Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
I should like to reflect a little on the idea that someone is highly incentivised to go back to work if he or she is a homeowner. I am not sure that the fact that one rents a property would decrease one's desire to get back to work, but perhaps that is a debate for another day. I am grateful to the Minister for his explanation. I think we understand where we are going to be on support for mortgage interest in universal credit, and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Brougham and Vaux): We come to Amendment 34A. Lady Hollis?
Baroness Hollis of Heigham: My Lords, I want to put a question to the Committee. We are going into a major new topic, which is underoccupancy. My amendment is primarily about the nature of the stock.
13 Oct 2011 : Column GC533
Lord Skelmersdale: My Lords, for myself, I believe that the availability of suitable accommodation-in other words, the single room rate and all the rest that follows-is actually a fairly discrete subject.
Baroness Hollis of Heigham: No, this is not that subject; Amendment 34A refers to underoccupancy. I think the noble Lord is referring to Amendment 37.
Lord Skelmersdale: Amendment 34A states,
Baroness Hollis of Heigham: Forgive me, there are two separate amendments dealing specifically with the single room rate later. I think that that raises very real concerns among people, as I am sure the noble Lord would agree, but that subject is not in Amendment 34A.
13 Oct 2011 : Column GC534
Lord De Mauley: My Lords, I was aware that this would be an issue. I have applied for divine inspiration, but I do not yet have it. However, I do not think that it would look good if the Committee stopped its deliberations so far in advance of the normal time. While I apply for further divine inspiration, I suggest that the debate begins and I will see what I can do to facilitate matters.
The Deputy Chairman of Committees: The Companion says Thursdays 2 pm to 6 pm for Grand Committees.
Lord McAvoy: My Lords, I do not wish to be unhelpful either, but that is the guidance that I received. This is my first experience as a Whip taking a Bill through Committee. That is compounded by the fact that this Committee is not meeting on the Floor of the House. I understand that on the Floor of the House a debate is finished, and have experience of that. It may be a reflection on me that I have not managed the amendments better. Nevertheless, I have received guidance from the Chief Whip that, as was just read out, a Grand Committee session lasts between 2 pm and 6 pm.
Lord Rix: My Lords, the problem with our group of amendments-I wish to speak myself to Amendment 35 -is that it is a very large group, and I think a lot of people may wish to speak to it. I therefore suspect that if we started now and continued to do housing, we would be here long after 6.30 pm.
Baroness Wilkins: My Lords, I do feel that we should stop now because the next group concerns a very large subject and we are all very tired after this week.
Lord De Mauley: Very well. This may be a convenient moment for the Committee to adjourn until Tuesday at 3.30 pm.
Committee adjourned at 5.40 pm.
Next Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |