The Modernisation of Higher Education in Europe - European Union Committee Contents


SUMMARY






While the EU's formal role in higher education is limited, with Member States retaining primary responsibility for their universities, we believe that it has still added value to this area in a number of ways, particularly through the Erasmus programme for student mobility, which has now entered its 25th year. The Commission believes, however, that the potential of European universities to contribute to Europe's future prosperity, in economic and social terms, remains underexploited. Its Communication on the modernisation of higher education in Europe sets out how it intends to support this aim through a number of initiatives, many of which form part of its funding proposals for research, innovation and education for the period 2014 to 2020, and for which it has proposed a significant increase in funding. Some of these proposals are welcome but as European universities and Member States are currently operating within a very difficult financial climate, it is important to be realistic about what can be achieved.




Since 1999, significant changes to European universities have occurred outside the EU framework as a result of the Bologna Process, which has seen the closer alignment of higher education systems across Europe. 47 European countries participate, including all 27 Member States. The Commission, which is also a member in its own right, has played a key role in its development, particularly regarding mobility but also through the sponsorship and development of instruments that have become important parts of the Bologna Process. While the United Kingdom already complies with many of the Bologna Process' features, and many of our witnesses were positive about its role in principle, we developed the impression that the Government and many universities were yet to realise and fully embrace its potential benefits.




Subject to reductions being made in other areas of the EU budget and overall restraint being achieved, we support the allocation of a bigger proportion of funds to research, innovation and education. We consider that the targeting of resources in this way will result in long-term economic benefits for the EU. The Commission's proposal for a new university ranking instrument, U-Multirank, elicited strong reactions among our witnesses. While we consider that it overcomes some of the disadvantages inherent in the current world rankings, we believe that it is not a priority at this stage.




To us, the benefits of mobility, personally and in terms of increased employability, are important but have yet to be proven. However, the monoglot culture that prevails in the United Kingdom has prevented its students from participating in mobility schemes to the same degree as other Member States. Coupled with financial, socioeconomic and cultural barriers, increased participation in future cannot be assured. We therefore urge the Government to overcome the United Kingdom's lack of mobility culture by making language learning compulsory in primary and secondary school, ensuring the continuation of the fee waiver scheme and supporting the development of the proposed Masters level student loan guarantee facility, both of which will aid more disadvantaged students in particular. Universities and the Commission can also do more to increase participation by promoting mobility opportunities far more widely and by making Erasmus placements more flexible.




The United Kingdom has long been an attractive location for students from other parts of Europe and beyond in order to hone their English language skills. However, increasing competition from Continental universities—many of which now provide courses in English with sometimes significantly cheaper fees than in the United Kingdom—means that the Government should remain vigilant about any factors that could undermine the higher education sector's competitive position, including recent domestic reforms.



The EU can continue to make a positive contribution to the modernisation of European higher education but it must be pragmatic and concentrate on areas where it can truly add value. For its part, the Government should place higher education at the centre of its growth agenda, domestically and across Europe, by drawing on the potential of both the EU and the Bologna Process.



 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2012