Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page



6 July 2009 : Column WA102

Government Departments: Staffing

Question

Asked by Lord Taylor of Holbeach

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Davies of Oldham): In addition to staff employed in the Legal and Strategic Human Resources group, human resources staff are employed in Defra's Shared Services Directorate, which provides transactional and helpdesk services to Defra, several of its network organisations and other bodies. Human resources staff are also employed in each of Defra's executive agencies.

The number of permanent, human resources staff employed in each of the areas is as follows:

Shared Services Directorate: 58. Of these, 57 are employed exclusively on HR and payroll transactional processing, of which 20 are employed exclusively on payroll processing.

Executive Agencies

Animal Health-25.

Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS)-Seven, supported by two people within the transactions department who do HR work as part of a wider role.

Food and Environment Research Agency (FERA)-16, including six in learning and development, payroll and occupational health.

Marine and Fisheries Agency (MFA)-Two.

Rural Payments Agency (RPA)-184 including policy, transactional services, business partners, payroll staff, personnel support teams and learning and development.

Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA)-32.

Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD)-Four, including one person in learning and development.

Human Rights

Questions

Asked by Lord Laird



6 July 2009 : Column WA103

The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): The judgments of the Grand Chamber in which violations against the UK were found during the relevant period and that were referred to in the earlier Written Answer of 20 April 2009 were: Edwards and Lewis v UK (39647/98 and 40461/98), Hirst v UK (No. 2) (74025/01), Roche v UK (32555/96), Dickson v UK (44362/04), Saadi v UK (13229/03).

Details of the violations found, including the articles of the convention concerned, are contained in the judgments of the Grand Chamber. These are available for viewing online at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) website at:

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action= html&documentId=706449&portal=hbkm&source= externalbydocnumber&table= F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649 (Edwards and Lewis v UK)

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action= html&documentId=787485&portal=hbkm&source= externalbydocnumber&table= F69A27FD8FB86142BF0IC1166DEA398649 (Hirst v UK (no.2))

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action= html&documentId=788085&portal=hbkm&source= externalbydocnumber&table= F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649 (Roche v UK)

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action= html&documentId=826595&portal=hbkm&source= externalbydocnumber&table= F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649 (Dickson v UK)

http://cmiskpechr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action= html&documentId=828277&portal=hbkm&source= externalbydocnumber&table= F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649 (Saadi v UK)

Information on the execution of ECtHR judgments, including details of any individual measures taken by way of just satisfaction to the applicant, is available for viewing online at the website of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Information on the execution of judgments still under consideration can be found at:

http://www.coe.int/t/DGHL/MONITORING/EXECUTION/Reports/Current/United_Kingdom _en.pdf.

Information on the execution of judgments that are awaiting final resolution can be found at:

http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution/Reports/Cases6.1-2009en.pdf.

Asked by Lord Lester of Herne Hill

The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Baroness Royall of Blaisdon): I have made a statement under Section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998 that in my view the provisions of the Bill are compatible with the convention rights.

Asked by Lord Lester of Herne Hill

Baroness Royall of Blaisdon: Courts will review the exercise of functions of the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority on the basis of the ordinary principles of administrative and human rights law.

Identity Cards

Question

Asked by Lord Rooker

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): Where it has not been possible to deliver an identity card, a calling card is left for the addressee explaining why the courier was unable to deliver. The addressee is given the option to rearrange a more suitable delivery time or to collect their card direct from the depot.

To date, in total around 24,000 calling cards have been left, with the vast majority of cards successfully delivered on the second occasion. It is not possible to break down this information to show how many cards were issued to students.

Immigration

Questions

Asked by Baroness Warsi

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): The information requested is as follows:



6 July 2009 : Column WA105



6 July 2009 : Column WA106



6 July 2009 : Column WA107

Nationality of people not granted ILR between 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2009 in relation to previous Question HL3655
NationalityNo. of Cases

Nigeria

4,860

Ghana

3,195

Bangladesh

1,380

Pakistan

1,145

India

790

Jamaica

605

Algeria

325

Sierra Leone

235

Sri Lanka

225

Kenya

190

Turkey

185

Uganda

185

Zimbabwe

175

United States

140

Mauritius

135

Malaysia

125

China

115

Zambia

110

Gambia

105

Philippines

105

Ivory Coast

100

Colombia

85

Morocco

80

Cameroon

65

Guyana

65

Tanzania

60

South Africa

45

Thailand

45

Trinidad and Tobago

45

Ecuador

40

St. Lucia

40

Canada

40

Egypt

40

Nepal

40

British National (Overseas)

40

Congo (Democratic Republic) (formerly Zaire)

40

Ethiopia

35

Australia

30

Grenada

30

Brazil

30

Iran

30

Angola

25

Hong Kong

25

Lebanon

25

Nationality Currently Unknown

25

New Zealand

20

Serbia

20

Barbados

20

Cyprus

15

Sudan

15

Russia

15

Korea (South)

15

Japan

15

Malawi

15

Singapore

15

Croatia

10

Dominica

10

Ukraine

10

Bulgaria

10

Poland

10

Romania

10

Tunisia

10

Dominican Republic

10

Libya

10

Somalia

10

St Vincent

10

Yemen

10

Congo

10

Guinea

10

Vietnam

10

Indonesia

5

Jordan

5

Liberia

5

Macedonia

5

Occupied Palestinian Territory

5

Peru

5

Senegal

5

St Kitts and Nevis

5

Togo

5

Afghanistan

5

Albania

5

Portugal

5

Benin

5

Bolivia

5

Chile

5

Montenegro

5

Syria

5

Eritrea

5

Fiji

5

Hungary

5

Saudi Arabia

5

Taiwan

5

Antigua and Barbuda

5

Chad

5

Democratic Republic of the Congo

5

Iraq

5

Israel

5

Kosovo

5

Mexico

5

Myanmar

5

Rwanda

5

Seychelles

5

Argentina

+

Bosnia and Herzegovina

+

Botswana

+

Burkina

+

France

+

Georgia

+

Ireland

+

Italy

+

Niger

+

Panama

+

Surinam

+

Swaziland

+

Venezuela

+

Armenia

+

Belarus

+

Cuba

+

Germany

+

Greece

+

Guinea-Bissau

+

Kazakhstan

+

Kuwait

+

Madagascar

+

Moldova

+

Mongolia

+

Total

15,960

Figures are rounded to nearest 5.

+ Indicates 1 or 2.

"-" Indicates nil.

Because of rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown.

Asked by Lord Avebury

Lord West of Spithead: Paragraph 6.2 is part of a section which explains Nationality Group's understanding of Indian citizenship law. It states that, as the Indian authorities do not allow dual nationality "no adult (18 and over) can hold Indian citizenship in conjunction with any other nationality or citizenship. This applies irrespective of whether the person holds any passports (either Indian or that of their other nationality/citizenship)".

Asked by Baroness Warsi


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page