Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their response to suggestions that the war in Afghanistan is unwinnable. [HL1454]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Baroness Taylor of Bolton): The NATO International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) is conducting counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan in support of the democratically elected Government of Afghanistan as they seek to build capacity and attempt to dismantle the insurgency through a politically led approach.
ISAF operations are making a big difference on the ground. However, Afghanistan's problems cannot be solved by military means alone.
To ask Her Majesty's Government why the Department for International Development withdrew its inter-country support programme on health and AIDS in Southern Africa. [HL1306]
To ask Her Majesty's Government who has been affected by the withdrawal of the Department for International Development's inter-country support programme on health and AIDS in Southern Africa. [HL1307]
To ask Her Majesty's Government what advice they have given to programmes which were expecting funding in the short and long term through the Department for International Development's recently withdrawn inter-country support programme on health and AIDS in Southern Africa. [HL1320]
Lord Tunnicliffe: The Department for International Development (DfID) has not withdrawn any funding for the Inter-Country Support Programme on Health and AIDS in Southern Africa (ICS) as the programme was not approved.
Following a mid-term review of DfID's regional programme in Southern Africa it was decided in October 2008 that the DfID-Southern Africa (DfID-SA) office should rebalance its commitments. It was agreed that DfID would not proceed with the design of ICS. Instead it will focus its work on other health and AIDS programmes; namely, a £12.5 million new programme to improve access to quality essential medicines in countries; and delivering on an existing £19 million programme providing behaviour change communication programmes.
The ICS programme was being designed to provide support to three key partners, the regional teams of UNAIDS and WHO and a challenge fund for regional civil society organisations (CSOs).
DfID remains very committed to UNAIDS and WHO. We recently agreed new institutional strategies for 2008-11 with both organisations. DfID will provide up to £34.8 million core funding to UNAIDS and £44 million core funding to WHO over this period. We rely on their management systems to ensure they allocate funds to regional and country programmes to deliver on their strategic objectives.
DfID has historic funding relationships with two CSOs: the Anglican Church of Southern Africa (ACSA) and the Health Economics and HIV/AIDS Research Division (HEARD) at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. DfID has taken steps to ensure the sustainability of these organisations, providing short-term funding and facilitating discussions to secure funding from other donors. DfID has also given advice and is providing technical assistance to ACSA on resource mobilisation. DfID has been able to provide some £1 million support to ARASA (AIDS and RIGHTS Alliance of Southern Africa) through another donor.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what will be the effect of the Department for International Development's decision to end its inter-country support programme on health and AIDS in Southern Africa on the regional-level approach to health and HIV/AIDS. [HL1321]
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether their decision to cut the Department for International Development's inter-country support programme on health and AIDS in Southern Africa represents a change in policy away from the championing of global health and HIV/AIDS architecture. [HL1322]
Lord Tunnicliffe: The Department for International Development (DfID) has not withdrawn any funding for the Inter-Country Support Programme on Health and AIDS in Southern Africa (ICS). This programme was not approved.
DfID remains seized of the importance of tackling AIDS in the hyper-endemic Southern Africa region and will remain a significant donor for HIV and AIDS and Health in the Southern Africa region, spending up to £61 million in the current financial year. It is expected that this level of spend will continue during 2010-11 and may increase the following year.
There is no change in DfID's policy. DfID remains committed to championing the global health and HIV/AIDS architecture including within the Southern Africa region. DfID has forged an excellent working relationship with others donors, national governments and regional institutions within Southern Africa. We remain active partners in the multi-donor group convened by the UNAIDS regional team, which is collectively monitoring whether there is any impact on the regional level approach to health and AIDS as a result of this and other donor decisions.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Baroness Taylor of Bolton): The original proposals submitted by industry indicated cost benefits to the UK and other nations from adoption of the commercial approach to procurement of this aircraft. This approach maximised the use of both civil practice and certification to deliver cost savings to the customers. Following detailed analysis by all nations involved, the contract to design and develop the A400M assumed that the bulk of the aircraft would be certified by the civil authorities with the nations taking responsibility only for the certification of the military aspects.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what precautions they have taken concerning the possibility of avian flu entering the United Kingdom; how often the arrangements are reviewed; and how they co-ordinate their action with other countries. [HL1539]
The Minister of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change & Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Hunt of Kings Heath): The following measures are in place to reduce the likelihood of avian flu entering the United Kingdom and to limit its economic and social impact.
We keep the level of threat under constant review. This is done through monitoring the international reports of disease incidence worldwide and assessing whether there is a change in threat for the UK. These assessments are published on the Defra website and stakeholder organisations are advised when a new assessment is published. Our current assessment is that the UK is at a low but constant risk of the virus being introduced.
There are a number of pathways through which the virus might be introduced. Trade in domestic poultry, other captive birds and poultry products is regulated. Regulation is based on international veterinary standards and certification designed to reduce the likelihood of the virus being transmitted via legal trade routes. The UK's Border Agency is responsible for undertaking anti-smuggling controls on products of animal origin (including avian products such as poultry meat and eggs) from third countries. These controls are risk-based, taking into account information from Defra on the changing global animal health situation.
Speedy detection of the virus in the UK and then swift action to contain and eradicate it is essential to limiting its impact. Keepers of domestic poultry and other kept birds practicing good biosecurity, maintaining vigilance and reporting suspicion of disease promptly to their vet is key. In addition, there is an official
3 Mar 2009 : Column WA130
We have well developed contingency plans for dealing with outbreaks. These have been activated eight times since April 2006. In addition, we have undertaken exercises with stakeholder partners to test out different scenarios. No two incidents are the same and after each one there is a lessons learnt exercise the conclusions of which are published on the Defra website.
In addition, vets from all the Governments of the EU meet at least once per month to discuss and adopt laws on animal health controls and meet more frequently if there is a major outbreak. The UK also attends OIE (the world animal health organisation) forums and provides funds for developing countries to help control disease and limit its spread worldwide.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they are still receiving reports of restrictions placed on church groups and on the Roma minority in Belarus; and whether they will make representations to the government of Belarus regarding freedom of religion, with particular reference to the New Life Church in Minsk. [HL1585]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): Our embassy in Minsk constantly monitors all human rights issues, including those related to religious freedoms and minority issues. Since a report concerning the treatment of the pastor of the New Life Church in May 2008, we have not received any further reports about the harassment of religious groups in Belarus, though we remain concerned about the human rights situation there. Our ambassador recently raised this issue with other EU heads of mission and expressed his concern. Our embassy in Minsk plans to lobby the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the near future.
To ask Her Majesty's Government who decided not to disclose the terms on which British Nuclear Fuels Ltd agreed on 17 December 2008 to sell its one-third share in the management company of the Atomic Weapons Establishment, Aldermaston, to Jacobs Engineering Group of Pasadena, California. [HL767]
To ask Her Majesty's Government what considerations led to their decision not to disclose the terms on which British Nuclear Fuels Ltd agreed on 17 December 2008 to sell its one-third share in
3 Mar 2009 : Column WA131
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether any independent professional advice was taken as to the agreement by which British Nuclear Fuels Ltd sold its one-third share in the management company of the Atomic Weapons Establishment, Aldermaston, to Jacobs Engineering Group of Pasadena, California; and, if so, by whom such advice was provided. [HL770]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform & Cabinet Office (Baroness Vadera): The decision on the form of the announcement was taken by the Board of BNFL, having consulted with the shareholder executive and the MoD.
As is common, with transactions of this nature, it was a term of the Jacobs proposal that the price and other commercially sensitive terms remained confidential. The Jacobs proposal was materially superior to the other proposal received.
The board of BNFL was advised in relation to the disposal by NM Rothschild and Freshfields.
Asked by Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the total expenditure incurred to date in respect of the British Coal vibration white finger litigation, broken down between payments made to (a) Capita and its predecessors; (b) medical service providers; (c) all other contractors; (d) the Solicitors' Co-ordinating Group; (e) individual claimants' solicitors; (f) the Union of Democratic Mineworkers and its claims handling company, Vendside Limited; and (g) defendants' solicitors and counsel; and what amount of compensation has been paid to the claimants. [HL1483]
The Minister of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change & Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Hunt of Kings Heath): The total expenditure under the vibration white finger scheme is broken down as requested above. These costs are actuals as at 31 January 2009:
(a) capita: £490 million (this is a total figure and cannot be broken down by scheme); (b) medical services: £35 million;(c) all other contractors: £106 million (this includes records management, consultants, technical costs and medical records collection);(d) Solicitors Co-ordinating Group: These costs are not recorded separately, they are shown as part of the claimants' solicitors costs (see e);(e) claimants' solicitors costs: £187 million (includes Solicitors Co-ordinating Group and the UDM costs);Asked by Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the total expenditure incurred to date in respect of the British Coal respiratory disease litigation, broken down between payments made to (a) Capita and its predecessors; (b) medical service providers; (c) all other contractors; (d) the Solicitors' Co-ordinating Group; (e) individual claimants' solicitors; (f) the Union of Democratic Mineworkers and its claims handling company, Vendside Limited; and (g) defendants' solicitors and counsel; and what amount of compensation has been paid to the claimants. [HL1484]
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: The total expenditure under the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is broken down as requested above. These costs are actuals as at 31 January 2009:
(a) capita: £490 million (this is a total figure and cannot be broken down by scheme);(b) medical services: £405 million;(c) all other contractors: £106 million (this includes records management, consultants, technical costs and medical records collection);(d) Solicitors Co-ordinating Group: these costs are not recorded separately and are shown as part of the claimants' solicitors costs (see e);(e) claimants' solicitors costs: £l billion;f) UDM and Vendside Limited: These costs are not recorded separately and are shown as part of the claimants' solicitors costs (see e);g) defendants' solicitors costs and counsel: £47 million (this is a total figure and cannot be broken down by scheme); andh) compensation paid (including CRU*): £2.3 billion.Asked by Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the projected date by which all claims under the British Coal respiratory disease litigation will have been settled and the scheme wound up; and what is the estimated cost that will have been incurred, broken down between (a) Capita and all other contractors;
3 Mar 2009 : Column WA133
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) scheme is due to be substantially completed on 30 November 2009. We expect around 2,000 claims still to be in process at that point with offers made but going through remaining stages. We expect these to reach settlement during 2010. These are estimated costs for COPD as at 31 October 2008:
(a) Capita and all other contractors: c£677 million (this is a total figure and cannot be broken down by scheme. Includes claim handling costs, consultants, records managements, medical records collection and technical costs but excludes legal fees). Medical costs (COPD Only): c£406 million;(b) claimants' legal costs: c£1,047 million;(c) defendant's legal costs: c£52 million (this is a total figure and cannot be broken down by scheme);(d) department's internal costs: information not available (these costs are not included as part of our forecasting exercises); and (e) compensation which remains to be paid to the claimants: c£30 million (including CRU*).Asked by Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the projected date by which all claims under the British Coal vibration white finger litigation will have been settled and the scheme wound up; and what is the estimated cost that will have been incurred, broken down between (a) Capita and all other contractors; (b) the claimants' legal costs; (c) the defendants' legal costs; (d) the internal costs of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and its predecessors; and (e) compensation which remains to be paid to the claimants. [HL1486]
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: The vibration white finger (VWF) scheme is due to be substantially completed on 1 May 2009 by which time we expect just some 400 claims will remain to be settled. These are estimated costs for VWF as at 31 October 2008:
(a) Capita and all other contractors: c£677 million (this is a total figure and cannot be broken down by scheme and includes claim handling costs, consultants, records management, medical records collection and technical costs but exclude legal fees). Medical costs (VWF only): c£35 million;(b) claimants' legal costs: c£192 million;(c) defendant's legal costs: c£52 million (this is a total figure and cannot be broken down by scheme);Next Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |