategies are known, an understanding of how to implement them is lacking. It is vital that business support bodies should continue to provide direct, tailored guidance to businesses, especially to help small- and medium-sized enterprises overcome the challenges they face. We are therefore extremely disappointed by the decision to reduce funding for some of the major business support bodies, including Envirowise, the Market Transformation Programme, the National Industrial Symbiosis Programme and the Waste and Resources Action Programme, and we are at a loss to understand the Government's reasoning. Discontinuation of the Business Resource Efficiency and Waste programme and funding cuts will only serve to reduce the services that business support bodies and local authorities can offer. Hitherto, hypothecation of a proportion of the landfill tax has sent a strong signal to industry that waste must be reduced, and ending this arrangement will undermine the Government's pledge to tackle commercial, industrial and construction waste. We recommend that the Government should once again ring-fence a proportion of the landfill tax revenue to fund waste reduction initiatives, thus providing businesses with both the carrot, and justification for the stick, in order to encourage change. (para 6.35)

8.20.  We recognise that the vast range of business support bodies is confusing for businesses and support the Government's Business Support Simplification Programme. Nevertheless, we are not satisfied that Business Link advisers are appropriately qualified to advise on resource efficiency. We recommend that the Government urgently provide further training for these advisers, especially in the field of waste reduction, and a system should be developed to monitor the quality of advice provided. As many businesses approach local authorities for assistance, local authorities must also ensure that their advisers recognise the need to refer businesses to Business Link for more detailed advice. (para 6.36)

8.21.  There is scope for waste prevention to be integrated into sustainable business models but the implementation of such strategies will take time. The success of sustainable business models depends upon the size and structure of the business, the take-back and recycling infrastructure, the current market value of products and consumer perceptions. Evidence supporting these strategies is scant but growing so we recommend that the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, along with business support agencies and industry, should continue to monitor such business models, assessing the barriers which inhibit their adoption and reviewing the range of policies and incentives that might be required to encourage their implementation. (para 6.47)

Taking the lead

8.22.  It is vital that government departments lead by example in reducing their own waste. Although pan-governmental performance on waste reduction has been good, some departments still lag behind and we are concerned that targets are not challenging enough. Departmental performance on sustainable procurement has been disappointing and procurement staff often fail to recognise the lifetime cost of products. We welcome the establishment of the Centre of Expertise for Sustainable Procurement and recommend that it should urgently review the knowledge of procurement staff, providing training where necessary, to ensure that staff recognise the true costs of the products they buy and understand how the principles of waste reduction fit into the larger aims of sustainability. (para 7.10)

8.23.  We support the Government's attempts to increase opportunities for small businesses to compete for procurement contracts and hope that their work will lead to a greater understanding and removal of the barriers which currently prevent this. (para 7.11)

8.24.  We welcome the fact that waste prevention has been recognised as an important strand within the Government's Waste Strategy, but this approach must be backed up with the appropriate policies. Progress is being made in tackling domestic waste, but this accounts for a relatively small proportion of all waste in the UK and more attention must now be paid to other waste streams. The Government should continue to work with stakeholders to ensure that policies are set appropriately, but the Government should now also take the lead in developing a strategy to reduce industrial and commercial waste. We welcome the revision of the Waste Framework Directive which we hope will contribute towards a more efficient use of resources and reiterate the importance of Government working with other EU Member States to ensure that the directive's provisions are implemented as quickly as possible. (para 7.39)

8.25.  Following their campaign to promote re-use and recycling, the Government must now provide clear and consistent signals that waste reduction is a priority. Businesses will not invest in sustainable practices unless they are confident of the Government's long-term policies, and consumers will not change behaviours without education or incentives. In order to engage, enable and encourage businesses and consumers to embrace waste reduction, it is crucial that work is undertaken on a whole supply chain basis, examining the impacts of products throughout their lifetime. We endorse the use of the product roadmap approach which tackles particular products or waste streams by working with all the relevant players, including manufacturers, retailers and consumers. We hope that the Government will use these roadmaps to provide industry and the general public with clear guidance on the direction they are taking. (para 7.40)

8.26.  We support the use of voluntary sectoral agreements to bring stakeholders together in tackling specific waste streams, enabling businesses to recognise the costs of their waste and giving them the opportunity and guidance to minimise it. The Government must be prepared to monitor these agreements and review policies when necessary. (para 7.41)

8.27.  The Government must engage with industry and provide the assurances and certainty required to enable businesses to invest in waste reduction strategies. In order to encourage innovation, we recommend that the Government adopt the "top runner" approach wherever possible. This strategy should involve the use of standards and choice editing, pre-selecting the most sustainable products, to drive continued improvements in sustainability. (para 7.42)

8.28.  We were disappointed by the unwillingness of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to discuss fiscal incentives and recommend that the department should work with the Treasury to review the case for implementing variable Value Added Tax to promote the development of sustainable products. (para 7.43)

8.29.  It is important that the Government address areas of public concern in order to engage with members of the public and encourage behavioural changes. Nevertheless, the Government's focus must now widen to include other waste streams apart from the obvious options of domestic waste and packaging. We welcome the identification of key materials from the commercial, industrial and construction sectors, but recommend that the Government should provide greater clarity about who will be taking the lead in addressing production and consumption in each of these areas and who will be responsible for promoting and monitoring the over-arching aim of waste reduction. (para 7.44)


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008