Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA101



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA101

Written Answers

Thursday 11 November 2010

Afghanistan

Question

Asked by Lord Rowlands

The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Howell of Guildford): I wish to clarify my Answer of 27 October 2010 (Official Report, col. 1218) on the provinces under the authority of the Government of Afghanistan. I can confirm the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan has full sovereign authority, including for security, over all 34 Afghan Provinces. Endorsed by United Nations Security Resolution 1386 and subsequent resolutions, the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) assists the Afghan National Security Forces in the maintenance of security throughout Afghanistan. Work is now under way to set up a conditions-based process, overseen by a joint Afghan-North Atlantic Treaty Organisation board, to assess the readiness of provinces to start the process of transition from an ISAF to an Afghan security lead. We are confident that a number of provinces will be assessed as ready to begin transition in the first half of 2011, but we should not pre-empt the recommendations of the board.

Agriculture: Census

Question

Asked by Lord Hylton

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Henley): Defra does not carry out twice-yearly censuses. The only census we run is the June Census of Agriculture, which is required to be carried out only once every 10 years under EU Regulation 1166/2008. We introduced a threshold into the 2010 census so the smallest farms (of which there are around 100,000 in England) were not surveyed, and we only collected the minimum information possible to meet legal requirements. In non-census years we run a smaller sample survey to capture information on the structures of farms in terms of crop areas, livestock populations and farm employee numbers. A project is currently under way to substantially reduce the sample size and volume of information required from 2011 onwards.



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA102

The second largest agricultural survey run by Defra, known to many as the December Census of Agriculture, has not been a census since the mid 1950s. This survey captures information on winter sown crop areas and cattle, pig and sheep populations under EU Regulations 543/2009 (crops) and 1165/2008 (livestock). The sampling size for this survey, which was 15,000 in 2009 (a sampling rate of 7 per cent), has been reduced to 5,000 for 2010 by using administrative sources such as the cattle tracing system (for cattle populations) and the sheep and goat inventory (for sheep populations).

The data obtained by the June and December surveys has many uses. For example, crop areas are used heavily by industry as estimates of the potential size of the cereals harvest and livestock data are collected to monitor long term trends in livestock populations and to estimate the effects of common agricultural policy reform on livestock sectors. The data are also used heavily in calculations for the inventory of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.

Declarations of the use of farm saved seed are the responsibility of the British Society of Plant Breeders (BSPB), which acts on behalf of its members who hold the plant breeders' rights. The Food and Environment Research Agency, which has overall responsibility for the plant breeders' rights legislation, understands that the BSPB works efficiently to collect this information from farmers and makes the declarations as simple as possible.

In relation to re-mapping, we will look to see that lessons are learnt from the recent Rural Payments Agency's mapping update exercise so that, going forward, the burden on farmers is minimised. During the next round of common agricultural policy reform we will be placing a particular emphasis on simplification, including reviewing the necessity of requiring the sometimes very small changes to maps that are currently demanded.

Finally, the Task Force on Farming Regulation was set up in July 2010 to identify ways of reducing regulatory burdens on farmers and to advise on how best to achieve a risk-based system of regulation. The task force is consulting widely and will report to Government in April 2011. A full list of members and terms of reference can be found on the Defra website at http://ww2.defra.gov.uk/2010/07/09/_farm-review/.

Armed Forces: A400M

Questions

Asked by Lord Gilbert

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Lord Astor of Hever): The Major Projects Report 2010 published a forecast figure for the UK A400M programme of £3,231 million. However, a detailed breakdown providing specifically the cost of the A400M design and production phase contract requires the consent of all the partner nations, Organisation Conjointe de Co-operation en matiere d'ARmement (OCCAR) and Airbus Military. It is for this reason we do not expect to disclose the information.



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA103

Asked by Lord Gilbert

Lord Astor of Hever: No such representations have been received.

Asked by Lord Gilbert

Lord Astor of Hever: We expect to start training UK aircrew and ground crew for the A400M aircraft in 2014.

The Ministry of Defence is currently in the invitation to negotiate stage prior to placing a contract to meet the training requirements for ground staff and aircrew to use the A400M. Costs are therefore not yet available and provision of our estimates would prejudice commercial interests.

We estimate that the initial training course for UK A400M pilots will last approximately 15 weeks and that for air loadmasters approximately 11 weeks.

Asked by Lord Gilbert

Lord Astor of Hever: There are 11 military and three civilian personnel dedicated to developing in-service support options. They are supported by up to another five civilian personnel who also provide functional support to the rest of the A400M project team.

Asked by Lord Gilbert



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA104

Lord Astor of Hever: Initial gate approval, which marks the start of an assessment phase in such a project, was given on 24 May 2006. We expect the assessment phase to conclude by the end of 2011. The results of our assessment of options can not be published as they are commercially sensitive. I can, however, confirm that the process will include a full value-for-money assessment, as well as ensuring that the chosen solution is suitably robust while also providing the necessary levels of operational flexibility.

Asked by Lord Gilbert

Lord Astor of Hever: Funding for the in-service support assessment phase was set as part of the initial gate approval in May 2006 and is estimated at £913,000.

Asked by Lord Gilbert

Lord Astor of Hever: Of the 14 dedicated in-service support personnel, 13 are either currently serving or ex-military and were selected for their specific skills and experience. The other civilian team member has also been selected for specific logistic skills.

Armed Forces: Aircraft

Questions

Asked by Lord West of Spithead

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Lord Astor of Hever): There is no impact on the standard operational load of weapons on the Tornado GR4 and Harrier GR9 when the temperature in Afghanistan exceeds 25 degrees Celsius. Comparatively, the Tornado is more capable. Its standard load carries more weapons enabling greater flexibility whilst on missions. Specifically:

the Tornado GR4 when fitted with the LITENING III advanced targeting pod can carry three Paveway IV weapons, three Brimstone guided missiles and one cannon loaded with 135 rounds of 27 millimetre ammunition. Alternatively, when fitted with the RAPTOR reconnaissance pod the Tornado GR4 can carry two Paveway IV weapons and one cannon loaded with 135 rounds of 27 millimetre ammunition; andthe Harrier GR9 when previously on duty in Afghanistan and fitted with the Sniper advanced targeting pod could carry two Paveway IV weapons, two CRV-7 unguided rocket pods (38 rockets total) and one Digital Joint Recce Pod (DJRP). The two

11 Nov 2010 : Column WA105

CRV-7 Pods could be replaced by two additional Paveway IV weapons; or two Maverick missiles; or one CRV-7 Pod and one Maverick missile respectively.

Asked by Lord Moonie

Lord Astor of Hever: A broad estimation is in the order of around £20 million per annum. This figure includes the direct variable costs of fuel, servicing and squadron personnel, but does not include fixed costs such as basing, platform support costs, or depreciation.

Asked by Lord Moonie

Lord Astor of Hever: The following table gives the targeting and reconnaissance pods, air to ground weapons and air to air weapons that have been cleared to be carried by Tornado GR4 or Harrier GR9. Currently, not all of these systems are in the inventory for these aircraft.



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA106

Tornado GR4Harrier GR9

Targeting/Reconnaissance Pods

Litening 3 (Recce/Datalink) Advanced Targeting Pod

Yes

No

Sniper Advanced Targeting Pod

Yes

Yes

Reconnaissance Airborne Pod Tornado (RAPTOR)

Yes

No

Digital Joint Reconnaissance Pod (DJRP)

Yes

Yes

Thermal Imagining Airborne Laser Designator Pod (TIALD)

Yes

Yes

Air to Ground Weapons

Paveway IV (500lb GPS/Laser Guided Bomb)

Yes

Yes

Dual Mode Seeker Brimstone Missile

Yes

No

Legacy Brimstone Missile

Yes

No

Storm Shadow

Yes

No

Mauser BK-27 Cannon

Yes

No

Air Launched Anti Radiation Missile (ALARM)

Yes

No

Paveway II (1000lb Laser Guided Bomb)

Yes

Yes

Paveway III (20001b Laser Guided Bomb)

Yes

Yes

Enhanced Paveway II (10001b GPS/Laser Guided Bomb)

Yes

Yes

Enhanced Paveway III (20001b GPS/Laser Guided Bomb)

Yes

No

Enhanced Paveway II+ (10001b GPS/Laser Guided Bomb)

No

Yes

CRV-7 Rocket Pod

No

Yes

Maverick AGM-65

No

Yes

10001b Dumb Freefall/Retard

Yes

Yes

5401b Dumb Freefall/Retard

Yes

Yes

Air To Air Weapons

AIM-9L Sidewinder

Yes

Yes

Advanced Short Range Air to Air Missile (ASRAAM)

Planned 2012

No

Asked by Lord Moonie

Lord Astor of Hever: The average cost per flying hour of Tornado GR4 and Harrier GR9 are around £35,000 per hour and £37,000 per hour respectively.

These costs are based on total fleet costs (including manpower, servicing, stock consumption, aircrew training, accommodation etc, depreciation and cost of capital charges).

Asked by Lord Moonie

Lord Astor of Hever: I refer the noble Lord to the Answer I gave on 4 November 2010 (Official Report, col. WA428), to the noble Lord, Lord West of Spithead.

Asked by Lord West of Spithead

Lord Astor of Hever: Operations from or to a damaged runway would have to be assessed on a case by case basis.

Asked by Lord West of Spithead

Lord Astor of Hever: When held on ground-based close air support (GCAS) alert both Harrier GR9 and Tornado GR4 are declared to operational commanders with the same required readiness state response time. I am withholding the exact GCAS required response time for these aircraft as its disclosure would, or would be likely to prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces.



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA107

Asked by Lord West of Spithead

Lord Astor of Hever: The Government are unequivocally committed to the defence of the Falklands.

I refer the noble Lord to the Secretary of State's comments during the Security Defence and Security Review debate on 4 November 2010 (Official Report, col. 1072W) in the other place. I am withholding further information as its release would, or would be likely to prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces. Our current defence posture in the Falklands is much stronger than that which pertained in the early 1980s. We now have aircraft deployed in defence of the Falkland Islands, currently the Typhoon. We also have a range of further capabilities to deter any aggression.

Armed Forces: Aircraft 1

Questions

Asked by Lord West of Spithead

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Lord Astor of Hever): The majority of Typhoons, all Tornado GR4s and all Harriers have a precision-guided ground attack capability, which can also be used to attack shipping.

Armed Forces: Alcohol

Question

Asked by Lord Moonie

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Lord Astor of Hever): Individual consumption limits and the sale of alcohol are regulated, particularly, but not only, when personnel are serving operationally. These controls are supported by disciplinary measures. All three services run robust programmes designed to

11 Nov 2010 : Column WA108

raise awareness and promote the message of sensible drinking. These programmes address all serving personnel but, where individuals are identified as being at risk, counselling and welfare support are offered. More serious cases are treated through specialist medical and psychological treatment and rehabilitation, including where appropriate as inpatients.

Arms Trade: Global Treaty

Question

Asked by Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead

The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Howell of Guildford): The UK is committed to securing a robust and effective arms trade treaty and played an active and constructive role at the start of negotiations in July 2010.

The Government are working with UK defence industry and non-governmental organisations to build support for the arms trade treaty, including by funding outreach and research projects, and regularly discusses the arms trade treaty with both sceptical and supportive countries. We will continue to support the UN process, in partnership with other arms trade treaty advocates, as it moves towards the Diplomatic Conference in 2012.

Benefits

Question

Asked by Lord Willis of Knaresborough

The Commercial Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Sassoon): There is estimated to be around £1.8 billion that would be saved if child benefit for 16 to 19 year-olds in full-time non-advanced education were withdrawn in 2011-12. This change would affect families at all income levels.

The Chancellor stated at the time of the Spending Review that no further changes to child benefit would be required, beyond those already announced.

Children: Care

Question

Asked by The Earl of Listowel

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Schools (Lord Hill of Oareford): The information has been placed in the Library. The number of looked-after children with 10 placements during the year has been provided for completeness.



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA109



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA110



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA111



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA112



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA113



11 Nov 2010 : Column WA114

Table 1: Children looked after at 31 March with (a) between five and nine, (b) 10 and (c) more than 10 placements during the year ending 31 March, by Local Authority1,2
Years ending 31 March 2009 to 2010
Coverage: England
Numbers
20092010
Between 5 and 910More than 10Between 5 and 910More than 10

England

1,200

40

110

1,200

40

90

North East

70

x

10

70

x

10

Darlington

x

0

0

x

0

0

Durham

25

x

x

30

x

5

Gateshead

x

0

0

x

x

0

Hartlepool

x

0

0

x

0

0

Middlesbrough

x

0

x

x

0

0

Newcastle upon Tyne

5

0

0

5

0

0

North Tyneside

5

0

0

5

0

0

Northumberland

x

0

0

x

0

0

Redcar and Cleveland

0

0

0

0

0

0

South Tyneside

10

0

x

10

0

0

Stockton-on-Tees

x

0

0

x

0

0

Sunderland

10

0

0

5

0

x

North West

190

10

20

200

x

20

Blackburn with Darwen

x

0

0

x

0

0

Blackpool

x

0

0

10

0

0

Bolton

15

0

5

10

0

10

Bury

5

0

0

5

0

0

Cheshire3

15

x

0

.

.

.

Cheshire East3

.

.

.

10

0

0

Cheshire West & Chester3

.

.

.

10

0

x

Cumbria

5

0

0

10

0

0

Halton

x

0

0

x

0

0

Knowsley

x

0

0

10

0

0

Lancashire

25

0

0

15

0

0

Liverpool

25

x

x

30

x

x

Manchester

10

0

0

10

0

0

Oldham

x

0

x

x

x

0

Rochdale

5

0

x

10

0

0

Salford

x

0

0

5

0

0

Sefton

5

0

x

15

0

x

St. Helens

x

0

0

x

0

0

Stockport

5

0

x

15

0

x

Tameside

5

x

x

x

0

0

Trafford

10

x

0

x

0

0

Warrington

x

0

x

5

0

0

Wigan

15

x

x

x

0

0

Wirral

10

0

x

10

0

0

Yorkshire and The Humber

140

10

10

120

x

10

Barnsley

10

0

0

x

0

0

Bradford

15

x

0

10

0

0

Calderdale

10

0

0

x

0

0

Doncaster

15

0

x

10

x

x

East Riding of Yorkshire

x

0

0

x

0

0

Kingston upon Hull, City of

10

0

x

15

x

x

Kirklees

10

0

0

x

0

0

Leeds

25

x

0

25

0

x

North East Lincolnshire

x

0

x

x

0

0

North Lincolnshire

x

0

0

x

0

0

North Yorkshire

5

0

x

x

0

0

Rotherham

10

x

x

10

0

x

Sheffield

10

0

0

10

0

0

Wakefield

10

0

0

x

0

0

York

x

0

x

x

0

x

East Midlands

80

x

x

70

x

0

Derby

10

0

0

x

0

0

Derbyshire

15

0

x

15

0

0

Leicester

10

0

0

10

x

0

Leicestershire

5

0

0

10

0

0

Lincolnshire

x

0

x

x

0

0

Northamptonshire

25

x

0

15

x

0

Nottingham

10

0

0

5

0

0

Nottinghamshire

x

0

0

x

0

0

Rutland

0

0

0

0

0

0

West Midlands

160

x

10

150

10

10

Birmingham

50

0

0

45

x

x

Coventry

10

0

x

10

0

x

Dudley

15

x

0

15

x

0

Herefordshire

x

0

0

x

0

0

Sandwell

5

0

0

x

0

0

Shropshire

x

0

0

x

0

0

Solihull

5

0

x

10

0

0

Staffordshire

20

0

x

20

0

x

Stoke-On-Trent

10

x

x

10

x

x

Telford and Wrekin

5

0

0

x

0

0

Walsall

5

0

0

x

0

0

Warwickshire

15

0

0

10

x

x

Wolverhampton

5

x

0

10

0

0

Worcestershire

5

0

0

10

0

0

East of England

120

x

10

110

x

x

Bedfordshire3

5

0

x

.

.

.

Bedford3

.

.

.

x

0

0

Central Bedfordshire3

.

.

.

0

0

0

Cambridgeshire

5

0

0

x

0

0

Essex

20

0

x

20

0

x

Hertfordshire

35

0

0

40

x

x

Luton

15

x

x

5

0

0

Norfolk

15

x

0

20

0

0

Peterborough

x

0

0

0

0

0

Southend-on-Sea

5

0

0

x

0

0

Suffolk

10

0

0

10

0

0

Thurrock

x

0

0

x

0

0

London

210

10

20

230

10

20

Inner London

100

x

10

100

x

10

Camden

5

0

0

x

0

0

City Of London

0

0

0

0

0

0

Hackney

x

x

x

x

0

0

Hammersmith and Fulham

x

0

0

x

0

x

Haringey

15

0

x

10

x

0

Islington

x

0

0

10

0

0

Kensington and Chelsea

x

x

5

x

x

x

Lambeth

15

x

0

15

0

x

Lewisham

10

0

0

5

0

0

Newham

10

0

x

20

0

0

Southwark

10

0

0

15

x

0

Tower Hamlets

x

x

0

x

0

0

Wandsworth

x

0

0

x

0

0

Westminster

x

0

0

x

0

0

Outer London

110

x

10

130

10

10

Barking and Dagenham

15

x

x

10

x

x

Barnet

x

0

0

5

0

0

Bexley

x

0

0

x

0

x

Brent

15

x

x

20

0

0

Bromley

x

0

0

10

0

0

Croydon

5

0

x

15

x

0

Ealing

x

0

0

x

0

0

Enfield

10

0

x

x

x

x

Greenwich

10

0

0

15

x

0

Harrow

x

x

x

x

x

0

Havering

5

0

x

x

0

0

Hillingdon

5

0

0

x

0

0

Hounslow

5

0

0

10

0

x

Kingston Upon Thames

x

0

0

x

0

0

Merton

x

0

0

x

x

0

Redbridge

x

0

0

x

0

0

Richmond Upon Thames

x

0

0

x

0

0

Sutton

x

0

x

10

x

0

Waltham Forest

10

0

0

5

0

0

South East

130

x

20

140

x

20

Bracknell Forest

x

0

0

5

0

x

Brighton and Hove

10

0

0

5

0

x

Buckinghamshire

x

0

x

x

0

x

East Sussex

5

0

0

x

0

0

Hampshire

30

x

x

35

x

10

Isle Of Wight

10

0

0

5

0

0

Kent

15

0

x

25

0

x

Medway Towns

x

0

0

x

0

0

Milton Keynes

x

0

0

x

0

0

Oxfordshire

x

0

0

5

0

0

Portsmouth

x

0

x

x

0

0

Reading

x

0

0

x

0

0

Slough

x

0

x

x

0

0

Southampton

10

x

5

x

0

x

Surrey

20

0

0

20

0

0

West Berkshire

0

0

0

0

0

0

West Sussex

5

0

0

5

0

0

Windsor and Maidenhead

x

x

0

x

0

x

Wokingham

x

0

0

0

0

0

South West

120

x

10

100

x

10

Bath and North East Somerset

0

0

0

x

0

0

Bournemouth

x

0

0

x

0

x

Bristol, City of

20

0

x

15

0

0

Cornwall

15

x

x

10

x

x

Devon

15

x

0

15

0

x

Dorset

5

0

0

x

0

0

Gloucestershire

10

0

x

10

0

0

Isles Of Scilly

0

0

0

0

0

0

North Somerset

5

0

x

x

0

x

Plymouth

10

0

x

10

0

x

Poole

x

0

0

x

0

0

Somerset

10

0

0

10

0

0

South Gloucestershire

x

0

0

x

x

0

Swindon

x

0

0

x

0

0

Torbay

5

0

x

x

0

x

Wiltshire

10

0

0

10

0

x


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page