The Draft Finance Bill 2014 - Economic Affairs Committee Contents


Chapter 2: Partnerships-General Background

8.  This chapter sets the scene for the next three chapters. It begins with a brief overview of the different types of partnership and of how the members of partnerships are taxed. And it goes on to outline the main findings and recommendations of the interim report of the OTS's Review of Partnerships.

What is a Partnership?

9.  The concept of a 'partnership' is one of the earliest forms of business organisation and its origins go back to the beginnings of commercial activity. The Partnership Act 1890, almost all of which remains in force today, consolidated existing law and defined partnership as "the relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit"[2].

10.  Partners in a partnership may be either natural persons or legal entities such as companies, and a partnership may consist entirely of natural persons, entirely of legal entities or a combination of both (a 'mixed' partnership). There is no limit on the number of partners in a partnership. A partnership may exist between two or more persons whether or not they have a formal partnership agreement.

11.  The 'business' carried on by a partnership can include "every trade, occupation, or profession"[3] and the profits or losses from that business may be shared between partners in any way they agree.

12.  Some members of a partnership, often referred to as 'salaried partners', may be entitled to a fixed share of the profits prior to any allocation of profits to other partners. Whether such partners are 'true' partners, or in fact employees of the partnership, depends on the facts in question including whether, in all other respects, the nature of their involvement in the conduct of the partnership's business is that of a true partner. There is no specific formula to determine status but the decision is guided by case law.

Types of Partnership

13.  There are three types of partnership: general partnerships, limited partnerships and limited liability partnerships.

GENERAL PARTNERSHIPS

14.  'General' partnerships, sometimes referred to as 'traditional' partnerships, are the sort of partnerships envisaged by the Partnership Act 1890. Each partner can act on behalf of the partnership in the conduct of its business with binding effect on the other partners, and all partners have unlimited liability for the debts of the partnership.

15.  A general partnership is not a legal person in England, Wales and Northern Ireland although it is in Scotland.

LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

16.  The concept of a 'limited partnership' was introduced by the Limited Partnerships Act 1907 and it allows a person to be a 'limited partner', whose liability for the partnership's debts is limited to his or her capital contribution to the partnership. A limited partnership must consist of at least one general partner, whose liability is unlimited, and one limited partner; limited partners must not be involved in the management of the partnership's business.

17.  In most other respects limited partnerships are subject to the Partnership Act 1890 and, like general partnerships, are not legal persons, except in Scotland.

LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIPS

18.  Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) were established by the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000. They are 'bodies corporate' with legal personality separate from their members. They enable each partner to limit his liability for the partnership's debts to an amount (usually the capital they have invested in the LLP) agreed with the other members of the LLP.

19.  Like general partnerships, LLPs can be formed by two or more (natural or legal) persons, including other LLPs, carrying on a business as defined above. LLPs therefore offer the limited liability benefits of the company combined with the organisational flexibility of general partnerships and have become a very popular way of organising business arrangements and transactions.

Partnership Facts

20.  In 2011-12 there were some 420,000 partnerships of one form or another, accounting for about 10 per cent of the total number of UK businesses. Partnerships are predominantly very small: 90 per cent had three or fewer partners and less than one per cent had more than 50. HMRC estimate that, of the partnerships operating in the UK, some 23,000 (about 5 per cent of all partnerships) had a corporate member. Of these just over half were mixed member partnerships and the remainder consisted of non-individual partners only.[4]

21.  Partnerships cover a very wide range of commercial activities from small husband and wife businesses to international professional service businesses and City-based vehicles investing in property development or venture capital activities.

Taxation of Partnerships

22.  The title of this section is, in one sense, a misnomer in that partnerships are not liable to tax in their own right on the profits and capital gains generated by their business activities. UK tax rules 'look through' the partnership to the individual partners or members who are then taxed on their share of the partnership's profits and gains at their marginal tax rates and according to whether they are individuals or companies. This transparency applies even where the partnership is a separate legal entity, as is the case for Scottish partnerships and for LLPs.

23.  This means that the total amount of tax and National Insurance Contributions (NICs) collected in respect of any given partnership's income and gains depends on the individual tax liability of each member and on the relative share of each in the profits, losses and capital gains of the partnership.

24.  For non-corporate members of general partnerships and limited partnerships, tax liability is governed by whether they are 'true' partners or whether they are employees. However, for tax purposes all LLP members are treated as partners, and therefore as self-employed, even if they would be treated as employees in a general partnership.

25.  The issue of employment status has significant tax consequences for both individual members and the partnership. A partner is deemed to carry on a personal trade or profession and his or her share of partnership profits or losses is calculated according to income tax rules. Profits are taxed at the partner's marginal rate of income tax—20, 40 or 45 percent—and NICs are payable at the self-employed rate of 9 per cent on profits up to £41,450[5] and 2 per cent thereafter. The partnership pays no employer NICs since the partner is not an employee.

26.  An employee is liable to income tax on his or her earnings (with less generous expense deductions) at the same marginal income tax rates as the partner, but pays NICs at the employee rate of 12 per cent on earnings up to £41,450[6] and 2 per cent thereafter. The partnership pays employer NICs at 13.8 per cent on those earnings[7] and collects income tax and NICs from employees under PAYE. And employment status confers certain rights and obligations on both the employee and the partnership (as employer).

27.  Tax liability on the share of the profits allocated to a corporate member of a partnership is calculated using corporation tax rules, including reliefs not available to individuals, and tax is payable at the corporation tax rate—23 per cent for 2013-14, but due to fall to 21 per cent next year and 20 per cent the year after.

28.  As for capital gains, the rules provide that, where a business is carried on in partnership, capital gains tax (CGT) is charged on the partners separately. The same applies to corporation tax on chargeable gains for company members of a partnership.

29.  These differences in tax treatment arise from the structure of the UK tax system and the current default assumption that every individual member of an LLP is a self-employed partner. They give rise to very substantial opportunities for minimising the tax and NIC liabilities of both partners and the partnership and for the partnership to reduce its employment law obligations. These tax arbitrage (and avoidance) opportunities lie at the heart of the changes proposed by the Government in the draft Finance Bill 2014.

30.  Turning to tax administration, partners must report their profits from the partnership business on an income tax or corporation tax return as appropriate. And, although it is not liable to tax in its own right, the partnership (or rather a partner nominated to do so) must make a 'partnership tax return', using income tax rules to compute the share of profits allocated to individual partners and corporation tax rules to compute profits allocated to corporate members. Where chargeable capital gains are made they must be reported on the chargeable assets page of the partnership tax return.

Review of Partnerships: Interim Report

31.  Against this rather complex background, the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) was commissioned in 2013 to carry out a comprehensive review of partnership taxation. The terms of reference of this review covered the range of taxes applying to partnerships and included the legislation itself, the administrative processes and the guidance provided by HMRC and complexities surrounding the different types of partnership.

32.  The interim report of the OTS review was published on 22 January 2014 and we heard evidence from the Tax Director of the OTS at around the same time. Given its terms of reference, the report and its recommendations are necessarily quite detailed and technical.

33.  The report was not based on a survey, but on interviews, meetings, seminars and the like carried out between September and November 2013, on written submissions and on intensive desk research in the OTS and on data analysis in HMRC. It paints a very interesting, and sometimes surprising, background picture of the scale on which the partnership form is used to organise business in the UK, of the size distribution of partnerships, and of the wide range of activities, from corner shop to multi-million pound property development, which partnerships of one kind or another undertake.

CONCLUSIONS

34.  The main findings of the report were that:

·  notwithstanding the size of their contribution to the UK economy, policymakers seem to pay scant regard to the effect on partnerships of tax policy changes. So, for example, the Government's strategy for developing a competitive UK business tax environment focuses entirely on corporate tax, sometimes at the expense of partnerships;

·  although a case can be made for a separate tax code for partnerships, which perhaps distinguished between small and large partnerships, there appears to be no appetite for the disruption and uncertainty such a major reform would entail; and

·  the most common concern among partnerships and their advisers was the absence of a mechanism, other than through a corporate partner, for retaining profits for commercial purposes, including the growth of the business.

35.  The interim report concluded that "HMRC and the tax system generally needs to evolve a more supportive and constructive approach to partnerships"[8] and in particular that:

·  the 'one size fits all' approach of partnership tax law and of tax administration leads to extra burdens and complexities for small partnerships as compared with sole traders carrying on businesses of a similar size;

·  the tax system needs to take a more strategic approach to partnerships rather than allowing their tax environment to develop merely as a consequence of policies and administrative arrangements designed for sole traders or companies;

·  HMRC needs to coordinate more effectively its work with partnerships, including its support functions, such as guidance notes, which are not currently consolidated; and

·  HMRC needs to take steps to change the widespread conviction that its view of partnerships is that they are primarily a vehicle for the reduction or avoidance of tax liabilities.

RECOMMENDATIONS

36.  The Report's recommendations are divided into 'short term fixes', medium-term proposals and suggestions for longer-term investigation.

37.  The short-term fixes are intended to provide "useful benefits, mainly for small firms, for modest effort on the part of (mainly) HMRC"[9] and include: republishing a model partnership agreement; producing a single consolidated manual with clearer, up-to-date guidance for partnerships; simplifying the SA and CTSA tax returns; and developing free tax return software for small partnerships.

38.  The OTS's main recommendations for the medium term, which "should be taken forward, presumably through formal consultation, in the near future",[10] are that HMRC should:

·  update the statements of practice for computing the capital gains made by partnerships;

·  ensure that double taxation agreements deal properly with partnerships so that credit for foreign tax is not lost;

·  simplify the rules for accounting for any non-trading income, such as interest, received by partnerships;

·  review the penalties for late filing of partnership returns and for failures to notify changes of status for VAT purposes; and

·  put in place arrangements for monitoring and responding to the development of new business structures involving partnerships.

39.  The Report also suggests that there is significant scope for HMRC's digital programme to offer further simplification of administrative processes for partners and partnerships, including submitting tax returns and partners' expense claims.

40.  Finally, the Report recommends that, in the longer term, further work should be done to investigate "areas where there is clearly a problem in need of simplification but where the solution is not clear-cut"[11] including:

·  ways of further reducing the administrative burdens of smaller partnerships, perhaps including removing the requirement for them to file a partnership return, and of improving their understanding of their tax obligations;

·  how the 1890 Act partnership agreement, which applies in the absence of a formal agreement between partners, might be updated and publicised more widely;

·  the scope for allowing partners to claim personal expenses outside the computation of partnership profits; and

·  the scope for removing SDLT charges in partnership reorganisations where no cash changes hands and for reducing the complexities caused by adopting accounting periods that do not correspond to the tax year.

41.  The OTS's Interim Report was published shortly after our inquiry had begun so that most of our witnesses had had little time to digest and take a view on its conclusions and recommendations. But it provided very useful background to our inquiry and witness comments about it were very positive.


2   Partnership Act 1890, section 1(1). Back

3   Ibid., section 45. Back

4   All figures from Review of partnerships: interim report, OTS, January 2014, Annex A. Back

5   Above a threshold amount. Back

6   IbidBack

7   IbidBack

8   Review of partnerships: interim report, OTS, January 2014, page 6. Back

9   Review of partnerships: interim report, OTS, January 2014, page 6. Back

10   Ibid., page 7. Back

11   Ibid., pages 7 and 8. Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014