Women on Boards
CHAPTER 1: Introduction
1. Gender equality is one of the core objectives
of the European Union. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Union states that "in all its activities, the Union shall
seek to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality, between
men and women".[1]
A European legislative framework is in place to support this agenda.
This includes the 2004 Directive on equal treatment of women and
men in the access to and supply of goods and services (also known
as the "Gender Directive"),[2]
and the 2006 Directive on equal opportunities for men and women
in the workplace.[3]
2. Equality in the labour market and in access
to board-level positions forms a key part of this work. The issue
of gender equality in the boardroom has been discussed at the
European Union level for some time, but it is only in recent years
that the prospect of specific European measures or legislation
to raise the proportion of women appointed to board-level positions
has come to the fore.
3. The Vice-President of the Commission and Commissioner
for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship, Viviane Reding,
has made this issue a priority during her term of office. In March
2010, the Commission published a "Women's Charter",
which included a pledge to "pursue the fairer representation
of women in positions of power in public life and the economy"[4]
This was followed in September 2010 by the "Strategy for
Equality between Women and Men, 2010-2015" which advocated
"targeted initiatives to improve the gender balance in decision
making".[5] Then,
in March 2011, the Commission invited European companies to sign
the "Women on the Board Pledge for Europe".[6]
By signing this pledge, companies would commit to raising female
representation on their boards to 30 per cent by 2015 and 40 per
cent by 2020.
4. Despite these efforts, progress remains slower
than we would wish. By March 2012, only 24 companies had signed
the pledge, whilst the average proportion of women on boards across
the EU was less than 14 per cent.[7]
This represented an improvement from 2010, when the overall average
was around 12 per cent; but at that rate of progression, the Commission
noted that it would take 40 years for women to make up 40 per
cent of board positions.[8]
It therefore launched a public consultation to identify measures
to address the "persistent lack of gender diversity in boardrooms
of listed companies across Europe",[9]
including possible legislative measures.
5. A legislative proposal was expected to follow
on from this process on 23 October 2012. However, a day of dramatic
developments saw the announcement postponed until at least 14
November amid media reports of a failure to agree upon a course
of action within the Commission.[10]
The intervening period has been characterised as one of uncertainty
ahead of the presentation of a new proposal.[11]
Attention has focused in particular on whether legislation should
be introduced seeking to institute an EU-wide quota requiring
a specified proportion of board positions to be taken up by women.
Such a step would represent a significant shift; until now, Member
States have taken the primary responsibility for improving gender
diversity and have done so in different ways. These varied approaches
are outlined in Box 1.
BOX 1
European policy approaches to gender diversity
|
|
|
Legislative measures
Following the example of Norway, which is outside
the EU[12] and which
introduced a legally binding quota of 40 per cent in 2003, a number
of EU Member States have introduced legislative targets or quotas
for gender representation on company boards. France, Italy and
Belgium have done so for company boards, including sanctions for
those companies which do not comply with the quotas. In addition
to this Denmark, Greece, Austria, Slovenia and Finland have introduced
gender requirements in legislation for the composition of the
boards of state-owned companies. Many of these countries have
accompanied quotas with efforts to effect cultural change in business.
Voluntary or self-regulatory initiatives
A number of other countries have adopted a self-regulatory
approach to achieve the same ends. The Netherlands and Spain,
for example, have introduced targets which are neither binding
nor accompanied by sanctions; the former has also introduced a
voluntary charter to encourage companies to increase female representation.
The other significant strand of action has been to use corporate
governance codes to drive changes in behaviourthis has
been the preferred course in Sweden, Germany, Poland, Luxembourg
and the United Kingdom.
|
Source: European Commission, Women in economic
decision-making in the EU: progress report, 2012[13]
6. The Government have supported strongly the
case for a voluntary approach to solving the problem in the United
Kingdom. In The Coalition: our programme for Government,
produced shortly after the 2010 election, they committed to "[promoting]
gender equality on the boards of listed companies".[14]
The Government subsequently appointed Lord Davies of Abersoch
to lead a review into how obstacles to the participation of women
on boards could be removed. In his March 2011 report Lord Davies
advocated a voluntary approach and set out a number of recommendations,
including that companies should set targets for the number of
women on their boards in 2013 and 2015, with the aim of a minimum
of 25 per cent female board representation by 2015.[15]
He also recommended measures to change corporate culture in recruitment
and reporting.
7. In March 2012, Lord Davies produced a follow-up
review.[16] This was
accompanied by an independent Female FTSE board report 2012,
produced by the Cranfield School of Management.[17]
The findings showed that 27 per cent of all board appointments
had been filled by women during the preceding 12 months and that
only 11 all-male boards remained in the FTSE 100. Jo Swinson MP,
Minister for Employment Relations and Consumer Affairs in the
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, and Minister for
Women and Equalities in the Department for Culture, Media and
Sport, also reported on progress. As of October 2012, 17.3 per
cent of board positions in the FTSE 100 were held by women, with
only eight boards still all-male.[18]
Furthermore, she highlighted that, in the year up to October 2012,
more than a third of candidates appointed to boards were female.[19]
FTSE 250 companies, though starting from a much lower level, also
made progress. The percentage of women on their boards increased
by 44 per cent in the period following the initial Davies review,
from 7.8 per cent in 2010 to 11.3 per cent in 2012; and the proportion
of all-male boards fell from half of companies in 2010 to around
a third in 2012.[20]
8. The Government have opposed the introduction
of quotas at an EU level. They contend that self-regulation needs
to be allowed to demonstrate its potential before legislation
is considered.[21] However,
they have maintained that they do not rule out quotas if the voluntary
approach does not bear fruit. The Minister made clear that "if
we cannot achieve the success that we want, it is not as if the
Government have forever ruled out countenancing quotas. But very
much the preference is that we do this through a business-led
voluntary approach."[22]
9. Our report has been produced, following the
developments in October 2012, in the context of significant uncertainty
in terms of the likely timing, strength and composition of any
legislative proposals from the Commission. At such a crucial moment,
this issue requires detailed and considered thinking about the
potential next steps. In the following chapters, we consider a
number of the principled and pragmatic questions that arise from
possible legislation. We begin with an exploration of the case
for action at both national and European levels, before moving
on to consider the range of possible policy measures, including
quotas, which could be pursued.
10. Our aim is to consider this issue not just
in the context of the Commission's forthcoming announcement, but
also in the context of the need to achieve long-term, sustainable
change across the EU. We seek to contribute to the debate on possible
legislation, and to ensure that negotiations at a European level
do not undercut efforts at a national level to improve the diversity
of corporate boards. In our work we have been helped greatly by
the wealth of written evidence that we received and by those who
provided oral evidence to the Committee. We are grateful to all
those who contributed.
11. We make this report to the House for debate.
1 Article 8, Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Union. This requirement is also reflected in Articles 2 and 3(3)
of the Treaty on European Union and Article 23 of the Charter
of Fundamental Rights. Back
2
Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle
of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and
supply of goods and services Back
3
Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal
opportunities and equal treatment of women and men in matters
of employment and occupation Back
4
Communication from the Commission, A strengthened commitment
to equality between women and men: a women's charter:
http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/president/news/documents/pdf/20100305_1_en.pdf Back
5
European Commission, Strategy for equality between women and
men, 2010 Back
6
European Commission, Women on the Board Pledge for Europe,
2011:
http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/reding/pdf/p_en.pdf Back
7
European Commission, Women in economic decision-making in the
EU: progress report: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/women-on-boards_en.pdf
Back
8
ibid. Back
9
European Commission, Consultation on Gender imbalance in the
EU, May 2012: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/gender-equality/opinion/120528_en.htm Back
10
See, for example, Euractiv, Commission puts geneder quota plans
on hold, 23 October 2012: http://www.euractiv.com/justice/commission-puts-gender-quota-pla-news-515625
Back
11
See Sky News, Female Boardroom quotas: EU delays decision,
23 October 2012: http://news.sky.com/story/1001576/female-boardroom-quotas-eu-delays-decision;
and Reuters, EU delays vote on quotas for women in boardroom,
23 October 2012: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/10/23/uk-eu-gender-idUKBRE89M0NC20121023
Back
12
Norway is, however, part of the European Economic Area in which
EU gender equality legislation applies Back
13
See http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/women-on-boards_en.pdf Back
14
HM Government, The Coalition: our programme for government,
2010: http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/coalition_programme_for_government.pdf Back
15
Lord Davies of Abersoch, Women on boards, February 2011:
http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/business-law/docs/w/11-745-women-on-boards.pdf Back
16
Lord Davies of Abersoch, Women on boards, March 2012:
http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/business-law/docs/w/12-p135-women-on-boards-2012.pdf Back
17
Cranfield University School of Management International Centre
for Women Leaders, The Female FTSE Board Report 2012: Milestone
or Millstone, 2012:
http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/dinamic-content/research/documents/2012femalftse.pdf Back
18
Q294 Back
19
Q295 Back
20
Professional Boards Forum, BoardWatch, The rate of new
appointments to FTSE 100 and 250 companies, 4 September
2012: http://www.boardsforum.co.uk/boardwatch.html Back
21
Q288 (Jo Swinson MP) Back
22
Q290 Back
|