International Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) students - Science and Technology Committee Contents


International Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) students

Chapter 1: Introduction

1.  In late 2011 and across the first half of 2012, this Committee conducted a major inquiry which culminated in a report entitled, Higher Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) subjects (2nd Report of Session 2012-13, July 2012).[1] This report included a section on immigration reforms (paragraphs 215-39) in which we expressed concerns that changes to the immigration rules may reduce the number of international students choosing to come and study in the UK. Eighteen months on from expressing this concern, we decided to revisit the specific issue of immigration reforms, investigate what effect they may or may not be having on international STEM students,[2] and establish whether we were correct to be apprehensive.

2.  International students are important to the UK for a host of reasons. In their July 2013 publication, International Education: Global Growth and Prosperity, the Government stated that:

    "Overseas students who come to Britain to study make a huge contribution to our economy. Each student in higher education on average pays fees of about £10,000 a year and spends more than this again while they are here. In 2011/12 we estimate that overseas students studying in higher education in the UK paid £10.2bn in tuition fees and living expenses [£3.9bn in tuition fees (net of scholarships) and £6.3bn in living expenses]. They boost the local economy where they study—as well as enhancing our cultural life, and broadening the educational experience of the UK students they study alongside."[3]

3.  The Government noted in this document that the market for international students had grown sharply in recent years and competition from other countries was increasing. Nevertheless, the Government stated that:

    "We believe it is realistic for numbers of international students in higher education to grow by 15-20% over the next five years. For this to happen we must show that the UK values international students, will provide a warm welcome and support while they are here and will keep in touch after they go home."[4]

4.  It is against this background that we set out to follow up on our previous report and examine whether the UK is indeed providing "a warm welcome." As Professor Finkelstein, Dean of the Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, put it to us: the welcome begins "from the moment they google UK Visa".[5]

5.  There is some difficulty in defining STEM subjects, which we identified in our previous report. In this report, as in our previous report, we have adopted a definition used by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) and the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). This definition uses the Joint Academic Coding System (JACS) which classifies all subjects into 21 groups. Within these groups, STEM classifiers are: medicine and dentistry; subjects allied to medicine; biological sciences; veterinary science, agriculture and related subjects; physical sciences; mathematical sciences; computer science; engineering and technology; and architecture, building and planning. While our focus in this inquiry has been on STEM students, we note that many of our observations in this report may well apply to students across all disciplines.

6.  We were well aware during our inquiry that some provisions in the Immigration Bill, currently before Parliament, were concerned with international students. We briefly allude to these provisions in Chapter 3, but it has not been the purpose of this inquiry to provide a parallel forum for detailed scrutiny of the Bill.

7.  We would like to thank everybody who provided evidence to this short inquiry, both in writing, and in oral evidence sessions, which we held in February and March. We have not attempted to explore all the many and varied issues which were raised with us; it was simply not possible in the time available. Instead, we have focused on the key issues which were brought to our attention time and again, issues which we may very well return to in the future.

8.  Finally, we are indebted to our specialist adviser for this inquiry, Professor Sir William Wakeham, whose expertise and experience greatly enhanced our work.


1   Available online: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldsctech/37/37.pdf. Back

2   The scope of this report is limited to considering the factors affecting STEM students from outside the European Economic Area. These are the students who may be affected by reforms to immigration rules. Factors influencing the decisions of EU students to come and study in the UK are not considered in this report. Back

3   HM Government (2013) International Education: Global Growth and ProsperityBack

4   HM Government (2013) International Education: Global Growth and ProsperityBack

5   Q 65. Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014