The Fight Against Fraud on the EU's Finances - European Union Committee Contents


APPENDIX 3: CALL FOR EVIDENCE


The House of Lords European Union Committee is to conduct an inquiry on EU policies and actions to combat fraud against the financial interests of the EU. The inquiry will be undertaken by its Sub-Committee on Justice, Institutions and Consumer Protection, chaired by Lord Bowness. The Sub-Committee invites evidence from anyone with an interest.

Written evidence is sought by 14 September 2012. Public hearings will be held in autumn 2012. The Committee aims to report to the House, with recommendations, in February 2013. The report will receive a response from the Government and may be debated in the House.

Background

Fraud is estimated to cost the EU around €500 million a year. The EU is vulnerable to fraud affecting both its expenditure and the sources of its revenue, such as customs duties and VAT.

While the EU Treaties place responsibility for the implementation of the EU budget on the Commission, they require both the EU Institutions and the Member States to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the EU.

Member States administer the collection of almost all the revenue of the EU budget, and share the management of about 80% of the EU's expenditure. Recovery of unduly paid funds is the responsibility of Member States.

The European Commission considers that there are shortcomings in national legal frameworks—definitions of offences and penalties, and of limitation periods, vary among the Member States, and cooperation between national authorities is insufficient.[232] National authorities do not always have the necessary means to prosecute cases involving EU funds, and do not systematically follow up investigations undertaken by the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF).

In the last 12 months, the Commission has announced a number of initiatives to enhance the fight against fraud, including a proposal to amend the framework of governance and powers of OLAF and proposals contained in the Commission's Communication on protecting the EU's financial interests through criminal law and administrative investigations.

In July 2011, the Commission published an anti-fraud Strategy intended to complement other Commission initiatives and set out actions to be achieved by the end of 2014. The Commission set out guiding principles for anti-fraud policies and a number of areas for action.

The issues

In addition to any general points you may wish to make, the Sub-Committee invites views on the following issues. You need not address all these issues.

  • How much fraud affects the EU budget? What statistics are available and how reliable are they? How does the EU position compare with fraud against national budgets?
  • What is the distinction between fraud and irregularity? Is this distinction meaningful? How much is lost from EU funds through irregularity?
  • How much of a link is there between fraud and organised crime?
  • Who is responsible for detecting frauds and irregularities, enforcing the law, and recovering misappropriated money? What are the roles of the Commission/OLAF, Eurojust, the Member States? How good is cooperation between the EU bodies and national authorities?
  • Do Member States take their responsibilities seriously? Are the doubts as to the commitment and capacity of national authorities to pursue fraud and irregularities, and the effectiveness of national actions, justified?
  • The Commission: how good are its internal systems and how effective is its training of staff?
  • OLAF: how successful is it? Does it have the necessary powers? Is it too powerful—does it respect the rights of suspects? Do the supervision arrangements work? Should it remain part of the Commission?
  • What is the role of Eurojust? Should it focus more on fraud cases? How could the proposed European Public Prosecutor's Office improve the fight against fraud?
  • Does the Commission's strategy set the right course? What should be the priorities?
  • How vulnerable are EU programmes to fraud and irregularities? Are some programmes or sectors more vulnerable than others? Can the design of legislation and frameworks be used to minimise the possibility of fraud or irregularity?

The Inquiry will not address issues relating to the establishment and discharge of the EU Budget, fraud against and counterfeiting of the euro currency, or fraud affecting the EU's expenditure relating to its external action.


232   See the Communication on the protection of the EU's financial interests-Doc. 11055/11 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2013